[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc git dev-5-gb33642e)

2013-10-03 Thread MPI Team 
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.

Snapshot:   hwloc dev-5-gb33642e
Start time: Thu Oct  3 22:27:02 EDT 2013
End time:   Thu Oct  3 22:29:28 EDT 2013

Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador

[hwloc-devel] github hwloc repo reset

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
I chatted w/ Brice in IM: the github/open-mpi/hwloc repo ***has been completely 
reset*** and now reflects all the correct information.

If you have any clones of the original githib/open-mpi/hwloc repo, either be 
*exceedingly* careful in pulling down new stuff, or, probably simpler/better: 
just rm -rf your local clone and pull down a fresh one.

Big apologies to everyone for all this hassle; it was my mistake that caused 
this kerfuffle (bonus to everyone: use kerfuffle in a sentence today).

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [hwloc-devel] New git repo attempt

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Brice Goglin  wrote:

> The master branch looks good to me, and the list of branches looks fine too.

Good.

> v1.7 misses the last git commits, but I guess you didn't update it yet.


Yes; I replayed on the master, but not v1.7 yet.  I'll go do that now...

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [hwloc-devel] New git repo attempt

2013-10-03 Thread Brice Goglin 
Le 03/10/2013 18:07, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> I did the conversion again, and then added the commits that we've put on 
> github since the original conversion (but I squashed most of them).  I put 
> the resulting repo here:
>
> https://github.com/jsquyres/hwloc-convert-again
>
> Does this look ok to everyone?  If so, I can kill the existing 
> githib/open-mpi/hwloc and replace it with this one.
>

The master branch looks good to me, and the list of branches looks fine too.

v1.7 misses the last git commits, but I guess you didn't update it yet.

Brice

[hwloc-devel] New git repo attempt

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
I did the conversion again, and then added the commits that we've put on github 
since the original conversion (but I squashed most of them).  I put the 
resulting repo here:

https://github.com/jsquyres/hwloc-convert-again

Does this look ok to everyone?  If so, I can kill the existing 
githib/open-mpi/hwloc and replace it with this one.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Samuel Thibault 
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 03 Oct 2013 18:01:25 +0200, a écrit :
> I have automatically imported the previous debian uploads.  I don't
> think we really need to keep the detailed commit, the releases have
> brought small diffs enough.

And that permits to switch to another layout which is nicer to handle
with git-buildpackage.

Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Samuel Thibault 
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Thu 03 Oct 2013 12:38:05 +0200, a écrit :
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin  wrote:
> > I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate).
> > But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and
> > give us credentials.
> 
> Done.

I have automatically imported the previous debian uploads.  I don't
think we really need to keep the detailed commit, the releases have
brought small diffs enough.

Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Brice Goglin  wrote:

> It was likely moved to the attic. If svn2git doesn't find it, that's
> fine, I still have it in my archives in case we ever want it (very
> unlikely).


Ah, ok.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Brice Goglin 
Le 03/10/2013 12:37, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
>> The only important one is "cuda".
>> Most other branches were merged, or manually applied to trunk, or are
>> obsolete. Maybe just keep "json" and "valarray" in case we ever need to
>> revive them.
> I just sent a mail to Dave; let's see what he says.
>
> I don't see a valarray branch in SVN -- where is that?

It was likely moved to the attic. If svn2git doesn't find it, that's
fine, I still have it in my archives in case we ever want it (very
unlikely).

Brice

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin  wrote:

> I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate).
> But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and
> give us credentials.

Done.

> The only important one is "cuda".
> Most other branches were merged, or manually applied to trunk, or are
> obsolete. Maybe just keep "json" and "valarray" in case we ever need to
> revive them.

I just sent a mail to Dave; let's see what he says.

I don't see a valarray branch in SVN -- where is that?

> Looks like we're also missing stable branches v0.9, v1.0 and v1.1 for
> some reason.


#$@%@#%$#@$%

I'm re-running the svn->git conversion on my laptop to see if I can figure out 
why these branches didn't make it over.

In the worst case, we can re-seed the hwloc git repo because nothing 
tremendously important has happened since the conversion (we can just replay 
the script update commits -- it'll be a little painful, but do-able).

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/