[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17359) EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.

2024-02-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17813306#comment-17813306
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17359:
---

hfutatzhanghb commented on PR #6503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6503#issuecomment-1921573095

   > Merged. Thanks for your contribution! @hfutatzhanghb
   
   Sir, thanks a lot for your reviewing and merging ~




> EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.
> 
>
> Key: HDFS-17359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ec
>Reporter: farmmamba
>Assignee: farmmamba
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 3.3.9, 3.4.1, 3.5.0
>
>
> In method DFSStripedOutputStream#checkStreamerFailures, we have below codes:
> {code:java}
>     Set newFailed = checkStreamers();
>     if (newFailed.size() == 0) {
>       return;
>     }    if (isNeedFlushAllPackets) {
>       // for healthy streamers, wait till all of them have fetched the new 
> block
>       // and flushed out all the enqueued packets.
>       flushAllInternals();
>     }
>     // recheck failed streamers again after the flush
>     newFailed = checkStreamers(); {code}
> We should better move the re-check logic into if condition to reduce useless 
> invocation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17359) EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.

2024-02-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17813269#comment-17813269
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17359:
---

tasanuma merged PR #6503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6503




> EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.
> 
>
> Key: HDFS-17359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ec
>Reporter: farmmamba
>Assignee: farmmamba
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In method DFSStripedOutputStream#checkStreamerFailures, we have below codes:
> {code:java}
>     Set newFailed = checkStreamers();
>     if (newFailed.size() == 0) {
>       return;
>     }    if (isNeedFlushAllPackets) {
>       // for healthy streamers, wait till all of them have fetched the new 
> block
>       // and flushed out all the enqueued packets.
>       flushAllInternals();
>     }
>     // recheck failed streamers again after the flush
>     newFailed = checkStreamers(); {code}
> We should better move the re-check logic into if condition to reduce useless 
> invocation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17359) EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.

2024-02-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17813270#comment-17813270
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17359:
---

tasanuma commented on PR #6503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6503#issuecomment-1921517899

   Merged. Thanks for your contribution! @hfutatzhanghb 




> EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.
> 
>
> Key: HDFS-17359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ec
>Reporter: farmmamba
>Assignee: farmmamba
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In method DFSStripedOutputStream#checkStreamerFailures, we have below codes:
> {code:java}
>     Set newFailed = checkStreamers();
>     if (newFailed.size() == 0) {
>       return;
>     }    if (isNeedFlushAllPackets) {
>       // for healthy streamers, wait till all of them have fetched the new 
> block
>       // and flushed out all the enqueued packets.
>       flushAllInternals();
>     }
>     // recheck failed streamers again after the flush
>     newFailed = checkStreamers(); {code}
> We should better move the re-check logic into if condition to reduce useless 
> invocation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17359) EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.

2024-01-26 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17811306#comment-17811306
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17359:
---

hadoop-yetus commented on PR #6503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6503#issuecomment-1912178649

   :broken_heart: **-1 overall**
   
   
   
   
   
   
   | Vote | Subsystem | Runtime |  Logfile | Comment |
   |::|--:|:|::|:---:|
   | +0 :ok: |  reexec  |   1m  3s |  |  Docker mode activated.  |
    _ Prechecks _ |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  dupname  |   0m  0s |  |  No case conflicting files 
found.  |
   | +0 :ok: |  codespell  |   0m  1s |  |  codespell was not available.  |
   | +0 :ok: |  detsecrets  |   0m  1s |  |  detect-secrets was not available.  
|
   | +1 :green_heart: |  @author  |   0m  0s |  |  The patch does not contain 
any @author tags.  |
   | -1 :x: |  test4tests  |   0m  0s |  |  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.  
|
    _ trunk Compile Tests _ |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  mvninstall  |  41m 47s |  |  trunk passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  compile  |   0m 58s |  |  trunk passed with JDK 
Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  compile  |   0m 52s |  |  trunk passed with JDK 
Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  checkstyle  |   0m 31s |  |  trunk passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  mvnsite  |   0m 58s |  |  trunk passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javadoc  |   0m 47s |  |  trunk passed with JDK 
Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javadoc  |   0m 42s |  |  trunk passed with JDK 
Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  spotbugs  |   2m 37s |  |  trunk passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  shadedclient  |  34m  3s |  |  branch has no errors 
when building and testing our client artifacts.  |
    _ Patch Compile Tests _ |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  mvninstall  |   0m 45s |  |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  compile  |   0m 52s |  |  the patch passed with JDK 
Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javac  |   0m 52s |  |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  compile  |   0m 44s |  |  the patch passed with JDK 
Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javac  |   0m 44s |  |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  blanks  |   0m  0s |  |  The patch has no blanks 
issues.  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  checkstyle  |   0m 19s |  |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  mvnsite  |   0m 46s |  |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javadoc  |   0m 35s |  |  the patch passed with JDK 
Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javadoc  |   0m 34s |  |  the patch passed with JDK 
Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  spotbugs  |   2m 38s |  |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  shadedclient  |  33m 54s |  |  patch has no errors 
when building and testing our client artifacts.  |
    _ Other Tests _ |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  unit  |   2m 26s |  |  hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch 
passed.  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  asflicense  |   0m 35s |  |  The patch does not 
generate ASF License warnings.  |
   |  |   | 130m 20s |  |  |
   
   
   | Subsystem | Report/Notes |
   |--:|:-|
   | Docker | ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base: 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6503/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
 |
   | GITHUB PR | https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6503 |
   | Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall 
mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets |
   | uname | Linux 138005f070ab 5.15.0-88-generic #98-Ubuntu SMP Mon Oct 2 
15:18:56 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
   | Build tool | maven |
   | Personality | dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh |
   | git revision | trunk / bde7710e7d1ffcd087c5a2f7068725f393aa338a |
   | Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08 |
   | Multi-JDK versions | 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08 |
   |  Test Results | 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6503/1/testReport/ |
   | Max. process+thread count | 683 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
   | modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client U: 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client |
   | Console output | 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6503/1/console |
   | versions | git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2 |
   | Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org |
   
   
   This 

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17359) EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.

2024-01-26 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17811257#comment-17811257
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17359:
---

hfutatzhanghb opened a new pull request, #6503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6503

   ### Description of PR
   Refer to HDFS-17359
   
   In method DFSStripedOutputStream#checkStreamerFailures, we have below codes:
   ```java
   Set newFailed = checkStreamers();
   if (newFailed.size() == 0) {
 return;
   }if (isNeedFlushAllPackets) {
 // for healthy streamers, wait till all of them have fetched the new 
block
 // and flushed out all the enqueued packets.
 flushAllInternals();
   }
   // recheck failed streamers again after the flush
   newFailed = checkStreamers(); 
   ```
   We should better move the re-check logic into if condition to reduce useless 
invocation.




> EC: recheck failed streamers should only after flushing all packets.
> 
>
> Key: HDFS-17359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17359
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ec
>Reporter: farmmamba
>Assignee: farmmamba
>Priority: Minor
>
> In method DFSStripedOutputStream#checkStreamerFailures, we have below codes:
> {code:java}
>     Set newFailed = checkStreamers();
>     if (newFailed.size() == 0) {
>       return;
>     }    if (isNeedFlushAllPackets) {
>       // for healthy streamers, wait till all of them have fetched the new 
> block
>       // and flushed out all the enqueued packets.
>       flushAllInternals();
>     }
>     // recheck failed streamers again after the flush
>     newFailed = checkStreamers(); {code}
> We should better move the re-check logic into if condition to reduce useless 
> invocation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org