Re: [IAEP] Measure Log?

2009-07-04 Thread Walter Bender
Claudia Urrea and John Watlington were just looking at this issue and have
some patches... Perhaps we can get them to post a new version (in
git.sugarlabs.org -- hint hint).

-walter

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:

  Hi...

 One of our Contributors Program clients is trying to interface a sensor
 with the Measure Activity.  He says he has updated his software which
 probably means he is using V.21.

 He wants to be able to record and save the results of his input.  We have
 both looked at v.21 and at the screenshots on the wiki.  They are totally
 different. The Log tab is missing from v.21.  How does he record, save,
 and export his results in the new version?

 Thanks,

 Caryl

 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep




-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] netbook as terminology

2009-07-04 Thread Walter Bender
I need to get more sleep (^through^threw ^come^came).

The unnamed person was Yves Behar (ir someone on his team).

-walter

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Bill Kerr billk...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote:

 When we began the project, I lobbied to call it a Children's Machine (CM)
 in reference both to Seymour Papert's book and as a reference to the CM
 series of connection machines that Danny Hillis created at Thinking
 Machines, another effort where they through away the rules to make a
 solution to fit a class of problems rather than make the problem fit the
 solution.

 Of course, XO is a brilliant name, that come from our design team as I
 recall, and I don't doubt that it was the correct decision for OLPC at the
 time.


 I agree that xo is a brilliant name. Congratulalions to the un-named person
 who thought it up. Some of these names convey functionality and purpose far
 better than the others. I have broken them into three categories based on
 how it feels to me.

 PURPOSE:
 Childrens Machine
 xo

 FUNCTION:
 Connection Machine
 Dynabook
 smartbook

 TECHNO CENTRIC:
 netbook
 MID
 thin-and-light
 low cost small notebook PC
 low cost ultra-portable notebook computers (Microsoft 
 mouthfulhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/06/03/microsoft-wants-new-term-for-netbooks-unhappy-with-other-5-ch/
 )
 ultra-portable
 mini notebooks

 I don't know that we should decide to push a name change on the market. The
 point I will make at the Desktop Summit is that the marketing of netbooks
 with 3G set an expectation that they are part of the cloud and that the
 push for bigger, fatter, faster netbooks has eroded the opportunity to think
 about new approaches to computing that smaller and lighter afford. But there
 remain opportunities to redefine the desktop, keeping it relevant, in many
 areas, ours being K-6. Even in the developed world, the Internet is not
 everywhere, e.g., most classrooms, and as much as it has been good for the
 service providers to pitch it as true, the cloud is not right solution to
 every problem.


 Would a good description of the sugar desktop be community user interface
 stressing F1 and F2 over the more traditional F3? That was my interpretation
 from reading the OLPC Human interface guidelines:
 Most developers are familiar with the desktop 
 metaphorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_metaphorthat dominates the 
 modern-day computer experience. This metaphor has evolved
 over the past 30 years, giving rise to distinct classes of interface
 elements that we expect to find in every OS: desktop, icons, files, folders,
 windows, etc. While this metaphor makes sense at the office—and perhaps even
 at home—it does not translate well into a collaborative environment such as
 the one that the OLPC laptops will embody. Therefore, we have adopted a new
 set of metaphors that emphasize community. While there are some correlations
 between the Sugar UI and those of traditional desktops, there are also clear
 distinctions. It is these distinctions that are the subject of the remainder
 of this section. We highlight the reasoning behind our shift in perspective
 and detail functionality with respect to the overall laptop experience

 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Human_Interface_Guidelines/The_Laptop_Experience/Introduction

 This article more or less persuaded me that cloud computing was an
 inevitable (long term) trend

 http://asc-parc.blogspot.com/2009/01/cloud-computing-science20-and-social.html

 The main value proposition is further abstraction that reduces management
 costs. For example, backup storage is abstracted into the cloud, so you
 don't have to worry about your hard disk failing. Computation is abstracted
 into the cloud, so you don't have to worry about not having enough
 computational nodes for your data analysis job. It is an inevitable trend in
 computing, because of the need to reduce complexity and
 data-management/computation-management costs. It's clear that, in the near
 future, the backup storage and computation will continue to evolve into
 collaborative workspaces that you never have to administer, nor would you
 have to worry about backing up your work

 Meanwhile back in the real world a huge problem in schools is filtering of
 the internet which ends up making many useful sites not accessible to most
 in school time (and in practice slows things down) - some students now by
 pass the filter using smart phones, smart phones as modems, 3G USB devices
 etc. - expensive for them but good to see the internet routing around this
 damage

 Education Departments don't seem capable of providing fast untrammelled
 internet access in my experience





 -walter





-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Reading (was Re: changes in outlook with Sugar

2009-07-04 Thread Jim Simmons
Edward,

I think you have an interesting idea here.  It reminded me of the
scene in _2001 A Space Odyssey_ where Hal 9000 is having the higher
functions of his brain disconnected and he tries to sing Daisy while
he still has enough connected to do it.  From my experience working
with espeak I'd say that getting a computer to sing, even badly, may
be beyond what we can reasonably do today.  Espeak can speak at
different pitches and rates, but I don't think you can change pitch
and rate while speech is going on and if you could that's still a long
way off from actual singing.

If there is value in making a Sugar Activity that acts as a regular
Karaoke machine that may be doable.  There is Karaoke software written
in Python that can do Karaoke and it can play OGG files.  It may be
possible to make a Sugar Activity version of this software.  It's
called cdgtools and the link is: http://www.kibosh.org/cdgtools/.

James Simmons


 We have a starting point for achieving fluency naturally in the
 karaoke-colored TTS speech engine under development. We need to
 provide it as a resource to all Activities that deal in text. We
 definitely want it to be able to read stories to the children.

 We also should use it to create a singalong program stocked with folk
 songs of the culture, because Same-Language-Subtitled Bollywood
 musicals and TV singalongs have proven to be the best literacy program
 in India, and indeed anywhere in the world. Singing engages parts of
 the brain that are not involved in reading text, and makes singing
 both more enjoyable and more memorable than reading text. Rhyme and
 meter are also important aids to memory and to enjoyment.

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


[IAEP] Problems Saving in Scratch

2009-07-04 Thread Caryl Bigenho

Hi,
Two grandkids playing with Scratch in build 802.  Both have received this 
message when trying to save their projects:
Save failed:Folder may be locked or read-only
Is this a bug or are they doing something wrong?  It happens both with a simple 
Save and a Save As
I checked the Journals.  One shows 535 MB free, the other 545 MB free.
Thanks,
Caryl



___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Problems Saving in Scratch

2009-07-04 Thread Walter Bender
My off the cuff guess is that the directory scratch is trying to save to is
owned by root. Can you use the terminal activity and run the ls command:

ls -ld ~/Activities/Scratch.activity

Please post the output to email.

-walter

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:

  Hi,
 Two grandkids playing with Scratch in build 802.  Both have received this
 message when trying to save their projects:

 Save failed:
 Folder may be locked or read-only

 Is this a bug or are they doing something wrong?  It happens both with a
 simple Save and a Save As

 I checked the Journals.  One shows 535 MB free, the other 545 MB free.

 Thanks,

 Caryl





 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep




-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Reading (was Re: changes in outlook with Sugar

2009-07-04 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi Jim,

On 4 Jul 2009, at 17:09, Jim Simmons wrote:

 Edward,

 I think you have an interesting idea here.  It reminded me of the
 scene in _2001 A Space Odyssey_ where Hal 9000 is having the higher
 functions of his brain disconnected and he tries to sing Daisy while
 he still has enough connected to do it.  From my experience working
 with espeak I'd say that getting a computer to sing, even badly, may
 be beyond what we can reasonably do today.  Espeak can speak at
 different pitches and rates, but I don't think you can change pitch
 and rate while speech is going on and if you could that's still a long
 way off from actual singing.

Not convinced it would make a viable solution for Sugar but...

There's a speech synth called Festival (actually developed by  
Edinburgh University, my old Uni). It does support a singing mode, but  
others have extended it more completely. Here's some MIDI generated  
samples from flinger (festival singer):

http://speech.bme.ogi.edu/cgi-bin/flinger/show_jukebox.pl?all

A few yeas back a colleague of mine was involved in a gallery art  
installation that used (I think) 4 Mac minis mounted on a wall, and a  
small back room server to parse incoming junk mail. The Mac minis then  
sang out some of that text content realtime :-)

Regards,
--Gary

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] Reading (was Re: changes in outlook with Sugar

2009-07-04 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
 Hi Jim,

 On 4 Jul 2009, at 17:09, Jim Simmons wrote:

 Edward,

 I think you have an interesting idea here.  It reminded me of the
 scene in _2001 A Space Odyssey_ where Hal 9000 is having the higher
 functions of his brain disconnected and he tries to sing Daisy while
 he still has enough connected to do it.  From my experience working
 with espeak I'd say that getting a computer to sing, even badly, may
 be beyond what we can reasonably do today.

It has been done. Google 「computer sing」 . But that doesn't matter for
the purpose of Same-Language Subtitling of videos of people singing,
or a karaoke program with text synched to MP3s.

 Espeak can speak at
 different pitches and rates, but I don't think you can change pitch
 and rate while speech is going on and if you could that's still a long
 way off from actual singing.

 Not convinced it would make a viable solution for Sugar but...

 There's a speech synth called Festival (actually developed by Edinburgh
 University, my old Uni). It does support a singing mode, but others have
 extended it more completely. Here's some MIDI generated samples from flinger
 (festival singer):

        http://speech.bme.ogi.edu/cgi-bin/flinger/show_jukebox.pl?all

http://www.chuckcaplan.com/blog/archives/2007/09/make_your_compu.html
September 07, 2007
Make Your Computer Sing With Festival

 A few yeas back a colleague of mine was involved in a gallery art
 installation that used (I think) 4 Mac minis mounted on a wall, and a small
 back room server to parse incoming junk mail. The Mac minis then sang out
 some of that text content realtime :-)

 Regards,
 --Gary



-- 
Silent Thunder (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) is my name
And Children are my nation.
The Cosmos is my dwelling place, The Truth my destination.
http://earthtreasury.org/worknet (Edward Mokurai Cherlin)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep