[Hibernate] Hibernate3 migration guide...
Hi guys, Just saw http://www.hibernate.org/250.html and I tried to update it to reflect the Interceptor.isUnsaved()/isTransient() rename, but couldn't since i did not have permission to do so. btw. by renaming to isTransient() and still having unsaved-value in the DTD, isn't that kinda counter-intuitive ? should it not be transient-value then, or ? p.s. I'm sending this mail "blindfolded" since i haven't been able to check mail for the last 60-70 hours (some server malfunction) so bare with me if some info have come out before this mail ,) -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
[Hibernate] defaut values for table hilo generator
The doc says table: hibernate_unique_key et column: next_hi The code says table: next_hi et column: next_hi Any objection if I change the *code* value for H3? Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/ --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
[Hibernate] TypeFactory old-time bug ?
Hi guys, Can it be true that TypeFactory should contain: basics.put( byte[].class.getName(), Hibernate.BINARY); and not basics.put( "byte[]", Hibernate.BINARY); The first one put in "B[]". This is both in H2 and H3 (for ages). Is there any usecase for the current put ? (I can't think of any, but since this have been there since beginning of time) -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
Re: [Hibernate] TypeFactory old-time bug ?
Its not a bug. It is very correct. Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: Hi guys, Can it be true that TypeFactory should contain: basics.put( byte[].class.getName(), Hibernate.BINARY); and not basics.put( "byte[]", Hibernate.BINARY); The first one put in "B[]". This is both in H2 and H3 (for ages). Is there any usecase for the current put ? (I can't think of any, but since this have been there since beginning of time) -- Gavin King +61 410 534 454 +1 404 822 8349 callto://gavinking Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
RE: [Hibernate] TypeFactory old-time bug ?
You would definitely need the first to properly handle introspected type resolution. For the second, I think they would normally just put "binary" as the type, but I would think an additional "byte[]" type mapping could not hurt. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl Andersen Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:46 AM To: Hibernate development Subject: [Hibernate] TypeFactory old-time bug ? Hi guys, Can it be true that TypeFactory should contain: basics.put( byte[].class.getName(), Hibernate.BINARY); and not basics.put( "byte[]", Hibernate.BINARY); The first one put in "B[]". This is both in H2 and H3 (for ages). Is there any usecase for the current put ? (I can't think of any, but since this have been there since beginning of time) -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
Re: [Hibernate] TypeFactory old-time bug ?
Hi, You would definitely need the first to properly handle introspected type resolution. Ok - i just weren't sure it was used since i couldn't make typename contain the introspected class name. For the second, I think they would normally just put "binary" as the type, but I would think an additional "byte[]" type mapping could not hurt. well - i thought the same and is running with it now. will commit it as such in H3. /max -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl Andersen Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:46 AM To: Hibernate development Subject: [Hibernate] TypeFactory old-time bug ? Hi guys, Can it be true that TypeFactory should contain: basics.put( byte[].class.getName(), Hibernate.BINARY); and not basics.put( "byte[]", Hibernate.BINARY); The first one put in "B[]". This is both in H2 and H3 (for ages). Is there any usecase for the current put ? (I can't think of any, but since this have been there since beginning of time) -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
