[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12130) Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16088187#comment-16088187
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-12130:
---
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #12012 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/12012/])
Revert "HDFS-12130. Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary."
(szetszwo: rev a1f12bb543778ddc243205eaa962e99da4d8f135)
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSPermissionChecker.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INode.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INodeReference.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/DirectorySnapshottableFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INodeDirectory.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/ContentSummaryComputationContext.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/DirectoryWithQuotaFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/BlockCollection.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/DirectoryWithSnapshotFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSDirStatAndListingOp.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/Snapshot.java
* (delete)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/TestGetContentSummaryWithPermission.java
HDFS-12130. Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary. (szetszwo: rev
f413ee33df301659c4ca9024380c2354983dcc84)
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSPermissionChecker.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INodeDirectory.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INode.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INodeReference.java
* (add)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/TestGetContentSummaryWithPermission.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/DirectorySnapshottableFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/ContentSummaryComputationContext.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/DirectoryWithSnapshotFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/Snapshot.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/BlockCollection.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/DirectoryWithQuotaFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSDirStatAndListingOp.java
> Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-12130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode
>Reporter: Chen Liang
>Assignee: Chen Liang
> Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1
>
> Attachments: HDFS-12130.001.patch, HDFS-12130.002.patch,
> HDFS-12130.003.patch
>
>
> Currently, {{getContentSummary}} takes two phases to complete:
> - phase1. check the permission of the entire subtree. If any subdirectory
> does not have {{READ_EXECUTE}}, an access control exception is thrown and
> {{getContentSummary}} terminates here (unless it's super user).
> - phase2. If phase1 passed, it will then traverse the entire tree recursively
> to get the actual content summary.
> An issue is, both phases currently hold the fs lock.
> Phase 2 has already been written that, it will yield the fs lock over time,
> such that it does not block other operations for too long. However phase 1
> does not yield. Meaning it's possible that the permission check phase still
> blocks things for long time.
> One fix is to add lock yield to phase 1. But a simpler fix is to merge phase
> 1 into phase 2. Namely, instead of doing a full traversal for permission
>
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12130) Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16088051#comment-16088051
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-12130:
---
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #12009 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/12009/])
HDFS-12130. Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary. (szetszwo: rev
a29fe100b3c671954b759add5923a2b44af9e6a4)
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/Snapshot.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INodeDirectory.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/ContentSummaryComputationContext.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/DirectorySnapshottableFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/BlockCollection.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/DirectoryWithQuotaFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSDirStatAndListingOp.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INode.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/snapshot/DirectoryWithSnapshotFeature.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSPermissionChecker.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/INodeReference.java
* (add)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/TestGetContentSummaryWithPermission.java
> Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-12130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode
>Reporter: Chen Liang
>Assignee: Chen Liang
> Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1
>
> Attachments: HDFS-12130.001.patch, HDFS-12130.002.patch,
> HDFS-12130.003.patch
>
>
> Currently, {{getContentSummary}} takes two phases to complete:
> - phase1. check the permission of the entire subtree. If any subdirectory
> does not have {{READ_EXECUTE}}, an access control exception is thrown and
> {{getContentSummary}} terminates here (unless it's super user).
> - phase2. If phase1 passed, it will then traverse the entire tree recursively
> to get the actual content summary.
> An issue is, both phases currently hold the fs lock.
> Phase 2 has already been written that, it will yield the fs lock over time,
> such that it does not block other operations for too long. However phase 1
> does not yield. Meaning it's possible that the permission check phase still
> blocks things for long time.
> One fix is to add lock yield to phase 1. But a simpler fix is to merge phase
> 1 into phase 2. Namely, instead of doing a full traversal for permission
> check first, we start with phase 2 directly, but for each directory, before
> obtaining its summary, check its permission first. This way we take advantage
> of existing lock yield in phase 2 code and still able to check permission and
> terminate on access exception.
> Thanks [~szetszwo] for the offline discussions!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12130) Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16087652#comment-16087652
]
Chen Liang commented on HDFS-12130:
---
Thanks [~szetszwo] for the review! The failed tests are unrelated, and passed
locally.
> Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-12130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode
>Reporter: Chen Liang
>Assignee: Chen Liang
> Attachments: HDFS-12130.001.patch, HDFS-12130.002.patch,
> HDFS-12130.003.patch
>
>
> Currently, {{getContentSummary}} takes two phases to complete:
> - phase1. check the permission of the entire subtree. If any subdirectory
> does not have {{READ_EXECUTE}}, an access control exception is thrown and
> {{getContentSummary}} terminates here (unless it's super user).
> - phase2. If phase1 passed, it will then traverse the entire tree recursively
> to get the actual content summary.
> An issue is, both phases currently hold the fs lock.
> Phase 2 has already been written that, it will yield the fs lock over time,
> such that it does not block other operations for too long. However phase 1
> does not yield. Meaning it's possible that the permission check phase still
> blocks things for long time.
> One fix is to add lock yield to phase 1. But a simpler fix is to merge phase
> 1 into phase 2. Namely, instead of doing a full traversal for permission
> check first, we start with phase 2 directly, but for each directory, before
> obtaining its summary, check its permission first. This way we take advantage
> of existing lock yield in phase 2 code and still able to check permission and
> terminate on access exception.
> Thanks [~szetszwo] for the offline discussions!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12130) Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16086630#comment-16086630
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-12130:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
12s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 13m
8s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
41s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs in trunk has 10 extant
Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 35s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch
generated 1 new + 179 unchanged - 2 fixed = 180 total (was 181) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 65m 50s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
20s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 90m 46s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailureReporting |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedInputStreamWithRandomECPolicy |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure080 |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure070 |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:14b5c93 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-12130 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12877179/HDFS-12130.003.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux d57a2f90a967 3.13.0-119-generic #166-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 3
12:18:55 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 5f1ee72 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_131 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| findbugs |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20267/artifact/patchprocess/branch-findbugs-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-warnings.html
|
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20267/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20267/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20267/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U:
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12130) Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16086520#comment-16086520
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-12130:
The patch looks good. One problem is that inode.getPathComponents() is called
for each inode in the subtree and getPathComponents() is expensive since it
builds the full path. We should avoid calling it for each inode.
> Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-12130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode
>Reporter: Chen Liang
>Assignee: Chen Liang
> Attachments: HDFS-12130.001.patch, HDFS-12130.002.patch
>
>
> Currently, {{getContentSummary}} takes two phases to complete:
> - phase1. check the permission of the entire subtree. If any subdirectory
> does not have {{READ_EXECUTE}}, an access control exception is thrown and
> {{getContentSummary}} terminates here (unless it's super user).
> - phase2. If phase1 passed, it will then traverse the entire tree recursively
> to get the actual content summary.
> An issue is, both phases currently hold the fs lock.
> Phase 2 has already been written that, it will yield the fs lock over time,
> such that it does not block other operations for too long. However phase 1
> does not yield. Meaning it's possible that the permission check phase still
> blocks things for long time.
> One fix is to add lock yield to phase 1. But a simpler fix is to merge phase
> 1 into phase 2. Namely, instead of doing a full traversal for permission
> check first, we start with phase 2 directly, but for each directory, before
> obtaining its summary, check its permission first. This way we take advantage
> of existing lock yield in phase 2 code and still able to check permission and
> terminate on access exception.
> Thanks [~szetszwo] for the offline discussions!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12130) Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16086438#comment-16086438
]
Chen Liang commented on HDFS-12130:
---
The failed tests are unrelated and all passed in my local run. The checkstyle
warning is due to the existing style issue in {{BlockCollection}} that actually
all the {{public}} modifier are redundant, will file a separate jira to fix it.
The findbug warnings are also unrelated.
> Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-12130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode
>Reporter: Chen Liang
>Assignee: Chen Liang
> Attachments: HDFS-12130.001.patch, HDFS-12130.002.patch
>
>
> Currently, {{getContentSummary}} takes two phases to complete:
> - phase1. check the permission of the entire subtree. If any subdirectory
> does not have {{READ_EXECUTE}}, an access control exception is thrown and
> {{getContentSummary}} terminates here (unless it's super user).
> - phase2. If phase1 passed, it will then traverse the entire tree recursively
> to get the actual content summary.
> An issue is, both phases currently hold the fs lock.
> Phase 2 has already been written that, it will yield the fs lock over time,
> such that it does not block other operations for too long. However phase 1
> does not yield. Meaning it's possible that the permission check phase still
> blocks things for long time.
> One fix is to add lock yield to phase 1. But a simpler fix is to merge phase
> 1 into phase 2. Namely, instead of doing a full traversal for permission
> check first, we start with phase 2 directly, but for each directory, before
> obtaining its summary, check its permission first. This way we take advantage
> of existing lock yield in phase 2 code and still able to check permission and
> terminate on access exception.
> Thanks [~szetszwo] for the offline discussions!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12130) Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16086419#comment-16086419
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-12130:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 13m
12s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
52s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
39s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs in trunk has 10 extant
Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 35s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch
generated 1 new + 179 unchanged - 2 fixed = 180 total (was 181) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
45s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 64m 35s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
19s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 89m 37s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailureReporting |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedInputStreamWithRandomECPolicy |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestDNFencingWithReplication |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:14b5c93 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-12130 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12877140/HDFS-12130.002.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 5d0baa882130 3.13.0-119-generic #166-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 3
12:18:55 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 945c095 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_131 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| findbugs |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20262/artifact/patchprocess/branch-findbugs-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-warnings.html
|
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20262/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20262/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20262/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output |
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12130) Optimizing permission check for getContentSummary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16084927#comment-16084927
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-12130:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
17s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m
17s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m
46s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs in trunk has 10 extant
Findbugs warnings. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 37s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch
generated 8 new + 179 unchanged - 2 fixed = 187 total (was 181) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
54s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 67m 10s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} asflicense {color} | {color:red} 0m
20s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 1 ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 95m 0s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSShell |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure150 |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestUnderReplicatedBlocks |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedInputStreamWithRandomECPolicy |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.TestLazyPersistReplicaRecovery
|
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:14b5c93 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-12130 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12876963/HDFS-12130.001.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 09d6f3a7e18e 3.13.0-116-generic #163-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 31
14:13:22 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 931a498 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_131 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| findbugs |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20253/artifact/patchprocess/branch-findbugs-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-warnings.html
|
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20253/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20253/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/20253/testReport/ |
| asflicense |
