[hwloc-users] Building hwloc for X11 on Mac OS X
I am trying to build the latest stable release of hwloc 1.11.7 for an El Capitan OS X system. I have a working X11 provide via XQuartz. I configure as such: $ configure --prefix= --with-x11 and the configure phase seems to find what it needs: ... checking for X... libraries /usr/X11/lib, headers /usr/X11/include ... checking X11/Xlib.h usability... yes checking X11/Xlib.h presence... yes checking for X11/Xlib.h... yes checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11... yes checking for X11/Xutil.h... yes checking X11/keysym.h usability... yes checking X11/keysym.h presence... yes checking for X11/keysym.h... yes ... The resulting Makefiles all seem to include the necessary -I and -L parts for building against X11 and the make proceeds with nothing unusual. However, launching lstopo always produces the text-based output. I cannot seem to get the X-display features to work. And yes, I am able to launch xterms and other X11-based apps correctly. Thanks, david -- David Gunter CCS-7 Los Alamos National Laboratory ___ hwloc-users mailing list hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
[hwloc-users] Building hwloc for X11 on Mac OS X
I am trying to build the latest stable release of hwloc 1.11.7 for an El Capitan OS X system. I have a working X11 provide via XQuartz. I configure as such: $ configure --prefix= --with-x11 and the configure phase seems to find what it needs: ... checking for X... libraries /usr/X11/lib, headers /usr/X11/include ... checking X11/Xlib.h usability... yes checking X11/Xlib.h presence... yes checking for X11/Xlib.h... yes checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11... yes checking for X11/Xutil.h... yes checking X11/keysym.h usability... yes checking X11/keysym.h presence... yes checking for X11/keysym.h... yes ... The resulting Makefiles all seem to include the necessary -I and -L parts for building against X11 and the make proceeds with nothing unusual. However, launching lstopo always produces the text-based output. I cannot seem to get the X-display features to work. And yes, I am able to launch xterms and other X11-based apps correctly. Thanks, david -- David Gunter CCS-7 Los Alamos National Laboratory ___ hwloc-users mailing list hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
[hwloc-users] Difference in core numbering for output formats
Can anyone explain why I get different outputs for Core IDs when using lstopo’s graphical output versus the text output I get with lstopo —only core? On a dual 10-core Sandy Bridge node I see two sets of cores, with IDs #0,1,2,3,4,8,9,10,11,12. This corresponds with the core IDs I see if I cat /proc/cpuinfo. However, the output from lstopo —only core gives Core L#0 Core L#1 Core L#2 Core L#3 Core L#4 Core L#5 Core L#6 Core L#7 Core L#8 Core L#9 Core L#10 Core L#11 Core L#12 Core L#13 Core L#14 Core L#15 Core L#16 Core L#17 Core L#18 Core L#19 Why would it be different from the previous? Thanks, david -- David Gunter HPC-ENV: Applications Readiness Team Los Alamos National Laboratory ___ hwloc-users mailing list hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
Re: [hwloc-users] Building hwloc for a Cray/KNL system
Samuel, That was the magic flag I needed. I had totally misunderstood wha it meant. Thanks, david -- David Gunter HPC-ENV: Applications Readiness Team Los Alamos National Laboratory > On Jan 27, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > Hello, > > Gunter, David O, on Fri 27 Jan 2017 18:05:44 +, wrote: >> $ aprun -n 1 -L 193 ~hwloc-tt/bin/lstopo-no-graphics > > Does aprun give you allocation of all cores? By default lstopo only > shows the allocated cores. To see all of them, use the --whole-system > option. > > Samuel ___ hwloc-users mailing list hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
[hwloc-users] Building hwloc for a Cray/KNL system
We have a Cray KNL system with hwloc 1.11.2 installed. When executing lstopo on a KNL node, I do not get any info on the cores and threads, the way I do on other Intel cpus. I downloaded and built the latest git version and built it, but it is giving me the same output (shown below). Has anyone successfuly built this for this type of system? $ ./configure —prefix=~/hwloc-tt --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu $ make $ make install $ aprun -n 1 -L 193 ~hwloc-tt/bin/lstopo-no-graphics Machine (110GB total) + Package L#0 Group0(Cluster) L#0 NUMANode L#0 (P#0 23GB) + L2 L#0 (1024KB) + L1d L#0 (32KB) + L1i L#0 (32KB) + Core L#0 + PU L#0 (P#0) NUMANode(MCDRAM) L#1 (P#4 4040MB) Group0(Cluster) L#1 NUMANode L#2 (P#1 24GB) NUMANode(MCDRAM) L#3 (P#5 4040MB) Group0(Cluster) L#2 NUMANode L#4 (P#2 24GB) NUMANode(MCDRAM) L#5 (P#6 4040MB) Group0(Cluster) L#3 NUMANode L#6 (P#3 24GB) NUMANode(MCDRAM) L#7 (P#7 4037MB) Application 2727480 resources: utime ~0s, stime ~0s, Rss ~4548, inblocks ~0, outblocks ~0 (dog@tt-login1 30%) aprun -n 1 -L 193 /usr/bin/lstopo-no-graphics Machine (110GB total) + Package L#0 Group0(Cluster) L#0 NUMANode L#0 (P#0 23GB) + L2 L#0 (1024KB) + L1d L#0 (32KB) + L1i L#0 (32KB) + Core L#0 + PU L#0 (P#0) NUMANode(MCDRAM) L#1 (P#4 4040MB) Group0(Cluster) L#1 NUMANode L#2 (P#1 24GB) NUMANode(MCDRAM) L#3 (P#5 4040MB) Group0(Cluster) L#2 NUMANode L#4 (P#2 24GB) NUMANode(MCDRAM) L#5 (P#6 4040MB) Group0(Cluster) L#3 NUMANode L#6 (P#3 24GB) NUMANode(MCDRAM) L#7 (P#7 4037MB) -- David Gunter HPC-ENV: Applications Readiness Team Los Alamos National Laboratory ___ hwloc-users mailing list hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
