Re: [Haskell-cafe] Happy, GLR and GHC 6.6
I'm not familiar with darcs. Shall I use darcs --whatsnew for it? darcs record pick the changes you wnat type a patch name darcs send select your patch No need to attach files, figure out the right email address, etc. Stefan Thanks. Iván. ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] Happy, GLR and GHC 6.6
Stefan O'Rear wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:38:27AM +0200, Iván Pérez Domínguez wrote: Hi everyone, As we all know, FiniteMap was deprecated, and with GHC-6.6 Data.Map must be used instead. Some function names in Data.Map clash with names in prelude, and Map is usually imported qualified. Happy generates GLR parsers (-l), but the templates it uses keep calling FiniteMap functions. When Data.Map is imported, it's not imported qualified and some function names are ambiguous. I've been using a modified template to generate a GLR parser with GHC-6.6 and it seems to work just fine (there are few changes, not a big deal anyway). I just got the most recent version of Happy and the problem remains, so I applied my changes to GLR_Lib.lhs and ran a diff. The result is attached to this mail. Hope it helps someone else. Why don't you just send a darcs patch? That would be easier for everyone :) Stefan I'm not familiar with darcs. Shall I use darcs --whatsnew for it? Ivan ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] Happy, GLR and GHC 6.6
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:31:23AM +0200, Iván Pérez Domínguez wrote: Stefan O'Rear wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:38:27AM +0200, Iván Pérez Domínguez wrote: Hi everyone, As we all know, FiniteMap was deprecated, and with GHC-6.6 Data.Map must be used instead. Some function names in Data.Map clash with names in prelude, and Map is usually imported qualified. Happy generates GLR parsers (-l), but the templates it uses keep calling FiniteMap functions. When Data.Map is imported, it's not imported qualified and some function names are ambiguous. I've been using a modified template to generate a GLR parser with GHC-6.6 and it seems to work just fine (there are few changes, not a big deal anyway). I just got the most recent version of Happy and the problem remains, so I applied my changes to GLR_Lib.lhs and ran a diff. The result is attached to this mail. Hope it helps someone else. Why don't you just send a darcs patch? That would be easier for everyone :) Stefan I'm not familiar with darcs. Shall I use darcs --whatsnew for it? darcs record pick the changes you wnat type a patch name darcs send select your patch No need to attach files, figure out the right email address, etc. Stefan ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] Happy, GLR and GHC 6.6
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:38:27AM +0200, Iván Pérez Domínguez wrote: Hi everyone, As we all know, FiniteMap was deprecated, and with GHC-6.6 Data.Map must be used instead. Some function names in Data.Map clash with names in prelude, and Map is usually imported qualified. Happy generates GLR parsers (-l), but the templates it uses keep calling FiniteMap functions. When Data.Map is imported, it's not imported qualified and some function names are ambiguous. I've been using a modified template to generate a GLR parser with GHC-6.6 and it seems to work just fine (there are few changes, not a big deal anyway). I just got the most recent version of Happy and the problem remains, so I applied my changes to GLR_Lib.lhs and ran a diff. The result is attached to this mail. Hope it helps someone else. Why don't you just send a darcs patch? That would be easier for everyone :) Stefan ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
