[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14705) Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16903326#comment-16903326 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-14705: --- FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #17066 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/17066/]) HDFS-14705. Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication. Contributed (weichiu: rev 2265872c2db98fbaf0cd847af6d12cd4bc76e9b2) * (edit) hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/TestFileAppend.java > Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication > --- > > Key: HDFS-14705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang >Assignee: CR Hota >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 3.3.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-14705.001.patch > > > A few HDFS tests sets a configuration property dfs.min.replication. This is > not being used anywhere in the code. It doesn't seem like a leftover from > legacy code either. Better to clean them out. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14705) Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16901737#comment-16901737 ] CR Hota commented on HDFS-14705: [~jojochuang] Thanks for the review. Should we commit this? > Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication > --- > > Key: HDFS-14705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang >Assignee: CR Hota >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HDFS-14705.001.patch > > > A few HDFS tests sets a configuration property dfs.min.replication. This is > not being used anywhere in the code. It doesn't seem like a leftover from > legacy code either. Better to clean them out. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14705) Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16901581#comment-16901581 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-14705: LGTM +1 > Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication > --- > > Key: HDFS-14705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang >Assignee: CR Hota >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HDFS-14705.001.patch > > > A few HDFS tests sets a configuration property dfs.min.replication. This is > not being used anywhere in the code. It doesn't seem like a leftover from > legacy code either. Better to clean them out. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14705) Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16901563#comment-16901563 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14705: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 39s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} | || || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files. {color} | || || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} || | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 18m 37s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 1s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 40s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 6s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 12m 17s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 10s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 51s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | || || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m 1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 11m 32s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 47s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | || || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} || | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 86m 45s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 31s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} | | {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}142m 48s{color} | {color:black} {color} | \\ \\ || Reason || Tests || | Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestLargeBlockReport | | | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | Docker | Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e | | JIRA Issue | HDFS-14705 | | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12976859/HDFS-14705.001.patch | | Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle | | uname | Linux 5a7194c57c4f 4.4.0-138-generic #164-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 2 17:16:02 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | | Build tool | maven | | Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh | | git revision | trunk / 22430c1 | | maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 | | Default Java | 1.8.0_222 | | findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 | | unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27421/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt | | Test Results | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27421/testReport/ | | Max. process+thread count | 4094 (vs. ulimit of 1) | | modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27421/console | | Powered
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14705) Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16901438#comment-16901438 ] CR Hota commented on HDFS-14705: [~jojochuang] Found this in just 2 tests and yes as you said, its not getting used. Not sure why it was added in the first place. Can you help take a look at the patch? > Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication > --- > > Key: HDFS-14705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang >Assignee: CR Hota >Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HDFS-14705.001.patch > > > A few HDFS tests sets a configuration property dfs.min.replication. This is > not being used anywhere in the code. It doesn't seem like a leftover from > legacy code either. Better to clean them out. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14705) Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16901332#comment-16901332 ] CR Hota commented on HDFS-14705: [~jojochuang] Thanks for creating this. May I assign this to myself? Will be good to know how this property has been moving around historically. > Remove unused configuration dfs.min.replication > --- > > Key: HDFS-14705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14705 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang >Priority: Trivial > > A few HDFS tests sets a configuration property dfs.min.replication. This is > not being used anywhere in the code. It doesn't seem like a leftover from > legacy code either. Better to clean them out. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org