[htdig] static compilation of htdig

2001-01-15 Thread Matthias Kleine 

Hi there!

I tried to give a --static option to configure, but it doen't know this
option. Do I have to edit the Makefile myself or is there another 
possibility for a static compilation. (Machine runs with Linux 2.2.14,
glibc 2.1.3, gcc v2.95.2).

Thanks for any hints,
Matthias 
-- 
-
Matthias Kleine   Phone: ++49-(0)6 11-17 31-624
Patzschke + Rasp Software AG  Fax:   ++49-(0)6 11-17 31-31
Bierstadter Strae 7  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-65189 Wiesbaden Web Site: http://www.prs.de/
-


To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
List archives:  http://www.htdig.org/mail/menu.html
FAQ:http://www.htdig.org/FAQ.html

Re: [htdig] static compilation of htdig

2001-01-15 Thread Geoff Hutchison 

At 11:52 AM +0100 1/15/01, Matthias Kleine wrote:
I tried to give a --static option to configure, but it doen't know this
option. Do I have to edit the Makefile myself or is there another

Any release of 3.1.x or before compiles essentially statically (it 
still links to your libc, for example), but the internal libraries 
like htcommon and htlib are linked statically.

In the 3.2 code, you may link these libraries statically with 
"--disable-shared" as an option to configure. (With all configure 
scripts, you may get a list of options by typing ./configure -?)

If you want to even link against libc statically, you'll have to edit 
the Makefiles.

--
-Geoff Hutchison
Williams Students Online
http://wso.williams.edu/


To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
List archives:  http://www.htdig.org/mail/menu.html
FAQ:http://www.htdig.org/FAQ.html