Re: [homenet] homenet naming drafts "terminology"

2021-05-05 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 6. May 2021, at 00:06, Michael Richardson  wrote:
> 
> 
> Ole Troan  wrote:
>> Is this the same as a hidden primary name server?
> 
> That's Stealth Primary.
> The DM is not a stealth primary, because it's not primary.
> It hasn't got the DNSSEC signing keys, for instance.

Distribution hub
Distribution leader
Distribution manager
Distribution head
Distribution director
Distribution controller
Distribution governor
Distribution center
Distribution central

Grüße, Carsten

___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet


Re: [homenet] [Captive-portals] [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications

2020-09-30 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2020-09-30, at 19:16, Michael Richardson  wrote:
> 
> the
> adversary

There may be more than one.
Of course, if you want to attack privacy, being Google or Facebook gives you 
unique opportunities.
That doesn’t mean you don’t want to have a seat belt any more if you have 
lane-keeping assistance.

Grüße, Carsten

___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet


Re: [homenet] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS)

2015-11-18 Thread Carsten Bormann
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Just to clarify, mandatory to implement doesn't mean you have to write the 
>> code.   It means the functionality has to be present in the deployed 
>> implementation so that two communicating partners can be configured to use 
>> it.   
> 
> Um, where is that defined? Is there a BCP that says that?
> 
> I don't think a protocol spec can say that feature X cannot be ifdeffed.
> It can say that a protocol must be capable of X and that implementations
> must therefore be capable of X. But if you tell implementors that they can't
> ifdef unused stuff when building images for highly constrained nodes, I
> don't think they will take you seriously.

Maybe slightly off-topic for homenet, but +1000 for constrained node
networks.

Grüße, Carsten

___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet