Re: Small note regarding the mailing list

2006-09-02 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 12:45 -0700, isaac jones wrote:
 On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 14:04 +0200, Christophe Poucet wrote:
  Hello,
  
  Just a small request.  Would it be feasible to tag the Haskell-prime
  list in a similar manner as Haskell-cafe?
 
 I'd rather not.  If you want to be able to filter, you can use the
 Sender field which will always be:
 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It's also got all the normal list-id: header which is the most
reliable way to identify it (and indeed all other mailing lists I've
ever seen).

Many email progs have special support for filter rules based on the
mailing list headers, eg evolution.

Duncan

___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime


Re: Small note regarding the mailing list

2006-09-02 Thread Philippa Cowderoy
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, isaac jones wrote:

 On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 14:04 +0200, Christophe Poucet wrote:
  Hello,
  
  Just a small request.  Would it be feasible to tag the Haskell-prime
  list in a similar manner as Haskell-cafe?
 
 I'd rather not.  If you want to be able to filter, you can use the
 Sender field which will always be:
 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

This isn't really enough if you're scan-reading a pile of stuff - are 
there any particularly good reasons to avoid the tags? They're pretty much 
standard practice.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A problem that's all in your head is still a problem.
Brain damage is but one form of mind damage.
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime


Re: Small note regarding the mailing list

2006-09-02 Thread Aaron Denney
On 2006-09-02, Philippa Cowderoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, isaac jones wrote:

 On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 14:04 +0200, Christophe Poucet wrote:
  Hello,
  
  Just a small request.  Would it be feasible to tag the Haskell-prime
  list in a similar manner as Haskell-cafe?
 
 I'd rather not.  If you want to be able to filter, you can use the
 Sender field which will always be:
 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 This isn't really enough if you're scan-reading a pile of stuff - are 
 there any particularly good reasons to avoid the tags? They're pretty much 
 standard practice.

They take away valuable space that can be used for informative messages.

If you want to filter it out, don't do it by hand, that's what computers
are for.

-- 
Aaron Denney
--

___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime


Re: Small note regarding the mailing list

2006-09-02 Thread Aaron Denney
On 2006-09-02, Philippa Cowderoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Aaron Denney wrote:

 On 2006-09-02, Philippa Cowderoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, isaac jones wrote:
 
  On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 14:04 +0200, Christophe Poucet wrote:
   Hello,
   
   Just a small request.  Would it be feasible to tag the Haskell-prime
   list in a similar manner as Haskell-cafe?
  
  I'd rather not.  If you want to be able to filter, you can use the
  Sender field which will always be:
  Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  This isn't really enough if you're scan-reading a pile of stuff - are 
  there any particularly good reasons to avoid the tags? They're pretty much 
  standard practice.
 
 They take away valuable space that can be used for informative messages.
 

 I rarely see a subject I can't read the whole of in a single line anyway, 
 though.

Well, I've seen it happen on occasion.

 If you want to filter it out, don't do it by hand, that's what computers
 are for.
 

 That's not the problem, though. The occasional problem is not accidentally 
 thinking oh, that's spam and deleting a post because you don't recognise 
 the poster and the subject line looks vaguely spamlike. And the spammers 
 have found ways of dealing with bayesian filters by now. If I whitelist 
 and then scan through a spam folder once in a while that makes things even 
 worse, because the proportion of spam in the spam folder is that much 
 higher.

I misspoke -- I shouldn't have said out.  Send mailing list
traffic to seperate mail folders, with seperate new mail indicators, and
everything is golden.

-- 
Aaron Denney
--

___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime


Re: Small note regarding the mailing list

2006-09-02 Thread Philippa Cowderoy
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Aaron Denney wrote:

 I misspoke -- I shouldn't have said out.  Send mailing list
 traffic to seperate mail folders, with seperate new mail indicators, and
 everything is golden.
 

Not really, 99% of the non-spam mail I get's from mailing lists so it 
gives the same problem as having a spam folder. I also get better workflow 
with a single inbox at the moment. 

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The task of the academic is not to scale great 
intellectual mountains, but to flatten them.
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime


Small note regarding the mailing list

2006-08-29 Thread Christophe Poucet
Hello,Just a small request. Would it be feasible to tag the Haskell-prime list in a similar manner as Haskell-cafe?With regards,Christophe Poucet / vincenz
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime