re: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence on FFPE skin

2013-03-21 Thread Hobbs, Carl
To me, the critical data is:  which Abs do you want to use on FFPWS of skin, 
please?
If you do chromogen IHC on your skins already, with them Abs, you can do IF.

Sure, autofluorescence can be a problem but..not that big a problem.

Interestedly,

Carl
NB: that article is..strange.

Carl Hobbs FIBMS
Histology and Imaging Manager
Wolfson CARD
School of Biomedical Sciences
Kings College London
Guys Campus
SE1 1UL
Tel: 020 78486813
Fax: 020 78486816
020 78486813




___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence in the clinical laboratory, some questions

2012-05-12 Thread Patrick Laurie
Hi Gayle,

We perform IF on renal biopsies and dermatological specimens with various
bullous disorders.  We perform IgA, IgM, IgG, C3, C1q, Albumin, Fibrinogen,
Kappa and Lambda on acetone fixed frozen sections.  These are all direct
IF.  We perform C4D indirectly on frozen tissue due to the lack of staining
intensity of any directly conjugated antibodies, as well as C4D IF on FFPE
tissue and we also perform IHC C4D on FFPE.  Our pathologist's usual
comments about the reason that they like the immunofluorescence is that
they can easily see smaller deposits using immunofluorescence that would be
indeterminate with conventional IHC.

We use an automated stainer for these, it allows us to be more hands off as
well as to incubate them in the dark.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, gayle callis gayle.cal...@bresnan.netwrote:

 Dear Histonetters,



 I know that immunofluorescence has been done for decades on renal biopsies,
 but am curious if laboratories are using IF more these days?   If so, I
 would be very interested to talk to you one on one about this as I have
 more
 questions on why you deviate from standard chromogenic enzyme
 immunohistochemistry and perform IF.   Comments about renal biopsy
 procedures are welcome too.



  Also, do you do mostly single IF or double IF, and the reasons why?   Is
 your IF done primarily on FFPE or frozen sections/acetone fixation?



 When you do immunofluorescence in your clinical laboratory are you using an
 automated stainer or a manual protocol?   Or is your clinical laboratory
 associated with medical research groups?



 Any comments/information is most welcome.



 Thanks..



 Gayle M. Callis

 HTL/HT/MT(ASCP)

 Bozeman MT





 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




-- 
Patrick Laurie HT(ASCP)QIHC
CellNetix Pathology  Laboratories
1124 Columbia Street, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98104
plau...@cellnetix.com
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] immunofluorescence mounting medium?

2012-03-05 Thread Wen,Yujie
http://www.vectorlabs.com/catalog.aspx?catID=279

VECTASHIELD Mounting Media for Fluorescence

This one works for me and was recommended by Leica technical support for oil 
immersion image.

 Original Message 
From: Collette, Nicole M.
Sent: Mon, Mar 5, 2012 12:35 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
CC:
Subject: [Histonet] immunofluorescence mounting medium?


Hello, Esteemed Histonetters,

I am trying to get nice publication-quality images of my immunofluorescent 
tissue sections. I am currently using Prolong Gold, and after I let the stuff 
cure for several days, my 100X oil-immersion images are still smeary, even 
after taking into account the unevenness of the tissue section. I don't seem to 
have this problem with colorimetric stains (histological stains, LacZ, etc.), 
so I am thinking the mounting medium is part of the problem? It seems to me 
that it never fully cures at the middle of the coverslip… Does anyone have a 
recommendation for a mounting medium that works better for this purpose? Any 
advice is appreciated.

Thanks in advance, and Happy Monday!

Sincerely,
Nicole Collette
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
collet...@llnl.gov
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence

2012-02-07 Thread Leiker, Merced
Paraffin does indeed give a lot of autofluorescence. We use a solution of 0.3% 
Sudan Black in 70% Ethanol for 10 minutes on the tissues to help with that 
after the staining. It doesn't mask the autofluorescence completely but reduces 
it enough to give us good contrast of signal against the background. Mostly we 
look at cardiac tissue. Maybe someone will have a better idea for brain...

Regards,
Merced

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Natalia 
Fernandez
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:35 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence


Hi everybody!
I have a problem with my experiment.
 
I try to do immunofuorescences in old human brains (parafine sections).
First I thought that the too much colocalisation was due to my antibodies 
(primary or secondary).
After several tests (Only 1st antibody, only 2nd one, simple staining, inverse 
simple staining,..) I saw that the tissue itself shows a lot of fluorescence 
(without antibodies, and even after a treatment against lipofuscine (solution 
of Potassium permanganate).
 
So my question is: Do you have the same problem?
Do you think that parafine could be the reason of this autofluorescence?!
What can I do?
 
Thank you so much for your answers :)
Natalia   
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence

2012-02-07 Thread Daniela Bodemer
Hi Natalia,

Human tissue is naturally autofluorescent. In our lab we do immunos on
frozens and quench the AF with chicago blue solution (1g Chicago Sky
Blue 6B-Sigma in 99ml MilliQ plus 1ml DMSO) after washing the secondary
antibodies with PBS (3x). Just load the tissue with a drop of the CB
solution for 15 secs and wash it in PBS again (3x). Mount as usual

D

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Natalia
Fernandez
Sent: Wednesday, 8 February 2012 2:35 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence


Hi everybody!
I have a problem with my experiment.
 
I try to do immunofuorescences in old human brains (parafine sections).
First I thought that the too much colocalisation was due to my
antibodies (primary or secondary).
After several tests (Only 1st antibody, only 2nd one, simple staining,
inverse simple staining,..) I saw that the tissue itself shows a lot of
fluorescence (without antibodies, and even after a treatment against
lipofuscine (solution of Potassium permanganate).
 
So my question is: Do you have the same problem?
Do you think that parafine could be the reason of this
autofluorescence?!
What can I do?
 
Thank you so much for your answers :)
Natalia
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

If you have any question, please contact MCRI IT Helpdesk for further
assistance.
__

__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
__

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence staining/minimizing background staining

2012-02-01 Thread Kim Merriam
Hi,
 
What fluorochromes are you using?  There is a lot of autofluorescence in the 
FITC channel.  Have you looked at an unstained tissues under the scope with 
each filter that you need, that may give you a clue as to where your background 
is coming from.  In addition to an unstained slide, I suggest eliminating the 
primary to see if your secondary is sticking to the tissues.
 
Are you doing single-color or double stains?  If you are getting a lot of 
autofluorescence with one fluorochrome, I would suggest trying a different 
one.  We use alexafluur-647 (far red) a lot because is it fairly clean (ie - 
very little autofluorescence in that channel)

Kim Merriam, MA, HT(ASCP)QIHC
Cambridge, MA



From: Kasai, Miki (NIH/NCI) [E] kas...@mail.nih.gov
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:50 PM
Subject: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence staining/minimizing background staining

Hi,

We are performing some immunofluorescence staining on mouse lung tissue.  We
are getting some nice positive staining with some of our initial antibodies
(procollagen, cytokeratin).

We would like to minimize the amount of background staining we are getting.
We are titering our primary antibodies to find out optimal Ab concentration
as well as the secondary conjugate Ab with the fluorophore of interest.  We
use donkey serum for general blocking.

Any other suggestions?

Much appreciation,
Miki


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence double labeling with two rabbitantibodies

2010-10-12 Thread Anatoli Gleiberman
Aline,
Jackson Immunoresearch provides protocol and reagents that are useful
for solving your problem: 
http://www.jacksonimmuno.com/technical/fab-blok.asp
I have used this approach to localize at the same sample simultaneously
two different isoforms of a transcription factor with two different
mouse monoclonals. Worked for me.

Anatoli Gleiberman, PhD
Director of Histopathology
Cleveland Biolabs, Inc
73 High Street
Buffalo, NY 14203
phone:716-849-6810 ext.354
fax:716-849-6817
e-mail: agleiber...@cbiolabs.com


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Aline
Rodrigues
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:29 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Immunofluorescence double labeling with two
rabbitantibodies

Hello all,
I using formalin fixed paraffin embedded specimens from fetuses from  
sheep to examine which cells are virally infected within the CNS.
I am using IBA-1 to identify microglial cells. The IBA-1 antibody is a  
rabbit antibody and it works really well in my specimens.
At the same time I am also using an antibody against the virus that I  
am studying that is also a rabbit Ab.
For these samples I am using double labeling to determine if cells are  
infected or not.
Both antibodies work, but I can use them together otherwise there is x- 
reaction.
Does anyone has any suggestions of how to label tissues with two  
different antibodies that come from the same species.
On immunoportal someone suggested to use 4%PFA to fix the tissues in  
between the first (primary and secondary Ab) and the second (primary  
and secondary Ab), however it did not work. PFA did not block the  
previously bound Abs.
The other option that I would have would be to use IBA-1 from goat. My  
problem with this antibody coming from goat is that I can have x- 
reaction and moderate background since goat and sheep are very closely  
related.
Please, if someone has any suggestions I would immensely appreciate!
Thank you very much!
I hope you have a wonderful day!
Aline 


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

 


This communication may contain privileged information.  It is intended solely 
for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of this 
information.  If you received this communication in error, please contact the 
sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic 
or hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic information about 
individuals and businesses subject to the restrictions of the 
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.  You may not directly or indirectly reuse or redisclose 
such information for any purpose other than to provide the services for which 
you are receiving the information.

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet