[Histonet] ThinPrep staining

2017-02-01 Thread Mike Toole via Histonet
Hi Charles,

The only concern mentioned was the intensity of and distribution of the OG. OG 
and EA are interdependent in the pap stain and it may just be a matter of 
adjusting the times for OG and EA.

A good book on the topic that I recommend is "Cytopreparation, Principles and 
Practice" by Gary Gill. It contains an entire chapter dedicated to the pap 
stain.

https://www.amazon.com/Cytopreparation-Principles-Practice-Essentials-Cytopathology/dp/1461449324


Mike


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Thinprep staining

2017-01-31 Thread Charles Riley via Histonet
The pathologists at my office keep asking me to fix the thin prep staining.
This is not part of my expertise as I was only given about 10 minutes worth
of cytoprep training in school. If anyone out there can offer any
assistance for the problem it would be greatly appreciated. Here is what
they have said is occurring:

"The Orange G staining is too light and inconsistently distributed across
the slide.

I have also noticed some perinuclear artifacts such as perinuclear
clearing."

Thanks in advance for your help


-- 

Charles Riley HT(ASCP)CM

Histopathology Coordinator/ Mohs
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] ThinPrep

2013-09-12 Thread White, Lisa M.
Does anyone know a CAP regulation for validation of ThinPrep?

 

Lisa White HT(ASCP)

Supervisory HT

James H. Quillen VAMC

Corner of Veterans Way and Lamont

VAMC Warehouse BLDG. 205

PO Box 4000
PLMS 113

Mountain Home, TN 37684

423-979-3567

423-979-3401 fax

 

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] thinprep

2011-09-09 Thread tahseen
We want to purchase a latest model machine for thin prep/sure path along
with an auto stainer for pap.stain.
Can you share your experience regarding both types of machines,
1) Which type of system is best
2)which machine will provide an auto stainer
3)which model of the recommended machine is best
4)will they arrange for training of cytotechnologist and pathologist for
processing and reportting of specimen
5)which company is providing best after sale service
Thanks



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] ThinPrep 2000

2011-08-04 Thread Bryan Watson
We are looking into using a ThinPrep 2000 instrument for our urine cytologies. 
A rep from Hologic told my manager these can also be used to do FISH on urines 
as well. I am wondering if anyone uses the ThinPrep 2000 for this purpose and 
if so, how well do you like it?
Thanks,
Bryan
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] ThinPrep 2000

2011-08-04 Thread Ghazal.Khan
I know of a lab where I work sometimes (on call) they use thin prep 2000
and do the fish studies on the sample. I think it's working for them.
The lab name is Uro partners.

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Bryan
Watson
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:35 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] ThinPrep 2000

We are looking into using a ThinPrep 2000 instrument for our urine
cytologies. A rep from Hologic told my manager these can also be used to
do FISH on urines as well. I am wondering if anyone uses the ThinPrep
2000 for this purpose and if so, how well do you like it?
Thanks,
Bryan
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
If the reader of this e-mail message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
notify the sender and destroy all copies of the transmittal. 

Thank you
University of Chicago Medical Center 


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] ThinPrep

2011-07-29 Thread Bryan Watson
Does anyone know if the ThinPrep system has a reagent rental program available, 
rather than just purchasing the instrument?
Thanks
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] ThinPrep vs. SurePath

2010-11-23 Thread Feher, Stephen
Hi Jennifer,

I have used both systems, as a cytotech, processing tech, and as a
supervisor.  As a cytotech, there is less area of the slide to have to
review so from that viewpoint it seems more efficient.  The drawback for
me was the size of the cells.  For Gyn specimens, very small high grade
cells can be difficult to detect without some sort of computer assisted
system. The Focal Point system was supposed to provide this assistance
but I found it somewhat unreliable.  This was further complicated by the
Focal Point being about 50% accurate in detecting endocervical cells.
Labs that allowed specimens that automatically signed out cases the
Focal Point deemed at the lowest risk for abnormal cells frequently had
clinicians repeating paps due to there being no endocervical material
detected.  I found that non-gyn specimens processed using SurePath were
very difficult for inexperienced techs and many pathologists simply did
not trust that they were getting the appropriate sampling of cells.
Very experienced cytotechs and some pathologists preferred SurePath for
non-gyns but they are in the minority and I found them difficult and
time consuming to review.  As a processing tech, SurePath was very time
consuming and if a lab has any kind of volume at all, had to have at
least 2 technicians dedicated to nothing but processing them.

ThinPrep has a larger are to look at and those techs who are used to
SurePath do not like to review them because the cells are quite a bit
larger, and if doing manual screening, takes a bit longer to review.
Use of the ThinPrep Imager has cut screening time down considerably.
Time and statistical analysis has shown that the Imager is a very
reliable instrument for indicating those areas of the slide where
abnormal cells may be found.  Criticism has been that the Imager
sometimes misses cells with HPV and viral  effect.  Even so, the primary
focus of many labs is to properly detect and report high grade lesions
and for this the Imager is reliable.  For me, non-gyn specimens were
easier to review and displayed a good distribution of cells.  A good
many pathologists agree and are confident that the cell sampling
adequate.  As a processing tech, ThinPrep processing takes less time and
less personnel than SurePath.  If the T-5000 processor is ever released
by the FDA for use in the US for gyn specimens, this time will be
further reduced.

In the end, the smaller cell distribution size offered by SurePath,
while seemingly more efficient, requires more time to review for many
techs due to the small size of the cells.  ThinPrep currently offers a
better solution to a majority of labs in terms of accuracy, time to
prepare, and Imaging.  

Hope this was helpful.


Steve

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Jennifer
MacDonald
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:20 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] ThinPrep vs. SurePath

Does anyone have an opinion as to why there seems to be many more
ThinPreps out there than Sure Path?  The SurePath seems more efficient,
but I might be missing something.
Thank you,
Jennifer MacDonald
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] ThinPrep vs. SurePath

2010-11-10 Thread Jennifer MacDonald
Does anyone have an opinion as to why there seems to be many more 
ThinPreps out there than Sure Path?  The SurePath seems more efficient, 
but I might be missing something.
Thank you,
Jennifer MacDonald
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet