[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13226) RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394832#comment-16394832
]
maobaolong commented on HDFS-13226:
---
[~elgoiri] Indeed, thank you for telling me. PTAL.
> RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-13226
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: hdfs
>Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>Reporter: maobaolong
>Assignee: maobaolong
>Priority: Major
> Labels: RBF
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-13226.001.patch, HDFS-13226.002.patch,
> HDFS-13226.003.patch, HDFS-13226.004.patch, HDFS-13226.005.patch,
> HDFS-13226.006.patch, HDFS-13226.007.patch, HDFS-13226.008.patch,
> HDFS-13226.009.patch
>
>
> one of the mount entry source path rule is that the source path must start
> with '\', somebody didn't follow the rule and execute the following command:
> {code:bash}
> $ hdfs dfsrouteradmin -add addnode/ ns1 /addnode/
> {code}
> But, the console show we are successful add this entry.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13226) RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
maobaolong updated HDFS-13226:
--
Attachment: HDFS-13226.009.patch
> RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-13226
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: hdfs
>Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>Reporter: maobaolong
>Assignee: maobaolong
>Priority: Major
> Labels: RBF
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-13226.001.patch, HDFS-13226.002.patch,
> HDFS-13226.003.patch, HDFS-13226.004.patch, HDFS-13226.005.patch,
> HDFS-13226.006.patch, HDFS-13226.007.patch, HDFS-13226.008.patch,
> HDFS-13226.009.patch
>
>
> one of the mount entry source path rule is that the source path must start
> with '\', somebody didn't follow the rule and execute the following command:
> {code:bash}
> $ hdfs dfsrouteradmin -add addnode/ ns1 /addnode/
> {code}
> But, the console show we are successful add this entry.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13224) RBF: Resolvers to support mount points across multiple subclusters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394824#comment-16394824
]
genericqa commented on HDFS-13224:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
20s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 18m
28s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
2s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 57s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
54s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 47s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch
generated 2 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 2 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 37s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}115m 35s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}170m 29s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestDFSUpgradeWithHA |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:d4cc50f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-13224 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12913956/HDFS-13224.006.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle cc |
| uname | Linux 92bbb2478f5e 3.13.0-135-generic #184-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 18
11:55:51 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / e1f5251 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_151 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/23400/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/23400/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13241) RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port 8888 is in use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394804#comment-16394804
]
genericqa commented on HDFS-13241:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
20s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 17m
8s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 53s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 6s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
6s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}120m 17s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}173m 26s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestNameNodeMetadataConsistency |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestRetryCacheWithHA |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockTokenWithDFSStriped |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestSafeModeWithStripedFileWithRandomECPolicy |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSClientRetries |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:d4cc50f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-13241 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12913954/HDFS-13241.002.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 5f48fdbe272b 3.13.0-135-generic #184-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 18
11:55:51 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / e1f5251 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_151 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/23399/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/23399/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 3314 (vs. ulimit of 1)
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13260) HA with QJM guideline might be confusing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YUBI LEE updated HDFS-13260: Attachment: HDFS-13260.patch > HA with QJM guideline might be confusing > > > Key: HDFS-13260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13260 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation >Affects Versions: 2.7.1 >Reporter: YUBI LEE >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HDFS-13260.patch > > > In an HA with QJM guideline, I think the word "dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir" > is not enough. If someone uses HA and Federation, it might be confusing > because the Journal ID is a unique identifier for one nameservice. > It should be "dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.[nameservice ID]" -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (HDFS-13260) HA with QJM guideline might be confusing
YUBI LEE created HDFS-13260: --- Summary: HA with QJM guideline might be confusing Key: HDFS-13260 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13260 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Affects Versions: 2.7.1 Reporter: YUBI LEE In an HA with QJM guideline, I think the word "dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir" is not enough. If someone uses HA and Federation, it might be confusing because the Journal ID is a unique identifier for one nameservice. It should be "dfs.namenode.shared.edits.dir.[nameservice ID]" -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13195) DataNode conf page cannot display the current value after reconfig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394763#comment-16394763
]
maobaolong commented on HDFS-13195:
---
[~elgoiri] [~arpitagarwal] Thank you to help me to re trigger the new test, and
after seeing the failed tests and timeout tests, i don't think those failed
tests is caused by me. So i re run some of the failed tests and i see them
passed.
> DataNode conf page cannot display the current value after reconfig
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-13195
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13195
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: datanode
>Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>Reporter: maobaolong
>Assignee: maobaolong
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.7.1
>
> Attachments: HDFS-13195-branch-2.7.001.patch,
> HDFS-13195-branch-2.7.002.patch, HDFS-13195.001.patch, HDFS-13195.002.patch
>
>
> Now the branch-2.7 support dfs.datanode.data.dir reconfig, but after i
> reconfig this key, the conf page's value is still the old config value.
> The reason is that:
> {code:java}
> public DatanodeHttpServer(final Configuration conf,
> final DataNode datanode,
> final ServerSocketChannel externalHttpChannel)
> throws IOException {
> this.conf = conf;
> Configuration confForInfoServer = new Configuration(conf);
> confForInfoServer.setInt(HttpServer2.HTTP_MAX_THREADS, 10);
> HttpServer2.Builder builder = new HttpServer2.Builder()
> .setName("datanode")
> .setConf(confForInfoServer)
> .setACL(new AccessControlList(conf.get(DFS_ADMIN, " ")))
> .hostName(getHostnameForSpnegoPrincipal(confForInfoServer))
> .addEndpoint(URI.create("http://localhost:0;))
> .setFindPort(true);
> this.infoServer = builder.build();
> {code}
> The confForInfoServer is a new configuration instance, while the dfsadmin
> reconfig the datanode's config, the config result cannot reflect to
> confForInfoServer, so we should use the datanode's conf.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13234) Remove renew configuration instance in ConfiguredFailoverProxyProvider and reduce memory footprint for client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394755#comment-16394755
]
He Xiaoqiao commented on HDFS-13234:
Thanks [~kihwal] for your detailed comments.
It is interesting issues (HADOOP-11223 and HADOOP-9570) for resolving
duplicated Configuration instances. But I am not sure if these issue are
complete solution for huge memory footprint waste of the case mentioned above.
Beside HADOOP-11223 and HADOOP-9570, I think it is necessary to maintain
incremental change for Configuration, thus Configuration::getDefault() +
Incremental Change could form the complete configuration and no unintended conf
update propagation, meaning while it could reduce memory footprint. If I am
wrong please correct me.
Thanks again.
> Remove renew configuration instance in ConfiguredFailoverProxyProvider and
> reduce memory footprint for client
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-13234
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13234
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fs, ha, hdfs-client
>Reporter: He Xiaoqiao
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-13234.001.patch
>
>
> The memory footprint of #DFSClient is very considerable in some special
> scenario since there are many #Configuration instances and occupy much memory
> resource (In an extreme case, org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration occupies
> over 600MB we meet under HDFS Federation an HA with QJM and there are dozens
> of NameNodes). I think some new Configuration instance is not necessary. Such
> as #ConfiguredFailoverProxyProvider initialization.
> {code:java}
> public ConfiguredFailoverProxyProvider(Configuration conf, URI uri,
> Class xface, HAProxyFactory factory) {
> this.xface = xface;
> this.conf = new Configuration(conf);
> ..
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13224) RBF: Resolvers to support mount points across multiple subclusters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394752#comment-16394752
]
Yiqun Lin commented on HDFS-13224:
--
[~elgoiri], thanks for updating the patch. Review comments based on v006 patch.
* #1 and #4 of my last review comments for {{TestMultipleDestinationResolver}}
seem still need to complete in the next patch.
* Can we document the setting {{DFSConfigKeys.FEDERATION_ROUTER_PREFIX +
"local-resolver.update-period";}} in hdfs-default.xml?
There are two part of work to do in Router Admin.
* Update the Router CLI usage and doc, add the option of DestinationOrder.
* Add some testing for Router Admin CLI, test if destination order
added/updated correctly via Router admin commands.
> RBF: Resolvers to support mount points across multiple subclusters
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-13224
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13224
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-13224.000.patch, HDFS-13224.001.patch,
> HDFS-13224.002.patch, HDFS-13224.003.patch, HDFS-13224.004.patch,
> HDFS-13224.005.patch, HDFS-13224.006.patch
>
>
> Currently, a mount point points to a single subcluster. We should be able to
> spread files in a mount point across subclusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13224) RBF: Resolvers to support mount points across multiple subclusters
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394740#comment-16394740 ] Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-13224: Thanks [~linyiqun] for the comments. I posted [^HDFS-13224.006.patch] solving most of them; a couple coming soon. > RBF: Resolvers to support mount points across multiple subclusters > -- > > Key: HDFS-13224 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13224 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13224.000.patch, HDFS-13224.001.patch, > HDFS-13224.002.patch, HDFS-13224.003.patch, HDFS-13224.004.patch, > HDFS-13224.005.patch, HDFS-13224.006.patch > > > Currently, a mount point points to a single subcluster. We should be able to > spread files in a mount point across subclusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13224) RBF: Resolvers to support mount points across multiple subclusters
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Íñigo Goiri updated HDFS-13224: --- Attachment: HDFS-13224.006.patch > RBF: Resolvers to support mount points across multiple subclusters > -- > > Key: HDFS-13224 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13224 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13224.000.patch, HDFS-13224.001.patch, > HDFS-13224.002.patch, HDFS-13224.003.patch, HDFS-13224.004.patch, > HDFS-13224.005.patch, HDFS-13224.006.patch > > > Currently, a mount point points to a single subcluster. We should be able to > spread files in a mount point across subclusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13226) RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394731#comment-16394731
]
Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-13226:
For [^HDFS-13226.008.patch], the checkstyle is related to the definition of
the constant messages.
We need to define them as static final.
> RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-13226
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: hdfs
>Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>Reporter: maobaolong
>Assignee: maobaolong
>Priority: Major
> Labels: RBF
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-13226.001.patch, HDFS-13226.002.patch,
> HDFS-13226.003.patch, HDFS-13226.004.patch, HDFS-13226.005.patch,
> HDFS-13226.006.patch, HDFS-13226.007.patch, HDFS-13226.008.patch
>
>
> one of the mount entry source path rule is that the source path must start
> with '\', somebody didn't follow the rule and execute the following command:
> {code:bash}
> $ hdfs dfsrouteradmin -add addnode/ ns1 /addnode/
> {code}
> But, the console show we are successful add this entry.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13241) RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port 8888 is in use
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] maobaolong updated HDFS-13241: -- Attachment: HDFS-13241.002.patch > RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use > - > > Key: HDFS-13241 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: hdfs, test >Affects Versions: 3.2.0 >Reporter: maobaolong >Assignee: maobaolong >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13241.001.patch, HDFS-13241.002.patch > > > TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13258) Ozone: restructure Hdsl/Ozone code to separated maven subprojects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394727#comment-16394727
]
genericqa commented on HDFS-13258:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
36s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 251 new or modified
test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-7240 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
20s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m
19s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 17m
51s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 3m
40s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 11m
43s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 52s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source:
hadoop-project hadoop-hdfs-project hadoop-tools/hadoop-tools-dist hadoop-dist .
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 6m
19s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 5m
56s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-7240 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
25s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 33m
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 13m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 13m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red} 13m 55s{color}
| {color:red} root generated 4 new + 1290 unchanged - 17 fixed = 1294 total
(was 1307) {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
3m 48s{color} | {color:orange} root: The patch generated 93 new + 620 unchanged
- 25 fixed = 713 total (was 645) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 12m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shellcheck {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} There were no new shellcheck issues. {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} shelldocs {color} | {color:orange}
0m 11s{color} | {color:orange} The patch generated 4 new + 100 unchanged - 0
fixed = 104 total (was 100) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m
2s{color} | {color:red} The patch 1 line(s) with tabs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 47s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source:
hadoop-project hadoop-hdfs-project hadoop-hdsl hadoop-ozone hadoop-cblock
hadoop-tools/hadoop-tools-dist . hadoop-dist hadoop-ozone/integration-test
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 15m
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 6m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 57m 58s{color}
| {color:red} root in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} |
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13258) Ozone: restructure Hdsl/Ozone code to separated maven subprojects
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Elek, Marton updated HDFS-13258: Attachment: HDFS-13258-HDFS-7240.004.patch > Ozone: restructure Hdsl/Ozone code to separated maven subprojects > - > > Key: HDFS-13258 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13258 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Elek, Marton >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13258-HDFS-7240.001.patch, > HDFS-13258-HDFS-7240.002.patch, HDFS-13258-HDFS-7240.003.patch, > HDFS-13258-HDFS-7240.004.patch > > > According to the merge disucssion at hdfs-dev/hadoop-dev list it would be > easier to review/maintain hdsl/ozone code if it would be: > 1. separated from hadoop-hdfs/hadoop-common > 2. would be more structured > This jira is about moving out all the hdsl/ozone code to separated maven > projects. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13226) RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394602#comment-16394602
]
genericqa commented on HDFS-13226:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m
31s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
15s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 36s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
10s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 49s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch
generated 8 new + 1 unchanged - 0 fixed = 9 total (was 1) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 46s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}132m 47s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
23s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}188m 56s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.web.TestWebHdfsTimeouts |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestRetryCacheWithHA |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailure |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockStatsMXBean |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailureReporting |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDirectoryScanner |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:d4cc50f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-13226 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12913942/HDFS-13226.008.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 0714375c67db 3.13.0-135-generic #184-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 18
11:55:51 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / e1f5251 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_151 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/23397/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13253) RBF: Quota management incorrect parent-child relationship judgement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394576#comment-16394576
]
Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-13253:
For [^HDFS-13253.002.patch], I would also do the static import in
{{RouterQuotaManager}} for {{isParentEntry()}}.
Other than that, LGTM; the failed unit tests are unrelated.
> RBF: Quota management incorrect parent-child relationship judgement
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-13253
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13253
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Yiqun Lin
>Assignee: Yiqun Lin
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-13253.001.patch, HDFS-13253.002.patch
>
>
> The Router quota management does not check for parent-child relation
> properly. Similar to HDFS-13233.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13248) RBF: Namenode need to choose block location for the client
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Íñigo Goiri updated HDFS-13248: --- Summary: RBF: Namenode need to choose block location for the client (was: RBF: namenode need to choose block location for the client) > RBF: Namenode need to choose block location for the client > -- > > Key: HDFS-13248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13248 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Weiwei Wu >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13248.000.patch, clientMachine-call-path.jpeg, > debug-info-1.jpeg, debug-info-2.jpeg > > > When execute a put operation via router, the NameNode will choose block > location for the router, not for the real client. This will affect the file's > locality. > I think on both NameNode and Router, we should add a new addBlock method, or > add a parameter for the current addBlock method, to pass the real client > information. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13248) RBF: namenode need to choose block location for the client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394572#comment-16394572
]
Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-13248:
{quote}
Thanks for the patch, Íñigo Goiri. Took a quick pass, #3 design LGTM.
{quote}
Thanks, I'll start building the unit tests for this and testing it in dev.
Eventually, we will need a check from people more familiar with the tokens
wiring in the NN.
> RBF: namenode need to choose block location for the client
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-13248
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13248
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Weiwei Wu
>Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-13248.000.patch, clientMachine-call-path.jpeg,
> debug-info-1.jpeg, debug-info-2.jpeg
>
>
> When execute a put operation via router, the NameNode will choose block
> location for the router, not for the real client. This will affect the file's
> locality.
> I think on both NameNode and Router, we should add a new addBlock method, or
> add a parameter for the current addBlock method, to pass the real client
> information.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-13241) RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port 8888 is in use
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394555#comment-16394555 ] maobaolong edited comment on HDFS-13241 at 3/11/18 4:01 PM: [~elgoiri] Thank you for this skill of JIRA, I did it just now. So the new build or jenkins will coming. was (Author: maobaolong): [~elgoiri] Thank you for this skill of JIRA, I did it just now. So the new build or jenkins will be coming. > RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use > - > > Key: HDFS-13241 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: hdfs, test >Affects Versions: 3.2.0 >Reporter: maobaolong >Assignee: maobaolong >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13241.001.patch > > > TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-13241) RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port 8888 is in use
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394555#comment-16394555 ] maobaolong edited comment on HDFS-13241 at 3/11/18 4:01 PM: [~elgoiri] Thank you for this skill of JIRA, I did it just now. So the new build or jenkins will be coming. was (Author: maobaolong): [~elgoiri] Thank you for this skill of JIRA, I did it just now. So the new build or jenkins will be comming. > RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use > - > > Key: HDFS-13241 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: hdfs, test >Affects Versions: 3.2.0 >Reporter: maobaolong >Assignee: maobaolong >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13241.001.patch > > > TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13241) RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port 8888 is in use
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394555#comment-16394555 ] maobaolong commented on HDFS-13241: --- [~elgoiri] Thank you for this skill of JIRA, I did it just now. So the new build or jenkins will be comming. > RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use > - > > Key: HDFS-13241 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: hdfs, test >Affects Versions: 3.2.0 >Reporter: maobaolong >Assignee: maobaolong >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13241.001.patch > > > TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13241) RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port 8888 is in use
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] maobaolong updated HDFS-13241: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use > - > > Key: HDFS-13241 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: hdfs, test >Affects Versions: 3.2.0 >Reporter: maobaolong >Assignee: maobaolong >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13241.001.patch > > > TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13241) RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port 8888 is in use
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] maobaolong updated HDFS-13241: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > RBF: TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use > - > > Key: HDFS-13241 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13241 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: hdfs, test >Affects Versions: 3.2.0 >Reporter: maobaolong >Assignee: maobaolong >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-13241.001.patch > > > TestRouterSafemode failed if the port is in use. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13204) RBF: Optimize name service safe mode icon
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394552#comment-16394552 ] maobaolong commented on HDFS-13204: --- [~elgoiri] Make sense very mush, and [~liuhongtong], would you like to update the css and html at this patch as [~elgoiri] said? > RBF: Optimize name service safe mode icon > - > > Key: HDFS-13204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13204 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: liuhongtong >Assignee: liuhongtong >Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-13204.001.patch, image-2018-02-28-18-33-09-972.png, > image-2018-02-28-18-33-47-661.png, image-2018-02-28-18-35-35-708.png > > > In federation health webpage, the safe mode icons of Subclusters and Routers > are inconsistent. > The safe mode icon of Subclusters may induce users the name service is > maintaining. > !image-2018-02-28-18-33-09-972.png! > The safe mode icon of Routers: > !image-2018-02-28-18-33-47-661.png! > In fact, if the name service is in safe mode, users can't do writing related > operations. So I think the safe mode icon in Subclusters should be modified, > which may be more reasonable. > !image-2018-02-28-18-35-35-708.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13226) RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394547#comment-16394547
]
maobaolong commented on HDFS-13226:
---
[~linyiqun] I've recover the `this` to the error message. PTAL.
> RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-13226
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: hdfs
>Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>Reporter: maobaolong
>Assignee: maobaolong
>Priority: Major
> Labels: RBF
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-13226.001.patch, HDFS-13226.002.patch,
> HDFS-13226.003.patch, HDFS-13226.004.patch, HDFS-13226.005.patch,
> HDFS-13226.006.patch, HDFS-13226.007.patch, HDFS-13226.008.patch
>
>
> one of the mount entry source path rule is that the source path must start
> with '\', somebody didn't follow the rule and execute the following command:
> {code:bash}
> $ hdfs dfsrouteradmin -add addnode/ ns1 /addnode/
> {code}
> But, the console show we are successful add this entry.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13226) RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
maobaolong updated HDFS-13226:
--
Attachment: HDFS-13226.008.patch
> RBF: We should throw the failure validate and refuse this mount entry
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-13226
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13226
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: hdfs
>Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>Reporter: maobaolong
>Assignee: maobaolong
>Priority: Major
> Labels: RBF
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-13226.001.patch, HDFS-13226.002.patch,
> HDFS-13226.003.patch, HDFS-13226.004.patch, HDFS-13226.005.patch,
> HDFS-13226.006.patch, HDFS-13226.007.patch, HDFS-13226.008.patch
>
>
> one of the mount entry source path rule is that the source path must start
> with '\', somebody didn't follow the rule and execute the following command:
> {code:bash}
> $ hdfs dfsrouteradmin -add addnode/ ns1 /addnode/
> {code}
> But, the console show we are successful add this entry.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13253) RBF: Quota management incorrect parent-child relationship judgement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394471#comment-16394471
]
genericqa commented on HDFS-13253:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
33s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 20m
30s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
10s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
17s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 3s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
9s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 50s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
54s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}131m 0s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}188m 48s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestReadStripedFileWithMissingBlocks |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailure |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.TestSpaceReservation |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockStatsMXBean |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailureReporting |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:d4cc50f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-13253 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12913923/HDFS-13253.002.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux dd00f06f15a0 3.13.0-135-generic #184-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 18
11:55:51 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / e1f5251 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_151 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/23396/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/23396/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 3093
