Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: RE: Definition of the Haskell standard library
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 23:53 +0200, Benjamin Franksen wrote: > Sven Panne wrote: > > Well, on a normal Linux distro a user should *never* have to call cabal (or > > any of its cousins) directly, the distro's package manager should be the > > used > > instead. > This is very theoretical. Perfect is the enemy of good? > I use debian (stable) and have to install non-deb > Haskell libraries all the time. No way distro package maintainers can > provide packages for each and every library out there, and even > for 'standard' libs (whatever that may mean) sometimes you need a newer or > an older version of a certain library (relative to what the distro offers). Ubuntu (which gets most of its packages from Debian) lists 60 GHC-related packages (apt-cache search libghc), which hopefully serves to build a reasonable set of applications. Ideally, Hackage could be provide its libraries as apt/yum repositories - at least for libraries that are reasonably stable and with reasonable quality. -k ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
[Haskell-cafe] Re: RE: Definition of the Haskell standard library
Sven Panne wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2007 19:39, Duncan Coutts wrote: >> [...] >> The docs for those packages would be available for packages installed >> via cabal (assuming the user did the optional haddock step) and would >> link to each other. > > Well, on a normal Linux distro a user should *never* have to call cabal (or > any of its cousins) directly, the distro's package manager should be the used > instead. This is very theoretical. I use debian (stable) and have to install non-deb Haskell libraries all the time. No way distro package maintainers can provide packages for each and every library out there, and even for 'standard' libs (whatever that may mean) sometimes you need a newer or an older version of a certain library (relative to what the distro offers). >> On some systems (windows, gnome) there are dedicated help viewers that >> can help with this contents/index issue. haddock supports both (mshelp, >> devhelp). I'm not sure everyone would find that a sufficient solution >> however. > > A "install-haddock" tool would be the solution IMHO. Yes. Cheers Ben ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe