Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
Sylvie, I think you should use ArcBruTile it's a plugin for ArcGIS Desktop 10.0/10.1/10.2. I attach the xml corresponding to humanitarian and mapnik as defined in [2] So maybe somebody can upload, so they are web-accesible for others. Best regards Álvaro Monares G. [1] http://arcbrutile.codeplex.com/ [2] http://arcbrutile.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=ArcBruTile%20and%20MapTiler&ANCHOR El 18-04-2014 13:14, Sylvie De Laborderie escribió: And one more question : do you know how to use the humanitarian Basemap with ArcGIS ? Do you have a wms link ? Many thanks, Sylvie Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:11:10 +0100 From: pierz...@yahoo.fr To: s_delaborde...@cartong.org; hot@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF Thanks Sylvie for this feedback from MSF. And thanks to CartONG who has assured the interaction with MSF on this. I am please to read that this has helped the humanitarian teams in such a difficult context. The village names file will be of great help. I will discuss with you about this and assure we can update the OpenStreetMap database. Pierre *De :* Sylvie De Laborderie *À :* "hot@openstreetmap.org" *Envoyé le :* Vendredi 18 avril 2014 17h57 *Objet :* [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF Please kindly find feedback from the MSF GIS off. from the field. To all OSM-Hot teams, First of all and once again, we would like to send a big THANK YOU to every single one of you. Your work is a gift to us all in the field. Building-scale mapping for such an area is a huge help for our outreach teams, and for many expats newly arrived and needing a briefing on how the outbreak is evolving. Finding remote localities and access to them is often a race against time as a few hours can make a serious difference, not only for patients, but also to arrive in time to prevent new contacts to happen and keep the outbreak from spreading further. Cross-checking between local knowledge and OSM maps allows us to work much faster Regarding locality names, we were able to acquire through various field trip with GPS devices a confirmed database of localities covering the sub-prefectures of Gueckedou-Centre, Temessadou-Dibo, and Guedembou. Thought this might be a nice input for you guys, to come as support to your amazing work. This data can be freely shared as long as credited to MSF-CH. There might be still some minor confirmations/changes to make, especially in remote/inaccessible areas, but these places have been taken directly by GPS on the field, and confirmed with local inhabitants. Hope this helps. One more time: thanks! JG ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot";> OSM Humanitarian EPSG:4326 http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/0"; units-per-pixel="0.70312500" order="0"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/1"; units-per-pixel="0.35156250" order="1"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/2"; units-per-pixel="0.17578125" order="2"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/3"; units-per-pixel="0.087890625000" order="3"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/4"; units-per-pixel="0.043945312500" order="4"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/5"; units-per-pixel="0.021972656250" order="5"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/6"; units-per-pixel="0.010986328125" order="6"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/7"; units-per-pixel="0.0054931640625000" order="7"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/8"; units-per-pixel="0.0027465820312500" order="8"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/9"; units-per-pixel="0.0013732910156250" order="9"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/10"; units-per-pixel="0.0006866455078125" order="10"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/11"; units-per-pixel="0.00034332275390625000" order="11"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/12"; units-per-pixel="0.00017166137695312500" order="12"/> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/13"; units-per-pixel="0.8583
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
For these Center towns with some services, I think that we should assure to have place=town. Pierre De : Andrew Buck À : Sylvie De Laborderie ; "hot@openstreetmap.org" Envoyé le : Samedi 19 avril 2014 15h05 Objet : Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, so the "Center" actually does have a meaning then and should stay as part of the name in the database. We may want to tag these towns with an additional tag and then maybe possibly remove the 'Center' from the actual name since there would be another way to distinguish these. Are these actually the seat of government for the sub-prefectures? If so, should we tag them as such and possibly remove the 'center' part of the name? - -AndrewBuck On 04/19/2014 05:18 AM, Sylvie De Laborderie wrote: > In most of the cases if a name contains "Center" is that it is > Temessadou Centre in Temessadou sub-prefecture , as opposed to > other villages in the same prefecture is calling also Temessadou. > Centre or Center : main city > > Hope it helps. > > > Sylvie de LaborderieGIS OfficerCartONG+33 7 87 05 43 92+33 4 79 26 > 28 82www.cartong.org > >> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:10:46 -0500 From: >> andrew.r.b...@gmail.com To: hot@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: >> [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF >> > Ok, I have finished merging in the names from the shapefile you > sent me. The changeset for the merge is listed below. I added > source=MSF-CH to both the changeset and the nodes themselves (maybe > a bit redundant but that was what I did). The changeset consisted > of 193 new place names to add, 176 existing nodes that are either > moved to a new position or had their tags changed or both (and 4 > nodes I deleted, 2 were correct 2 need to be undeleted as I seem to > have accidentally deleted them somehow). Thanks to Paul Norman and > Jaakkoh for helping me with the undelet work. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21788686 > > In total there were 358 objects in the shapefile you sent me. I > manually checked each one and for any that had nothing at all in > OSM already I just dumped them straight in. For the ones that > already had a name in OSM spelled identically I just merged the > nodes so that the position is taken from the MSF node and any old > tags like alt_name or the GNS unique feature ID get copied over > (this lets you cross reference your own database against the GNS > database if you want). > > There were about 100 or so towns which had entries already in OSM > with slightly different spellings, in these cases I just merged the > nodes and switched the OSM spelling to alt_name and used your names > for the name=* field (except for a few cases where the accenting > was better on the OSM version so I kept that in name and added > yours as an alt_name). > > There were about 10 or so places where OSM already had a town name > but that name was very different from the MSF name. In these cases > I kept both nodes and added a 'fixme' and 'note' tag to explain > the situation. Those towns can be found in the query below. It > would be good if someone from MSF could have a look through these > and see if they can fix any of them. The query below will pull in > all of these nodes plus all place nodes within 500 meters of them > so you can see the towns that were already in OSM that got me > confused. If you click the 'export' button at teh top you can load > the data from this overpass query directly into josm through the > remote control by clicking the 'josm' link on the export window > that pops up. > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36P > > The only question I had was regarding some of the names you > provided. About 10 or so had a town name followed by the word > 'Center' or 'Centre'. I am wondering if this 'Center' should be > deleted from the name or left as it is. You can see an overpass > query of these nodes at the link below if you want to see the > actual names. > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36R > > So aside from that no major problems. If you want to see all the > names that have been added from MSF (both in this block and the > first ones you gave us for Guekedou) you can see them at the > following query: > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36S > > Thanks for all of this data, it is really interesting to get > results like this back from the field. Not only are your town > names now merged into a much larger database allowing your teams to > more accurately find place names by searching, but they also help > us find mistakes in our own data
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, so the "Center" actually does have a meaning then and should stay as part of the name in the database. We may want to tag these towns with an additional tag and then maybe possibly remove the 'Center' from the actual name since there would be another way to distinguish these. Are these actually the seat of government for the sub-prefectures? If so, should we tag them as such and possibly remove the 'center' part of the name? - -AndrewBuck On 04/19/2014 05:18 AM, Sylvie De Laborderie wrote: > In most of the cases if a name contains "Center" is that it is > Temessadou Centre in Temessadou sub-prefecture , as opposed to > other villages in the same prefecture is calling also Temessadou. > Centre or Center : main city > > Hope it helps. > > > Sylvie de LaborderieGIS OfficerCartONG+33 7 87 05 43 92+33 4 79 26 > 28 82www.cartong.org > >> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:10:46 -0500 From: >> andrew.r.b...@gmail.com To: hot@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: >> [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF >> > Ok, I have finished merging in the names from the shapefile you > sent me. The changeset for the merge is listed below. I added > source=MSF-CH to both the changeset and the nodes themselves (maybe > a bit redundant but that was what I did). The changeset consisted > of 193 new place names to add, 176 existing nodes that are either > moved to a new position or had their tags changed or both (and 4 > nodes I deleted, 2 were correct 2 need to be undeleted as I seem to > have accidentally deleted them somehow). Thanks to Paul Norman and > Jaakkoh for helping me with the undelet work. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21788686 > > In total there were 358 objects in the shapefile you sent me. I > manually checked each one and for any that had nothing at all in > OSM already I just dumped them straight in. For the ones that > already had a name in OSM spelled identically I just merged the > nodes so that the position is taken from the MSF node and any old > tags like alt_name or the GNS unique feature ID get copied over > (this lets you cross reference your own database against the GNS > database if you want). > > There were about 100 or so towns which had entries already in OSM > with slightly different spellings, in these cases I just merged the > nodes and switched the OSM spelling to alt_name and used your names > for the name=* field (except for a few cases where the accenting > was better on the OSM version so I kept that in name and added > yours as an alt_name). > > There were about 10 or so places where OSM already had a town name > but that name was very different from the MSF name. In these cases > I kept both nodes and added a 'fixme' and 'note' tag to explain > the situation. Those towns can be found in the query below. It > would be good if someone from MSF could have a look through these > and see if they can fix any of them. The query below will pull in > all of these nodes plus all place nodes within 500 meters of them > so you can see the towns that were already in OSM that got me > confused. If you click the 'export' button at teh top you can load > the data from this overpass query directly into josm through the > remote control by clicking the 'josm' link on the export window > that pops up. > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36P > > The only question I had was regarding some of the names you > provided. About 10 or so had a town name followed by the word > 'Center' or 'Centre'. I am wondering if this 'Center' should be > deleted from the name or left as it is. You can see an overpass > query of these nodes at the link below if you want to see the > actual names. > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36R > > So aside from that no major problems. If you want to see all the > names that have been added from MSF (both in this block and the > first ones you gave us for Guekedou) you can see them at the > following query: > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36S > > Thanks for all of this data, it is really interesting to get > results like this back from the field. Not only are your town > names now merged into a much larger database allowing your teams to > more accurately find place names by searching, but they also help > us find mistakes in our own data (there were a couple I found that > the topo maps had wrong, or that we had wrongly located), and we > also get alternate spellings on a lot of places to which makes you > more likely to find a place when you search for it in OSM. > > -AndrewBuck > > > > > > On 04/18/2014 12:42 PM,
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
In most of the cases if a name contains "Center" is that it is Temessadou Centre in Temessadou sub-prefecture , as opposed to other villages in the same prefecture is calling also Temessadou. Centre or Center : main city Hope it helps. Sylvie de LaborderieGIS OfficerCartONG+33 7 87 05 43 92+33 4 79 26 28 82www.cartong.org > Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:10:46 -0500 > From: andrew.r.b...@gmail.com > To: hot@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ok, I have finished merging in the names from the shapefile you sent > me. The changeset for the merge is listed below. I added > source=MSF-CH to both the changeset and the nodes themselves (maybe a > bit redundant but that was what I did). The changeset consisted of > 193 new place names to add, 176 existing nodes that are either moved > to a new position or had their tags changed or both (and 4 nodes I > deleted, 2 were correct 2 need to be undeleted as I seem to have > accidentally deleted them somehow). Thanks to Paul Norman and Jaakkoh > for helping me with the undelet work. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21788686 > > In total there were 358 objects in the shapefile you sent me. I > manually checked each one and for any that had nothing at all in OSM > already I just dumped them straight in. For the ones that already had > a name in OSM spelled identically I just merged the nodes so that the > position is taken from the MSF node and any old tags like alt_name or > the GNS unique feature ID get copied over (this lets you cross > reference your own database against the GNS database if you want). > > There were about 100 or so towns which had entries already in OSM with > slightly different spellings, in these cases I just merged the nodes > and switched the OSM spelling to alt_name and used your names for the > name=* field (except for a few cases where the accenting was better on > the OSM version so I kept that in name and added yours as an alt_name). > > There were about 10 or so places where OSM already had a town name but > that name was very different from the MSF name. In these cases I kept > both nodes and added a 'fixme' and 'note' tag to explain the > situation. Those towns can be found in the query below. It would be > good if someone from MSF could have a look through these and see if > they can fix any of them. The query below will pull in all of these > nodes plus all place nodes within 500 meters of them so you can see > the towns that were already in OSM that got me confused. If you click > the 'export' button at teh top you can load the data from this > overpass query directly into josm through the remote control by > clicking the 'josm' link on the export window that pops up. > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36P > > The only question I had was regarding some of the names you provided. > About 10 or so had a town name followed by the word 'Center' or > 'Centre'. I am wondering if this 'Center' should be deleted from the > name or left as it is. You can see an overpass query of these nodes > at the link below if you want to see the actual names. > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36R > > So aside from that no major problems. If you want to see all the > names that have been added from MSF (both in this block and the first > ones you gave us for Guekedou) you can see them at the following query: > > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36S > > Thanks for all of this data, it is really interesting to get results > like this back from the field. Not only are your town names now > merged into a much larger database allowing your teams to more > accurately find place names by searching, but they also help us find > mistakes in our own data (there were a couple I found that the topo > maps had wrong, or that we had wrongly located), and we also get > alternate spellings on a lot of places to which makes you more likely > to find a place when you search for it in OSM. > > - -AndrewBuck > > > > > > On 04/18/2014 12:42 PM, nicolas chavent wrote: > > *Version française infra* > > > > Thanks CartONG, Sylvie and JG for your appreciation of the HOT/OSM > > community support to the response to the ebola outbreak in Guinea > > and surrounding countries by MSF CH, IFRC/ARC and through them WHO, > > Government and NGOs. I am translating this email in French; the > > actions required to make the best use of the field-sruveyed 350 > > features MSF-CH localities database shared with OSM are being > > looked at by some of OSM/HOT coordinators. > > > > > >
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
Many thanks Andrew for this but should the link end with .xml ? Sylvie de LaborderieGIS OfficerCartONG+33 7 87 05 43 92+33 4 79 26 28 82www.cartong.org > Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:22:24 -0500 > From: andrew.r.b...@gmail.com > To: hot@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > We don't have any WMS servers for any of the layers that I am aware > of. Most of the rendered layers are accessible as a TMS tile layer, > which is what google and bing and others use. The TMS url for the HDM > tiles is below (you will need to replace z, x, and y with the proper > values in ArcGIS I assume): > > http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/z/x/y.png > > Hope this works for you. > > Regarding the village names, this is awesome feedback. I will go > through and try to match them all up with the ones we already have in > our database so we get both spellings, etc. Any differences I will > note in the 'note' or 'fixme' tag. > > - -AndrewBuck > > On 04/18/2014 11:14 AM, Sylvie De Laborderie wrote: > > And one more question : do you know how to use the humanitarian > > Basemap with ArcGIS ? Do you have a wms link ? Many thanks, > > > > Sylvie > > > > Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:11:10 +0100 From: pierz...@yahoo.fr To: > > s_delaborde...@cartong.org; hot@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: > > [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF > > > > Thanks Sylvie for this feedback from MSF. And thanks to CartONG who > > has assured the interaction with MSF on this. I am please to read > > that this has helped the humanitarian teams in such a difficult > > context. The village names file will be of great help. I will > > discuss with you about this and assure we can update the > > OpenStreetMap database. Pierre > > > > De : Sylvie De Laborderie À : > > "hot@openstreetmap.org" Envoyé le : > > Vendredi 18 avril 2014 17h57 Objet : [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points > > villages MSF > > > > > > > > > > Please kindly find feedback from the MSF GIS off. from the field. > > > > To all OSM-Hot teams,First of all and once again, we would like to > > send a big THANK YOU to every single one of you. Your work is a > > gift to us all in the field. Building-scale mapping for such an > > area is a huge help for our outreach teams, and for many expats > > newly arrived and needing a briefing on how the outbreak is > > evolving. Finding remote localities and access to them is often a > > race against time as a few hours can make a serious difference, not > > only for patients, but also to arrive in time to prevent new > > contacts to happen and keep the outbreak from spreading further. > > Cross-checking between local knowledge and OSM maps allows us to > > work much fasterRegarding locality names, we were able to acquire > > through various field trip with GPS devices a confirmed database of > > localities covering the sub-prefectures of Gueckedou-Centre, > > Temessadou-Dibo, and Guedembou.Thought this might be a nice input > > for you guys, to come as support to your amazing work. This data > > can be freely shared as long as credited to MSF-CH. There might be > > still some minor confirmations/changes to make, especially in > > remote/inaccessible areas, but these places have been taken > > directly by GPS on the field, and confirmed with local > > inhabitants.Hope this helps. One more time: thanks! JG > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ HOT mailing list > > HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > > > > > ___ HOT mailing list > > HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > > > > > > > ___ HOT mailing list > > HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTUV9LAAoJEK7RwIfxHSXbjSsP/2DBr+ayIIVTbQPXhTdyoVnf > souz08eTnFY8vcCrTEW35tjA9v+xNDXh9Y0O5uTkQKvkS+wd4gVESUrpUBmvZopy > vctvgEia1+aOTY5FKrwFQsG/esy5B3bOg76EMFdiEizlPIDQhvqSSsyBVvuhtHlm > HJskwLmtiwZXoWSUzf3KMBj+1hnvqHvilgQtSynQtI1HnpmM2hrsDogUTSFJ2tTs > nWrAf3roj7pjSwLHxckrwocn9tG5U7P3TJNf52dhEwdM/8E4lCLTWiKuVtgFkYFG > vO9itDvm1aSIWkooOefWIr+0QOAY6xp3pnO5xR4B5RtlYThP/mNma9slfKQ8u2Tx &g
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, I have finished merging in the names from the shapefile you sent me. The changeset for the merge is listed below. I added source=MSF-CH to both the changeset and the nodes themselves (maybe a bit redundant but that was what I did). The changeset consisted of 193 new place names to add, 176 existing nodes that are either moved to a new position or had their tags changed or both (and 4 nodes I deleted, 2 were correct 2 need to be undeleted as I seem to have accidentally deleted them somehow). Thanks to Paul Norman and Jaakkoh for helping me with the undelet work. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21788686 In total there were 358 objects in the shapefile you sent me. I manually checked each one and for any that had nothing at all in OSM already I just dumped them straight in. For the ones that already had a name in OSM spelled identically I just merged the nodes so that the position is taken from the MSF node and any old tags like alt_name or the GNS unique feature ID get copied over (this lets you cross reference your own database against the GNS database if you want). There were about 100 or so towns which had entries already in OSM with slightly different spellings, in these cases I just merged the nodes and switched the OSM spelling to alt_name and used your names for the name=* field (except for a few cases where the accenting was better on the OSM version so I kept that in name and added yours as an alt_name). There were about 10 or so places where OSM already had a town name but that name was very different from the MSF name. In these cases I kept both nodes and added a 'fixme' and 'note' tag to explain the situation. Those towns can be found in the query below. It would be good if someone from MSF could have a look through these and see if they can fix any of them. The query below will pull in all of these nodes plus all place nodes within 500 meters of them so you can see the towns that were already in OSM that got me confused. If you click the 'export' button at teh top you can load the data from this overpass query directly into josm through the remote control by clicking the 'josm' link on the export window that pops up. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36P The only question I had was regarding some of the names you provided. About 10 or so had a town name followed by the word 'Center' or 'Centre'. I am wondering if this 'Center' should be deleted from the name or left as it is. You can see an overpass query of these nodes at the link below if you want to see the actual names. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36R So aside from that no major problems. If you want to see all the names that have been added from MSF (both in this block and the first ones you gave us for Guekedou) you can see them at the following query: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/36S Thanks for all of this data, it is really interesting to get results like this back from the field. Not only are your town names now merged into a much larger database allowing your teams to more accurately find place names by searching, but they also help us find mistakes in our own data (there were a couple I found that the topo maps had wrong, or that we had wrongly located), and we also get alternate spellings on a lot of places to which makes you more likely to find a place when you search for it in OSM. - -AndrewBuck On 04/18/2014 12:42 PM, nicolas chavent wrote: > *Version française infra* > > Thanks CartONG, Sylvie and JG for your appreciation of the HOT/OSM > community support to the response to the ebola outbreak in Guinea > and surrounding countries by MSF CH, IFRC/ARC and through them WHO, > Government and NGOs. I am translating this email in French; the > actions required to make the best use of the field-sruveyed 350 > features MSF-CH localities database shared with OSM are being > looked at by some of OSM/HOT coordinators. > > > Merci CartONG, Sylvie et JG pour votre appréciation positive de la > réponse des communautés OSM et HOT en soutien à la réponse à > l'épidémie d'Ebola en Guinée Conakry et dans les pays limitrophes > par MSF CH, ICFRC/ARC et à travers eux l'OMS, les structures > gouvernementales et ONGs. Ci-dessous, une traduction libre/rapide > de votre courriel. Certains des coordinateurs OSM/HOT examinent le > jeu de données terrain de 350 localités collectées par MSF CH et > partagées avec OSM pour en faire le meilleur usage possible. > > > Aux équipes/ communautés OSM et HOT, > > Avant toute chose et une fois de plus, nous voudrions vous > transmettre nos vifs remerciements à chaque individu actif dans > cette réponse de crise. Votre travail est un don pour celles et > ceux engagés dans la réponse sur le terrain. Votre cartographie à > l'échelle du bâti sur de si larges théâtres d'opération est une > aide immense et précieuse pour nos équipes mobiles, ainsi que pour > les nombreux internationaux récemment arrivés et nécessitant un > briefing sur
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
*Version française infra* Thanks CartONG, Sylvie and JG for your appreciation of the HOT/OSM community support to the response to the ebola outbreak in Guinea and surrounding countries by MSF CH, IFRC/ARC and through them WHO, Government and NGOs. I am translating this email in French; the actions required to make the best use of the field-sruveyed 350 features MSF-CH localities database shared with OSM are being looked at by some of OSM/HOT coordinators. Merci CartONG, Sylvie et JG pour votre appréciation positive de la réponse des communautés OSM et HOT en soutien à la réponse à l'épidémie d'Ebola en Guinée Conakry et dans les pays limitrophes par MSF CH, ICFRC/ARC et à travers eux l'OMS, les structures gouvernementales et ONGs. Ci-dessous, une traduction libre/rapide de votre courriel. Certains des coordinateurs OSM/HOT examinent le jeu de données terrain de 350 localités collectées par MSF CH et partagées avec OSM pour en faire le meilleur usage possible. Aux équipes/ communautés OSM et HOT, Avant toute chose et une fois de plus, nous voudrions vous transmettre nos vifs remerciements à chaque individu actif dans cette réponse de crise. Votre travail est un don pour celles et ceux engagés dans la réponse sur le terrain. Votre cartographie à l'échelle du bâti sur de si larges théâtres d'opération est une aide immense et précieuse pour nos équipes mobiles, ainsi que pour les nombreux internationaux récemment arrivés et nécessitant un briefing sur la dynamique notamment spatiale de l'épidémie. Identifier, localiser et accéder à des lieux de peuplement reculés est très souvent une course contre le temps dès lors que quelques heures peuvent faire la différence et pour les patients, et pour arriver à temps de façon à prévenir de nouvelles contaminations et d'enrayer ainsi la propagation de l'épidémie. L'utilisation conjointe des savoirs de terrain mobilisables et des cartes OSM ou produites à partir de données OSM nous a permis de gagner en efficacité, d'améliorer par des gains de temps l'élasticité de notre réponse. A propos des noms de lieux de peuplement, nous avons été acapable de constituer à partir de données terrains collectées au GPS une base de données consolidée de qualité portant sur les noms des localités (lieux de peupelement) des sous-préfectures de Gueckedou-Centre, Temessadou-Dibo, and Guedembou. Nous pensons que cela pourrait être un apport intéressant pour le projet OSM. ce serait notre contribution en support (à notre tour) pour votre remarquable et étonnant travail. Ces données peuvent être librement partagées dans la mesure où elles demeurrent attribuées à MSF-CH. Il se peut qu'il y ait encore des modifications mineures à y apporter, notamment dans les endroits les plus reculés et inaccessibles, mais toutes ces localités ont été relevés au GPS et la toponymie confirmée par certains de leurs habitants. En espérant que cela vous soit d'intérêt. Une fois de plus : merci ! On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Sylvie De Laborderie < s_delaborde...@cartong.org> wrote: > Please kindly find feedback from the MSF GIS off. from the field. > > To all OSM-Hot teams, > First of all and once again, we would like to send a big THANK YOU to > every single one of you. Your work is a gift to us all in the field. > Building-scale mapping for such an area is a huge help for our outreach > teams, and for many expats newly arrived and needing a briefing on how the > outbreak is evolving. Finding remote localities and access to them is often > a race against time as a few hours can make a serious difference, not only > for patients, but also to arrive in time to prevent new contacts to happen > and keep the outbreak from spreading further. Cross-checking between local > knowledge and OSM maps allows us to work much faster > Regarding locality names, we were able to acquire through various field > trip with GPS devices a confirmed database of localities covering the > sub-prefectures of Gueckedou-Centre, Temessadou-Dibo, and Guedembou. > Thought this might be a nice input for you guys, to come as support to > your amazing work. This data can be freely shared as long as credited to > MSF-CH. There might be still some minor confirmations/changes to make, > especially in remote/inaccessible areas, but these places have been taken > directly by GPS on the field, and confirmed with local inhabitants. > Hope this helps. One more time: thanks! > > JG > > > > > > ___ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > -- Nicolas Chavent Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team http://hot.openstreetmap.org/ Mobile (FRA): +33 (0)6 52 40 78 20 Email: nicolas.chav...@hotosm.org Email: nicolas.chav...@gmail.com Skype: c_nicolas Twitter: nicolas_chavent ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We don't have any WMS servers for any of the layers that I am aware of. Most of the rendered layers are accessible as a TMS tile layer, which is what google and bing and others use. The TMS url for the HDM tiles is below (you will need to replace z, x, and y with the proper values in ArcGIS I assume): http://a.tile.openstreetmap.fr/hot/z/x/y.png Hope this works for you. Regarding the village names, this is awesome feedback. I will go through and try to match them all up with the ones we already have in our database so we get both spellings, etc. Any differences I will note in the 'note' or 'fixme' tag. - -AndrewBuck On 04/18/2014 11:14 AM, Sylvie De Laborderie wrote: > And one more question : do you know how to use the humanitarian > Basemap with ArcGIS ? Do you have a wms link ? Many thanks, > > Sylvie > > Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:11:10 +0100 From: pierz...@yahoo.fr To: > s_delaborde...@cartong.org; hot@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: > [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF > > Thanks Sylvie for this feedback from MSF. And thanks to CartONG who > has assured the interaction with MSF on this. I am please to read > that this has helped the humanitarian teams in such a difficult > context. The village names file will be of great help. I will > discuss with you about this and assure we can update the > OpenStreetMap database. Pierre > > De : Sylvie De Laborderie À : > "hot@openstreetmap.org" Envoyé le : > Vendredi 18 avril 2014 17h57 Objet : [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points > villages MSF > > > > > Please kindly find feedback from the MSF GIS off. from the field. > > To all OSM-Hot teams,First of all and once again, we would like to > send a big THANK YOU to every single one of you. Your work is a > gift to us all in the field. Building-scale mapping for such an > area is a huge help for our outreach teams, and for many expats > newly arrived and needing a briefing on how the outbreak is > evolving. Finding remote localities and access to them is often a > race against time as a few hours can make a serious difference, not > only for patients, but also to arrive in time to prevent new > contacts to happen and keep the outbreak from spreading further. > Cross-checking between local knowledge and OSM maps allows us to > work much fasterRegarding locality names, we were able to acquire > through various field trip with GPS devices a confirmed database of > localities covering the sub-prefectures of Gueckedou-Centre, > Temessadou-Dibo, and Guedembou.Thought this might be a nice input > for you guys, to come as support to your amazing work. This data > can be freely shared as long as credited to MSF-CH. There might be > still some minor confirmations/changes to make, especially in > remote/inaccessible areas, but these places have been taken > directly by GPS on the field, and confirmed with local > inhabitants.Hope this helps. One more time: thanks! JG > > > > > > ___ HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > ___ HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > > ___ HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTUV9LAAoJEK7RwIfxHSXbjSsP/2DBr+ayIIVTbQPXhTdyoVnf souz08eTnFY8vcCrTEW35tjA9v+xNDXh9Y0O5uTkQKvkS+wd4gVESUrpUBmvZopy vctvgEia1+aOTY5FKrwFQsG/esy5B3bOg76EMFdiEizlPIDQhvqSSsyBVvuhtHlm HJskwLmtiwZXoWSUzf3KMBj+1hnvqHvilgQtSynQtI1HnpmM2hrsDogUTSFJ2tTs nWrAf3roj7pjSwLHxckrwocn9tG5U7P3TJNf52dhEwdM/8E4lCLTWiKuVtgFkYFG vO9itDvm1aSIWkooOefWIr+0QOAY6xp3pnO5xR4B5RtlYThP/mNma9slfKQ8u2Tx c39WtDQfW4Gfcge4JZjNajqfMA1dRvDXS17HlCER0RrELEAcjUpXABC9A4orec4w NjV7VX3fnv/TjoR7XMfvZjlMG1asIVoeCDaDMLU6YsLaOGMUazr+p8pyzRmtmNYj 6NZemBLKIw6owejw4N40AMZQt1AKaPf7oVQArAkZwUgJJoqHBTVHuOlL7tkSEhEj 8TwL4XLZZqk4wh8ydOh6IueCtnSC5YDNYI5jjqeEjcbaxrs2mT46WYdtdy0dX2KO dVvLn2gVdNYfOiR2UNH1zqFSxvGQQmCDis5oVu55KqJfLvmAEF+UkDZTQu5r08qq VnjMhzU/HT4ZRbOHJ/H1 =3i3m -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
Sylvie, we only have a TMS link. Does somebody know if ArcGIS accepts TMS links? Pierre De : Sylvie De Laborderie À : Pierre Béland ; "hot@openstreetmap.org" Envoyé le : Vendredi 18 avril 2014 18h14 Objet : RE: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF And one more question : do you know how to use the humanitarian Basemap with ArcGIS ? Do you have a wms link ? Many thanks, Sylvie Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:11:10 +0100 From: pierz...@yahoo.fr To: s_delaborde...@cartong.org; hot@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF Thanks Sylvie for this feedback from MSF. And thanks to CartONG who has assured the interaction with MSF on this. I am please to read that this has helped the humanitarian teams in such a difficult context. The village names file will be of great help. I will discuss with you about this and assure we can update the OpenStreetMap database. Pierre De : Sylvie De Laborderie À : "hot@openstreetmap.org" Envoyé le : Vendredi 18 avril 2014 17h57 Objet : [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF Please kindly find feedback from the MSF GIS off. from the field. To all OSM-Hot teams, First of all and once again, we would like to send a big THANK YOU to every single one of you. Your work is a gift to us all in the field. Building-scale mapping for such an area is a huge help for our outreach teams, and for many expats newly arrived and needing a briefing on how the outbreak is evolving. Finding remote localities and access to them is often a race against time as a few hours can make a serious difference, not only for patients, but also to arrive in time to prevent new contacts to happen and keep the outbreak from spreading further. Cross-checking between local knowledge and OSM maps allows us to work much faster Regarding locality names, we were able to acquire through various field trip with GPS devices a confirmed database of localities covering the sub-prefectures of Gueckedou-Centre, Temessadou-Dibo, and Guedembou. Thought this might be a nice input for you guys, to come as support to your amazing work. This data can be freely shared as long as credited to MSF-CH. There might be still some minor confirmations/changes to make, especially in remote/inaccessible areas, but these places have been taken directly by GPS on the field, and confirmed with local inhabitants. Hope this helps. One more time: thanks! JG ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
And one more question : do you know how to use the humanitarian Basemap with ArcGIS ? Do you have a wms link ? Many thanks, Sylvie Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:11:10 +0100 From: pierz...@yahoo.fr To: s_delaborde...@cartong.org; hot@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF Thanks Sylvie for this feedback from MSF. And thanks to CartONG who has assured the interaction with MSF on this. I am please to read that this has helped the humanitarian teams in such a difficult context. The village names file will be of great help. I will discuss with you about this and assure we can update the OpenStreetMap database. Pierre De : Sylvie De Laborderie À : "hot@openstreetmap.org" Envoyé le : Vendredi 18 avril 2014 17h57 Objet : [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF Please kindly find feedback from the MSF GIS off. from the field. To all OSM-Hot teams,First of all and once again, we would like to send a big THANK YOU to every single one of you. Your work is a gift to us all in the field. Building-scale mapping for such an area is a huge help for our outreach teams, and for many expats newly arrived and needing a briefing on how the outbreak is evolving. Finding remote localities and access to them is often a race against time as a few hours can make a serious difference, not only for patients, but also to arrive in time to prevent new contacts to happen and keep the outbreak from spreading further. Cross-checking between local knowledge and OSM maps allows us to work much fasterRegarding locality names, we were able to acquire through various field trip with GPS devices a confirmed database of localities covering the sub-prefectures of Gueckedou-Centre, Temessadou-Dibo, and Guedembou.Thought this might be a nice input for you guys, to come as support to your amazing work. This data can be freely shared as long as credited to MSF-CH. There might be still some minor confirmations/changes to make, especially in remote/inaccessible areas, but these places have been taken directly by GPS on the field, and confirmed with local inhabitants.Hope this helps. One more time: thanks! JG ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF
Thanks Sylvie for this feedback from MSF. And thanks to CartONG who has assured the interaction with MSF on this. I am please to read that this has helped the humanitarian teams in such a difficult context. The village names file will be of great help. I will discuss with you about this and assure we can update the OpenStreetMap database. Pierre De : Sylvie De Laborderie À : "hot@openstreetmap.org" Envoyé le : Vendredi 18 avril 2014 17h57 Objet : [HOT] FW: Message OSM + points villages MSF Please kindly find feedback from the MSF GIS off. from the field. To all OSM-Hot teams, First of all and once again, we would like to send a big THANK YOU to every single one of you. Your work is a gift to us all in the field. Building-scale mapping for such an area is a huge help for our outreach teams, and for many expats newly arrived and needing a briefing on how the outbreak is evolving. Finding remote localities and access to them is often a race against time as a few hours can make a serious difference, not only for patients, but also to arrive in time to prevent new contacts to happen and keep the outbreak from spreading further. Cross-checking between local knowledge and OSM maps allows us to work much faster Regarding locality names, we were able to acquire through various field trip with GPS devices a confirmed database of localities covering the sub-prefectures of Gueckedou-Centre, Temessadou-Dibo, and Guedembou. Thought this might be a nice input for you guys, to come as support to your amazing work. This data can be freely shared as long as credited to MSF-CH. There might be still some minor confirmations/changes to make, especially in remote/inaccessible areas, but these places have been taken directly by GPS on the field, and confirmed with local inhabitants. Hope this helps. One more time: thanks! JG ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
