Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Markware Software Services markwaresoftw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, if you need it, I have a Geoserver Instance not doing much at the moment that could be used. geoserver loves geoTiffs. It is trivial to set it up. Just a matter of dropping the Geotiff into a directory, configuring a layer and its ready to go. Its a 2TB 32Gb Ram Ubuntu Trusty Server with lots of bandwidth available. This sounds good to me. In the mean time I have a TileStasch server set up for testing/learning. It sounds like the next step is just get one sample Skybox for Good GeoTiff file for deloyment Mark. There was a blog post that said downloads were offered in MBTile format as well. I have no idea which would be easier to work with. Can we get any random Skybox for Good GeoTiff to get started with? Cheers, Blake Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Blake Girardot bgirar...@gmail.com wrote: Sign me up to help get the map tile server set up and running. I am glad to get it set up and admin it to get started while workflow shakes out. Disclaimer: I have no idea how to do either of the above, but I learn fast. Cheers, Blake On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Mikel Maron mikel.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Hey A few notes from talking this through with Josh * Requests for SkyBox imagery would go through the usual HOT imagery coordination process http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation#Imagery_Coordination * Use of SkyBox imagery for HOT activations would be coordinated through tasking manager projects. * The listing of all SkyBox for good requests is at https://mapsengine.google.com/00979750194450688595-08887688179650036554-4/mapview/?authuser=0 . We'd go through the coordination processes above, if a HOT activation wanted to use existing imagery. * At the moment, there is no tile service. HOT would need to set up tiles from a downloaded GeoTIFF. Hope that clears things up. Btw, would be good to simply set up a test with one of the SkyBox for good GeoTIFFs, to see how it compares with Bing georeferencing and resolution. Best Mikel ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
Hey A few notes from talking this through with Josh * Requests for SkyBox imagery would go through the usual HOT imagery coordination process http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation#Imagery_Coordination* Use of SkyBox imagery for HOT activations would be coordinated through tasking manager projects.* The listing of all SkyBox for good requests is at https://mapsengine.google.com/00979750194450688595-08887688179650036554-4/mapview/?authuser=0. We'd go through the coordination processes above, if a HOT activation wanted to use existing imagery.* At the moment, there is no tile service. HOT would need to set up tiles from a downloaded GeoTIFF. Hope that clears things up. Btw, would be good to simply set up a test with one of the SkyBox for good GeoTIFFs, to see how it compares with Bing georeferencing and resolution. BestMikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:34 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: These are great news for HOT Activations. In the context of the Ebola outbreak, we have large territories to cover in West Africa. There are various areas not yet well covered with high-res imagery. With the sudden resurgence in various areas, we have to try to find rapidly imagery. Imagery could be also helpful to do some prevention mapping in areas at risk, with limitroph regions having a spread of the epidemy. There are areas in east Guinea and West Ivory Coast with no high-res imagery. We have the capacity to mount a tms server. If there are Skymap imagery archives, What would help us is to have access to a catalog of metadata for this imagery and a protocol to request for imagery. regard Pierre De : Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz À : Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com; Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net Cc : hot hot@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Samedi 22 novembre 2014 2h52 Objet : Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery Hi Satoshi, Yes. My fault for delaying this but now done. Hence Josh' announcement. I am happy that: - The provider is aware of what we will do with their imagery and data derived from it. - The provider has given their explicit permission to include derived data into the OSM database. - The proposed attribution mechanism, adding source to tags and/or change sets is practical, (the imagery will only be released in the context of HOT projects). I have also added a new section for HOT under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution . Mike LWG On 22/11/2014 01:15, Satoshi IIDA wrote: Hello, As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html Are there any progress since the discussion? 2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net: Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good program. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current HOT Activation, under the condition that changesets and/or features that are derived from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are attributed to Skybox. That's fantastic news!! Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You? I bet that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-) This could, for example, include the method of attributing Skybox as the source, or a similar method deemed appropriate by HOT. We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down to source (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added imagery_used tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be good to add imagery_used in JOSM with the same behavior as iD, just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set of imagery. -- Pat ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
Thanks Mikel, Once imageries are available for the West Africa countries affected by the Ebola outbreak emergency, we could surely try these to help to the response. Pierre De : Mikel Maron mikel.ma...@gmail.com À : Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr; m...@ayeltd.biz m...@ayeltd.biz; Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com; Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net Cc : hot hot@openstreetmap.org; legal-t...@openstreetmap.org legal-t...@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Mardi 25 novembre 2014 16h56 Objet : Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery Hey A few notes from talking this through with Josh * Requests for SkyBox imagery would go through the usual HOT imagery coordination process http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation#Imagery_Coordination* Use of SkyBox imagery for HOT activations would be coordinated through tasking manager projects.* The listing of all SkyBox for good requests is at https://mapsengine.google.com/00979750194450688595-08887688179650036554-4/mapview/?authuser=0. We'd go through the coordination processes above, if a HOT activation wanted to use existing imagery.* At the moment, there is no tile service. HOT would need to set up tiles from a downloaded GeoTIFF. Hope that clears things up. Btw, would be good to simply set up a test with one of the SkyBox for good GeoTIFFs, to see how it compares with Bing georeferencing and resolution. BestMikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:34 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: These are great news for HOT Activations. In the context of the Ebola outbreak, we have large territories to cover in West Africa. There are various areas not yet well covered with high-res imagery. With the sudden resurgence in various areas, we have to try to find rapidly imagery. Imagery could be also helpful to do some prevention mapping in areas at risk, with limitroph regions having a spread of the epidemy. There are areas in east Guinea and West Ivory Coast with no high-res imagery. We have the capacity to mount a tms server. If there are Skymap imagery archives, What would help us is to have access to a catalog of metadata for this imagery and a protocol to request for imagery. regard Pierre De : Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz À : Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com; Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net Cc : hot hot@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Samedi 22 novembre 2014 2h52 Objet : Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery Hi Satoshi, Yes. My fault for delaying this but now done. Hence Josh' announcement. I am happy that: - The provider is aware of what we will do with their imagery and data derived from it. - The provider has given their explicit permission to include derived data into the OSM database. - The proposed attribution mechanism, adding source to tags and/or change sets is practical, (the imagery will only be released in the context of HOT projects). I have also added a new section for HOT under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution . Mike LWG On 22/11/2014 01:15, Satoshi IIDA wrote: Hello, As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html Are there any progress since the discussion? 2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net: Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good program. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current HOT Activation, under the condition that changesets and/or features that are derived from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are attributed to Skybox. That's fantastic news!! Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You? I bet that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-) This could, for example, include the method of attributing Skybox as the source, or a similar method deemed appropriate by HOT. We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down to source (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added imagery_used tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be good to add imagery_used in JOSM with the same behavior as iD, just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set of imagery. -- Pat
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
Sign me up to help get the map tile server set up and running. I am glad to get it set up and admin it to get started while workflow shakes out. Disclaimer: I have no idea how to do either of the above, but I learn fast. Cheers, Blake On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Mikel Maron mikel.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Hey A few notes from talking this through with Josh * Requests for SkyBox imagery would go through the usual HOT imagery coordination process http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation#Imagery_Coordination * Use of SkyBox imagery for HOT activations would be coordinated through tasking manager projects. * The listing of all SkyBox for good requests is at https://mapsengine.google.com/00979750194450688595-08887688179650036554-4/mapview/?authuser=0. We'd go through the coordination processes above, if a HOT activation wanted to use existing imagery. * At the moment, there is no tile service. HOT would need to set up tiles from a downloaded GeoTIFF. Hope that clears things up. Btw, would be good to simply set up a test with one of the SkyBox for good GeoTIFFs, to see how it compares with Bing georeferencing and resolution. Best Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:34 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: These are great news for HOT Activations. In the context of the Ebola outbreak, we have large territories to cover in West Africa. There are various areas not yet well covered with high-res imagery. With the sudden resurgence in various areas, we have to try to find rapidly imagery. Imagery could be also helpful to do some prevention mapping in areas at risk, with limitroph regions having a spread of the epidemy. There are areas in east Guinea and West Ivory Coast with no high-res imagery. We have the capacity to mount a tms server. If there are Skymap imagery archives, What would help us is to have access to a catalog of metadata for this imagery and a protocol to request for imagery. regard Pierre De : Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz À : Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com; Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net Cc : hot hot@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Samedi 22 novembre 2014 2h52 Objet : Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery Hi Satoshi, Yes. My fault for delaying this but now done. Hence Josh' announcement. I am happy that: The provider is aware of what we will do with their imagery and data derived from it. The provider has given their explicit permission to include derived data into the OSM database. The proposed attribution mechanism, adding source to tags and/or change sets is practical, (the imagery will only be released in the context of HOT projects). I have also added a new section for HOT under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution . Mike LWG On 22/11/2014 01:15, Satoshi IIDA wrote: Hello, As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html Are there any progress since the discussion? 2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net: Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good program. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current HOT Activation, under the condition that changesets and/or features that are derived from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are attributed to Skybox. That's fantastic news!! Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You? I bet that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-) This could, for example, include the method of attributing Skybox as the source, or a similar method deemed appropriate by HOT. We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down to source (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added imagery_used tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be good to add imagery_used in JOSM with the same behavior as iD, just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set of imagery. -- Pat ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ HOT
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
Hi all, if you need it, I have a Geoserver Instance not doing much at the moment that could be used. geoserver loves geoTiffs. It is trivial to set it up. Just a matter of dropping the Geotiff into a directory, configuring a layer and its ready to go. Its a 2TB 32Gb Ram Ubuntu Trusty Server with lots of bandwidth available. Regards Mark Cupitt If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt *See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c* === The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. === On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Blake Girardot bgirar...@gmail.com wrote: Sign me up to help get the map tile server set up and running. I am glad to get it set up and admin it to get started while workflow shakes out. Disclaimer: I have no idea how to do either of the above, but I learn fast. Cheers, Blake On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Mikel Maron mikel.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Hey A few notes from talking this through with Josh * Requests for SkyBox imagery would go through the usual HOT imagery coordination process http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation#Imagery_Coordination * Use of SkyBox imagery for HOT activations would be coordinated through tasking manager projects. * The listing of all SkyBox for good requests is at https://mapsengine.google.com/00979750194450688595-08887688179650036554-4/mapview/?authuser=0 . We'd go through the coordination processes above, if a HOT activation wanted to use existing imagery. * At the moment, there is no tile service. HOT would need to set up tiles from a downloaded GeoTIFF. Hope that clears things up. Btw, would be good to simply set up a test with one of the SkyBox for good GeoTIFFs, to see how it compares with Bing georeferencing and resolution. Best Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:34 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: These are great news for HOT Activations. In the context of the Ebola outbreak, we have large territories to cover in West Africa. There are various areas not yet well covered with high-res imagery. With the sudden resurgence in various areas, we have to try to find rapidly imagery. Imagery could be also helpful to do some prevention mapping in areas at risk, with limitroph regions having a spread of the epidemy. There are areas in east Guinea and West Ivory Coast with no high-res imagery. We have the capacity to mount a tms server. If there are Skymap imagery archives, What would help us is to have access to a catalog of metadata for this imagery and a protocol to request for imagery. regard Pierre De : Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz À : Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com; Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net Cc : hot hot@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Samedi 22 novembre 2014 2h52 Objet : Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery Hi Satoshi, Yes. My fault for delaying this but now done. Hence Josh' announcement. I am happy that: The provider is aware of what we will do with their imagery and data derived from it. The provider has given their explicit permission to include derived data into the OSM database. The proposed attribution mechanism, adding source to tags and/or change sets is practical, (the imagery will only be released in the context of HOT projects). I have also added a new section for HOT under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution . Mike LWG On 22/11/2014 01:15, Satoshi IIDA wrote: Hello, As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html Are there any progress since the discussion? 2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net: Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good program. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
Hello Michael. Thank you for efforts! And congrats! :) the imagery will only be released in the context of HOT projects AFAIK, imagery are now released in geo-tiff format, so target area is very limited. It is very suitable for this context. If they publish more broader area, and published in TMS or other format in future, we should consider such a situation. At least now, I'm very happy to hear this statement. Thanks again! 2014-11-22 16:52 GMT+09:00 Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz: Hi Satoshi, Yes. My fault for delaying this but now done. Hence Josh' announcement. I am happy that: - The provider is aware of what we will do with their imagery and data derived from it. - The provider has given their explicit permission to include derived data into the OSM database. - The proposed attribution mechanism, adding source to tags and/or change sets is practical, (the imagery will only be released in the context of HOT projects). I have also added a new section for HOT under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution . Mike LWG On 22/11/2014 01:15, Satoshi IIDA wrote: Hello, As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html Are there any progress since the discussion? 2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net: Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good http://www.skyboximaging.com/blog/introducing-skybox-for-good program. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current HOT Activation http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation, under the condition that changesets and/or features that are derived from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are attributed to Skybox. That's fantastic news!! Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You? I bet that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-) This could, for example, include the method of attributing Skybox as the source, or a similar method deemed appropriate by HOT. We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down to source (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added imagery_used tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be good to add imagery_used in JOSM with the same behavior as iD, just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set of imagery. -- Pat ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ HOT mailing listHOT@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
These are great news for HOT Activations. In the context of the Ebola outbreak, we have large territories to cover in West Africa. There are various areas not yet well covered with high-res imagery. With the sudden resurgence in various areas, we have to try to find rapidly imagery. Imagery could be also helpful to do some prevention mapping in areas at risk, with limitroph regions having a spread of the epidemy. There are areas in east Guinea and West Ivory Coast with no high-res imagery. We have the capacity to mount a tms server. If there are Skymap imagery archives, What would help us is to have access to a catalog of metadata for this imagery and a protocol to request for imagery. regard Pierre De : Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz À : Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com; Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net Cc : hot hot@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Samedi 22 novembre 2014 2h52 Objet : Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery Hi Satoshi, Yes. My fault for delaying this but now done. Hence Josh' announcement. I am happy that: - The provider is aware of what we will do with their imagery and data derived from it. - The provider has given their explicit permission to include derived data into the OSM database. - The proposed attribution mechanism, adding source to tags and/or change sets is practical, (the imagery will only be released in the context of HOT projects). I have also added a new section for HOT under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution . Mike LWG On 22/11/2014 01:15, Satoshi IIDA wrote: Hello, As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html Are there any progress since the discussion? 2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net: Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good program. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current HOT Activation, under the condition that changesets and/or features that are derived from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are attributed to Skybox. That's fantastic news!! Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You? I bet that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-) This could, for example, include the method of attributing Skybox as the source, or a similar method deemed appropriate by HOT. We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down to source (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added imagery_used tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be good to add imagery_used in JOSM with the same behavior as iD, just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set of imagery. -- Pat ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good http://www.skyboximaging.com/blog/introducing-skybox-for-good program. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current HOT Activation http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation, under the condition that changesets and/or features that are derived from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are attributed to Skybox. That's fantastic news!! Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You? I bet that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-) This could, for example, include the method of attributing Skybox as the source, or a similar method deemed appropriate by HOT. We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down to source (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added imagery_used tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be good to add imagery_used in JOSM with the same behavior as iD, just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set of imagery. -- Pat ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
Hello, As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html Are there any progress since the discussion? 2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net: Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good http://www.skyboximaging.com/blog/introducing-skybox-for-good program. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current HOT Activation http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation, under the condition that changesets and/or features that are derived from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are attributed to Skybox. That's fantastic news!! Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You? I bet that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-) This could, for example, include the method of attributing Skybox as the source, or a similar method deemed appropriate by HOT. We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down to source (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added imagery_used tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be good to add imagery_used in JOSM with the same behavior as iD, just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set of imagery. -- Pat ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
Re: [HOT] Skybox for Good imagery
Hi Satoshi, Yes. My fault for delaying this but now done. Hence Josh' announcement. I am happy that: * The provider is aware of what we will do with their imagery and data derived from it. * The provider has given their explicit permission to include derived data into the OSM database. * The proposed attribution mechanism, adding source to tags and/or change sets is practical, (the imagery will only be released in the context of HOT projects). I have also added a new section for HOT under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution . Mike LWG On 22/11/2014 01:15, Satoshi IIDA wrote: Hello, As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html Are there any progress since the discussion? 2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel ptres...@myuw.net mailto:ptres...@myuw.net: Josh -- As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox for Good http://www.skyboximaging.com/blog/introducing-skybox-for-goodprogram. We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current HOT Activation http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation, under the condition that changesets and/or features that are derived from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are attributed to Skybox. That's fantastic news!! Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You? I bet that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-) This could, for example, include the method of attributing Skybox as the source, or a similar method deemed appropriate by HOT. We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down to source (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added imagery_used tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be good to add imagery_used in JOSM with the same behavior as iD, just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set of imagery. -- Pat ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com mailto:nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot ___ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
