Re: [hwloc-devel] New git repo attempt

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Brice Goglin  wrote:

> The master branch looks good to me, and the list of branches looks fine too.

Good.

> v1.7 misses the last git commits, but I guess you didn't update it yet.


Yes; I replayed on the master, but not v1.7 yet.  I'll go do that now...

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [hwloc-devel] New git repo attempt

2013-10-03 Thread Brice Goglin 
Le 03/10/2013 18:07, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> I did the conversion again, and then added the commits that we've put on 
> github since the original conversion (but I squashed most of them).  I put 
> the resulting repo here:
>
> https://github.com/jsquyres/hwloc-convert-again
>
> Does this look ok to everyone?  If so, I can kill the existing 
> githib/open-mpi/hwloc and replace it with this one.
>

The master branch looks good to me, and the list of branches looks fine too.

v1.7 misses the last git commits, but I guess you didn't update it yet.

Brice

[hwloc-devel] New git repo attempt

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
I did the conversion again, and then added the commits that we've put on github 
since the original conversion (but I squashed most of them).  I put the 
resulting repo here:

https://github.com/jsquyres/hwloc-convert-again

Does this look ok to everyone?  If so, I can kill the existing 
githib/open-mpi/hwloc and replace it with this one.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/