Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] URGENT action needed

2017-08-11 Thread Samuel Cantero
mind-boggling indeed. SL has been in GSoC and GCI for years. I'm not a
board member but +1 for sure.

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Walter Bender 
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Laura Vargas 
> wrote:
>
>> Walter,
>>
>> -1 since there are still US$7.000 from last Google's programs we
>> participated still uncollected and currently we have no way of assuring we
>> will collect Google's funds this time.
>>
>
> Google has been consistently paying us for almost 10 years. The fact that
> we have not yet seen the $7000 from GCI is an SFC interface issue.
>
> The fact that we are about to jeopardize Samson's opportunity to represent
> SL at the GSoC summit is mind-boggling.
>
> -walter
>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-08-10 15:44 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender :
>>
>>> I presume we need a motion and a vote on this. Time is of the essence,
>>> so please respond ASAP.
>>>
>>> Motion: Samson Goddy has been selected as a Sugar Labs representative to
>>> the Google Summer of Code mentor summit. He has requested a travel advance
>>> to cover the costs of his visa application. The advance, including wire
>>> fees comes to $US 627.05. This motion is to approve the travel advance. (As
>>> additional background, Google will be covering up to $2200 in travel
>>> expenses for two representatives to attend the summit. Since our other
>>> representative is local to the SF area, the bulk of that money would be
>>> available to cover Samson's travel, so the net impact on SL funds will be
>>> negligible.
>>>
>>> regards.
>>>
>>> -walter
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: Accounting at Software Freedom Conservancy <
>>> account...@sfconservancy.org>
>>> Date: Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:16 PM
>>> Subject: URGENT request for Sugar Labs to approve of US$627.05 advance
>>> for Goddy for GSoC Mentor Summit (was: Is Goddy actually requesting $160 ?)
>>> To: su...@sfconservancy.org
>>> Cc: Martin Michlmayr , Samson Goddy <
>>> samsongo...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sugar Labs PLC,  please urgently page down to the all caps section below.
>>>
>>> Samson,
>>>
>>> Samson Goddy wrote at 08:52 (EDT) on Wednesday:
>>> > it has been 5 days, i already made request to su...@sfconservancy.org
>>> for
>>> > funding. Since it takes up to 15 working days(3 weeks) for the embassy
>>> to
>>> > accept appointment for interview.
>>> >
>>> > I haven't heard anything from both parties.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, We are waiting for someone from Sugar Labs to reply to
>>> approve the expense.  I don't know why they haven't replied.
>>>
>>> SUGAR LABS PLC: By my calculation, Samson is asking for this:
>>>
>>>   FOR TRAVEL TO GET A VISA, AND FOR THE VISA FEES ITSELF, SAMSON GODDY
>>> ASKS
>>>   FOR A CASH ADVANCE OF TRAVEL EXPENSES (TO COME TO GSOC MENTOR SUMMIT
>>>   2017).  The totals are as follows:
>>>
>>>   If we use western union, N202,350 = $570 (rate set by WU)
>>>
>>>   If we use wire, he's asking for 561+(561*.05)+13+25 = US$627.05 to be
>>> wired.
>>>wire fees
>>>
>>> If Sugar Labs PLC replies with approval before Sunday night US/Eastern,
>>> we
>>> can likely process a payment by wire on Monday.
>>>
>>>
>>> We don't typically use Western Union, and it would be substantial effort
>>> for
>>> us to do that, so we'd like Sugar to approve the additional wire fees as
>>> it will make payment more rapid for Samson and easier for Conservancy.
>>>
>>> Samson, your request was a bit ramble-y, so if I gleaned the wrong totals
>>> above, please correct them.
>>>
>>> Samson, in preparation for Sugar Labs PLC hopefully approving this
>>> request,
>>> could you let me know if the wire instructions I used for you before are
>>> still correct, and if not, send me new ones?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bradley M. Kuhn
>>> Distinguished Technologist of Software Freedom Conservancy
>>>  |--> & also, de-facto Bookkeeper for the moment
>>> Pls support Conservancy!: https://sfconservancy.org/supporter/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Walter Bender
>>> Sugar Labs
>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Laura V.
>> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>>
>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
>> ~ Laura Victoria
>>
>> Happy Learning!
>> #LearningByDoing
>> #Projects4good
>> #IDesignATSugarLabs
>> #WeCanDoBetter
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs Member's List June 2017: 140 verified members

2017-07-13 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> wrote:

> Dear Samuel,
>
> I just checked and your email is not on the original list, so it would be
> normal you didn't get either of the verification emails.
>
> Are you sure you went trough the new member process? If yes could you
> re-send to membersATsugarlabs.org the email membership request or a new one
> if not?
>

I didn't know about a membership process. is that really necessary to send
another email for it?

>
> Will be happy to add you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Laura V
>
>
>
>
> 2017-07-06 10:44 GMT-05:00 Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I didn't receive the email (twice). maybe a typo in my email address?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Sam C.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all, hola a todos!
>>>
>>> I'm happy to report  that after second round of emails verification
>>> (Thank you Ignacio!), emails corrections and addition of new members
>>> (Welcome Hilary!), we have a current total 140 members:
>>>
>>> 1 Aaron Borden
>>> 2 Adam Holt
>>> 3 Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
>>> 4 Alejandro Gonzalez Barrera
>>> 5 Alexander Dupuy
>>> 6 Alfonso de la Guarda
>>> 7 Ana Cichero Mildwurf
>>> 8 Andreas Gros
>>> 9 Andres Aguirre
>>> 10 Andrés Ambrois
>>> 11 Aneesh Dogra
>>> 12 Anish Mangal
>>> 13 Anne Gentle
>>> 14 Antonio Carlos
>>> 15 Anurag Goel
>>> 16 Asaf Paris Mandoki
>>> 17 Avni Khatri
>>> 18 Benjamin Berg
>>> 19 Benjamin Mako Hill
>>> 20 Bernie Innocenti
>>> 21 Bert Freudenberg
>>> 22 Bill Bogstad
>>> 23 Bob Stepno
>>> 24 Carla Gomez Monroy
>>> 25 Carol Lerche
>>> 26 Carol Ruth Silver
>>> 27 Caryl Bigenho
>>> 28 Chris Ball
>>> 29 Chris Leonard
>>> 30 Christoph Derndorfer
>>> 31 Claudia Urrea
>>> 32 Cristian Paul Peñaranda Rojas
>>> 33 Daksh Shah
>>> 34 Dan Williams
>>> 35 Dan Winship
>>> 36 Daniel Castelo
>>> 37 David Van Assche
>>> 38 David Wallace
>>> 39 Edward Cherlin
>>> 40 Eli Heuer
>>> 41 Enrique Mayorga González
>>> 42 Erik Blankinship
>>> 43 Frederick Grose
>>> 44 Gary Martin
>>> 45 George Hunt
>>> 46 Gerald Ardito
>>> 47 Greg DeKoenigsberg
>>> 48 Greg Smith
>>> 49 Guillaume Desmottes
>>> 50 Harriet Vidyasagar
>>> 51 Henry Hardy
>>> 52 Henry Holtzman
>>> 53 Hernan Pachas
>>> 54 Hilary Naylor
>>> 55 I. T. Daniher
>>> 56 Iain Davidson
>>> 57 Ian Bicking
>>> 58 Ibiam Chihurumnaya
>>> 59 Ifeanyi Mattew
>>> 60 Ignacio Rodríguez
>>> 61 Irma Couretot
>>> 62 James F. Carroll
>>> 63 James Simmons
>>> 64 Jean Piché
>>> 65 Jecel Assumpcao
>>> 66 Jhan Carlo Perez Ramirez
>>> 67 Jim Gettys
>>> 68 John Watlington
>>> 69 Jose Antonio Rocha
>>> 70 Jose Miguel Garcia
>>> 71 Juan Camilo Lema
>>> 72 June Kleider
>>> 73 Kaif Khan
>>> 74 Kevin Cole
>>> 75 Kim Rose
>>> 76 Laura Victoria Vargas
>>> 77 Lionel Laske
>>> 78 Luis Patricio Acevedo Jimenez
>>> 79 Luke Faraone
>>> 80 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>>> 81 Manu Cornet
>>> 82 Manusheel Gupta
>>> 83 Marc Maurer
>>> 84 Marco Pesenti Gritti
>>> 85 Marcos Orfila
>>> 86 Mariah ELi
>>> 87 Martin Dengler
>>> 88 Martin Langhoff
>>> 89 Matt Lee
>>> 90 Mel Chua
>>> 91 Michael Stone
>>> 92 Nathanael Lécaudé
>>> 93 Neyder Achahuanco
>>> 94 Noah Kantrowitz
>>> 95 Olivier Bélanger
>>> 96 Pablo Baqués
>>> 97 Pablo Flores
>>> 98 Pacita Peña
>>> 99 Paulo Drummond
>>> 100 Peter Robinson
>>> 101 Phil Bordelon
>>> 102 Rabi Karmacharya
>>> 103 Rafael Cordano
>>> 104 Rafael Ortiz
>>> 105 Raffael Reichelt
>>> 106 Ralph Hyre
>>> 107 Raul Hugo
>>> 108 Rita Freudenberg
>>> 109 Rosamel Ramirez
>>> 110 Daniel Francis
>>> 111 Sam Parkinson
>>> 112 Sameer Verma
>>> 113 Samson Goddy
>>> 114 Samuel (SJ) Klein
>>> 115 Samuel Greenfeld
>>> 116 Sanchit Bansal
>>> 117 Sandra Thaxter
>>> 118 Sascha Silbe
>>> 119 Sayamindu Dasgupta
>>

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs Member's List June 2017: 140 verified members

2017-07-06 Thread Samuel Cantero
I didn't receive the email (twice). maybe a typo in my email address?

Best,

Sam C.

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Laura Vargas  wrote:

> Hello all, hola a todos!
>
> I'm happy to report  that after second round of emails verification (Thank
> you Ignacio!), emails corrections and addition of new members (Welcome
> Hilary!), we have a current total 140 members:
>
> 1 Aaron Borden
> 2 Adam Holt
> 3 Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
> 4 Alejandro Gonzalez Barrera
> 5 Alexander Dupuy
> 6 Alfonso de la Guarda
> 7 Ana Cichero Mildwurf
> 8 Andreas Gros
> 9 Andres Aguirre
> 10 Andrés Ambrois
> 11 Aneesh Dogra
> 12 Anish Mangal
> 13 Anne Gentle
> 14 Antonio Carlos
> 15 Anurag Goel
> 16 Asaf Paris Mandoki
> 17 Avni Khatri
> 18 Benjamin Berg
> 19 Benjamin Mako Hill
> 20 Bernie Innocenti
> 21 Bert Freudenberg
> 22 Bill Bogstad
> 23 Bob Stepno
> 24 Carla Gomez Monroy
> 25 Carol Lerche
> 26 Carol Ruth Silver
> 27 Caryl Bigenho
> 28 Chris Ball
> 29 Chris Leonard
> 30 Christoph Derndorfer
> 31 Claudia Urrea
> 32 Cristian Paul Peñaranda Rojas
> 33 Daksh Shah
> 34 Dan Williams
> 35 Dan Winship
> 36 Daniel Castelo
> 37 David Van Assche
> 38 David Wallace
> 39 Edward Cherlin
> 40 Eli Heuer
> 41 Enrique Mayorga González
> 42 Erik Blankinship
> 43 Frederick Grose
> 44 Gary Martin
> 45 George Hunt
> 46 Gerald Ardito
> 47 Greg DeKoenigsberg
> 48 Greg Smith
> 49 Guillaume Desmottes
> 50 Harriet Vidyasagar
> 51 Henry Hardy
> 52 Henry Holtzman
> 53 Hernan Pachas
> 54 Hilary Naylor
> 55 I. T. Daniher
> 56 Iain Davidson
> 57 Ian Bicking
> 58 Ibiam Chihurumnaya
> 59 Ifeanyi Mattew
> 60 Ignacio Rodríguez
> 61 Irma Couretot
> 62 James F. Carroll
> 63 James Simmons
> 64 Jean Piché
> 65 Jecel Assumpcao
> 66 Jhan Carlo Perez Ramirez
> 67 Jim Gettys
> 68 John Watlington
> 69 Jose Antonio Rocha
> 70 Jose Miguel Garcia
> 71 Juan Camilo Lema
> 72 June Kleider
> 73 Kaif Khan
> 74 Kevin Cole
> 75 Kim Rose
> 76 Laura Victoria Vargas
> 77 Lionel Laske
> 78 Luis Patricio Acevedo Jimenez
> 79 Luke Faraone
> 80 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> 81 Manu Cornet
> 82 Manusheel Gupta
> 83 Marc Maurer
> 84 Marco Pesenti Gritti
> 85 Marcos Orfila
> 86 Mariah ELi
> 87 Martin Dengler
> 88 Martin Langhoff
> 89 Matt Lee
> 90 Mel Chua
> 91 Michael Stone
> 92 Nathanael Lécaudé
> 93 Neyder Achahuanco
> 94 Noah Kantrowitz
> 95 Olivier Bélanger
> 96 Pablo Baqués
> 97 Pablo Flores
> 98 Pacita Peña
> 99 Paulo Drummond
> 100 Peter Robinson
> 101 Phil Bordelon
> 102 Rabi Karmacharya
> 103 Rafael Cordano
> 104 Rafael Ortiz
> 105 Raffael Reichelt
> 106 Ralph Hyre
> 107 Raul Hugo
> 108 Rita Freudenberg
> 109 Rosamel Ramirez
> 110 Daniel Francis
> 111 Sam Parkinson
> 112 Sameer Verma
> 113 Samson Goddy
> 114 Samuel (SJ) Klein
> 115 Samuel Greenfeld
> 116 Sanchit Bansal
> 117 Sandra Thaxter
> 118 Sascha Silbe
> 119 Sayamindu Dasgupta
> 120 Sean DALY
> 121 Sebastian Silva
> 122 Seth Woodworth
> 123 Sora Edwards
> 124 Stefan Unterhauser
> 125 Tabitha Roder
> 126 Tariq Badsha
> 127 Thomas C. Gilliard
> 128 Tim McNamara
> 129 Tim Moody
> 130 Tomeu Vizoso
> 131 Tony Anderson
> 132 Tony Forster
> 133 Torello Querci
> 134 Tymon Radzik
> 135 Valerie Taylor
> 136 Wade Brainerd
> 137 Walter Bender
> 138 Yamile Susana Galvis Rizo
> 139 Yannick Warnier
> 140 Yoshiki Ohshima
>
> If your name is not on the list and it should be, please reply ASAP (keep
> copy to IAEP and membersATsugarlabs.org) and please specify if:
>
> A- You didn't get the verification email that was sent on May 30, 2017, or
>
> B- You did get the verification email that was sent on May 30, 2017 and
> you did click on the verification link provided.
>
>
> If you are a new member and wish to be added please follow the membership
> application instructions
> .
> If you consider someone you know deserves to be added please ask them to
> follow the application instructions.
>
>
> The list is updated on the Sugar Labs Wiki at:
>
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List
>
>
> Regards and thank you everyone!
>
>
>
> *Membership Committee *
> --
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar Labs] Verified Sugar Labs member's list

2017-05-30 Thread Samuel Cantero
B

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Walter Bender 
wrote:

> B
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Laura Vargas 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all, Hola a todos,
>>
>> I'm happy to share the current Sugar Lab's member's list. After first
>> round of email verification was made,
>> we are a preliminary total of 98 members:
>>
>> 1 Aaron Borden
>> 2 Adam Holt
>> 3 Alejandro Gonzalez Barrera
>> 4 Alexander Dupuy
>> 5 Ana Cichero Mildwurf
>> 6 Andreas Gros
>> 7 Aneesh Dogra
>> 8 Anish Mangal
>> 9 Antonio Carlos
>> 10 Asaf Paris Mandoki
>> 11 Avni Khatri
>> 12 Benjamin Berg
>> 13 Benjamin Mako Hill
>> 14 Bernie Innocenti
>> 15 Bert Freudenberg
>> 16 Bill Bogstad
>> 17 Bob Stepno
>> 18 Carla Gomez Monroy
>> 19 Carol Lerche
>> 20 Carol Ruth Silver
>> 21 Chris Leonard
>> 22 Christoph Derndorfer
>> 23 Cristian Peñaranda Rojas
>> 24 Daksh Shah
>> 25 Dan Williams
>> 26 Dan Winship
>> 27 David Van Assche
>> 28 David Wallace
>> 29 Edward Cherlin
>> 30 Eli Heuer
>> 31 Frederick Grose
>> 32 Gary Martin
>> 33 George Hunt
>> 34 Gerald Ardito
>> 35 Greg DeKoenigsberg
>> 36 Greg Smith
>> 37 Guillaume Desmottes
>> 38 Harriet Vidyasagar
>> 39 Hernan Pachas
>> 40 I. T. Daniher
>> 41 Ian Bicking
>> 42 Ibiam Chihurumnaya
>> 43 Ifeanyi Mattew
>> 44 Ignacio Rodríguez
>> 45 Irma Couretot
>> 46 James F. Carroll
>> 47 Jean Piché
>> 48 Jecel Assumpcao
>> 49 Jhan Carlo Perez Ramirez
>> 50 Jim Gettys
>> 51 John Watlington
>> 52 Jose Antonio Rocha
>> 53 Jose Miguel Garcia
>> 54 Kaif Khan
>> 55 Kevin Cole
>> 56 Kim Rose
>> 57 Laura Victoria Vargas
>> 58 Lionel Laske
>> 59 Luis Patricio Acevedo Jimenez
>> 60 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> 61 Manusheel Gupta
>> 62 Marc Maurer
>> 63 Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> 64 Martin Dengler
>> 65 Michael Stone
>> 66 Nathanael Lécaudé
>> 67 Noah Kantrowitz
>> 68 Pablo Baqués
>> 69 Pablo Flores
>> 70 Paulo Drummond
>> 71 Phil Bordelon
>> 72 Rabi Karmacharya
>> 73 Rafael Cordano
>> 74 Rafael Ortiz
>> 75 Raul Hugo
>> 76 Rita Freudenberg
>> 77 S. Daniel Francis
>> 78 Sam P.
>> 79 Sameer Verma
>> 80 Samuel (SJ) Klein
>> 81 Sean DALY
>> 82 Sebastian Silva
>> 83 Sora Edwards
>> 84 Stefan Unterhauser
>> 85 Tabitha Roder
>> 86 Tariq Badsha
>> 87 Thomas C. Gilliard
>> 88 Tim McNamara
>> 89 Tim Moody
>> 90 Tomeu Vizoso
>> 91 Tony Anderson
>> 92 Tony Forster
>> 93 Torello Querci
>> 94 Tymon Radzik
>> 95 Wade Brainerd
>> 96 Yamile Susana Galvis Rizo
>> 97 Yannick Warnier
>> 98 Yoshiki Ohshima
>>
>> If your name is not on the list and it should be, please reply ASAP (keep
>> copy to IAEP and membersATsugarlabs.org) and please specify if:
>>
>> A- You are a new member and wish to be added, or
>>
>> B- You didn't get the verification email that was sent on April 10, 2017,
>> or
>>
>> C- You did get the verification email that was sent on April 10, 2017 and
>> you did click on the verification link provided.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you everyone at Systems for the support and specially Ignacio for
>> leading the implementation.
>>
>> Blessings and regards,
>>
>>
>> Laura
>>
>> -- Membership and Election's Committe
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] email motion re Scratch Conference

2017-05-19 Thread Samuel Cantero
For your proposal.

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Samson Goddy <samsongo...@sugarlabs.org>
wrote:

> Hi
> Samuel, +1 for my statement or lionel's statement.
>
> On May 19, 2017 9:33 PM, "Samuel Cantero" <scante...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not a member of SLOB but agree. +1
>>
>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Samson Goddy <samsongo...@sugarlabs.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, i don't know why you came up with these ideas,but everyone knows
>>> that getting a visa is difficult in every country. Your team in OLPC france
>>> can also attend the event, but i and ibiam are both special guests coming
>>> from Africa. I suggest you a take a look at my proposal again.
>>>
>>> Before i came up this proposal. I already made contact with the embassy,
>>> so i know all the requirements to get a schengen (business) visa. I am also
>>> pretty sure, if accidentally we don't get to France we will have to refund
>>> the money to SL account.
>>>
>>> Summary of my proposal.
>>>
>>> Ibiam's flight to BDX and hotel bills, the team down in france will
>>> cover this visa and visa processing fees.
>>>
>>> Samson, i only need money for visa processing and my stay in lagos
>>> during the time for visa processing.
>>>
>>> Note: we are not going on our own, the team down in France are standing
>>> for us.
>>>
>>> BR
>>>
>>> Samson
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not for the idea:
>>>> - It's possible than some OLPC France guys will be present there. They
>>>> could present Sugar/Sugarizer to the conference as well. And if they do,
>>>> the come from France - compared to Nigeria.
>>>> - Are you sure to obtain a Visa for the conference ? French government
>>>> is sometimes hard about Visa delivery to avoid illegal immigration.
>>>>
>>>>Lionel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-05-19 18:10 GMT+02:00 Ignacio Rodríguez <igna...@sugarlabs.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> I still don't know the difference of "seconded" or +1 to be honest :P
>>>>>
>>>>> But as I already said, its +1 from me
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:01 PM Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Sameer Verma <sve...@sfsu.edu>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I second.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sameer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 19, 2017 5:50 AM, "Walter Bender" <walter.ben...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps someone can second the motion so we can begin voting?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Samson Goddy <
>>>>>>> samsongo...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you all for the positive comments. But i am little sad that
>>>>>>>> since wednesday, only one vote has been made. Where we have 7 SLOBs 
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> in this community. I am pleading to other SLOBs member to come and 
>>>>>>>> vote, so
>>>>>>>> that i and Ibiam can have idea what to do next if this motion passes or
>>>>>>>> not. Because if this motion pass, we will have to wait for SFC 30 days
>>>>>>>> policy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Samson Goddy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez <
>>>>>>>> igna...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's +1 from me :)
>>>>>>>>> I've seen some pictures on Facebok and I love what you both are
>>>>>>>>> doing, awesome work, Samson and Ibiam.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread Samuel Cantero
Thanks all for the comments. Here are my replies:

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Tony Anderson 
 wrote:
>Hi Sam,
>
>Thanks for the proposal. Naturally this raises the question of the
relationship >between your ASLOv3 and the GSOC project. Do you see two
parallel >implementations or a merger of the two projects?

I don't understand your question. It's a proposal for the new ASLO
implementation. One of the goals defined in Jatin's project. or is there
another direction defined for this I am not aware of?

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:04 AM, James Cameron  wrote:
>No.  I disagree with the conclusion.

I'm not saying I'm right. It's my point of view and I'm glad you have
shared yours. Yes, lack of maintainers is a big issue and I don't expect
the proposed design will fix all issues we have.

> The argument that ASLO is out of date because of there being two
> places to update information ... is specious.  Besides, "two" is
> wrong; there is a third place critical for downstream packaging;
> download.sugarlabs.org.

download.sugarlabs.org simply list the activities (xo files) stored at
files/ folder registered in ASLO. It's a must the sync between ASLO and
download.

>My prediction is that this new effort is just going to make things
>worse.  Few of you speaking in the debate are an activity maintainer
>or developer.  You risk making a tool that nobody will use.

I do not plan to rebuild "the same" ASLO just with a new
language/framework. I'm not interested on that. I have had hard time
finding someone to support or upgrade cakePHP (or other components) in
current ASLO. I didn't see much people helping me last time when it got
broken in server/OS update. So we also risk having a tool (current ASLO)
that nobody will maintain.

We need to fix this issue. We have two options: build a new version but
according to our reality or try to upgrade all components in current ASLO
which does not seem too appealing to developers. It's hard to get
contributors for this codebase.

>It is my job to review activities before they are built into an image;
>checking for malicious code, correct licensing, and correct function.

That's my point about removing the moderation queue. The image builders
will ALWAYS check the activities before they are built into an image.

>Nobody has asked me or added me to moderators queue.  Why not?  ;-)

I didn't know you were not a moderator. Can someone with admin rights add
to James?

> So just to clarify, you are removing from the activity maintainers the
> right and duty to run "python setup.py dist_xo", and "python setup.py
> dist_source", and you are _trusting_ the activity maintainers not to
> place anything in setup.py to subvert or take control of your server?

I was thinking to run this step inside a non privileged container but ideas
are welcome.

> There will be activities that cannot be processed in this way; such as
> the Wikipedia activity.

I'm aware that might be corner cases. That is the reason why it's a draft.

> There will be activities from maintainers who won't engage in this new
> process; how will those activities be welcomed?

They have now the chance to speak up.

> I've no issues with the remainder of the proposal.  Good design.

Thanks. But I don't understand how we should proceed. It looks like we all
are in different tracks.

> I don't think the user base is large enough for an image building web
> service.

Agree and image building need a lot of testing.

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Jatin Dhankhar 
 wrote:
> My main query is, how we will accomplish moderation and publishing
> to ASLO using Github as a tool ? I might be wrong about the whole
> moderation thing but a healthy discussion will hopefully lead us in
> the right direction.

I think we don't need moderation nor approval. We want to simplify. Please,
you can test current workflow in ASLO to understand why I say simplify.

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Tony Anderson 
 wrote:
>So I see this three-month project as providing a new implementation of the
>distribution function of ASLO,  while support for activity developers and
>maintainers moves to github.

what you mean with a new implementation of the distribution function of
ASLO?

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:31 AM, James Cameron  wrote:
> I agree.  Django apps are easily internationalised.
+1

> We already have patch review; much better moderation or approval than
> we had before.
+1

> Let's drop the moderation and approval requirement.  Leave it to the
> image builders if they want to go further.  Speaking as an image
> builder.
+1


On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Laura Vargas 
wrote:

> Thank you Samuel and Walter for share,
>
> I don't understand all the technicalities yet. I try to follow and learn
> :D
>
> I agree with Chris Leonard, we should *prioritize facilitation of the
> localization and internationalization 

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-18 Thread Samuel Cantero
s/These are my notes/These are some notes/g :)

Walter Bender has helped me to shape this first proposal.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> These are my notes in order to augment current proposal: https://goo.gl/
> VEIzCr
>
> You can add comments/suggestions to the document.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sam C.
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Jatin Dhankhar <dhankhar.ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Thank you Laura for attaching the proposal.
>> I will be glad if you can point me in the right direction regarding my
>> GSOC project, suggest flaws and how it can be improved. If anyone has any
>> questions or speculations, feel free to ping me. I am also writing weekly
>> summary of GSOC here https://jatindhankhar.in/posts/.
>> If something is missing or incorrect, let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jatin Dhakhar
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Laura Vargas <la...@co.sugarlabs.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jatin welcome to Sugar Labs Community!
>>>
>>> Hi Aleksey,
>>>
>>> I hope to find time to be able to follow Jatin's project proposed time
>>> line. I hope you can find some time too. See pdf attached for project's
>>> details.
>>>
>>> Regards and blessings to all the team,
>>>
>>>
>>> Laura Victoria
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net>
>>> Date: 2017-05-17 18:57 GMT-05:00
>>> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition
>>> To: Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi, Laura
>>>
>>> Done.
>>>
>>> Tony
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/18/2017 12:56 AM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>>>
>>> Samuel and new ASLO team,
>>>
>>> Can you please attach the pdf with the project description?
>>>
>>> In my opinion, as ASLO is such a powerful resource used today by active
>>> deployments, a successful successor will provide at least the same services.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Laura V.
>>> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>>>
>>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
>>> ~ Laura Victoria
>>>
>>> Happy Learning!
>>> #LearningByDoing
>>> #Projects4good
>>> #IDesignATSugarLabs
>>> #WeCanDoBetter
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing 
>>> listSugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-18 Thread Samuel Cantero
Hi all,

These are my notes in order to augment current proposal:
https://goo.gl/VEIzCr

You can add comments/suggestions to the document.

Best regards,

Sam C.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Jatin Dhankhar 
wrote:

> Hi,
> Thank you Laura for attaching the proposal.
> I will be glad if you can point me in the right direction regarding my
> GSOC project, suggest flaws and how it can be improved. If anyone has any
> questions or speculations, feel free to ping me. I am also writing weekly
> summary of GSOC here https://jatindhankhar.in/posts/.
> If something is missing or incorrect, let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Jatin Dhakhar
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Laura Vargas 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Jatin welcome to Sugar Labs Community!
>>
>> Hi Aleksey,
>>
>> I hope to find time to be able to follow Jatin's project proposed time
>> line. I hope you can find some time too. See pdf attached for project's
>> details.
>>
>> Regards and blessings to all the team,
>>
>>
>> Laura Victoria
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Tony Anderson 
>> Date: 2017-05-17 18:57 GMT-05:00
>> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition
>> To: Laura Vargas 
>>
>>
>> Hi, Laura
>>
>> Done.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On 05/18/2017 12:56 AM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>>
>> Samuel and new ASLO team,
>>
>> Can you please attach the pdf with the project description?
>>
>> In my opinion, as ASLO is such a powerful resource used today by active
>> deployments, a successful successor will provide at least the same services.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Laura V.
>> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>>
>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
>> ~ Laura Victoria
>>
>> Happy Learning!
>> #LearningByDoing
>> #Projects4good
>> #IDesignATSugarLabs
>> #WeCanDoBetter
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing 
>> listSugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

2017-05-16 Thread Samuel Cantero
>
> Samuel Cantero wrote:
> > we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must ease
> > activities management, for both image builders and developers.
>
> Please also consider Sugar Network, which Sebastian knows about, and
> is used heavily, judging by the hit counts on the Sugar Labs servers.
>

Can someone explain the relationship between ASLO and Sugar network?
Pitifully we can't work in ASLO and Sugar network at the same time, but we
can take into account what is needed for interaction with Sugar network. At
least in design in the first stage.

>
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

2017-05-12 Thread Samuel Cantero
No yet. But I know they are working to upgrade it ASAP. Hopefully they will
end that soon.

Aside from that, we're going to try to build a new ASLO in GSoC which must
ease activities management, for both image builders and developers. I will
be helping on that.

On May 12, 2017 1:25 PM, "Dave Crossland" <d...@lab6.com> wrote:

> Do those xo run the latest release?
>
> On May 12, 2017 1:01 PM, "Samuel Cantero" <scante...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not agree. In Paraguay, kids are still using a lot the python
>> codebase and I guess we're not the only one. We should work to find out a
>> new release manager if Sam P can't make it anymore.
>>
>> Certainly there are many things to improve, but we shall overcome. I
>> don't think solution is to discard all XOs schools have around here.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sam C.
>>
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It seems to me that the classic Sugar python codebase could be returned
>>> to Quozl / OLPC, and Sugar Labs could focus on the JS Sugarizer codebase.
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

2017-05-12 Thread Samuel Cantero
I'm not agree. In Paraguay, kids are still using a lot the python codebase
and I guess we're not the only one. We should work to find out a new
release manager if Sam P can't make it anymore.

Certainly there are many things to improve, but we shall overcome. I don't
think solution is to discard all XOs schools have around here.

Regards,

Sam C.

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Dave Crossland  wrote:

> It seems to me that the classic Sugar python codebase could be returned to
> Quozl / OLPC, and Sugar Labs could focus on the JS Sugarizer codebase.
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Separate Emails

2017-03-25 Thread Samuel Cantero
I understand and I am also agree that mailing list might be a barrier
sometimes.

Bernie and I would like to try mailman3 and hyperkitty. Check
lists.fedoraproject.org.

Issue, as always, is lack of time.

Best regards,

Sam C.

On Mar 24, 2017 10:31 AM, "Samson Goddy"  wrote:

>
>
> On Mar 24, 2017 2:28 PM, "Laura Vargas"  wrote:
>
>
>
> 2017-03-24 7:49 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy :
>
>> We can use any name as far as the address is AT sugarlabs Dot com.
>>
>
> I guess you meant DOT org, right?
>
> Yes. Thanks
>
>
>
>
>> So what i am saying. For example,
>>
>> samsongo...@sugarlabs.org => i...@list.sugarlabs.org
>>
>> Presuming that is the mail, is there any possibilities of
>> i...@list.sugarlabs.org to receive the mails from
>> samsongo...@sugarlabs.org?
>>
>> But if not we can still create it, select some few individuals that will
>> be responsible for forwarding the mail to the lists.
>>
>> Samson
>>
>
>
> The idea of getting info requests from info AT sugarlabs DOT org directly
> to the mailing list opposes to the nature and purpose of mailing lists,
> which is to get subscribers involved in the conversations.
>
>
> I guess the redesign of the Sugar Web site project will benefit from clear
> communication strategies and channels for new visitors and subscribers.
>
> Yes, also making it easier for newbies to communicate to the community.
> Without stress of mailing list but also encourage them them to join the
> list.
>
> Samson
>
>
> Regards,
> Laura V
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2017 1:38 PM, "Sebastian Silva" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Samson,
>>
>> I was hoping you'd get a constructive answer, so rather I'll try it.
>>
>> If I read you right you want email aliases for the following:
>>
>> info AT sugarlabs.org => iaep AT lists.sugarlabs.org
>> systems AT sugarlabs => sugar-devel AT lists.sugarlabs.org
>> For one thing I think they are very confusing, possibly even used (we
>> have a systems list, for instance).
>>
>> More importantly, as Luke points out, our lists require that people
>> subscribe first. It's impossible to subscribe without obtaining the list
>> email. I could see the value of perhaps making aliases to abbreviate the
>> (lists.) bit?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19/03/17 20:04, Samson Goddy wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am requesting possible two email addresses for the social media
>> accounts. I am proposing if we could have email accounts like "
>> i...@sugarlabs.org" that could be connected with iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> and "syst...@sugarlabs.org" for "sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org".
>>
>>  Why? because most people don't really buy the idea about subscribing to
>> mailing-lists first, before asking some important questions. I had  issues
>> when handling questions thrown the SL twitter account, Tymon also had some
>> similar issue on Facebook.
>>
>>
>>
>> BR
>>
>> Samson Goddy
>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop 
>> project!)IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Laura V.
> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>
> “No paradox, no progress.”
> ~ Niels Bohr
>
> Happy Learning!
>
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Systems] Sugar Network maintenance

2017-02-27 Thread Samuel Cantero
As I said last time, the page must require authentication before accepting
any POST request. Currently, we are just blocking the range of offending
IPs. As you might guess, this is unviable.

On Feb 27, 2017 22:37, "Dave Crossland"  wrote:

> Hi
>
> Was this resolved?
>
> On 21 February 2017 at 10:34, Laura Vargas  wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Again we are having a spam attack that modifies the texts of one of the
>> contexts of the main visualization of the Sugar Network :(
>>
>> This problem was reported last year and resolved during the past month
>> but was present again today and so I'm asking for your help.
>>
>> March is the month in which the students start their learning cycle here
>> in the South and thus it would be nice to be prepared.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards and Blessings
>>
>> --
>> Laura Victoria
>> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>>
>> “No paradox, no progress.”
>> ~ Niels Bohr
>>
>> Happy Learning!
>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Dave
>
> ___
> Systems mailing list
> syst...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs 2017 Budget

2017-02-24 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Feb 24, 2017 4:14 AM, "Samson Goddy" <samsongo...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:



On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Where can I read more about the sugar open badges? :)
>
Some time ago Aleksey suggested to the list, that we should sponsor with
US$500/month to active Sugar Labs contributors in need on a monthly basis.

Today we have many active contributors that are vital to the Sugar Labs
ecosystem and many of them have expressed they are somehow in need of
financial resources, perhaps it is time we retribute them with trust and
monthly donations.

At the same time and as part of the Marketing and Funding plan, there is
interest among active contributors to start an implementation of Open
Badges for Sugar Labs.

I personally believe, Open Badges may be one way to open channels for
resources to flow to active contributors.

According to our financial status, I calculated at least 7 badges with
stipends can be created and granted on a yearly basis starting 2017.

Under this model and for the first year (03/2017 - 03/2018), each badge
could have a US$500/month stipend attached, for a total of US$3,500 per
month, totaling US$ 42,000 per year in stipends [1] to Active contributors.

The beneficiary or "badge holder" can choose to accept our* monthly
donation* or if not in need can also choose to pass it on to any active
contributor in need or to give it back to the General Funds account. I
volunteer myself to co-manage payments and logistics with Adam and SFC and
Ignacio has volunteer to lead the development of the Badges.

Here are the names for the badges with stipends and their holders I'm
proposing for the first year of the model:

# 1 Infrastructure Hero - Samuel Cantero


Thanks for taking me into account, but as I've told Laura, I would like to
continue helping SL without any stipends.

Best regards,

Sam.

# 2 Infrastructure Hero - Sebastian Silva
# 3 Release Manager - Ignacio Rodriguez
# 4 Translations Manager - Chris Leonard
# 5 Marketing Team Leader - Samson Goddy
# 6 Sugar Network Project Leader - Laura Vargas
# 7 Social Help Project Leader - Sam Parkinson

Here are the names for the badges without stipends and their holders I'm
proposing for the first year of the model:

# 8 Sugarizer Project Leader - Lionel Laske
# 9 Sugar Labs Honor Badge - Walter Bender
# 10 Secretary - Dave Crossland
# 11 Treasure Keeper - Adam Holt

Please share your toughs on the subject.

If you consider there are more Badges and/or Badge holders that should be
considered for the first year, please feel free to nominate someone else or
yourself and give a name to the Badge.

Also, if you have a strong opposition to the model or to any of the listed
badges or badge holders, please share the reasons openly.

Hopefully by the end of next week we can give it a try to put it all into a
single motion :D

Best regards and blessings for all,
Laura Victoria

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stipend

>
> On Feb 23, 2017 9:57 PM, "Laura Vargas" <la...@somosazucar.org> wrote:
>
> Hello all! Hola a todos!
>
> 2016 Fiscal year is soon coming to its end (March 1st 2016 until February
> 28th 2017).
>
> Subject to final reports from Adam, we must consider and project our
> expenses of the 2017 fiscal year. I would like to help in a first draft.
>
>
> From the systems, marketing and funding threads, it has become clear Sugar
> Labs Project basically requires:
>
>
> *[1] To sponsor any motivated, active individuals in need to continue
> doing the best they can to support our mission.*
>
> - For this end I'm leading the initiative of Open Badges (12 Badges in
> total, 6 with a US$ 500 monthly stipend) totaling US$36,000.
> - Also for this end, Walter is leading the Outreachy internship initiative
> with a budget of US$ 5,500.
>
> *[2] To make sure our servers are safe and our systems are distributed.*
>
> - For this end systems have required to budget and acquire a UPS for our
> servers at MIT. On January Samuel quoted 3 options budget range of US$200 -
> US$1.000.
> - Please can anyone confirm if we require to maintain and budget for
> additional infrastructure?
>
> *[3] To maintain domains and trademarks*.
>
> - As far as I understand only sugarlabs.org and sugarlabs.net will need
> to be renewed this year at a estimated cost of less than US$100.
> - Last year we spent $700 on trademark registration, I'm not sure if this
> is a yearly fee, please can anyone confirm? I will assume it is.
>
>
>
> *This give us a preliminary Total of Estimated Expenses for 2017 of
> US$43,300  *
>
>
> This is what I'm aware of, as the community still needs to define its
> Marketing objectives and strategies and therefore it may be too soon to
> estimate a Budget on that.
>
> Please share any other ini

Re: [IAEP] [Systems] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

2017-02-22 Thread Samuel Cantero
James has informed to me that we also need the following services which
sugar 0.110 depends on:

- use-socialhelp.sugarlabs.org (Alt-Shift-H Help),
- activities.sugarlabs.org (My Settings, Software Update, and a Browse
  start page link),
- activities-2.sugarlabs.org (My Settings, Software Update, see below),
- www.sugarlabs.org (Browse start page link),
- bugs.sugarlabs.org (Browse start page link),
- wiki.sugarlabs.org (Browse start page link),

activities-2.sugarlabs.org was already shut down, but Sugar has a
reference, so James has prepared a patch.
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/742.

All of the previous cited sites SHOULD be maintained. We'll do our best to
keep those sites updated and protected. We need a maintainer for
activites.sugarlabs.org if possible and improve bugs.sugarlabs.org or
replace by another tool.

James told me that Sugar no longer depends on jabber.sugarlabs.org but
there was a reference to that as well.

Best regards,

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Sam Parkinson <sam@sam.today> wrote:

> On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 20:25 -0300, Samuel Cantero wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Currently we have two physical nodes - Justice and Freedom - which belongs
> to SugarLabs and one VM (Sunjammer) provided by the FSF. These nodes are
> running Ubuntu 16.04. Last upgrade was done by Bernie Innocenti and by me.
>
> The main purpose of this email is to update our list of machine/services
> maintainers. We need to have a responsible for every service and update our
> wiki page according to the provided information. The Maintainer must be
> responsible for keeping service up, the OS updated and apply all the
> security patches. I can find that many of our services are just broken or
> forgotten. We need to some do cleaning/pruning.
>
> Below are listed all the current machines/services we're hosting. Please,
> if you're responsible for the machine/service maintenance, identify
> yourself. If no one if responsible for the machine/service, we need to
> define what to do with those machines, whether to find a new maintainer or
> to decommission the machine/service.
>
> Justice:
>
> 1. OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
> 2. Maintainers: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva and Samuel Cantero.
> 3. Services (VMs running inside this node):
> amnesia:
> OS: Fedora 18. This OS has reached End of Life.
> Maintainer: X.
> Services provided:
> Apparently it's used by Paraguay Educa. It's running an HTTP server,
> MySQL, etc.
> Are we still using this?
> aslo:
> OS: Ubuntu 14.04.5. EOL: April 2019.
> Maintainer: Samuel Cantero.
> Codebase maintainer: X. it would be nice to have someone behind it.
> Aleksey have been helping so far.
> Services provided:
> activities.sugarlabs.org
> zatoichi:
> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. EOL: April 2017.
> Maintainer: X.
> Services provided:
> *.paraguayeduca.org
> Can we keep all the services for PyEduca in one machine? Do we really need
> amnesia and zatoichi?
> lightwave:
> OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS.
> Maintainer: Bernie Innocenti / Samuel Cantero.
> Services provided:
> Primary DNS server.
> mothership:
> I can't get into the VM. I don't have information about maintainer nor the
> OS/services running inside.
> pootle:
> OS: Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS.
> Maintainer: Chris Leonard.
> Services provided:
> translate.sugarlabs.org
> library:
> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS.
> Maintainer: X.
> Services provided:
> library.sugarlabs.org (pathagar).
> Jita:
> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
> Maintainer: X.
> Services provided:
> cgit.sugarlabs.org. I guess we can decommission this.
> chat.sugarlabs.org.
> fedora.sugarlabs.org (service down, no one reported so no one is using
> it).
> git.sugarlabs.org (gitorious). Someone should move all repos inside
> git.sl.o to GitHub.
> meeting.sugarlabs.org,
> network.sugarlabs.org,
> node.sugarlabs.org (are we using this?)
> school-network.org
> Freedom
>
> 1. OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
> 2. Maintainers: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva, Sam Parkinson and
> Samuel Cantero.
> 3. Services:
> Main backup server.
> We have a bunch of VMs not used by SL. These are: ole, kuckuck,
> munin, owncloud, pirate, hammock, chat, hanginggarden, beacon. AFAIK,
> these VM belongs to Stephan Unterhauser (Dogi). I don't know about the
> terms defined between SugarLabs and Stephan. Hence, I must ask: Is
> Sugarlabs going to continue hosting these VMs?
> We also have the following containers:
> org.sugarlabs.www-rebuilder.
> Maintainer: Sam Parkinson.
> Services:
> used for update the SL www site after a new commit into GitHub repo
> (through Webhooks).
> related: www.sugarlabs.org
> org.sugarlabs.use-socialhelp:
> Maintainer: Sam Parkinson.
> Services:
> socialhelp.sugarlabs.org?
> org.

Re: [IAEP] [Systems] Stopwatch activity maintainer needed.

2017-02-21 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On 18/02/17 14:03, Samuel Cantero wrote:
>
> it was me.
>
> Ignacio, problem solved. It was a firewall issue. Go ahead.
>
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> I had set the firewall in response to an attack on network.sugarlabs.org
> (check Jan 18th "Please Help" email thread on systems@). Having turned
> off the firewall, this attack has just resumed.
>
> The attack consists of ~20 IP addresses issuing a POST request every few
> seconds and updating a Sugar Network project with SPAM contents.
>

Who is in charge of maintaining the site? An authentication must be done
before allowing any POST data. Site must add authentication mechanism. We
can block now 20 IPs but it'll be unstoppable over time. We can't block the
whole internet.

>
> I have a script /root/block.sh with firewall rules that blocked the IP
> addresses we isolated from the logs.
>
> Previously this script missed to allow https, but I've added this now, so
> I've re-enabled the firewall. It looks to me like gitorious works.
>
> I hope it doesn't cause other issues.
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
>
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

2017-02-20 Thread Samuel Cantero
Amnesia and Mothership are being used by ParaguayEduca and are being
managed by Roberto Rodriguez Alcalá. So they're in good hands.

Please, if you're a maintainer of a service and you've found that you're
not being listed as maintainer, reply this thread. Otherwise, we'll assume
that machine/service is not being used and they will be shut down for a
reasonable period of time until someone claim it. Later, machine/service
will be removed.

Best regards,

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org>
wrote:

> On 19/02/17 10:35, Samuel Cantero wrote:
>
> Thanks for the inventory. Did you update the wiki
> <http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Machine> as well? That's where I expect to
> find this information, according to the Infrastructure team docs.
>
> Would you like to add a maintainer page with this information?
>
> I've added you and me to be admins of jita
> <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Machine/jita>. Thanks for volunteering to
> help!
>
> From a quick read I find infrastructure docs
> <http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Infrastructure_Team/Resources> to be
> adequate. We should definitively try to prune unused services if they
> become a burden. At any rate, good team for keeping all of that running all
> this time! A good sysadmin is invisible, but shows in details and tricks
> that one can only learn in a team, if so inclined. I have a lot of learning
> to thank from being a member of infrastructure team ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Sebastian
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

2017-02-19 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Feb 19, 2017 10:35, "Sebastian Silva" <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote:

Hi Samuel,

Thanks for the inventory. Did you update the wiki
<http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Machine> as well? That's where I expect to
find this information, according to the Infrastructure team docs.

Would you like to add a maintainer page with this information?

I'm adding some missing info below:


On 18/02/17 18:25, Samuel Cantero wrote:

*Jita*:

   - OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
  - Maintainer: X.
  - Services provided:
  - network.sugarlabs.org,
 - node.sugarlabs.org (are we using this?) YES this is the API for
 network.sugarlabs.org. Clients and web frontend use this.

Aleksey used to admin this host. I go in and fix issues when the services
above present problems, which are under active use by the XO deployment in
Peru.

I can step up to maintain if we can coordinate.


That would be good.



*Freedom*

1. *OS*: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
2. *Maintainers*: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva, Sam Parkinson and
Samuel Cantero.
3. *Services:*


beacon <http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Machine/beacon> is a development
server that I admin. I also have *replicator* which is a build vm that is
off and only activated when needed to build XO images.


OK. Not all VMS belong to Dogi. So far 3 VMS are being used by SL.


*Sunjammer*

1. *OS*: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
2. *Maintainers*: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva, and Samuel Cantero.
3. *Services:*

   - bitlbee

I restarted it but I know we're supposed to switch to something else...
which is?


Bernie and I are using ZNC as IRC bouncer. It is running as local user.
Each one is responsible for its instance.


   - ejabberd

I guess this is used by Sugar clients when they look for their
neighboorhood at schoolserver.sugarlabs.org?


Can someone confirm this?
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

2017-02-18 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Feb 18, 2017 22:52, "Ignacio Rodríguez" <igna...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:

> kuckuck
I'm almost the only user, I use it for "random" subjects, like testing
scripts or services, or hosting bots as gcibot. AFAIK it only uses 1gb
of ram and 20gb of space, so if it doesn't bother anyone I would like
to keep it running. Thanks


I have no problem and I guess no one will have problem with it. But at
least I didn't know the machine purpose and who was in charge. So good to
know about it.


On 2/18/17, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Samuel,
>
> I wanted to make a few comments on just a few parts of this list.
>
>> Justice:
>>
>> 1. OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
>> 2. Maintainers: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva and Samuel Cantero.
>> 3. Services (VMs running inside this node):
>
> Thanks to you, Sebastian and Bernie for maintaining this core server
> (justice), it is indispensable to our mission, and I don't think you
> guys can ever be thanked enough for the work you do to keep this
> running and providing the many services it hosts.
>
>> amnesia:
>>
>> OS: Fedora 18. This OS has reached End of Life.
>> Maintainer: X.
>> Services provided:
>>
>> Apparently it's used by Paraguay Educa. It's running an HTTP server,
>> MySQL, etc.
>> Are we still using this?
>
> Let me (and maybe Walter) reach out to ParaguayEduca about amnesia.
> Walter presented in Paraguay not too long ago and he and I are also
> working on some great stuff in terms of Guaraní (Paraguay)
> localization that will be the subject of some upcoming posts to this
> list and hopefully discussion by the SLOB.
>
>> aslo:
>>
>> OS: Ubuntu 14.04.5. EOL: April 2019.
>> Maintainer: Samuel Cantero.
>> Codebase maintainer: X. it would be nice to have someone behind it.
>> Aleksey have been helping so far.
>> Services provided:
>>
>> activities.sugarlabs.org
>
> Obviously a critical piece of infrastructure for getting our code out
> there.  I only wish more of the activities posted there were set up
> for i18n so that we could localize them on Pootle.
>
> I've got a partial (and certainly outdated) inventory of the
> activities on ASLO (see attached file).  I'd love to work with someone
> on updating and completing it, particularly with an eye toward trying
> to identify additional high-priority targets of i18n/L10n or migration
> to our main  github repository.
>
>> pootle:
>>
>> OS: Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS.
>> Maintainer: Chris Leonard.
>> Services provided:
>>
>> translate.sugarlabs.org
>
>
> That OS is getting long-in-the-tooth.  We are going to want to upgrade
> to Version 2.8 of Pootle in the near future, it could be released any
> day now.  It will bring back some nice features like repository
> integration (via the Pootle FS) that will make the back and forth of
> POT files and PO files in the repos much easier.
>
> http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/pootle/en/latest/
releases/2.8.0.html
>
> We will obviously want to do that in a new VM (with  a current OS)
> when we do it, but eventually the new instance will completely replace
> the old instance (after a proper migration).  I'd be thrilled to begin
> working on a migration project with one of the sysadmins, but I know
> it won't be Bernie, because he won't touch Django (ask him what he
> really thinks about Django sometime).
>
>> Jita:
>>
>> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
>> Maintainer: X.
>> Services provided:
>>
>> git.sugarlabs.org (gitorious). Someone should move all repos inside
>> git.sl.o to GitHub.
>
> As I think was demonstrated today, there is still some great code that
> hasn't made it to github yet.  I'd like to approach a Gitorious
> de-commission methodically so we don't lose anything worthwhile, I
> only called out those repos that already were hosted on Pootle.  I'm
> sure there is more good stuff left behind and we might want to start
> by de-duplicating old Gitorius from current Github repos.  Who would
> like to form the Gitorious De-commisioning Committee with me to
> inventory old git and start trimming away things that have a new home?
>  I can guarantee that there will be things that need community input
> from this list (e.g. which slider puzzle version is worth carrying
> forwardf?).
>
>
> cjl
>


--
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

2017-02-18 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Feb 18, 2017 22:06, "Chris Leonard" <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Samuel,

I wanted to make a few comments on just a few parts of this list.

> Justice:
>
> 1. OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
> 2. Maintainers: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva and Samuel Cantero.
> 3. Services (VMs running inside this node):

Thanks to you, Sebastian and Bernie for maintaining this core server
(justice), it is indispensable to our mission, and I don't think you
guys can ever be thanked enough for the work you do to keep this
running and providing the many services it hosts.

> amnesia:
>
> OS: Fedora 18. This OS has reached End of Life.
> Maintainer: X.
> Services provided:
>
> Apparently it's used by Paraguay Educa. It's running an HTTP server,
MySQL, etc.
> Are we still using this?

Let me (and maybe Walter) reach out to ParaguayEduca about amnesia.
Walter presented in Paraguay not too long ago and he and I are also
working on some great stuff in terms of Guaraní (Paraguay)
localization that will be the subject of some upcoming posts to this
list and hopefully discussion by the SLOB.


I'm from Paraguay. So I can contact them if needed and also provide
assistance.


> aslo:
>
> OS: Ubuntu 14.04.5. EOL: April 2019.
> Maintainer: Samuel Cantero.
> Codebase maintainer: X. it would be nice to have someone behind it.
Aleksey have been helping so far.
> Services provided:
>
> activities.sugarlabs.org

Obviously a critical piece of infrastructure for getting our code out
there.  I only wish more of the activities posted there were set up
for i18n so that we could localize them on Pootle.

I've got a partial (and certainly outdated) inventory of the
activities on ASLO (see attached file).  I'd love to work with someone
on updating and completing it, particularly with an eye toward trying
to identify additional high-priority targets of i18n/L10n or migration
to our main  github repository.


> pootle:
>
> OS: Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS.
> Maintainer: Chris Leonard.
> Services provided:
>
> translate.sugarlabs.org


That OS is getting long-in-the-tooth.  We are going to want to upgrade
to Version 2.8 of Pootle in the near future, it could be released any
day now.  It will bring back some nice features like repository
integration (via the Pootle FS) that will make the back and forth of
POT files and PO files in the repos much easier.

http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/pootle/en/latest/releases/2.8.0.html

We will obviously want to do that in a new VM (with  a current OS)
when we do it, but eventually the new instance will completely replace
the old instance (after a proper migration).  I'd be thrilled to begin
working on a migration project with one of the sysadmins, but I know
it won't be Bernie, because he won't touch Django (ask him what he
really thinks about Django sometime).


We can work together on that.


> Jita:
>
> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
> Maintainer: X.
> Services provided:
>
> git.sugarlabs.org (gitorious). Someone should move all repos inside
git.sl.o to GitHub.

As I think was demonstrated today, there is still some great code that
hasn't made it to github yet.  I'd like to approach a Gitorious
de-commission methodically so we don't lose anything worthwhile, I
only called out those repos that already were hosted on Pootle.  I'm
sure there is more good stuff left behind and we might want to start
by de-duplicating old Gitorius from current Github repos.  Who would
like to form the Gitorious De-commisioning Committee with me to
inventory old git and start trimming away things that have a new home?
 I can guarantee that there will be things that need community input
from this list (e.g. which slider puzzle version is worth carrying
forwardf?).


I'm agree. I propose to make gitorious inaccessible for sometime after
first check have been made. We can keep it for a long time in case some
need arise.



cjl
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

2017-02-18 Thread Samuel Cantero
Hello everyone,

Currently we have two physical nodes - Justice and Freedom - which belongs
to SugarLabs and one VM (Sunjammer) provided by the FSF. These nodes are
running Ubuntu 16.04. Last upgrade was done by Bernie Innocenti and by me.

The main purpose of this email is to update our list of machine/services
maintainers. We need to have a responsible for every service and update our
wiki page according to the provided information. The Maintainer must be
responsible for keeping service up, the OS updated and apply all the
security patches. I can find that many of our services are just broken or
forgotten. We need to some do cleaning/pruning.

Below are listed all the current machines/services we're hosting. Please,
if you're responsible for the machine/service maintenance, identify
yourself. If no one if responsible for the machine/service, we need to
define what to do with those machines, whether to find a new maintainer or
to decommission the machine/service.

*Justice*:

1. *OS*: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
2. *Maintainers*: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva and Samuel Cantero.
3. *Services* (VMs running inside this node):

   - *amnesia:*
  - OS: Fedora 18. This OS has reached End of Life.
  - Maintainer: X.
  - Services provided:
 - Apparently it's used by Paraguay Educa. It's running an HTTP
 server, MySQL, etc.
 - Are we still using this?
  - *aslo:*
  - OS: Ubuntu 14.04.5. EOL: April 2019.
  - Maintainer: Samuel Cantero.
  - Codebase maintainer: X. it would be nice to have someone behind it.
  Aleksey have been helping so far.
  - Services provided:
 - activities.sugarlabs.org
  - *zatoichi:*
  - OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. EOL: April 2017.
  - Maintainer: X.
  - Services provided:
 - *.paraguayeduca.org
 - Can we keep all the services for PyEduca in one machine? Do we
 really need amnesia and zatoichi?
 - *lightwave:*
  - OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS.
  - Maintainer: Bernie Innocenti / Samuel Cantero.
  - Services provided:
 - Primary DNS server.
  - *mothership:*
  - I can't get into the VM. I don't have information about maintainer
  nor the OS/services running inside.
   - *pootle:*
  - OS: Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS.
  - Maintainer: Chris Leonard.
  - Services provided:
 - translate.sugarlabs.org
  - *library*:
  - OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS.
  - Maintainer: X.
  - Services provided:
 - library.sugarlabs.org (pathagar).
  - *Jita*:
  - OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
  - Maintainer: X.
  - Services provided:
 - cgit.sugarlabs.org. I guess we can decommission this.
 - chat.sugarlabs.org.
 - fedora.sugarlabs.org (service down, no one reported so no one is
 using it).
 - git.sugarlabs.org (gitorious). Someone should move all repos
 inside git.sl.o to GitHub.
 - meeting.sugarlabs.org,
 - network.sugarlabs.org,
 - node.sugarlabs.org (are we using this?)
 - school-network.org

*Freedom*

1. *OS*: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
2. *Maintainers*: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva, Sam Parkinson and
Samuel Cantero.
3. *Services:*

   - Main backup server.
   - We have a bunch of VMs not used by SL. These are: ole, kuckuck,
   munin, owncloud, pirate, hammock, chat, hanginggarden, beacon. AFAIK, these
   VM belongs to Stephan Unterhauser (Dogi). I don't know about the terms
   defined between SugarLabs and Stephan. Hence, I must ask: *Is Sugarlabs
   going to continue hosting these VMs?*
   - We also have the following containers:
  - org.sugarlabs.www-rebuilder.
 - Maintainer: Sam Parkinson.
 - Services:
- used for update the SL www site after a new commit into
GitHub repo (through Webhooks).
- related: www.sugarlabs.org
 - org.sugarlabs.use-socialhelp:
  - Maintainer: Sam Parkinson.
 - Services:
- socialhelp.sugarlabs.org?
- org.sugarlabs.socialhelp_sso
  - Maintainer: Sam Parkinson.
 - Services:
- socialhelp.sugarlabs.org?
- local_discourse/app
  - Maintainer: Sam Parkinson.
 - Services:
- socialhelp.sugarlabs.org?
 - org.turtleartday.www-rebuilder
  - Maintainer: Samuel Cantero.
 - Services:
 - used for update the turtleartday.org site after a new commit
into GitHub repo (through Webhooks).
- related: turtleartday.org
 - org.sugarlabs.developer-rebuilder
  - Maintainer: Sam Parkinson.
 - Services:
- related: developer.sugarlabs.org
 - org.sugarlabs.bundlebin
  - Maintainer: Sam Parkinson.
 - Services:
- bundlebin.sugarlabs.org
 - org.sugarlabs.bugs
  - Maintainer: Sam Parkinson / Samuel Cantero.
 - Services:
- bugs.sugarlabs.org

*Sunjammer*

1. *OS*: Ubuntu

Re: [IAEP] [Systems] Stopwatch activity maintainer needed.

2017-02-18 Thread Samuel Cantero
it was me.

Ignacio, problem solved. It was a firewall issue. Go ahead.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Sebastian Silva 
wrote:

> I'm logging thru the vm console.
>
> Not finding signs of trouble. As I was diagnosing, I was kicked out with
> the following message:
>
> icarito@jita:~$ error: Disconnected from qemu:///system due to I/O error
>
>
>
> On 18/02/17 13:43, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
> > I'm not being able to
> > -> git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/stopwatch/stopwatch.git
> > or access to src.sugarlabs.org
> >
> > Any sys admin here? (adding systems to this thread)
> >
> > On 2/18/17, Chris Leonard  wrote:
> >> Can one of our activity maintainers please rescue StopWatch from our
> >> old git repository and migrate it to github?
> >>
> >> https://git.sugarlabs.org/stopwatch
> >>
> >> We got lots of localization for this, but it need to be migrated so I
> >> can land the new strings.
> >>
> >> cjl
> >> ___
> >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> >> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> >
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] Outreachy

2017-02-08 Thread Samuel Cantero
Great! :)

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Avni Khatri 
wrote:

> Excited to see Sugar Labs applying for this!
>
> On Feb 8, 2017, at 12:23 PM, Walter Bender 
> wrote:
>
> Unless I hear otherwise, I plan to submit an application to Outreachy [1]
> on behalf of Sugar Labs. Outreachy is an SFC program that helps people from
> groups underrepresented in free and open source software get involved. I'm
> also preparing a SL Outreachy landing page in the wiki [2].
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> [1] https://www.gnome.org/outreachy/
> [2] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Outreachy
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] TurtleArtDay.org domain transfer + new site

2016-08-08 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Dave Crossland  wrote:

> Hi
>
> Sam, do you have access to the original site files? If so, could you
> confirm where the files are - on sunjammer, perhaps?
>

It is in zatoichi. The VM is hosted on justice. Do you need access? I can
create an account for you.

>
> On 2 August 2016 at 14:55, Laura Vargas  wrote:
>
>> Looking good!
>>
>> As a suggestion, after the text:
>> "Sugar Labs® is supported by donations and is seeking funding to
>> accelerate development."
>>
>> Some basic instructions might come in place, something like:
>>
>> "To make a donation, please get in contact with the IAEP mailing list."
>>
>
> Done!
>
>
>> Would be great to have a version in Spanish too...
>>
>
> Please translate https://github.com/sugarlabs/turtleartday.org/blob/gh-
> pages/README.md and make a pull request :)
>
> Maybe http://tortugarte.org/ can be available for the Tortugarte Day in
>> the Spanish version?
>>
>
> It seems Paul Comfort owns this domain. I will email him.
>
> Cheers
> Dave
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] TurtleArtDay.org domain transfer + new site

2016-07-31 Thread Samuel Cantero
Turtleartday.org is up and running :)

I have added a Let's Encrypt certificate also for turtleartday.org. This
has been done following the doc that I have written some time ago:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sysadmin/Letsencrypt. However, we should
update this and move to Certbot or another client.

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Bernie Innocenti 
wrote:

> On 27/07/16 00:54, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> > I updated it.
> >
> > We should have a similar page for turtleart.org <
> http://turtleart.org>.
> >
> >
> > I made this as a start:
> >
> > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/turtleartday.org
>
> Awesome, thanks!
>
> --
>  _ // Bernie Innocenti
>  \X/  http://codewiz.org
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] TurtleArtDay.org domain transfer + new site

2016-07-26 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:

>
> On 26 July 2016 at 22:38, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Zone added.
>>
>
> Awesome! Thanks guys!
>
>
>> Now we need to configure the site in freedom. Dave, in what is written
>> the new site?
>>
>
> Its a jekyll site, I assume Sam P has used
> https://developer.github.com/webhooks/ to set up freedom so that on each
> commit to the master branch of https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs then
> freedom pulls that repo master branch and runs jekyll to update
> the www.sl.o website.
>

I have found how Sam P did it. In
https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs/settings/hooks there is a
webhook defined. This webhook send a POST request in JSON format to
https://hook.sugarlabs.org/www.sugarlabs.org. A container named
org.sugarlabs.www-rebuilder is in charge of processing this payload. This
container was down. I had to manually trigger the delivery of the last two
payloads. They have previously failed because the container was down.

This container does the following:

(1) Install jekyll.
(2) Clone the SL repo.
(3) Install Flask
(4) Execute a Flask Python App which does the following: pull the repo and
jekyll build. This app doesn't parse the POST request.

The site is generated in the folder /clone/_site which is bind to the
following dir in freedom: /srv/www-out. This is the doc root for the SL in
the nginx server block.

We can apply the same procedure for turtleartday.org.

>
> --
> Cheers
> Dave
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] TurtleArtDay.org domain transfer + new site

2016-07-26 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:

>
> Hi
>
> On 26 July 2016 at 13:03, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On 18 July 2016 at 14:48, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2 July 2016 at 17:29, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Claudia can follow
>>>>> https://wiki.gandi.net/en/domains/transfer/fromgodaddy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I worked with Claudia on this and she has just sent the auth code to
>>>> Bernie. Thank you Claudia!
>>>>
>>>> I noticed the domain needs renewal on September 24 this year, so would
>>>> be great to be ready for that when the finance manager is appointed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for renewing it Bernie!
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2. Bernie can follow https://wiki.gandi.net/en/domains/transfer
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bernie, let me know if you'd like me to carry this out for you, or Sam
>>>> C, etc :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good news - over the weekend I met up with Bernie at HOPE and he figured
>>> out how to authorize the transfer with GoDaddy, so the transfer is now
>>> complete.
>>>
>>> Bad news - right now it seems http://www.turtleartday.org is down
>>> again; I assume this is because the Gandhi.net hosting transfer is complete
>>> but the A records are now not set up.
>>>
>>
>> According to whois, turtleartday.org is pointing out to these NS:
>>
>> Name Server: NS66.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
>> Name Server: NS65.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
>>
>> We should modify it to point out to ns1.sugarlabs.org and add the DNS
>> records.
>>
>
> Yes that sounds ideal :)
>

I guess Bernie has access to the platform. Do you also have access? Who can
change the NS? I can add the DNS records for turtleartday.org after we
define where to host.

>
>
>>
>>>
>>>> A. I offer to port the existing website to
>>>>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/turtleartday.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've done the content for this, and the next step is to do the CSS/JS.
>>>> I hope to do that next weekend.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> B. I ask Sam to set up another git hook on the sugar webserver to keep
>>>>> that repo sync'd with the webserver
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sam, no need to do this before the CSS is ready, I think :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> The CSS is now ready - please see
>>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/turtleartday.org (with live preview at
>>> https://sugarlabs.github.io/turtleartday.org)
>>>
>>> So now the next steps are for the A records to be set up (if needed);
>>> and github webhooks made so that the sugar webserver keep the repo sync'd
>>> with the webserver, or, to point the A records to 192.30.252.153 and
>>> 192.30.252.154 and create a CNAME file in the repo.
>>>
>>> Where are we going to host the site?
>>
>
> I think we should use a similar set up to www.sugarlabs.org - how is that
> hosted?
>

It is hosted in freedom, but it is not inside a container. We just use
nginx. It was set up by Sam P. Are we using the same technologies?

--
> Cheers
> Dave
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] TurtleArtDay.org domain transfer + new site

2016-07-26 Thread Samuel Cantero
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Dave Crossland  wrote:

>
> Hi
>
> On 18 July 2016 at 14:48, Dave Crossland  wrote:
>
>> On 2 July 2016 at 17:29, Dave Crossland  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 1. Claudia can follow
>>> https://wiki.gandi.net/en/domains/transfer/fromgodaddy
>>>
>>
>> I worked with Claudia on this and she has just sent the auth code to
>> Bernie. Thank you Claudia!
>>
>> I noticed the domain needs renewal on September 24 this year, so would be
>> great to be ready for that when the finance manager is appointed.
>>
>
> Thanks for renewing it Bernie!
>
>
>> 2. Bernie can follow https://wiki.gandi.net/en/domains/transfer
>>>
>>
>> Bernie, let me know if you'd like me to carry this out for you, or Sam C,
>> etc :)
>>
>
> Good news - over the weekend I met up with Bernie at HOPE and he figured
> out how to authorize the transfer with GoDaddy, so the transfer is now
> complete.
>
> Bad news - right now it seems http://www.turtleartday.org is down again;
> I assume this is because the Gandhi.net hosting transfer is complete but
> the A records are now not set up.
>

According to whois, turtleartday.org is pointing out to these NS:

Name Server: NS66.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS65.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

We should modify it to point out to ns1.sugarlabs.org and add the DNS
records.

>
>
>> A. I offer to port the existing website to
>>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/turtleartday.org
>>>
>>
>> I've done the content for this, and the next step is to do the CSS/JS. I
>> hope to do that next weekend.
>>
>>
>>> B. I ask Sam to set up another git hook on the sugar webserver to keep
>>> that repo sync'd with the webserver
>>>
>>
>> Sam, no need to do this before the CSS is ready, I think :)
>>
>
> The CSS is now ready - please see
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/turtleartday.org (with live preview at
> https://sugarlabs.github.io/turtleartday.org)
>
> So now the next steps are for the A records to be set up (if needed); and
> github webhooks made so that the sugar webserver keep the repo sync'd with
> the webserver, or, to point the A records to 192.30.252.153 and
> 192.30.252.154 and create a CNAME file in the repo.
>
> Where are we going to host the site?

> --
> Cheers
> Dave
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] TurtleArtDay.org domain transfer + new site

2016-07-21 Thread Samuel Cantero
I was checking the DNS records for turtleartday.org in order to move it to
our DNS servers. It is pointing out to 18.85.44.66 (zatoichi) but it also
has an MX record pointing out to smtp.secureserver.net. Are we using this
currently? Are we keeping it in our DNS?

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti 
wrote:

> The transfer is still pending on Gandi, blocked by this step:
>
> STEP 4: The transfer has been accepted by the former provider
> (GoDaddy.com, LLC)
>
> (Note: This step is optional; the transfer will proceed automatically
> after timeout unless denied by the current registrar.)
>
>
> On 18/07/16 19:54, Claudia Urrea wrote:
> > Thanks, Bernie.
> >
> > I authorized the transfer a few minutes ago.
> >
> > Claudia
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Bernie Innocenti  > > wrote:
> >
> > On 18/07/16 16:09, Claudia Urrea wrote:
> > > I worked with Claudia on this and she has just sent the auth
> code to
> > > Bernie. Thank you Claudia!
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> >
> > I started the transfer to Gandi. I gave ownership to the SFC, and put
> > myself as technical contact.
> >
> > I'm waiting for the operation to complete. Later, we can move the
> DNS to
> > the SL nameservers.
> >
> >
> > > I noticed the domain needs renewal on September 24 this year,
> so
> > > would be great to be ready for that when the finance manager is
> > > appointed.
> > >
> > > I paid in the past and I don't mind paying for it again.
> >
> > No problem, I already paid for the renewal (or maybe the SFC got
> > charged, it wasn't clear from the instructions :-)
> >
> > --
> >  _ // Bernie Innocenti
> >  \X/  http://codewiz.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>  _ // Bernie Innocenti
>  \X/  http://codewiz.org
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Systems] Maintenance downtime today for OS upgrades

2016-07-09 Thread Samuel Cantero
Hi all,

We had some issues with the docker upgrade, mainly with the btrfs fs. I had
to remove all of the btrfs subvolumes. I had to recreate every container
again (which is not a problem).

bugs.sl.o and bundlebin.sl.o are running again, but I could not find the
container for socialhelp.sl.o. All the active containers should be in
/containers pointing the git repo in /srv/containers. I've checked the
nginx config file for socialhelp.sl.o and it says that it should be running
on port localhost:8002 (proxypass), but there isn't a container.yml file
with that port. Have we removed this service?

Best regards,

Samuel C.


On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Bernie Innocenti  wrote:

> On 09/07/16 19:15, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > Samuel is currently restoring docker images, and meanwhile I'm upgrading
> > freedom.
>
> Correction: I'm currently upgrading justice. Freedom was already done
> earlier today.
>
> --
>  _ // Bernie Innocenti
>  \X/  http://codewiz.org
> ___
> Systems mailing list
> syst...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Planned Sunjammer Reboot

2016-06-03 Thread Samuel Cantero
Everything is up and running. Please let me know if you find something
broken.

Best regards,

Samuel C.

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Sunjammer had an unattended kernel upgrade yesterday. We know now that
> kernel updates are not banned from the unattended upgrades config.
>
> I am at the FSF now and I'll reboot sunjammer in a little while in order
> to check if it comes back. It is better to find this out now than after an
> unexpected power event.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Samuel C.
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Planned Sunjammer Reboot

2016-06-03 Thread Samuel Cantero
Hi all,

Sunjammer had an unattended kernel upgrade yesterday. We know now that
kernel updates are not banned from the unattended upgrades config.

I am at the FSF now and I'll reboot sunjammer in a little while in order to
check if it comes back. It is better to find this out now than after an
unexpected power event.

Best regards,

Samuel C.
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep