[Histonet] Microtome calibration

2008-10-31 Thread anhtx




Dear all

Is anyone practising microtome calibration for thickness of sections cut?
Our GLP auditors are frequently asking for it.
They also suggest that automatic tissue processor time in each reagent
should be calibrated.

any comments

Regards
Dr Girish
India

Disclaimer

This message contains legally privileged and/or confidential information. If 
you are not the intended recipient(s), or employee or agent responsible for 
delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email.


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] PIN-4 controls

2008-10-31 Thread Sharon Campbell
Happy Halloween!

Does anyone know of a good PIN-4 control? We are currently using
in-house tissue but are finding a lot of variance with the stainability.
If anyone knows of a good source I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks in advance,

 

 

Sharon Campbell, HTL(ASCP)CM, BSBM

Histology Supervisor

Celligent Diagnostics, LLC

Formerly Pathology Associates Services

101 East W.T. Harris Blvd, Suite 1212

Charlotte, NC  28262

(704) 549-8444 x104

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] pronase vs. proteinase-k

2008-10-31 Thread Kimberly Tuttle
Are they the same ?

Kimberly C. Tuttle  HT (ASCP)
Pathology Biorepository and Research Core
University of Maryland 
Room NBW58, UMMC
22 S. Greene St
Baltimore, MD 21201
(410) 328-5524
(410) 328-5508 fax 


 

This e-mail and any accompanying attachments may be privileged, confidential, 
contain protected health information about an identified patient or be 
otherwise protected from disclosure. State and federal law protect the 
confidentiality of this information. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient; you are prohibited from using, disclosing, reproducing or 
distributing this information; you should immediately notify the sender by 
telephone or e-mail and delete this e-mail.


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] anti-mouse ferritin

2008-10-31 Thread Kim Merriam
Hi,
 
Any recommedations for anti-mouse ferritin antibodies (looking to stain FFPE 
mouse tissue).
 
Thanks,
Kim

Kim Merriam, MA, HT(ASCP)QIHC
Cambridge, MA



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Microtome calibration

2008-10-31 Thread Dr. med. Frauke Neff

Dear Dr. Girish,
I agree with rene, if the qualitiy of the cuts is fine it doesn't matter if they
 are 1µm or 2.3µm thick.
But I'm highly interested in how your GLP auditors want to calibrate the
thickness of the section cuts. Are you supposed to measure the slides after
cutting?! Before or after stretching in the water bath?! If they have a
protocol how to do this I would be happy if they can share it with us.

Frauke


Quoting Rene J Buesa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Dr. Girish:

 BOTH requirements are rubbish invented by bureaucrats with lots of time in
 their hands and trying to appear concerned and knowledgeable.

 Thickness is not necessary as long as the section is diagnostically useful or
 if some quantitative method as to the intensity is done in which case
 thickness = amount of matter, and would influence the outcome of the
 quantitative process.

 Timing the tissue processor is also totally irrelevant because it does not
 really matter a few minutes each way during a processing protocol. More
 important would be to keep a record of the fixation time that is the only
 step really critical in tissue processing.

 René J.

 --- On Fri, 10/31/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Histonet] Microtome calibration
 To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 2:49 AM



 Dear all

 Is anyone practising microtome calibration for thickness of sections cut?
 Our GLP auditors are frequently asking for it.
 They also suggest that automatic tissue processor time in each reagent
 should be calibrated.

 any comments

 Regards
 Dr Girish
 India





 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Microtome calibration

2008-10-31 Thread Rene J Buesa
Frauke:
That calibration is ussually done by measuring the advance mechanism of the 
block holder and how many µm the block moves towards the blade, but that is 
rubbish.
René J.

--- On Fri, 10/31/08, Dr. med. Frauke Neff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From: Dr. med. Frauke Neff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Microtome calibration
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 9:41 AM

Dear Dr. Girish,
I agree with rene, if the qualitiy of the cuts is fine it doesn't matter if
they
 are 1µm or 2.3µm thick.
But I'm highly interested in how your GLP auditors want to calibrate the
thickness of the section cuts. Are you supposed to measure the slides after
cutting?! Before or after stretching in the water bath?! If they have a
protocol how to do this I would be happy if they can share it with us.

Frauke


Quoting Rene J Buesa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Dr. Girish:

 BOTH requirements are rubbish invented by bureaucrats with
lots of time in
 their hands and trying to appear concerned and knowledgeable.

 Thickness is not necessary as long as the section is diagnostically useful
or
 if some quantitative method as to the intensity is done in which case
 thickness = amount of matter, and would influence the outcome of the
 quantitative process.

 Timing the tissue processor is also totally irrelevant because it does not
 really matter a few minutes each way during a processing protocol. More
 important would be to keep a record of the fixation time that is the only
 step really critical in tissue processing.

 René J.

 --- On Fri, 10/31/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Histonet] Microtome calibration
 To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 2:49 AM



 Dear all

 Is anyone practising microtome calibration for thickness of sections cut?
 Our GLP auditors are frequently asking for it.
 They also suggest that automatic tissue processor time in each reagent
 should be calibrated.

 any comments

 Regards
 Dr Girish
 India





 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.





___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Microtome calibration

2008-10-31 Thread Pamela Marcum
We have a GLP person who is not familiar with Histology at all.  We have had
to educate her about these issues and may other things.  Calibration finally
came down to having a PM on the units every year.  After she understood all
the things we do with a section during the cutting phase and pick up that
would alter a true measurement. 

We also do MMA sections on the microtome and even those are next to
impossible to measure due to some stretching of the section during pick up
and drying.  Oh Yes, the drying of the slides really put her in a tail spin
as this was just not allowing the sections to stay the same as when they
were picked up.  

Sometimes a long talk and demonstration is the only way to make the point
that we are not standardized like clinical chemistry etc.  

Pamela A Marcum
University of Pennsylvania 
School of Veterinary Medicine
Comparative Orthopedic Laboratory (CORL)
382 W Street Rd
Kennett Square PA 19438
610-925-6278

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 10:08 AM
To: Dr. med. Frauke Neff
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Microtome calibration

Frauke:
That calibration is ussually done by measuring the advance mechanism of the
block holder and how many µm the block moves towards the blade, but that is
rubbish.
René J.

--- On Fri, 10/31/08, Dr. med. Frauke Neff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

From: Dr. med. Frauke Neff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Microtome calibration
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 9:41 AM

Dear Dr. Girish,
I agree with rene, if the qualitiy of the cuts is fine it doesn't matter if
they
 are 1µm or 2.3µm thick.
But I'm highly interested in how your GLP auditors want to calibrate the
thickness of the section cuts. Are you supposed to measure the slides after
cutting?! Before or after stretching in the water bath?! If they have a
protocol how to do this I would be happy if they can share it with us.

Frauke


Quoting Rene J Buesa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Dr. Girish:

 BOTH requirements are rubbish invented by bureaucrats with
lots of time in
 their hands and trying to appear concerned and knowledgeable.

 Thickness is not necessary as long as the section is diagnostically useful
or
 if some quantitative method as to the intensity is done in which case
 thickness = amount of matter, and would influence the outcome of the
 quantitative process.

 Timing the tissue processor is also totally irrelevant because it does not
 really matter a few minutes each way during a processing protocol. More
 important would be to keep a record of the fixation time that is the only
 step really critical in tissue processing.

 René J.

 --- On Fri, 10/31/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Histonet] Microtome calibration
 To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 2:49 AM



 Dear all

 Is anyone practising microtome calibration for thickness of sections cut?
 Our GLP auditors are frequently asking for it.
 They also suggest that automatic tissue processor time in each reagent
 should be calibrated.

 any comments

 Regards
 Dr Girish
 India





 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.




  
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Polyclonal Proteolipid Protein Ab?

2008-10-31 Thread Patten, Nicole (NIH/NIAAA) [F]
I have been (unsuccessfully) trying to find a polyclonal antibody
against human proteolipid protein (stains myelin) that will work with
immunofluorescence on FFPE sections. I have also tried some myelin basic
protein with no luck. Has anyone found any in the past that have
worked?? 
Thanks!

 

Nicole J. Patten
Post-Baccalaureate Fellow/IRTA
NIAAA/National Institutes of Health

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Formalin and Xylene Monitoring Badges

2008-10-31 Thread Sandra Cheasty
Happy Halloween...  I'm looking for a source of monitoring badges for formalin 
and xylene, both the 8 hour TWA and the STEL.

Thank you, Sandy



Sandra Cheasty

Histology Supervisor

UW-Madison

School of Veterinary Medicine

608 263-1680

















___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Formalin and Xylene Monitoring Badges

2008-10-31 Thread Kathleen Boozer
ASSAY TECHNOLOGY
1252 Quarry Lane
Pleasanton, CA  94566
1-800-833-1258 

 Sandra Cheasty [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/31/2008 08:51 
Happy Halloween...  I'm looking for a source of monitoring badges for formalin 
and xylene, both the 8 hour TWA and the STEL.

Thank you, Sandy



Sandra Cheasty

Histology Supervisor

UW-Madison

School of Veterinary Medicine

608 263-1680

















___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] RE: Formalin and Xylene Monitoring Badges

2008-10-31 Thread Blazek, Linda
Try Mercedes Medical.
http://www.mercedesmedical.com/


Linda Blazek HT (ASCP)
Manager/Supervisor
GI Pathology of Dayton
7415 Brandt Pike
Huber Heights, OH 45424
Phone: (937) 293-4424 ext 7118
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sandra Cheasty
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:52 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Formalin and Xylene Monitoring Badges

Happy Halloween...  I'm looking for a source of monitoring badges for formalin 
and xylene, both the 8 hour TWA and the STEL. 

Thank you, Sandy

 

Sandra Cheasty

Histology Supervisor

UW-Madison 

School of Veterinary Medicine

608 263-1680

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Formalin and Xylene Monitoring Badges

2008-10-31 Thread Michele Wich
Morphix Technologies
www.morphtec.com
757-431-2260

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathleen
Boozer
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:22 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu; Sandra Cheasty
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Formalin and Xylene Monitoring Badges

ASSAY TECHNOLOGY
1252 Quarry Lane
Pleasanton, CA  94566
1-800-833-1258

 Sandra Cheasty [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/31/2008 08:51 
Happy Halloween...  I'm looking for a source of monitoring badges for
formalin and xylene, both the 8 hour TWA and the STEL.

Thank you, Sandy



Sandra Cheasty

Histology Supervisor

UW-Madison

School of Veterinary Medicine

608 263-1680

















___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

This communication is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may 
contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from 
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any 
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited.  Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender 
immediately and delete it from his or her computer

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Re: bone marrow biopsies

2008-10-31 Thread Robert Richmond
Cindi Robinson replied to me offline, saying some of the things Vinnie
della Speranza also said. I wasn't aware that hydrochloric acid
decalcification (I assume that regular brand-name Decal is HCl) with
prompt timing degraded IHC - something I guess that every lab has to
determine for themselves. Is formic acid the decalcifier of choice for
marrow cores? (One more reason to be using properly identified
chemicals, and not secret proprietary mixtures, as John Kiernan has so
often stressed on this list.)

Repeating what I said before, I think that communication between
histotechnologists and pathologists, and between pathologists and
oncologists, is essential here. How often is overnight turnaround
critical to patient care? Can the oncologists do biopsies earlier in
the day when they need overnight turnaround?

Actually, this isn't the worst communication problem I've seen among
these groups of people. Even more serious is getting co-operation
among all parties in getting marrow smears done right. In many
services I've worked in, it's almost unheard of to get a marrow
specimen with properly prepared and adequately stained smears. The
procedure requires constant attention to detail, and frequent training
of new workers by experienced technologists and - dare I say it? -
pathologists.

Bob Richmond
Samurai Pathologist
Knoxville TN

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet