Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] re-definition of '.'
Hello Max, Tuesday, November 22, 2005, 2:30:23 AM, you wrote: 2) sequential functions application in OOP style: [1..100] .map (2*) .sum ME Great proposal! And the only feature haskell will lack is computable go to! ME And if we add both haskell would become the most expressive and ME powerful programming language since INTERCAL is the word OOP persuade so strange on you? two days above someone wrote about the same operator, just with different name and i don't see any critics from you or any other FP purists you missed the key of my idea - because '.' syntax is so needed for modules and records, we must either support this as special syntax rules or invent some functional explanation for this syntax. i propose just such explanations, while all other records proposals just say this must become a special syntax -- Best regards, Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] re-definition of '.'
is the word OOP persuade so strange on you? No, my brain exploded by the examples and proposed rules made me look so When it is exploding I often start acting funnily. And I was fortunate enough not to begin biting the dogs and scratching the cats after an attempt to predict an order of application with two different (but not so) operators that bubble arguments left to right and then throw them backward and over again. bow-wow Something like PLEASE READ OUT statement in INTERCAL. There was nothing about OOP in my posting (as well as in yours). see any critics from you or any other FP purists Not sure I see what you mean by 'FP purists' in the context of Haskell language But whatever -, Haskell is still a pure language, isn't it? Looks like now it's time to change this inadvertence. Let it be impure, vulgar, dirty and scripting! And you are absolutely right. I missed the key of your idea. My brain is erupted, you know... :( ||amx ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
