On 6/8/07, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I second that. I particularly like the elimination of ]'s. We certainly
> need some symbol to separate the map and the key; but we do really need
> to also mark "here be the end of the key"?
and how (arr ! "key" ++ "data") should be parsed? :)
Roughly the same way you'd parse 2 * 3 + 4.
/g
--
The man who'd introduced them didn't much like either of them, though
he acted as if he did, anxious as he was to preserve good relations at
all times. One never knew, after all, now did one now did one now did
one.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
