Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] A New Kind Of Hacking!

2013-08-16 Thread Paul Fox
chris wrote:
  On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Bastien b...@laptop.org wrote:
  
  
   What was the rationale for stopping filtering incoming spam?
   Too many false positives?

wad may be remembering something that i don't, but i don't think
OLPC has made any changes to mailing list mail flow (or any laptop.org
mail flow) in quite a long time (measured in years).

i saw an increase in spam to my l.o account starting some time in the
past year, so whatever is being seen now i don't is due to a very
recent change.  i also don't think caryl's recent hack is new at
all.  From addresses are trivially forged.

  
  I'm also curious.  The level of spam has made list moderation essentially
  meaningless.  I cannot possibly look at each moderated message as a
  potential genuine contribution, so I just delete them and let them time out
  of the list folder.
  
  Some spam filtering is important for RT as well, where I spend way too much
  time deleting spam.
  
  If OLPC can't maintain some basic infrastructure supoort, I need to know
  for my own decision-making.  For instance, I might choose to move the L10n
  list to SugarLabs instead, and I may or may not continue contributing my
  time to RT cleaning if I'm just cleaning because a decision was made that
  my time is less valuable than some admin time to set up spam filtering.

we have an acute shortage of admins, let alone admin time.  almost
all the folks that have played that role in the past have left.  (i've
never played an admin role at OLPC -- it's not really in my skillset --
and probably won't start now).

paul
=-
 paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] XO-4 Questions After Viewing CES video

2013-01-11 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote:
  
  On 10.01.2013, at 21:19, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
  
   More recent versions of the XO-4 touchscreen firmware should allow
   a many-finger keyboard.  I hope someone with an XO-4 is working
   on a demo!
  
  Oh, I must have missed the announcement.  How is the raw touch data
  exposed?

sorry!  a few releases of the touchscreen firmware ago, the max number
of touches quietly went from 2 to 4.  full positioning is still only
accurate with just 2, but the touchscreen will attempt to keep track
of 4 if they're separable in at least one axis.  so there's nothing
special for a program to do (i.e., no raw data to fetch).

i haven't experimented with the feature much, but gonzalo has the
beginnings of a nice little piano playing activity floating around
somewhere.

paul
=-
 paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] XO-4 Questions After Viewing CES video

2013-01-11 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote:
  
  On 11.01.2013, at 05:22, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
  
   bert wrote:
   
   On 10.01.2013, at 21:19, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
   
   More recent versions of the XO-4 touchscreen firmware should allow
   a many-finger keyboard.  I hope someone with an XO-4 is working
   on a demo!
   
   Oh, I must have missed the announcement.  How is the raw touch data
   exposed?
   
   sorry!  a few releases of the touchscreen firmware ago, the max number
   of touches quietly went from 2 to 4.  full positioning is still only
   accurate with just 2, but the touchscreen will attempt to keep track
   of 4 if they're separable in at least one axis.  so there's nothing
   special for a program to do (i.e., no raw data to fetch).
   
   i haven't experimented with the feature much, but gonzalo has the
   beginnings of a nice little piano playing activity floating around
   somewhere.
  
  Ah, it does work indeed, see screenshot at
  
  http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4611

for well-placed touches only.  :-)  (i'm actually a little surprised
that that screenshot worked.)

paul

  
  Thanks!
  
  - Bert -
  

=-
 paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Names for new XO-3 (XO-4!)

2012-08-24 Thread Paul Fox
caryl wrote:
  
  Hi Martin,
  Thanks for the correction!  I was confused.  Whatever the name,
  this new hybrid of laptop and tablet will be a giant leap forward
  in educational computers.  I had the opportunity to see and play
  with Bert F's touchscreen XO-1.75 at our SCaLE booth this winter. 
  While the screen will be entirely different (and superior) the
  combo idea is the same.  Wonderful!

to be clear, it won't be _that_ different from what you played with. 

the technology has changed, but you'll still be moving the cursor by
poking a finger at the screen of something that's shaped identically
to the other, uh, 2.5 million XO laptops in the world.  :-)

paul

  Caryl
  
   From: martin.langh...@gmail.com
   Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:47:14 -0400
   Subject: Re: [IAEP] Names for new XO-3
   To: cbige...@hotmail.com
   CC: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; support-g...@laptop.org
   
   Hi Caryl,
   
   just to clarify -- the unit is XO-4. Two variants will be available --
   XO-4 Laptop and XO-4 Touch (a laptop with multitouch screen).
   
   The XO-4 Laptop is in general terms externally similar to XO-1.75, but
   gruntier guts. XO-4 Touch adds multitouch, so the frame changes a bit.
   
   cheers,
   
   
   martin
   
   On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com 
   wrote:
OK... crazy idea time... since the new XO-3 will actually be a hybrid of
laptop and tablet, maybe it should have a new device name to distinguish 
it
from others that are merely one or the other. Here are a couple of ideas 
for
device names that hit me this morning:
LapLet
TabTop
Anyone else have an idea to share?
Caryl
   
   
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
   
   
   
   -- 
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
 part 2 text/plain 
  150
  ___
  support-gang mailing list
  support-g...@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang

=-
 paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] More 'human' voice synth (TTS)

2011-06-21 Thread Paul Fox
sridhar wrote:
  I'm wondering if there's anything we can do to make TTS sound more
  'human'. We'd like to be able to use the XOs to teach English
  literacy, but the espeak voices are very robotic.
  
  My understanding is that espeak is optimised for low-power devices
  (great for XOs) and clear (if robotic) speech. Would it be feasible to
  switch to something else, like festival?

i've run festival as part of my home automation system for many many
years, including the last 3 or so on an XO-1 (debxo) which acts as my
current HA server.

the first secret is to run it in client/server mode, to avoid the
server startup latency on every enunciation.  but even after that, i
think the latency will be too high for your application.  i just
tested it:  given a moderate english sentence, it took 3 seconds to
produce output.  (i hide this on my system by caching utterances --
that's more feasible in a menuing system than when teaching literacy.)
http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/junk/festival_out.wav   (5 seconds on XO-1)

flite is a lower cost version of festival that might be appropriate.
it seems to reduce the conversion time to about half a second.
but the quality suffers as well.
http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/junk/flite_out.wav   (.5 seconds on XO-1)

fyi, current festival server process footprint:
root   999  0.0  9.4  26668 20004 ?Ss   Jun06  10:03 
/usr/bin/festival --server /usr/local/etc/nosil.scm

i haven't used espeak -- i suspect there are API interfaces that are
far richer than what i'm doing from the shell commandline.  i don't
know how one might access festival at that level.

paul

  
  This is some food for thought:
  http://braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup/2008-July/046755.html
  
  Sridhar
  
  
  Sridhar Dhanapalan
  Technical Manager
  One Laptop per Child Australia
  M: +61 425 239 701
  E: srid...@laptop.org.au
  A: G.P.O. Box 731
   Sydney, NSW 2001
  W: www.laptop.org.au
  ___
  Devel mailing list
  de...@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

=-
 paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Assorted Observations and Comments

2011-02-01 Thread Paul Fox
caryl wrote:
  
  Hi James and others...
  I have seen some bug reports re 10.1.3.  Is it ready for big time?  I want 
  the most stable build I can install to show the XOs to their best advantage 
  at 
  the expo. I have time to install 10.1.3 if it is decidedly better.  I would 
  like things to go as smoothly as possible as there will be times volunteers 
  are 
  running the booth while I do a presentation and/or help with Karsten Wade's 
  hands-on workshop with XO-1s.

10.1.3 is as ready as the 10 series will ever be. :-)
(and definitely ready for big time.)

here's simon's announcement mail, which covers the (many!) new features
the team got in:
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/030826.html

paul
=-
 paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


Re: [IAEP] !! in 10.1.3, setting languages property clears all activities

2011-01-30 Thread Paul Fox
daniel wrote:
  Hi Tim,
  
  On 28 January 2011 15:36, Timothy Falconer tee...@waveplace.org wrote:
   sugar-control-panel -s languages Kreyol/Haiti
  
   And after restarting, ALL OF THE ACTIVITIES ARE GONE.
  
   Can anyone confirm this or give me guidance.  How can I set the language 
   in a 
  bash script in 10.1.3?
  
  I imagine this is because the language is not included. What version

why would this make the activities disappear?

paul

  of the software did you last successfully run this on?
  
  The languages included in 10.1.x are:
  en_US,es,ar,pt,pt_BR,fr,ht,mn,mr_IN,am_ET,km_KH,ne_NP,ur_PK,rw,ps,fa_AF,si,zh_CN
  
  Reconstructing the image with another language added is as easy as
  having good bandwith and a Fedora 11 machine available (which is
  probably very difficult if you are in Haiti). The target XOs must all
  be unlocked (security disabled). I'd be happy to guide you through the
  build process if this is an option for you.
  
  Daniel
  ___
  Devel mailing list
  de...@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

=-
 paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep