Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
Wow, that was fast! I'm heading out for the day, but i'll try it first thing in the morning. Thanks :-) On Oct 2, 2012 5:14 PM, "Samuel Thibault" wrote: > Hello, > > Sebastian Kuzminsky, le Wed 03 Oct 2012 01:08:46 +0200, a écrit : > > Here you go (the list server rejected it because it was too big, but this > > compressed version should make it through). > > Thanks! > > There were two bugs which resulted into cpuid not being properly > compiled. I have fixed them in the trunk, could you try again? > > Samuel > ___ > hwloc-users mailing list > hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users >
Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
Hello, Sebastian Kuzminsky, le Wed 03 Oct 2012 01:08:46 +0200, a écrit : > Here you go (the list server rejected it because it was too big, but this > compressed version should make it through). Thanks! There were two bugs which resulted into cpuid not being properly compiled. I have fixed them in the trunk, could you try again? Samuel
Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Sebastian Kuzminsky, le Wed 03 Oct 2012 00:35:48 +0200, a écrit : > > [root@host-183 /home/nfshome/seb/tmp/hwloc-svn]# ./bin/lstopo > > > > > > * CPU cpusets * > > > > cpu 0 (os 0) has cpuset 0x0001 > ... > > cpu 31 (os 31) has cpuset 0x8000 > > Machine#0(local=0KB total=33493800KB Backend=x86 Backend=FreeBSD > OSName=FreeBSD OSRelease=7.3-LROS-sawtooth.master.236 OSVersion="FreeBSD) > cpuset 0xf...f complete 0x online 0xf...f allowed 0xf...f nodeset > 0x0 completeN 0x0 allowedN 0xf...f > > Hum, so there's no actual trace of the x86 detection. Could you post > your config.log? > Here you go (the list server rejected it because it was too big, but this compressed version should make it through). I'm building hwloc on a FreeBSD 7.4 server and executing it on the computer i'm testing, which is running a slightly hacked version of FreeBSD 7.3. config.log.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data
Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
Sebastian Kuzminsky, le Wed 03 Oct 2012 00:35:48 +0200, a écrit : > [root@host-183 /home/nfshome/seb/tmp/hwloc-svn]# ./bin/lstopo > > > * CPU cpusets * > > cpu 0 (os 0) has cpuset 0x0001 ... > cpu 31 (os 31) has cpuset 0x8000 > Machine#0(local=0KB total=33493800KB Backend=x86 Backend=FreeBSD > OSName=FreeBSD OSRelease=7.3-LROS-sawtooth.master.236 OSVersion="FreeBSD) > cpuset 0xf...f complete 0x online 0xf...f allowed 0xf...f nodeset 0x0 > completeN 0x0 allowedN 0xf...f Hum, so there's no actual trace of the x86 detection. Could you post your config.log? Samuel
Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Sebastian Kuzminsky, le Tue 02 Oct 2012 23:47:05 +0200, a écrit : > > I've attached the output from both platforms. > > On freebsd, could you pass --enable-debug to ./configure and rerun > lstopo, to get more debugging information? > > Here's my configure line (and my output is attached): ./configure --disable-libxml2 --disable-cairo --disable-pci --prefix=/home/seb/tmp/hwloc-svn --enable-debug Thanks for looking at my problem :-) debug-lstopo Description: Binary data
Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 02/10/2012 23:45, Sebastian Kuzminsky a écrit : > > Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? > > You're probably not doing anything wrong. The Linux output is indeed OK. > The FreeBSD output is generated by reading cpuid information directly > from the processor, we may need to update this code for recent > processors like yours. > > Thanks Brice! I checked out r4874 of the svn trunk and built it and ran it, and i think the output got less informative: [testlab@host-183 /home/nfshome/seb/tmp/hwloc-svn]$ ./bin/lstopo Machine (32GB) PU L#0 (P#0) PU L#1 (P#1) PU L#2 (P#2) PU L#3 (P#3) PU L#4 (P#4) PU L#5 (P#5) PU L#6 (P#6) PU L#7 (P#7) PU L#8 (P#8) PU L#9 (P#9) PU L#10 (P#10) PU L#11 (P#11) PU L#12 (P#12) PU L#13 (P#13) PU L#14 (P#14) PU L#15 (P#15) PU L#16 (P#16) PU L#17 (P#17) PU L#18 (P#18) PU L#19 (P#19) PU L#20 (P#20) PU L#21 (P#21) PU L#22 (P#22) PU L#23 (P#23) PU L#24 (P#24) PU L#25 (P#25) PU L#26 (P#26) PU L#27 (P#27) PU L#28 (P#28) PU L#29 (P#29) PU L#30 (P#30) PU L#31 (P#31) [testlab@host-183 /home/nfshome/seb/tmp/hwloc-svn]$ ./bin/lstopo --version lstopo 1.6a1
Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
Hello, Sebastian Kuzminsky, le Tue 02 Oct 2012 23:47:05 +0200, a écrit : > I've attached the output from both platforms. On freebsd, could you pass --enable-debug to ./configure and rerun lstopo, to get more debugging information? Samuel
Re: [hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
Le 02/10/2012 23:45, Sebastian Kuzminsky a écrit : > Hi folks, I just discovered hwloc and it's really cool. Very useful, > so thanks! > > I'm trying to understand the hardware layout of a computer I'm working > with, an HP Proliant DL360p G8 server with two Intel E5-2690 processors. > > I'm getting puzzling results from lstopo (from hwloc 1.5). The > results I get in Linux make good sense, but the results I get in > FreeBSD (running on the same hardware) seem wrong. Specifically, > notice how the first 10 CPUs are not assigned to any socket or L1/L2 > cache. Strange! > > I've attached the output from both platforms. > > Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? Hello, You're probably not doing anything wrong. The Linux output is indeed OK. The FreeBSD output is generated by reading cpuid information directly from the processor, we may need to update this code for recent processors like yours. Brice
[hwloc-users] hwloc 1.5, freebsd and linux output on the same hardware
Hi folks, I just discovered hwloc and it's really cool. Very useful, so thanks! I'm trying to understand the hardware layout of a computer I'm working with, an HP Proliant DL360p G8 server with two Intel E5-2690 processors. I'm getting puzzling results from lstopo (from hwloc 1.5). The results I get in Linux make good sense, but the results I get in FreeBSD (running on the same hardware) seem wrong. Specifically, notice how the first 10 CPUs are not assigned to any socket or L1/L2 cache. Strange! I've attached the output from both platforms. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? hwloc-1.5.linux-output Description: Binary data hwloc-1.5.freebsd-output Description: Binary data
