On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:51:08PM +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote: > On 24/01/18 13:32, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > b) DNS naming and delegation in Last Call.
All of it, or just the simple one? I think the timeframe for "simple" is "soonish" and the "real" one from the architecture document might well be "heat death of the universe". Also, I think the "real" one is going to interact badly with a number of security issues, so I am not too convinced that we will be able to do the "real" one without working some on the use cases. > Reasonable points. Do others (dis)agree? Only a little: > other bits of work need to be fully finished - if we know > what kind of keying that'll be used in the final results, > we could make some progress, but I do agree we'd need to I disagree to the extent I agree with the above. That is, I think it is reasonable to work on things as it starts to be clear what else we can rely on. A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
