> #5 The arguments why this is better than DDNS don't convince > me, except for the last one (new RR types). Given that DDNS is > deployed, what's the chances that this would also get traction?
I think that's an important point. I actually asked the very same question back in 2014: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/CBoLV2St-kSW0vQNE4GtKqRQthA/ https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/m3tmE8m1pt11YIB5yAtWUMFlv3c/ The authors integrated the discussion as Section 1.2 of the draft, which is what you are referring to. I'm not sure if I'm convinced by their arguments, I suspect that there's some unstated requirement that I don't undestand. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
