Re: [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Ifeanyi Peterwrote: > Maybe anytime we have suggestions that concerns Marketing, we would just > forward it to the Marketing Dept. for review. How to I join the marketing > team as well, I have some suggestions. Thanks Ifeanyi To join the Marketing team, just subscribe to the Marketing list: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing There is also a wiki section: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team The team is small and we have been dormant, as I've explained before because I am not sure what the SL message should be - where we are going. We don't have funds for market studies, but I believe that for anyone able to identify OLPC in unaided awareness, we are considered linked to OLPC and many casual observers are probably unaware that OLPC is still around. SL has been tops in SEO for years, which is a great asset - many organizations cannot say that. Anyone searching for us finds us easily. What they don't find is a clear message from us, and software to try with 1-click install. This last has a lot do with Sugar's IT architecture, and it is my hope that Sugarizer (and other approaches such as Activities running outside Sugar) can introduce Sugar to teachers more easily. Sean. ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion)
Sean, I completely agree with everything you said. We seem to have such a leaky conversion funnel that advertising and social media would be a waste of money anyway. You are 100% right that content is key now. Thanks, Sam On Thu, Jun 9, 2016, 19:41 Sean DALYwrote: > I'm sorry, I don't see how SL can support a new paid position. My > suggestion would be to evaluate how the paid Translation Manager position > works out. > > I'm glad Samson you are eager to work on social media (as I've said), > however I don't understand your marketing objectives. Put another way, just > what content, from where, will generate lots of likes and clicks, towards > what goal? I think the goal is developer recruitment, not for teachers or > education IT buyers, or small donors, or major donors. If they matter too, > do we use the same plan and tactics for them? > > As I've said, I am opposed to associating random advertising with Sugar > Labs for negligeable income. We should really do Google AdGrants. This can > be done in cooperation with the SFC which is the nonprofit entity which > will qualify (and Dave - we shouldn't try to control their account for > this). > > I am pleased there is motivation to work on PR, however major media tech > sites won't publish anything about us unless we have news, and right now we > don't. (Ifeanyi - it's not the case that buying ads from news sites will > generate coverage, that's not how journalists work.) > > I'm not comfortable with the idea of creating a Facebook-only version of > Sugarizer (? if there are resources to do so?) - as fun and ubiquitous as > fb is, it's a proprietary environment with highly questionable privacy > policies. It's already possible to link to a public website from Facebook, > this would be far better. > > The previous times I have raised these points they haven't been answered. > Perhaps the time has come for me to step away from Marketing/PR at SL and > let you guys reinvent the wheel. > > Sean > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > >> [ Here is the full text of the doc, by Samson with editing assistance >> by myself ] >> >> Concerning SL vision 2016, I think that SL should add social media as >> one of our main ways to get new members. With the big name we have, we >> should use that as an advantage to get people into our community - but >> we aren’t. >> >> Let me use myself as an example, I am a very active user in the social >> world (facebook, twitter, instagram, and YouTube) even though I don’t >> have a smartphone or a laptop of my own to use regularly. I have over >> 560 followers on twitter. According to twitter official report, my >> tweets receive more than 1.9k impressions per day. For the past 28 >> days I have gotten over 42.4k impressions. My lowest impression is >> about 50 on a tweet. My highest tweet is about 4,800 on a tweet. Now >> imagine if SL can get this number of impressions by activeness alone >> on twitter. Same goes to facebook, also posting images on instagram. >> We can get more than 400 impressions a day via twitter, Also facebook >> and instagram. If we do the math correctly, SL can get over 600 people >> a day from social media to sugarlabs.org. That’s valuable traffic for >> our sites. >> >> >> How do we get started with this new development? >> >> >> It’s very simple; I propose the following motion: >> >> >> Motion: create a “Social Media Manager,” role, similar to the >> translation manager position, paid $1,000/month plus discretionary use >> of an advertising budget of $100/month. >> >> >> I believe that the role will not be taken seriously if it is volunteer >> driven. I am in charge of the social accounts of my church,another >> non-profit organization. Their social media marketing was also not >> taken seriously until the church made a modestly paid role. The church >> community and I both saw it as a responsibility when the role was >> paid; and my work was effective, as now we have over 4,000 followers >> on facebook. >> >> >> Money should be spent in order to gain more. More social media >> followers will lead to more active members which will lead to member >> donations. I know it’s a non-profit organization but that does not >> mean we shouldn’t grow. >> >> To get my contract approved by SLOBs. I spent almost 100 USD (21,000 >> naira) in cyber cafes answering questions that were not related to my >> project, so if anyone does not understand this proposal, I strongly >> suggest they make research on the internet first before asking >> questions, because I will not answer if the questions are not >> relevant. >> >> >> I believe in the growth of SL, but I think we can’t grow big if we are >> not doing well on social media. Even if I am not experienced in >> business, based on the fact that I am still young and not yet a >> college graduate, this seems essential to any non-profit business. I >> always thank God for Nigeria because even if the government
Re: [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion)
I'm sorry, I don't see how SL can support a new paid position. My suggestion would be to evaluate how the paid Translation Manager position works out. I'm glad Samson you are eager to work on social media (as I've said), however I don't understand your marketing objectives. Put another way, just what content, from where, will generate lots of likes and clicks, towards what goal? I think the goal is developer recruitment, not for teachers or education IT buyers, or small donors, or major donors. If they matter too, do we use the same plan and tactics for them? As I've said, I am opposed to associating random advertising with Sugar Labs for negligeable income. We should really do Google AdGrants. This can be done in cooperation with the SFC which is the nonprofit entity which will qualify (and Dave - we shouldn't try to control their account for this). I am pleased there is motivation to work on PR, however major media tech sites won't publish anything about us unless we have news, and right now we don't. (Ifeanyi - it's not the case that buying ads from news sites will generate coverage, that's not how journalists work.) I'm not comfortable with the idea of creating a Facebook-only version of Sugarizer (? if there are resources to do so?) - as fun and ubiquitous as fb is, it's a proprietary environment with highly questionable privacy policies. It's already possible to link to a public website from Facebook, this would be far better. The previous times I have raised these points they haven't been answered. Perhaps the time has come for me to step away from Marketing/PR at SL and let you guys reinvent the wheel. Sean On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Dave Crosslandwrote: > [ Here is the full text of the doc, by Samson with editing assistance > by myself ] > > Concerning SL vision 2016, I think that SL should add social media as > one of our main ways to get new members. With the big name we have, we > should use that as an advantage to get people into our community - but > we aren’t. > > Let me use myself as an example, I am a very active user in the social > world (facebook, twitter, instagram, and YouTube) even though I don’t > have a smartphone or a laptop of my own to use regularly. I have over > 560 followers on twitter. According to twitter official report, my > tweets receive more than 1.9k impressions per day. For the past 28 > days I have gotten over 42.4k impressions. My lowest impression is > about 50 on a tweet. My highest tweet is about 4,800 on a tweet. Now > imagine if SL can get this number of impressions by activeness alone > on twitter. Same goes to facebook, also posting images on instagram. > We can get more than 400 impressions a day via twitter, Also facebook > and instagram. If we do the math correctly, SL can get over 600 people > a day from social media to sugarlabs.org. That’s valuable traffic for > our sites. > > > How do we get started with this new development? > > > It’s very simple; I propose the following motion: > > > Motion: create a “Social Media Manager,” role, similar to the > translation manager position, paid $1,000/month plus discretionary use > of an advertising budget of $100/month. > > > I believe that the role will not be taken seriously if it is volunteer > driven. I am in charge of the social accounts of my church,another > non-profit organization. Their social media marketing was also not > taken seriously until the church made a modestly paid role. The church > community and I both saw it as a responsibility when the role was > paid; and my work was effective, as now we have over 4,000 followers > on facebook. > > > Money should be spent in order to gain more. More social media > followers will lead to more active members which will lead to member > donations. I know it’s a non-profit organization but that does not > mean we shouldn’t grow. > > To get my contract approved by SLOBs. I spent almost 100 USD (21,000 > naira) in cyber cafes answering questions that were not related to my > project, so if anyone does not understand this proposal, I strongly > suggest they make research on the internet first before asking > questions, because I will not answer if the questions are not > relevant. > > > I believe in the growth of SL, but I think we can’t grow big if we are > not doing well on social media. Even if I am not experienced in > business, based on the fact that I am still young and not yet a > college graduate, this seems essential to any non-profit business. I > always thank God for Nigeria because even if the government is not > doing well, we Nigerians always find a way to thrive with any little > chance we find because of the way we think and live. Social media is > now essential for all organizations in all countries, including > Nigeria. > > > According to our last report on activities.sugarlabs.org our weekly > download is getting lower and lower, though over 11 million activities > have been downloaded in total. > > > What
Re: [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion)
Nice one mattew, yeah we already proposed $100/Month for ads. I don't think it should be bigger than that, Since the proposed fee of the Social Manager will be $1100/Month. This money covers the managers money and the ads for our social media site or any other site. Also Every member of SugarLabs should subcribe at https://www.youtube.com/c/SugarlabsOrg-EN to gain more impressions. Samson Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:33:40 + From: ifeanyipete...@yahoo.com To: samsongo...@sugarlabs.org; d...@lab6.com CC: sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; market...@lists.sugarlabs.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion) Nice proposal/motion by Samson Goddy ft Dave. The Youtube channel created is okay - I just subscribed and I am raising a motion for everyone on SL devel list to subscribe in order for the channel to start gaining popularity and SEO optimization by Google Search Console. It is when there is traffic from different IPs that Youtube channels tend to get exposed to search engines like Google, Bing, Ask etc. >We will work with Digital Trends, BBC tech, CNN tech and other>tech-related >sites to publish SL articles. I like the point Samson raised on his statement above and he also confirmed that he can take care of Digital Trends. What happens to BBC Tech, CNN tech, techcrunch.com etc. I think before these other organizations will like to blog about SugarLabs, SL has to be a customer is some way e.g Buying an ads space from them. I am also proposing (i.e adding to the proposal by Samson) - that provisions should be made for ads in websites. Secondly, News pitching is another great was to market SL to the world. I have a list of Tech sites that will want us at SL to pitch News on their website (free and paid). With us doing this a lick or two will be leading to SL wiki page or social media accounts, which will in turn lead to like-minded persons to join SL. Regards,Ifeanyi On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 1:16 AM, "sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org"wrote: Send Sugar-devel mailing list submissions to sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org You can reach the person managing the list at sugar-devel-ow...@lists.sugarlabs.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Sugar-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion) (Dave Crossland) 2. Re: Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion) (Dave Crossland) 3. Re: Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion) (samson goddy) 4. Re: Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion) (Dave Crossland) 5. Re: A Better Idea... (Laura Vargas) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:11:54 -0600 From: Dave Crossland To: samson goddy Cc: "market...@lists.sugarlabs.org" , "sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org" , iaep , sugar labs Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion) Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 [ Here is the full text of the doc, by Samson with editing assistance by myself ] Concerning SL vision 2016, I think that SL should add social media as one of our main ways to get new members. With the big name we have, we should use that as an advantage to get people into our community - but we aren’t. Let me use myself as an example, I am a very active user in the social world (facebook, twitter, instagram, and YouTube) even though I don’t have a smartphone or a laptop of my own to use regularly. I have over 560 followers on twitter. According to twitter official report, my tweets receive more than 1.9k impressions per day. For the past 28 days I have gotten over 42.4k impressions. My lowest impression is about 50 on a tweet. My highest tweet is about 4,800 on a tweet. Now imagine if SL can get this number of impressions by activeness alone on twitter. Same goes to facebook, also posting images on instagram. We can get more than 400 impressions a day via twitter, Also facebook and instagram. If we do the math correctly, SL can get over 600 people a day from social media to sugarlabs.org. That’s valuable traffic for our sites. How do we get started with this new development? It’s very simple; I propose the following motion: Motion: create a “Social Media Manager,” role, similar to the translation manager position, paid $1,000/month plus discretionary use of an advertising budget of $100/month.
Re: [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion)
https://plus.google.com/117498324552994144988 > From: d...@lab6.com > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:52:35 -0600 > Subject: Re: Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion) > To: samsongo...@hotmail.com > CC: sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; market...@lists.sugarlabs.org; > iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; wal...@sugarlabs.org > > On 7 June 2016 at 16:50, samson goddywrote: > > Sure I am going to use your help on that. > > Let me know your G+ profiles and I'll add you to the YouTube Channel > that I've set up: > > https://www.youtube.com/c/SugarlabsOrg-EN ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion)
On 7 June 2016 at 16:50, samson goddywrote: > Sure I am going to use your help on that. Let me know your G+ profiles and I'll add you to the YouTube Channel that I've set up: https://www.youtube.com/c/SugarlabsOrg-EN ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion)
[ Here is the full text of the doc, by Samson with editing assistance by myself ] Concerning SL vision 2016, I think that SL should add social media as one of our main ways to get new members. With the big name we have, we should use that as an advantage to get people into our community - but we aren’t. Let me use myself as an example, I am a very active user in the social world (facebook, twitter, instagram, and YouTube) even though I don’t have a smartphone or a laptop of my own to use regularly. I have over 560 followers on twitter. According to twitter official report, my tweets receive more than 1.9k impressions per day. For the past 28 days I have gotten over 42.4k impressions. My lowest impression is about 50 on a tweet. My highest tweet is about 4,800 on a tweet. Now imagine if SL can get this number of impressions by activeness alone on twitter. Same goes to facebook, also posting images on instagram. We can get more than 400 impressions a day via twitter, Also facebook and instagram. If we do the math correctly, SL can get over 600 people a day from social media to sugarlabs.org. That’s valuable traffic for our sites. How do we get started with this new development? It’s very simple; I propose the following motion: Motion: create a “Social Media Manager,” role, similar to the translation manager position, paid $1,000/month plus discretionary use of an advertising budget of $100/month. I believe that the role will not be taken seriously if it is volunteer driven. I am in charge of the social accounts of my church,another non-profit organization. Their social media marketing was also not taken seriously until the church made a modestly paid role. The church community and I both saw it as a responsibility when the role was paid; and my work was effective, as now we have over 4,000 followers on facebook. Money should be spent in order to gain more. More social media followers will lead to more active members which will lead to member donations. I know it’s a non-profit organization but that does not mean we shouldn’t grow. To get my contract approved by SLOBs. I spent almost 100 USD (21,000 naira) in cyber cafes answering questions that were not related to my project, so if anyone does not understand this proposal, I strongly suggest they make research on the internet first before asking questions, because I will not answer if the questions are not relevant. I believe in the growth of SL, but I think we can’t grow big if we are not doing well on social media. Even if I am not experienced in business, based on the fact that I am still young and not yet a college graduate, this seems essential to any non-profit business. I always thank God for Nigeria because even if the government is not doing well, we Nigerians always find a way to thrive with any little chance we find because of the way we think and live. Social media is now essential for all organizations in all countries, including Nigeria. According to our last report on activities.sugarlabs.org our weekly download is getting lower and lower, though over 11 million activities have been downloaded in total. What we need to do to get SL growing bigger: 1. SL needs to get a official YouTube account and channel: a. We need a Gmail account to create the account. b. We need to monetize our videos using Google adsense to create more funds for SL. c. We will verify our YouTube channel. d. We will show live workshops in the channel. E.g. turtle art day 2. Make our twitter page live again: a. We will regain access to @sugarlabs and shut down @sugar_labs b. We will verify @sugarlabs account c. We will boost (paying fees)our important tweets, like recruitment for GSOC and GCI, our stable releases, etc. d. We will run hashtag campaigns 3 Make our Facebook account live again: We already own a facebook account, with almost 700 followers but low engagement from followers. a. We need to verify our facebook page(in progress) with a verified page. We will stream live video of workshops or related projects. b. We will post 5 times a day c. We will boost our important posts d. We will request SL members on facebook to share our posts with their friends. Facebook owns an app market that enable javascript projects to run on facebook. For example, people play games on facebook while chatting: Sometimes I play “Pool Live Pro” while I update my profile or chat with friends. So we will port sugarizer to the platform. 4. Make use of instagram: a. We will post minimum 5 pictures of SL projects a day b. We will request SL members on instagram to refer SL page to their followers 5. Make use of linkedIn: a. We will update the community page on LinkedIn b. We will ask every member on LinkedIn to update their profile to show their involvement in Sugar Labs. 6. Make use of Google+ a. We will make use of Google+ by posting our upcoming meetings b. We will also post videos of Sugar labs 7. Make use of Online Media
[IAEP] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion)
Hello Everyone, I and Dave came up with this proposal on how to make this organization bigger. I was suppose to draft just the youtube proposal as promised. So we came up with a better idea to go into the social world explained by the proposal[1]. About the sugar Vision 2016, i think that supporting this motion will make things happen. Don't make the $ in the proposal affect your judgement. P.S This way is one of the major way i think will benefit SL. The proposal is drafted in google doc check link below. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fKvuQ6ZgCD87n9FS_8yybOvUCeZBnZgzwGJX8xgQwjw/edit?usp=sharing [1] regards Samson Goddy / Dave Crossland ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep