Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Bob Shannon
 However, one aspect bothers me greatly:
 That is a new emphasis on 'being green.' And how does
 SHARE propose to save the planet? A: By encouraging
 speakers to NOT pass out the customary handouts which
 show the slides to be presented during their talk.
 The assumption is that attendees can later download
 the presentation slides from the web if they so desire.

Going Green is a euphemism for we want to save money by not providing 
copiers at the conference. SHARE does not discourage speakers from 
distributing paper handouts; it just doesn't want to incur the cost of printing 
them. IMO, going green was a convenient spin to justify the policy change.

 Share should get smart like Microsoft,they handed out Cdroms and free
 software and free handoutshumConsidering I am a mainframe Software  
 developer I appreciated it.

SHARE meets twice a year, which makes collecting and organizing the 
presentations onto a CD in time for the conference just about impossible. 
Material about late breaking sessions such as the z10 announcement cannot be 
disclosed to SHARE in advance of the announcement.

 The problem with that is few laptops will last an entire day without being  
 re-charged

A friend of mine brought a battery brick (my term) that was made by Black  
Decker. He plugged his laptop into the brick and it was good for about nine 
hours.

 Getting through US customs as a foreign national is just too much of a
 PITA.

Going through US security as a US citizen is no fun either, nor is foreign 
travel for US citizens. It's unfortunate.

Bob Shannon
Rocket Software

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: The System z10s Are Shipping

2008-03-01 Thread Bob Shannon
Where are you and what are you doing now and where is it shiiping too or are 
you just getting excited because IBM is shipping something again to somewhere 
?

There was a guy like you doing the same in the 40's called Kilroy... so I 
have to assume you are shipping to IRAQ.

Note: The papers says, only INDIA and CHINA is still buying. The rest of us 
is down sizing.

Based on what I heard at SHARE, and based on the people to whom I spoke, these 
comments are ludicrous. The new machines are being received very well.

Bob Shannon
Rocket Software

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
 
 
In a message dated 3/1/2008 6:51:32 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Going Green is a euphemism for we want to save money by not providing  
copiers at the conference. SHARE does not discourage speakers from 
distributing 
 paper handouts; it just doesn't want to incur the cost of printing them. 
IMO,  going green was a convenient spin to justify the policy change.
 
So the green does not mean eco-friendly but rather refers to the color of  
the FERNs [1] being saved?
 
What about providing copiers that are not free?  You copy your paper  and pay 
for how many pages you copied.  SHARE could still be non-profit if  they 
computed the charge per page properly.  Or instead of a copier there  could be 
a 
page in the final agenda (is that still being printed?  how much  paper is 
wasted on that thing?) with directions to all the retail  stores nearby which 
have 
pay-per-use copiers (Kinko's, e.g.).
 
Bill  Fairchild
Rocket Software
 
[1] FEderal Reserve Notes





**Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.  
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp0030002598)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Bob Shannon
 You copy your paper  and pay for how many pages you copied.

There was a business center in the convention center where anyone could have 
copies made for a fee. There is no reason to provide a competing service. It's 
also no secret that places such as Kinko's provide copying services.

 SHARE could still be non-profit

About 15 years ago the IRS decided that SHARE (and GUIDE) are not non-profits.

Bob Shannon
Rocket Software

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread R.S.

(several guys) wrote:

You copy your paper  and pay for how many pages you copied.


There was a business center in the convention center where anyone could have 
copies made for a fee. There is no reason to provide a competing service. It's 
also no secret that places such as Kinko's provide copying services.


IMHO it is almost as interesting and on-topic as weather report for 
SHARE conference.  g
All details of copiers, copying services and SHARE non-profit status 
should be discussed very thoroughly. Every detail should be talked over, 
including closely related topics like baseball league, 29th of Feb, 
taxes, offshore, etc.


I couldn't resist
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, 
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2008 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA  wynosi 
118.642.672 zote i zosta w caoci wpacony.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Mark S. Waterbury
COMMON, the IBM midrange (System i, iSeries and AS/400) user group 
(www.common.org), which is very similar to SHARE, began a similar 
exercise about 5 years ago. They started distributing hand-outs on CDs, 
instead of paper copies, to reduce costs and save a tree.  Many people 
complained loudly and often, and the COMMON board of directors ended up 
backing away from this decision to go paperless. And not all of the 
speakers went along with the program at first. Some speakers still 
insist on hardcopy only.


COMMON still provides downloadable hand-outs on their web site, but only 
to members who attended that particular conference. And, they still 
provide the option for speakers to bring in their own printed hand-outs. 
COMMON no longer produces CDs. And speakers can still indicate if they 
want hard-copy hand-outs or not, when they upload their handouts to the 
web site prior to the conference.  COMMON has greatly scaled back the 
size and cost of the on-site copy center at each conference.


COMMON also provides a nice pad of paper and pencils and pens in each 
attendee's bag, so that you can take notes for sessions that do not 
have hand-outs.


I think the last time I attended COMMON, about half of the sessions had 
paper hand-outs; the rest were on-line.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SPAM: Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Rick Fochtman

-snip--
What I would love to see happen is that the handouts are on flash drives 
or they could load the handouts on my flash drive so I can take notes 
directly on my computer.

unsnip-
Or on CD-ROM or DVD. Then there would be two CD's: handouts and proceedings.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Edward Jaffe

Warner Mach wrote:

SHARE is now wrapping up and was, as usual, highly
worthwhile ... However, one aspect bothers me greatly:
That is a new emphasis on 'being green.' And how does
SHARE propose to save the planet? A: By encouraging 
speakers to NOT pass out the customary handouts which

show the slides to be presented during their talk.
The assumption is that attendees can later download 
the presentation slides from the web if they so desire.

  .
One speaker actually suggested that the attendee might
take notes on a pad of some sort (remember college?) and
then download the presentation and transfer the notes to
the presentation; rather than write the notes directly
on the presentation handout, as was customary.
  .
It is interesting how companies and organizations are
eager to show their alignment with 'green-ness' when being
green corresponds with less expense and trouble for those
in charge.
  .
To my mind there are a world of good reasons why this new
policy is a bad one (fill in the blanks). I asked at the
headquarters desk where to send comments on the new policy.
I was told: [EMAIL PROTECTED].
  .
If you are a member of SHARE and have an opinion on this
issue you might drop them a line. Let's discourage this trend 
before a large number of speakers adopt it.
  


Like many so-called green initiatives, this is nothing more than a 
popular delusion based on a gross misunderstanding of the facts.


SHARE simply stated that, in order to reduce costs, it would no longer 
provide on-site copy services during the conference.


Only a very tiny subset of speakers, those that were accustomed to 
printing their handouts on SHARE's dime, were affected. For them, two 
obvious alternatives were suggested: a) present without handouts or b) 
create -- at your own expense --abbreviated handouts in outline form.


For everyone else, SHARE was business as usual.

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Eric Bielefeld
I too would like to weigh in on this subject.  I would much prefer having the 
handout to look at and take notes on while I'm in a session.  I haven't been to 
Share for 3 or 4 years now.  Mostly because the last 2 years at PH they were 
closing the datacenter, and didn't want to pay for any education.  I can't 
quite see paying several thousand dollars when I'm unemployed to go to Share, 
as you never know how soon a job will come around.  Before I got my job at 
Aviva, I went almost 9 months.  Boy - does that eat in to savings.  

Anyway, back to the topic.  One suggestion I have is that all handouts are 
printed on both sides.  Depending on the level of detail, 2 or 4 frames or more 
per page greatly cuts down on the amount of paper also.  I know some of the 
handouts, like the ones from Marne Wall are especially appreciated.  She puts 
much of the text and other pertinent info on each slide.  That is very 
valuable.  Thanks Marne, and keep it up!

Regarding laptops at Share, the last year I went I took my laptop along.  I 
think I took it to sessions 2 or 3 of the 5 days.  I found it to be a real 
pain.  Mine is fairly heavy - especially when you have it at the expo.  I saved 
money for PH by rooming 3 or 4 blocks away, making it hard to just put it in 
to my room.  Also, then you have to look for a plug in, which isn't always very 
easy to find.  I do remember one session on RMF reports, where I logged on to 
PH's computer, and looked at some of my own reports as the presenter was 
talking about them.  That was cool, and helpful.  Taking notes on paper is 
fine, but it works a lot better taking them on the handout

I sincerely hope that most presenters will continue to provide handouts.  I 
think for the money, they provide a huge value.  I wonder which is cheaper - 
printing them on your home office copier and shipping them, or printing them at 
Kinkos.  I'm sure the hotel or convention center copy prices are ridiculous!

--
Eric Bielefeld
Systems Programmer
Aviva USA
Des Moines, Iowa
515-645-5153

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How to find uncatalog datasets.

2008-03-01 Thread Joel C. Ewing
Are you not yet using SMS-managed volumes and forcing all non-system 
DASD datasets to be SMS-managed?  If not, you should be.


SMS datasets are forced to be cataloged, even if the end-user out of 
ignorance doesn't specify it properly in his JCL, and if some rare 
system failure were to allow one to be uncataloged, running periodic 
DIAGNOSEs against catalogs and VVDSs will catch that as an inconsistency.


Pre-SMS we used to worry about this kind of thing and run daily/weekly 
cleanup of uncataloged datasets, but the problem completely disappeared 
over a decade ago when we converted all application DASD datasets to SMS 
and enforced this restriction via naming conventions, ACS routines, and 
RACF.


I haven't seen an uncataloged DASD dataset for years, except for ones 
Technical Support deliberately creates as part of system cloning on 
non-SMS volumes.


Uncataloged datasets introduce a myriad of problems in dataset 
management, tracking, and cleanup, not to mention that 99.9% of the time 
when an end-user or application programmer creates one, they can't find 
it, just think it was deleted somehow, and try to create another copy 
somewhere else. Uncataloged DASD datasets should be disallowed by 
installation standards and enforcement mechanisms like SMS  RACF should 
be in place to prevent accidental creation in the first place.


Sivakumar, Manikandan wrote:

Folks,

I would like to know information how to list the uncatalog datasets. I
would like to know whether we can use IDCAMS utility or any other
utility. Thanks.

Regards, Mani


...


--
Joel C. Ewing, Fort Smith, AR[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM announced z10 ..why so fast...any problem on z 9

2008-03-01 Thread Edward Jaffe

Tommy Tsui wrote:

..I
think z9 is announced around 3 years...As I remember, IBM never try to
announced a new model of mainframe computer just three years later...


Using http://www.tech-news.com/ as a reference, the history of IBM CMOS 
mainframe processor hardware generations is as follows:


Processor 1stAvail
  
9672-G13Q 94
9672-G23Q 95
9672-G33Q 96
9672-G42Q 97
9672-G53Q 98
9672-G62Q 99
z900   1Q 00
z800   1Q 02
z900-GA2   2Q 02
z990   2Q 03
z9-109 4Q 03
z890   2Q 04
z9EC   3Q 05
z9BC   2Q 06
z101Q 08

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Preview of z/OS V1.10

2008-03-01 Thread Chris Taylor
From the Share session what's new in DFSMS under z/OS V1.9 Statement of 
Direction

VSAM KEYRANGE Attribute
• Support for the VSAM KEYRANGE attribute will not be withdrawn as previously
stated
• No supported release of z/OS allows you to define new VSAM data sets with 
the
KEYRANGE attribute
• On modern storage devices, KEYRANGE is generally detrimental to
performance. For this reason, IBM recommends that you minimize or eliminate
your use of KEYRANGE.
• Striped data sets are expected to provide better performance than 
KEYRANGE,
and can be viewed as a good replacement for KEYRANGE data sets.
• To detect the KEYRANGE attribute on existing data sets, refer to INFO APAR
II13894.
• Use the DFSMShsm ARCTOOLS (FINDKRDS) to detect this attribute for data
sets migrated with DFSMShsm. Details on how to use this tool are in the
DFSMShsm Implementation and Customization Guide (SC35-0418).

and

VSAM IMBED and REPLICATE Attributes
• In a future release of z/OS, when DFSMShsm or DFSMSdss recalls or
restores a VSAM data set with either IMBED or REPLICATE attribute or
both, the attributes will be removed.
• Once recalled or restored, the data sets would no longer have these 
attributes. Until this enhancement is made available, support for IMBED and 
REPLICATE will not be withdrawn.
• No supported release of z/OS allows you to define new VSAM data sets
or catalogs with the IMBED or REPLICATE attributes
• Using them for existing data sets can waste DASD space and can often
degrade performance, and for this reason, IBM recommends that you
stop using these attributes.
• For information about how to detect IMBED and REPLICATE attributes
on existing data sets and catalogs, refer to INFO APAR II13894.
• Tivolitm Advanced Catalog Management for z/OS also has the ability to 
remove these attributes

Regards,

Chris Taylor

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: new Feb2008 zPOP: Execute Relative Long

2008-03-01 Thread Edward Jaffe

Tom Schmidt wrote:

See SA22-7832-06 for the EXRL instruction.
(I'm sure Ed's been aware for several months now, but the rest of us may be 
happy now.)
  


Give 'em an inch and they'll take a yard! People are already clamoring 
for additional forms of EXRL that can OR the mask with other than byte 
one of the target instruction! It never ends! :-)


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz
Although it is true that SHARE is trying to cut down on copying costs,
which certainly helps green initiatives, I don't believe it is the intent
of presenters to stop bring handouts with them.  I, and many others, still
make a certain amount of copies, and makes sure our presentations are
uploaded
prior to the start of the conference. The uploading has no cost to
presenters,
but the making of copies can be quite costly.  Some late breaking types of

material will still not make it (example: all of the z10 info could not be 
published ahead of time) in time for the conference opening.  Hopefully, it
will 
be uploaded during the week, or shortly after.  There is also the
Proceedings 
DVD that can be purchased that contains all of the materials.  And if all
else
fails, a kind eMail to the presenter requesting the presentation, usually
gets a
good response.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 SYSN 08:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SHARE  no handouts(?)

Warner Mach wrote:
 SHARE is now wrapping up and was, as usual, highly
 worthwhile ... However, one aspect bothers me greatly:
 That is a new emphasis on 'being green.' And how does
 SHARE propose to save the planet? A: By encouraging 
 speakers to NOT pass out the customary handouts which
 show the slides to be presented during their talk.
 The assumption is that attendees can later download 
 the presentation slides from the web if they so desire.
   .
 One speaker actually suggested that the attendee might
 take notes on a pad of some sort (remember college?) and
 then download the presentation and transfer the notes to
 the presentation; rather than write the notes directly
 on the presentation handout, as was customary.
   .
 It is interesting how companies and organizations are
 eager to show their alignment with 'green-ness' when being
 green corresponds with less expense and trouble for those
 in charge.
   .
 To my mind there are a world of good reasons why this new
 policy is a bad one (fill in the blanks). I asked at the
 headquarters desk where to send comments on the new policy.
 I was told: [EMAIL PROTECTED].
   .
 If you are a member of SHARE and have an opinion on this
 issue you might drop them a line. Let's discourage this trend 
 before a large number of speakers adopt it.
   

Like many so-called green initiatives, this is nothing more than a 
popular delusion based on a gross misunderstanding of the facts.

SHARE simply stated that, in order to reduce costs, it would no longer 
provide on-site copy services during the conference.

Only a very tiny subset of speakers, those that were accustomed to 
printing their handouts on SHARE's dime, were affected. For them, two 
obvious alternatives were suggested: a) present without handouts or b) 
create -- at your own expense --abbreviated handouts in outline form.

For everyone else, SHARE was business as usual.

-- 
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z10 LSPR

2008-03-01 Thread Edward Jaffe

William Bishop wrote:
Since when are the MSU ratings dependent upon which release of zOS you are 
running?
  


I believe the LSPR workloads for z10 are executed with the HiperDispatch 
feature fully enabled.


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


z10 and crypto HW

2008-03-01 Thread R.S.

I'm trying to figure out: Are there any crypto-related chages in z10 ?
AFAIK the same crypto cards (CEX2C) are used in z9 and z10.
I would like to have HW support for AES algorithms.
Did I miss something ?

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, 
nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2008 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA  wynosi 
118.642.672 złote i został w całości wpłacony.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Gibney, Dave
  SHARE in Costa Rico anytime soon ?  :)

  Getting through US customs as a foreign national is just too much of
a
  PITA.
 
 Going through US security as a US citizen is no fun either, nor is
foreign
 travel for US citizens. It's unfortunate.
 
 Bob Shannon
 Rocket Software
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz
By the way, Eric, you can reduce your registration costs but doing a 
presentation at
SHARE.  Each day you do one, you get to attend that day for free.  Granted, it 
doesn't
help with travel and hotel, but it is something.  Marna Walle's sessions are 
always good.
I usually have her last migration sessions sitting on my shelf.  But she is one 
of the folks
who puts here sessions on the website.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric 
Bielefeld
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 SYSN 09:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SHARE  no handouts(?)

I too would like to weigh in on this subject.  I would much prefer having the 
handout to look at and take notes on while I'm in a session.  I haven't been to 
Share for 3 or 4 years now.  Mostly because the last 2 years at PH they were 
closing the datacenter, and didn't want to pay for any education.  I can't 
quite see paying several thousand dollars when I'm unemployed to go to Share, 
as you never know how soon a job will come around.  Before I got my job at 
Aviva, I went almost 9 months.  Boy - does that eat in to savings.  

Anyway, back to the topic.  One suggestion I have is that all handouts are 
printed on both sides.  Depending on the level of detail, 2 or 4 frames or more 
per page greatly cuts down on the amount of paper also.  I know some of the 
handouts, like the ones from Marne Wall are especially appreciated.  She puts 
much of the text and other pertinent info on each slide.  That is very 
valuable.  Thanks Marne, and keep it up!

Regarding laptops at Share, the last year I went I took my laptop along.  I 
think I took it to sessions 2 or 3 of the 5 days.  I found it to be a real 
pain.  Mine is fairly heavy - especially when you have it at the expo.  I saved 
money for PH by rooming 3 or 4 blocks away, making it hard to just put it in 
to my room.  Also, then you have to look for a plug in, which isn't always very 
easy to find.  I do remember one session on RMF reports, where I logged on to 
PH's computer, and looked at some of my own reports as the presenter was 
talking about them.  That was cool, and helpful.  Taking notes on paper is 
fine, but it works a lot better taking them on the handout

I sincerely hope that most presenters will continue to provide handouts.  I 
think for the money, they provide a huge value.  I wonder which is cheaper - 
printing them on your home office copier and shipping them, or printing them at 
Kinkos.  I'm sure the hotel or convention center copy prices are ridiculous!

--
Eric Bielefeld
Systems Programmer
Aviva USA
Des Moines, Iowa
515-645-5153

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z10 and crypto HW

2008-03-01 Thread Ulrich Boche

R.S. wrote:

I'm trying to figure out: Are there any crypto-related chages in z10 ?
AFAIK the same crypto cards (CEX2C) are used in z9 and z10.
I would like to have HW support for AES algorithms.
Did I miss something ?

If you check the announcement letter thoroughly, you will see that CPACF 
 for z10 will support AES-192 and AES-256 (in addition to AES-128 which 
is already supported with z9). Also, the hash algorithms SHA-256, 
SHA-384 and SHA-512 are supported.


CEX2C will support RSA private/public keys up to 4096 bits.
--
Ulrich Boche
SVA GmbH, Germany
IBM Premier Business Partner

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM announced z10 ..why so fast...any problem on z 9

2008-03-01 Thread Marian Gasparovic
z9-109 4Q 03  is wrong, z9-109 was announced in 2Q 05 and later
renamed to z9 EC in 2Q 06 with z9 BC announcement

On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Tommy Tsui wrote:
   ..I
   think z9 is announced around 3 years...As I remember, IBM never try to
   announced a new model of mainframe computer just three years later...

  Using http://www.tech-news.com/ as a reference, the history of IBM CMOS
  mainframe processor hardware generations is as follows:

  Processor 1stAvail
    
  9672-G13Q 94
  9672-G23Q 95
  9672-G33Q 96
  9672-G42Q 97
  9672-G53Q 98
  9672-G62Q 99
  z900   1Q 00
  z800   1Q 02
  z900-GA2   2Q 02
  z990   2Q 03
  z9-109 4Q 03
  z890   2Q 04
  z9EC   3Q 05
  z9BC   2Q 06
  z101Q 08

  --
  Edward E Jaffe
  Phoenix Software International, Inc
  5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
  Los Angeles, CA 90045
  310-338-0400 x318
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
  send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
  Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z10 and crypto HW

2008-03-01 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 3:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z10 and crypto HW

I'm trying to figure out: Are there any crypto-related chages in z10 ?
AFAIK the same crypto cards (CEX2C) are used in z9 and z10. 
I would like to have HW support for AES algorithms.
Did I miss something ?

There are crypto instructions that support AES already that are part of
base z9, referred to by IBM as CPACF instructions: KM, KMC, KIMD,
KLMD, KMAC.  They do require feature activation, but I understand that
it is a no-charge feature.

There is an IBM sample program showing how to use them here (google
CPACFZ9S):

http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/PRS2669

The crypto cards also require use of the ICSF software to manage
encrypted keys along with the enhanced crypto capabilities.  The base
crypto instructions do not support encrypted keys, you must use clear
(not-encrypted) keys in the programs that execute the instructions.

HTH

Peter
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of 
the 
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM announced z10 ..why so fast...any problem on z 9

2008-03-01 Thread Edward Jaffe

Gibney, Dave wrote:

   The Multiprise 2003's were also CMOS. We replaced a 3090-400J with
one sometime after 96.
  


Yup. As well as MP3000s, P/390s, etc. I didn't mention them because I 
don't consider them direct ancestors of the current machines.


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z10 and crypto HW

2008-03-01 Thread R.S.

Ulrich Boche wrote:

R.S. wrote:

I'm trying to figure out: Are there any crypto-related chages in z10 ?
AFAIK the same crypto cards (CEX2C) are used in z9 and z10.
I would like to have HW support for AES algorithms.
Did I miss something ?

If you check the announcement letter thoroughly, you will see that CPACF 
 for z10 will support AES-192 and AES-256 (in addition to AES-128 which 
is already supported with z9). Also, the hash algorithms SHA-256, 
SHA-384 and SHA-512 are supported.


CEX2C will support RSA private/public keys up to 4096 bits.


Ulrich,
thank you for quick response.
I checked the announcement (I don't know whether it was thoroughly), 
however ...I already have AES-256, as well as RSA-4096. Going into 
details now I realize, that I don't have AES-192, and HW-support for 
RSA-4096 (but the service is present). I haven't checked SHA's.


Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüssen
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, 
nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2008 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA  wynosi 
118.642.672 złote i został w całości wpłacony.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM announced z10 ..why so fast...any problem on z 9

2008-03-01 Thread Gibney, Dave
   The Multiprise 2003's were also CMOS. We replaced a 3090-400J with
one sometime after 96.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
 Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 10:47 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: IBM announced z10 ..why so fast...any problem on z 9
 
 Tommy Tsui wrote:
  ..I
  think z9 is announced around 3 years...As I remember, IBM never try
to
  announced a new model of mainframe computer just three years
later...
 
 Using http://www.tech-news.com/ as a reference, the history of IBM
CMOS
 mainframe processor hardware generations is as follows:
 
 Processor 1stAvail
   
 9672-G13Q 94
 9672-G23Q 95
 9672-G33Q 96
 9672-G42Q 97
 9672-G53Q 98
 9672-G62Q 99
 z900   1Q 00
 z800   1Q 02
 z900-GA2   2Q 02
 z990   2Q 03
 z9-109 4Q 03
 z890   2Q 04
 z9EC   3Q 05
 z9BC   2Q 06
 z101Q 08
 
 --
 Edward E Jaffe
 Phoenix Software International, Inc
 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
 Los Angeles, CA 90045
 310-338-0400 x318
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: new Feb2008 zPOP: Execute Relative Long

2008-03-01 Thread Clark Morris
On 1 Mar 2008 10:59:02 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

Tom Schmidt wrote:
 See SA22-7832-06 for the EXRL instruction.
 (I'm sure Ed's been aware for several months now, but the rest of us may be 
 happy now.)
   

Give 'em an inch and they'll take a yard! People are already clamoring 
for additional forms of EXRL that can OR the mask with other than byte 
one of the target instruction! It never ends! :-)

As one of those people who has wanted an execute that would allow us
to expand each nibble in the pack/unpack/decimal instructions to at
least a byte, I am guilty.  This would allow for large fixed decimal
fields.  Floating point decimal isn't always the best idea.

Clark Morris

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Mark Post
 On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 11:15 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
-snip-
 Only a very tiny subset of speakers, those that were accustomed to 
 printing their handouts on SHARE's dime, were affected. For them, two 
 obvious alternatives were suggested: a) present without handouts or b) 
 create -- at your own expense --abbreviated handouts in outline form.

You got it almost right.  Since you didn't get it exactly right, you've smeared 
people such as myself that never expected SHARE to pay for printing handouts.  
Few, if any, of the speakers work in an office where an unlimited number of 
copies is considered acceptable.  For people like me that work at home, things 
like Kinkos is the only alternative.  Given the chance to avoid paying ~$250.00 
for printing, I jumped on it.  (Even doubled-sided 2-up copies add up when 
you're giving 7 hours or so of sessions.  Anything like 4-up gets as many 
complaints as no handouts.)  

 For everyone else, SHARE was business as usual.

Sure was.  I saw a few hundred pounds of handouts sitting on just one of the 
tables in the convention center late Friday.  Not sure how much was on all the 
other tables spread around, but it was more than a little.


Mark Post

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Edward Jaffe

Mark Post wrote:

(Even doubled-sided 2-up copies add up when you're giving 7 hours or so of 
sessions.  Anything like 4-up gets as many complaints as no handouts.)
  


I have for many years distributed handouts that are 4-up, double-sided 
i.e., 8 slides per physical sheet and never, ever had a single 
complaint. The trick is to use a printing technique that eliminates all 
extraneous white space between and around slide images.



I saw a few hundred pounds of handouts sitting on just one of the tables in the 
convention center late Friday.  Not sure how much was on all the other tables 
spread around, but it was more than a little.
  


Not sure about those other tables, but a semi-annual perusal of the 
official Extra Speaker Handouts table, Friday @ noon, is an excellent 
way to learn which speakers consistently over-estimate the popularity of 
their sessions! Good thing it all gets recycled ...


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: new Feb2008 zPOP: Execute Relative Long

2008-03-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:00:43 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:

Give 'em an inch and they'll take a yard! People are already clamoring
for additional forms of EXRL that can OR the mask with other than byte
one of the target instruction! It never ends! :-)

Why not just a facility that will OR an entire grande register with
8 bytes of instructions and execute the result?  If one wished, one
might put zeroes in the storage and the instruction proper in the
register.

This comes perilously close to self-modifying code.

I'm reminded of the PDP-6/10/20, where the registers were memory
mapped, or the bottom 16 words of memory were register mapped,
depending on model/feature/price.  One could MVC (of course; no
need for LM) a short loop into registers and branch to location
0 to execute it.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Good thing it all gets recycled ...

But, like a paging operation, the best recycled material is the stuff that 
doesn't have to be recycled.

Now, can we drop this thread, please.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Pinnacle
- Original Message - 
From: , IBM Mainframe Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: SHARE  no handouts(?)





In a message dated 3/1/2008 6:51:32 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Going Green is a euphemism for we want to save money by not providing
copiers at the conference. SHARE does not discourage speakers from 
distributing

paper handouts; it just doesn't want to incur the cost of printing them.
IMO,  going green was a convenient spin to justify the policy change.

So the green does not mean eco-friendly but rather refers to the color 
of

the FERNs [1] being saved?

What about providing copiers that are not free?  You copy your paper  and 
pay

for how many pages you copied.  SHARE could still be non-profit if  they
computed the charge per page properly.  Or instead of a copier there 
could be a

page in the final agenda (is that still being printed?  how much  paper is
wasted on that thing?) with directions to all the retail  stores nearby 
which have

pay-per-use copiers (Kinko's, e.g.).



The lowest price onsite was $.25/image (not page, image, so 2-sided was 
$.50).  Even if you could get offsite to Kinko's, speakers such as myself 
giving 6 presentations could well spend over $1000 on repro.


Regards,
Tom Conley 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Cobol Java Ldap and between

2008-03-01 Thread Magen Nargalit
Hi, 

Does any body knows if there was any enhancment if the
way standard structured cobol can call a java program?

Do you still need to ceate a c/c++ connector ?

I saw that oo cobol can call directly to java, can 
a structured cobol call to an oo cobol which calls java?

I want to query z/os ldap server from a cobol program
is there any other way for doing it?

and last question.
If a c/c++ connector s required and I don't have c/c++ compiler
for z/os can I compile on another platform and port the 
object / Module to z/os environment?

Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks 
Magen

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Fw: Cobol Java Ldap and between

2008-03-01 Thread Bill Klein
I could be mistaken on this, but I don't think there is any requirement for
a C/C++ connector for a non-OO COBOL program to INVOKE (not CALL) an OO
COBOL program.

I eally do NOT know this part of Enterprise COBOL, but you can check out:
http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/igy3pg40/6.0 

and possibly directly to your quesiton,

 http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/igy3pg40/4.1.5 


Magen Nargalit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi, 
 
 Does any body knows if there was any enhancment if the
 way standard structured cobol can call a java program?
 
 Do you still need to ceate a c/c++ connector ?
 
 I saw that oo cobol can call directly to java, can 
 a structured cobol call to an oo cobol which calls java?
 
 I want to query z/os ldap server from a cobol program
 is there any other way for doing it?
 
 and last question.
 If a c/c++ connector s required and I don't have c/c++ compiler
 for z/os can I compile on another platform and port the 
 object / Module to z/os environment?
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SHARE no handouts(?)

2008-03-01 Thread Edward Jaffe

Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz wrote:

By the way, Eric, you can reduce your registration costs but doing a 
presentation at
SHARE.  Each day you do one, you get to attend that day for free.  Granted, it 
doesn't
help with travel and hotel, but it is something.


Be sure to work with the schedulers to avoid presenting twice in the 
same day. I spoke with someone in Orlando that presented four out of 
five days and paid for only one!


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


IBM Tivoli Monitoring (ITM for short) (was: Is IBM/Tivoli turning into CA?)

2008-03-01 Thread Bruce Hewson
Hello Andrew,

And so we have a case of us customers being ignored... :-)

The PC I use has only got Company mandated and wrapped products installed.

We don't get to have any Tivoli product installed onto them.We cannot
just install your lovely products onto these PCs..Let alone they would
have to pay licence fees for such. 

Hard to justify when we have the Omegamon product installed under z/OS...

So there is no way I get to access Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP)..

You are going to have to do far better to enable us poor z/OS Sysprogs
access to software not running under z/OS

Maybe if the whole Omegamon product suite was better documented, and that is
one thing I do believe will improve now that it is IBM owned, we would be
able implement TEP and Omegamon XE and JUSTIFY such extra costs for all
Sysprogs and selected Application Programmers.

(It may be simpler for you to code these new functions in these off-box
products, but it is hard not to think they are just ways to make more money!)

Include in all of this the pain of using ICAT to manage multiple system
copies of the Omegamon product suites, it is no wonder I have not been able
to investigate well the world of Omegamon outside of the classic interfaces.
I have not got past performing a complete Run Time Environment rebuild every
time we get a maintenance/release upgrade to our product set. The
opportunities for regressed changes are immense.

The same as Doug, I only use the VTAM interfaces to the Omegamon product suite.

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:39:06 -0500, Andrew McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Doug Fuerst wrote:
 ICKY. So I have to put in the XE piece and access the TEMS to look at
 anything. The setup for that has pretty bad and confusing
 documentation, and is an unwieldy implementation. Besides, I was told
 by Omegamon support that there was nothing in the GUI that I couldn't
 get to in the VTAM classic sessions, it would just look better and
 could be analyzed using Excel and the like.
 Did it occur to anyone in Omegamon support that I might like to look
 at the TSO/VTAM CUA type display?
 I GUESS NOT

 Doug
I certainly don't want to step into a messy thread here (why do I feel
that it's to late?) but here goes

The XE levels of the V41 OMEGAMONs are where all the power of the
products are. They allow you to use the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP)
and it's single pane of glass architecture to combine distributed
monitoring and System z OMEGAMONs all on one GUI. The overall technology
is called IBM Tivoli Monitoring (ITM for short). Once you are
comfortable with the attributes (metrics), workspaces, situations and
queries of one product, you can jump over to any other product without
any problems.

As far as VTAM monitoring, the OMEGAMON XE for Mainframe Networks
includes the MFN II (CUA) 3270 based product, which still provides VTAM
monitoring. However, there are a lot more features available if you
implement the XE agent and the TEP. For instance, FTP session monitoring
and VTAM EE and HPR connection.

Here's the latest ITM doc, which has some excellent manuals in it.
Especially the installation manual:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v15r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itm.doc/understand.htm
--


Andrew McIntyre - Consulting IT Specialist
IBM System z™ Software Technical Sales
SMPO (Software Migration Project Office)
TMT (Tivoli Migration Team)
404-487-2477 or tie 546-2477
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Netview problem

2008-03-01 Thread Bruce Hewson
Hello Rafal,

Are you running your Netview task as SUB=MSTR?

Please provide sample of duplicated messages.

Thanks
Bruce Hewson

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Where can I find the C compiler JCL procedure?

2008-03-01 Thread Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
Running ADCD z/OS 1.8. Not sure which member of ADCD.Z18.PROCLIB is the C 
compiler procedure or if the compiler JCL is in another library altogether.

TIA,
Jerry

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html