Re: [Haskell-cafe] I've just heard of a neat security measure that when you compile the code it generates different object code...
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:43:11PM +1300, Chris Wong wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:27 PM, KC kc1...@gmail.com wrote: ... with the same functionality. Thus, your program would be a moving target to hackers. Would this be challenging with ghc? Although it's possible, I doubt this would do anything. Most exploits are just programmer mistakes; changing the object code doesn't change the fact that there's a gaping security hole in your program. Plus, it would be harder to debug the compiler, since the mangling code would be non-deterministic by definition. So I doubt anyone would try to implement that. I could help though if you want to write a virus in Haskell ;) /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves. -- Alan Kay pgpIhry6Qw78h.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] I've just heard of a neat security measure that when you compile the code it generates different object code...
I wonder, if there is any example of actual Haskell program cracked / reverse engineered? GHC-generated code is already quite hard to understand… ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
[Haskell-cafe] I've just heard of a neat security measure that when you compile the code it generates different object code...
... with the same functionality. Thus, your program would be a moving target to hackers. Would this be challenging with ghc? -- -- Regards, KC ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] I've just heard of a neat security measure that when you compile the code it generates different object code...
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:27 PM, KC kc1...@gmail.com wrote: ... with the same functionality. Thus, your program would be a moving target to hackers. Would this be challenging with ghc? Although it's possible, I doubt this would do anything. Most exploits are just programmer mistakes; changing the object code doesn't change the fact that there's a gaping security hole in your program. Plus, it would be harder to debug the compiler, since the mangling code would be non-deterministic by definition. So I doubt anyone would try to implement that. ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
