[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1220) Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime

2010-09-10 Thread dhruba borthakur (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907903#action_12907903
 ] 

dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1220:


The rename does not actually sync all the data from the kernel buffers to disk. 
Thus, it is theoretically possible that  even though the NN actually wrote out 
everything to disk and the machine rebooted, some data in any of the 
fstime/edits/fsimage could be missing. I think we should issue a fsync() on all 
these files before closing them.


 Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime
 

 Key: HDFS-1220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220
 Project: Hadoop HDFS
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: name-node
Affects Versions: 0.20.1
Reporter: Thanh Do

 - Summary: updating fstime file on disk is not atomic, so it is possible that
 if a crash happens in the middle, next time when NameNode reboots, it will
 read stale fstime, hence unable to start successfully.
  
 - Details:
 Basically, this involve 3 steps:
 1) delete fstime file (timeFile.delete())
 2) truncate fstime file (new FileOutputStream(timeFile))
 3) write new time to fstime file (out.writeLong(checkpointTime))
 If a crash happens after step 2 and before step 3, in the next reboot, 
 NameNode
 got an exception when reading the time (8 byte) from an empty fstime file.
 This bug was found by our Failure Testing Service framework:
 http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2010/EECS-2010-98.html
 For questions, please email us: Thanh Do (than...@cs.wisc.edu) and 
 Haryadi Gunawi (hary...@eecs.berkeley.edu

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1220) Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime

2010-09-10 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12907907#action_12907907
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1220:
---

Dhruba: Didn't we take care of that in HDFS-970?

 Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime
 

 Key: HDFS-1220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220
 Project: Hadoop HDFS
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: name-node
Affects Versions: 0.20.1
Reporter: Thanh Do

 - Summary: updating fstime file on disk is not atomic, so it is possible that
 if a crash happens in the middle, next time when NameNode reboots, it will
 read stale fstime, hence unable to start successfully.
  
 - Details:
 Basically, this involve 3 steps:
 1) delete fstime file (timeFile.delete())
 2) truncate fstime file (new FileOutputStream(timeFile))
 3) write new time to fstime file (out.writeLong(checkpointTime))
 If a crash happens after step 2 and before step 3, in the next reboot, 
 NameNode
 got an exception when reading the time (8 byte) from an empty fstime file.
 This bug was found by our Failure Testing Service framework:
 http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2010/EECS-2010-98.html
 For questions, please email us: Thanh Do (than...@cs.wisc.edu) and 
 Haryadi Gunawi (hary...@eecs.berkeley.edu

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1220) Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime

2010-06-23 Thread Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882003#action_12882003
 ] 

Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-1220:
---

I think in both issues (this and HDFS-1221) you are missing the point discussed 
in HDFS-955 in details. 
We first write everything (fsimage, edits, fstime, and VERSION) into a separate 
directory. If everything is done successfully then this directory will be used 
as a startup point by the NN. If not the old directory is still present and NN 
will recover it and start from the previous image.
Does this answer your concerns?

 Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime
 

 Key: HDFS-1220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220
 Project: Hadoop HDFS
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: name-node
Affects Versions: 0.20.1
Reporter: Thanh Do

 - Summary: updating fstime file on disk is not atomic, so it is possible that
 if a crash happens in the middle, next time when NameNode reboots, it will
 read stale fstime, hence unable to start successfully.
  
 - Details:
 Basically, this involve 3 steps:
 1) delete fstime file (timeFile.delete())
 2) truncate fstime file (new FileOutputStream(timeFile))
 3) write new time to fstime file (out.writeLong(checkpointTime))
 If a crash happens after step 2 and before step 3, in the next reboot, 
 NameNode
 got an exception when reading the time (8 byte) from an empty fstime file.
 This bug was found by our Failure Testing Service framework:
 http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2010/EECS-2010-98.html
 For questions, please email us: Thanh Do (than...@cs.wisc.edu) and 
 Haryadi Gunawi (hary...@eecs.berkeley.edu

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1220) Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime

2010-06-22 Thread Thanh Do (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12881526#action_12881526
 ] 

Thanh Do commented on HDFS-1220:


it is not exactly the same as HDFS-1221, although fstime suffered from 
corruption too
(which may lead to data loss). 
In this case, i think the update to fstime should be atomic, or NameNode some 
how
should anticipate reading an empty fstime.

 Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime
 

 Key: HDFS-1220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220
 Project: Hadoop HDFS
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: name-node
Affects Versions: 0.20.1
Reporter: Thanh Do

 - Summary: updating fstime file on disk is not atomic, so it is possible that
 if a crash happens in the middle, next time when NameNode reboots, it will
 read stale fstime, hence unable to start successfully.
  
 - Details:
 Basically, this involve 3 steps:
 1) delete fstime file (timeFile.delete())
 2) truncate fstime file (new FileOutputStream(timeFile))
 3) write new time to fstime file (out.writeLong(checkpointTime))
 If a crash happens after step 2 and before step 3, in the next reboot, 
 NameNode
 got an exception when reading the time (8 byte) from an empty fstime file.
 This bug was found by our Failure Testing Service framework:
 http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2010/EECS-2010-98.html
 For questions, please email us: Thanh Do (than...@cs.wisc.edu) and 
 Haryadi Gunawi (hary...@eecs.berkeley.edu

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1220) Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime

2010-06-16 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879666#action_12879666
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1220:
---

I believe we fixed this in trunk by saving to an fsimage_ckpt dir and then 
moving it into place atomically once all the files are on disk. See HDFS-955?

 Namenode unable to start due to truncated fstime
 

 Key: HDFS-1220
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1220
 Project: Hadoop HDFS
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: name-node
Affects Versions: 0.20.1
Reporter: Thanh Do

 - Summary: updating fstime file on disk is not atomic, so it is possible that
 if a crash happens in the middle, next time when NameNode reboots, it will
 read stale fstime, hence unable to start successfully.
  
 - Details:
 Basically, this involve 3 steps:
 1) delete fstime file (timeFile.delete())
 2) truncate fstime file (new FileOutputStream(timeFile))
 3) write new time to fstime file (out.writeLong(checkpointTime))
 If a crash happens after step 2 and before step 3, in the next reboot, 
 NameNode
 got an exception when reading the time (8 byte) from an empty fstime file.
 This bug was found by our Failure Testing Service framework:
 http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2010/EECS-2010-98.html
 For questions, please email us: Thanh Do (than...@cs.wisc.edu) and 
 Haryadi Gunawi (hary...@eecs.berkeley.edu

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.