Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-28 Thread Magnus Therning
On 27/07/10 18:58, Andrew Coppin wrote:
 Magnus Therning wrote:
 On 26/07/10 22:01, Andrew Coppin wrote:
  
 So I'm told. But it appears that some people believe that NNTP *is*
 Usenet, which is not the case. I use NNTP almost every single day, but
 I've never seen Usenet in my life...
 

 So you've only ever been on private NNTP servers then, never browsed
 through
 comp.* or sci.*?
   
 
 I don't even know what they are. (Except that now, by inference, I can
 guess they're something to do with Usenet.)

Ah, fascinating, there must be an entire world of NNTP servers out there
that
I've never come across :-)  My previous employer had an internal NNTP server
running, which was a virtual gold mine of knowledge and insight.  It was a
largely unknown gold mine at that.

Anyway, I know there are several locations where I can host a mailing list
(google groups, yahoo etc), are there similar free services that offer free
NNTP services?

 For example, Microsoft has a private NNTP server for technical support.

Ah, that's very useful to know.

/M



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-27 Thread Ketil Malde
Brandon S Allbery KF8NH allb...@ece.cmu.edu writes:

 Usenet *is* NNTP.

In the same way the web is HTTP...

(Usenet is a set of global, distributed forums using a message format
similar enough to email (RFC822 + extensions) that many mail reader
software supports news, and vice versa.  NNTP is the protocol used for
user access and distribution.  IIRC - anybody interested in more
accuracy will have to look it up :-)

-k
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-27 Thread namekuseijin
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:09 AM, aditya siram aditya.si...@gmail.com wrote:
 We have a Google group. Doesn't that qualify?

One can't post to Haskell Cafe through the usenet/NNTP/google group interface...
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-27 Thread Andrew Coppin

Magnus Therning wrote:

On 26/07/10 22:01, Andrew Coppin wrote:
  

So I'm told. But it appears that some people believe that NNTP *is*
Usenet, which is not the case. I use NNTP almost every single day, but
I've never seen Usenet in my life...



So you've only ever been on private NNTP servers then, never browsed through
comp.* or sci.*?
  


I don't even know what they are. (Except that now, by inference, I can 
guess they're something to do with Usenet.)


For example, Microsoft has a private NNTP server for technical support.

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Daniel Díaz
Hi all,

I want to open a Haskell forum based on phpBB, but I need some collaborators
for organize its content, and moderate its use. When we have finished, I
will open this forum for the entire community of Haskell!

If you are interested, mail me:
danield...@asofilak.es

Thanks in advance.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Vo Minh Thu
2010/7/26 Daniel Díaz lazy.dd...@gmail.com:
 Hi all,

 I want to open a Haskell forum based on phpBB, but I need some collaborators
 for organize its content, and moderate its use. When we have finished, I
 will open this forum for the entire community of Haskell!

Hi,

The idea of a forum has been brought to this list a few times in the
past. Unfortunately for those who thought it was a good idea, it
didn't really catched up.

Haskellers are generaly found of the mailing-list interface.

Beside, with stackoverflow, reddit, #haskell, the wiki, the upcoming
social hackage, ... our bases are nicely covered.

Do you know have some particular ideas that a forum would be a good
new avenue for haskellers?

Cheers,
Thu
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Daniel Díaz
Well, I thought that it may be a more comfortable way to communicate between
us. Specially for newcomers. Don't forget that Haskell is a growing
community.

It's just my opinion.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Job Vranish
I agree. A web forum would be more friendly to newcomers, easier to browse,
and better organized, than the mailing list.

Some people will still prefer the mailing list of course, but I think there
will be enough demand to justify a forum :)

- Job



On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Daniel Díaz lazy.dd...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, I thought that it may be a more comfortable way to communicate
 between us. Specially for newcomers. Don't forget that Haskell is a growing
 community.

 It's just my opinion.

 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Nick Bowler
On 10:37 Mon 26 Jul , Job Vranish wrote:
 I agree. A web forum would be more friendly to newcomers, easier to browse,
 and better organized, than the mailing list.

I don't understand this sentiment at all.  How are web forums easier to
browse than list archives?  Especially given that there are usually
multiple archives for each ML, with a variety of ways to use them (e.g.,
I tend to use gmane with my newsreader for this purpose).

 Some people will still prefer the mailing list of course, but I think there
 will be enough demand to justify a forum :)

Wine has a web forum that is directly connected to their mailing lists:
each post on the forum is sent to the corresponding list and vice versa.
The web forum interface doesn't support proper threading, but it
otherwise seems to work OK.  Perhaps something like that would be
useful?

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Magnus Therning
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 15:47, Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com wrote:
 On 10:37 Mon 26 Jul     , Job Vranish wrote:
 I agree. A web forum would be more friendly to newcomers, easier to browse,
 and better organized, than the mailing list.

 I don't understand this sentiment at all.  How are web forums easier to
 browse than list archives?  Especially given that there are usually multiple
 archives for each ML, with a variety of ways to use them (e.g., I tend to
 use gmane with my newsreader for this purpose).

Irrespective of what is easier to use, what really counts is where the
*targets* of your post hang out.  Personally I prefer a mailing list, and I
would only ever use a forum if I had a better chance of getting good and
informative answers there.

Another option is to import the entire haskell-cafe archive into gmail :-)

 Some people will still prefer the mailing list of course, but I think there
 will be enough demand to justify a forum :)

 Wine has a web forum that is directly connected to their mailing lists:
 each post on the forum is sent to the corresponding list and vice versa.
 The web forum interface doesn't support proper threading, but it
 otherwise seems to work OK.  Perhaps something like that would be
 useful?

This would be a good compromise.

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org          Jabber: magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Christopher Done
I'd only really go on a Haskell forum hosted at haskell.org. If there
wlil be one, I'd moderate. Only things a forum has over a mailing list
is syntax highlighting and attachments imo. Cons are being tied to a
web site, anonymity, existence of moderators, etc. Seems a bit like
spreading the community thin. It's not *that* big.

On 26 July 2010 15:30, Daniel Díaz lazy.dd...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 I want to open a Haskell forum based on phpBB, but I need some collaborators
 for organize its content, and moderate its use. When we have finished, I
 will open this forum for the entire community of Haskell!

 If you are interested, mail me:
 danield...@asofilak.es

 Thanks in advance.

 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Roman Beslik
 Hi. I personally find web-forum a more convenient and structured way 
of communication. I will help if the forum exports posts or topics as a 
feed.


Are you strictly devoted to phpBB? I think that fluxBB is a decent 
choice. Just suggesting.


On 26.07.10 16:30, Daniel Díaz wrote:
I want to open a Haskell forum based on phpBB, but I need some 
collaborators for organize its content, and moderate its use.


--
Best regards,
  Roman Beslik.

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Andrew Coppin

Vo Minh Thu wrote:

The idea of a forum has been brought to this list a few times in the
past. Unfortunately for those who thought it was a good idea, it
didn't really catched up.

Haskellers are generaly found of the mailing-list interface.
  


I'm not particularly fond of mailing lists. It's a very unstructured way 
to manage large volumes of messages. (Plus my ISP's spam filter is 
utterly hopeless. It somehow fails to block the actual spam, and yet 
repeatedly marks Haskell Cafe messages as spam...)


My personal preference would be for NNTP. It seems to handle threading 
much better. You can easily kill threads you're not interested in, and 
thereafter not bother downloading them. You can use several different 
client programs. And so on. However, last time I voiced this opinion, 
people started talking about something called usenet, which I've never 
heard of...



Beside, with stackoverflow, reddit, #haskell, the wiki, the upcoming
social hackage, ... our bases are nicely covered.
  


Kind of fragmented though, no?

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Brandon S Allbery KF8NH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 7/26/10 15:56 , Andrew Coppin wrote:
 My personal preference would be for NNTP. It seems to handle threading much
 better. You can easily kill threads you're not interested in, and
 thereafter not bother downloading them. You can use several different client
 programs. And so on. However, last time I voiced this opinion, people
 started talking about something called usenet, which I've never heard of...

Usenet *is* NNTP.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxN6lQACgkQIn7hlCsL25VNdgCgt3dLl3e7l5jBEdZC5ogEamKB
5V0An0HDm12NbgWHjjNd8tuKaXggAwRM
=jXbn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Nick Bowler
On 20:56 Mon 26 Jul , Andrew Coppin wrote:
 My personal preference would be for NNTP. It seems to handle threading 
 much better. You can easily kill threads you're not interested in, and 
 thereafter not bother downloading them. You can use several different 
 client programs. And so on. However, last time I voiced this opinion, 
 people started talking about something called usenet, which I've never 
 heard of...

Conveniently, all of the haskell mailing lists have an NNTP interface
available.  Add news.gmane.org as a server in your newsreader and
subscribe to gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe.

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Andrew Coppin

Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:

On 7/26/10 15:56 , Andrew Coppin wrote:
  

My personal preference would be for NNTP. It seems to handle threading much
better. You can easily kill threads you're not interested in, and
thereafter not bother downloading them. You can use several different client
programs. And so on. However, last time I voiced this opinion, people
started talking about something called usenet, which I've never heard of...



Usenet *is* NNTP.
  


So I'm told. But it appears that some people believe that NNTP *is* 
Usenet, which is not the case. I use NNTP almost every single day, but 
I've never seen Usenet in my life...


___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Magnus Therning
On 26/07/10 22:01, Andrew Coppin wrote:
 Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
 On 7/26/10 15:56 , Andrew Coppin wrote:
  
 My personal preference would be for NNTP. It seems to handle
 threading much
 better. You can easily kill threads you're not interested in, and
 thereafter not bother downloading them. You can use several different
 client
 programs. And so on. However, last time I voiced this opinion, people
 started talking about something called usenet, which I've never
 heard of...
 

 Usenet *is* NNTP.
   
 
 So I'm told. But it appears that some people believe that NNTP *is*
 Usenet, which is not the case. I use NNTP almost every single day, but
 I've never seen Usenet in my life...

So you've only ever been on private NNTP servers then, never browsed through
comp.* or sci.*?

Wikipedia has a nice article on usenet, of course:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet

/M



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Richard O'Keefe

On Jul 27, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Nick Bowler wrote:

 On 20:56 Mon 26 Jul , Andrew Coppin wrote:
 My personal preference would be for NNTP. It seems to handle threading 
 much better. You can easily kill threads you're not interested in, and 
 thereafter not bother downloading them. You can use several different 
 client programs. And so on. However, last time I voiced this opinion, 
 people started talking about something called usenet, which I've never 
 heard of...
 
 Conveniently, all of the haskell mailing lists have an NNTP interface
 available.  Add news.gmane.org as a server in your newsreader and
 subscribe to gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe.

I often find messages in this mailing list with such detailed and
valuable information that I want to print them, take them away,
and study them for a couple of days.  From Mail, nothing could be
simpler.  Visiting gmane with Google Chromium, all I can ever print
is the first screen or so of a pane.

I am *sick* of web browsers that cannot or will not print the whole
of a frame.  You'd think Google Chromium would do better, but no.
It does try to help by *printing* scroll bars, though...

Mailing list = simple yes trouble no.
Browser based = simple no trouble yes.

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread Kurt Häusler
Hi,
I think it might be valuable to have a web forum. Not as a different interface 
to the same community, but as a different community.
Perhaps the sort of people that prefer mailing lists and the sort of people 
that prefer web forums are different after all, and a community that grows up 
around a forum could serve different needs and exhibit different 
characteristics to that of the mailing list.

It would not be fragmentation, it would be growth, and I imagine there would be 
a degree of overlap.

For me the choice of mailing list or web forum depends on the topic, and how I 
want to use it, I think for me, when it comes to feeling part of a Haskell 
community a web forum may suit better than the mailing list, so I would like to 
try it.

For me mailing lists are great for focussed technical questions and 
discussions, but less useful for building a community. A web forum tends to be 
less sterile and allows more personality to show through and I guess it allows 
a bit more of the culture surrounding the core tech to flourish, as members 
begin to form images of each other. Definitely not for many of you I am sure, 
but I think if the goal is to nourish a culture and encourage a true community 
rather than just technical QA, then a web forum would be an intriguing option.

But a different interface to the same community doesn't make much sense. And 
let us try and find a Haskell based software solution for it, I thought phpBB 
was a joke in the OP.



___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell Forum

2010-07-26 Thread aditya siram
We have a Google group. Doesn't that qualify?
-deech

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Kurt Häusler kurt.haeus...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,
 I think it might be valuable to have a web forum. Not as a different
 interface to the same community, but as a different community.
 Perhaps the sort of people that prefer mailing lists and the sort of people
 that prefer web forums are different after all, and a community that grows
 up around a forum could serve different needs and exhibit different
 characteristics to that of the mailing list.

 It would not be fragmentation, it would be growth, and I imagine there
 would be a degree of overlap.

 For me the choice of mailing list or web forum depends on the topic, and
 how I want to use it, I think for me, when it comes to feeling part of a
 Haskell community a web forum may suit better than the mailing list, so I
 would like to try it.

 For me mailing lists are great for focussed technical questions and
 discussions, but less useful for building a community. A web forum tends to
 be less sterile and allows more personality to show through and I guess it
 allows a bit more of the culture surrounding the core tech to flourish, as
 members begin to form images of each other. Definitely not for many of you I
 am sure, but I think if the goal is to nourish a culture and encourage a
 true community rather than just technical QA, then a web forum would be an
 intriguing option.

 But a different interface to the same community doesn't make much sense.
 And let us try and find a Haskell based software solution for it, I thought
 phpBB was a joke in the OP.



 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe