Re: [HOT] Image offset issue #1515
I thought that perhaps there was another source of imagery for that task, but this doesn't appear to be the case. Mapbox satellite and Bing seem to be aligned. Some of the mapping was done some time ago, so perhaps the Bing imagery was updated in the meantime. There are no GPS tracks in the task area, and very little Strava. I checked some of the change set comments to see if they might indicate what was done and why, but I found nothing of use for this investigation. On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kretzer wrote: > Sorry, with the link it's easier to find: > http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1515#task/30 > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016 um 23:41 Uhr > > Von: Kretzer > > An: "HOT Openstreetmap" > > Betreff: Image offset issue #1515 > > > > Hi, > > I started some tracing in task #1515 (Mochendi, Botswana). I opened a > tile (#30) with all roads and many buildings already in place, all somewhat > offset from the Bing imagery. Between them they were very consistent, so I > figured it would make more sense to align the image than move alle the > existing features. This I did and traced the missing buildings to the > realigned image. > > > > Now this tile is pretty consistent in itself but not to the adjoining > areas. So what next? > > Can someone check the georeferencing of the Bing image? Or should the > whole content be moved to fit to the current imagery? I did not check the > whole area, but many roads seem to be similarly offset and many buildings > aligned to the current Bing imagery. > > > > Thanks! > > K > > (feeling confused at the moment) > > ___ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] Image offset issue #1515
Sorry, with the link it's easier to find: http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1515#task/30 > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016 um 23:41 Uhr > Von: Kretzer > An: "HOT Openstreetmap" > Betreff: Image offset issue #1515 > > Hi, > I started some tracing in task #1515 (Mochendi, Botswana). I opened a tile > (#30) with all roads and many buildings already in place, all somewhat offset > from the Bing imagery. Between them they were very consistent, so I figured > it would make more sense to align the image than move alle the existing > features. This I did and traced the missing buildings to the realigned image. > > Now this tile is pretty consistent in itself but not to the adjoining areas. > So what next? > Can someone check the georeferencing of the Bing image? Or should the whole > content be moved to fit to the current imagery? I did not check the whole > area, but many roads seem to be similarly offset and many buildings aligned > to the current Bing imagery. > > Thanks! > K > (feeling confused at the moment) ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
[HOT] Image offset issue #1515
Hi, I started some tracing in task #1515 (Mochendi, Botswana). I opened a tile (#30) with all roads and many buildings already in place, all somewhat offset from the Bing imagery. Between them they were very consistent, so I figured it would make more sense to align the image than move alle the existing features. This I did and traced the missing buildings to the realigned image. Now this tile is pretty consistent in itself but not to the adjoining areas. So what next? Can someone check the georeferencing of the Bing image? Or should the whole content be moved to fit to the current imagery? I did not check the whole area, but many roads seem to be similarly offset and many buildings aligned to the current Bing imagery. Thanks! K (feeling confused at the moment) ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
