Re: Proposal: accept tuple sections

2016-10-13 Thread Mario Blažević 

On 2016-10-12 12:41 PM, Iavor Diatchki wrote:

Hello,

it seems that there isn't much controversy over the TupleSections
propsal, so I'd like to move the we accept it for the next language
standard.

Does anyone have any objections?


	I have no objection to the proposal in the abstract, but I don't think 
the concrete proposal is completely fleshed out. I'd prefer to see the 
actual modifications to Haskell 2010 grammar, at least, before the final 
vote.


	The above comment should really be in the RFCs repository, attached to 
the proposal. Is that doable?


___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Re: Proposal: accept tuple sections

2016-10-12 Thread Richard Eisenberg 
+1

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:42 PM, John Wiegley  wrote:
> 
>> "ID" == Iavor Diatchki  writes:
> 
> ID> it seems that there isn't much controversy over the TupleSections propsal,
> ID> so I'd like to move the we accept it for the next language standard.
> 
> No objection here.
> 
> -- 
> John Wiegley  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
> http://newartisans.com  60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
> ___
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Re: Proposal: accept tuple sections

2016-10-12 Thread John Wiegley 
> "ID" == Iavor Diatchki  writes:

ID> it seems that there isn't much controversy over the TupleSections propsal,
ID> so I'd like to move the we accept it for the next language standard.

No objection here.

-- 
John Wiegley  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com  60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Proposal: accept tuple sections

2016-10-12 Thread Iavor Diatchki 
Hello,

it seems that there isn't much controversy over the TupleSections propsal,
so I'd like to move the we accept it for the next language standard.

Does anyone have any objections?

-Iavor
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime