Re: Repro Variable blocked records
Found the problem If go into ISPF/EDIT on the ds it chops off trailing blanks PRESERVE ON it a good idea, except when you really want to truncate trailing blanks. -- Peter Hunkeler Credit Suisse -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
WLMOPT
can any of you share the WLMOPT tool used to display IEAOP Hello list, can any of you share the WLMOPT tool used to display IEAOPTxx ? I tried to download it from http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/wlm/tools/wlmque.html but got back 'error 404, page not found' You can reply me offline. Thanks. Walter Marguccio z/OS Systems Programmer BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH Munich - Germany -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: On software-hardware licensing bundling
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:06:20 +0100, Mikhail Ramendik m...@ramendik.ru wrote: These days the company has significant business on the software and information side, but still makes a lot of money selling hardware. The hardware is proprietary, and has proprietary software as well. The company refuses to license software without the hardware, and uses legal pressure to remove any emulators. And if someone tries to make MONEY on those emulators - they would face the full wrath, and certainly not see software licenses. Is the company named IBM? No What are you trying to say? That if Apple behaves like this then it's OK for IBM to do so too? Regards, Roger Bowler Hercules the people's mainframe -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
PDPCLIB (GCC) on S/390
Hi all. PDPCLIB is the C runtime library for the GCC port to MVS. Within PDPCLIB, there are two assembler files - mvsstart and mvssupa that do all the interaction with MVS. Almost all the work is in mvssupa. That has recently been radically revamped, and I would like to get it: 1. Tested on S/390 (ie MVS/ESA, OS/390, or z/OS). 2. Peer-reviewed. There is stand-alone JCL here: http://mvs380.sourceforge.net/pdp390.txt I have tested it on an MVS/XA-like environment, but I want to see if the code will run RMODE ANY. Regarding the peer review, I'm not after radical changes to add great new features (that could be done another day though). I'm just after you should have checked for the return code here or you used an L instead of LA here one or two-line changes. I know a couple of people here are interested in GCCMVS on z/OS, so here's your chance to ensure you get (closer to) what you want. Note that not all the features you see in the assembler have been opened up to the public (since that requires a separate overhaul of the C code, which is done by people with a different skillset), but some really great improvements are: 1. You now have default DCB info for datasets. 2. GETLINE/PUTLINE are used for a proper TSO CP. The S370 (24-bit only) and S380 (24-bit code, 31-bit data) I am able to test myself (and they work), but I am unable to test the S390 (pure 31-bit) myself and would normally have to go through a 3rd party to do that, so I'm hoping someone here could do that as well as looking over the code. I'm expecting it to be released in a matter of weeks, and be bundled as part of a SEASIK DFDSS dump containing this plus a variety of other free software (DIFF3, PATCH, BISON etc). Thanks. Paul. P.S. Expected output: 00 93899585 40F14040 40404040 40404040 line 1 10 40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040 20 40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040 30 40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040 40 40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040 50 93899585 40818283 40404040 40404040 line abc 60 40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040 70 40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040 80 40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040 90 40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: (slightly OT - Linux) Did IBM bet on the wrong OS?
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:44:23 -0500, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote: From the IBM viewpoint, *BSD would be superior to Linux due to the BSD license allowing for OCO distribution. IBN, or at least the historic z systems area, loves OCO and seems to dislike releasing source. However, from my limited knowledge, the z/Linux effort was a skunk works project by a group in IBM Germany. I don't know why they chose Linux. There already was a Linux for 370 development going on by another group of non-IBM people. This project still has a web page at http://linas.org/linux/i370.html . The reason to go with Linux was that it was designed (since 1993) to be a portable operating system. The effort to port Linux to S/390 was substantially less than the effort to port any other operating system. It is also important to note that by 2Q2003, Linux was the dominant UNIX operating system in terms of number of servers shipped (and that has continued to grow). The various BSD versions are rounding error compared to Linux. Note that while z/OS and z/VSE are mostly OCO, much of z/VM is still shipped as source. While the Linux for S/390 project started as a skunk works project under Dr. Karl Heinz Strassemeyer, it soon got support from the GMs of S/390 (Dave Carlucci and later Bill Zeitler). The Linux for S/390 project under Linas Vepstas was a non-IBM project, but several of the team members were IBMers (including Linas) working in their spare time. You can get my presentation on this subject at http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/jelliott/pdfs/s9050je.pdf Jim -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
RMM VRSDROP
Hello, I am working in env z/OS 1.11 and I need some help with the new parameter VRSDROP. Indeed, I defined the new parameter VRSDROP(PERCENT(5),FAIL). This morning the EDGHSKP utility run and got RC=12. Thiis is the message file: EDG6001I INVENTORY MANAGEMENT STARTING ON 26/04/2010 AT 05:30:41 - PARAMETERS I DATEFORM(E),VRSEL,EXPROC EDG2309I THE PARMLIB OPTIONS CURRENTLY IN USE ARE VRSEL(NEW) VRSJOBNAME(2) VRSMIN(50,FAIL) VRSCHANGE(INFO) VRSDROP(PERCENT(5),FAIL) VRSRETAIN(PERCENT(80),INFO) EXPDTDROP(PERCENT(5),FAIL) SMSTAPE(PURGE(ASIS) UPDATE(EXITS,SCRATCH,COMMAND)) CATRETPD(72) UNCATALOG(N) TPRACF(N) NOTIFY(N) SYSID(T2T1) CATSYSID(*) RETAINBY(SET) MOVEBY(SET) GDG(CYCLEBY(GENERATION),DUPLICATE(BUMP)) EDG2229I NUMBER OF VRS RECORDS READ IS 73 EDG2238I NUMBER OF UNUSED VRS RECORDS IS 37 EDG2242I INITIAL NUMBER OF VRS RETAINED VOLUMES = 5058 5% EDG2244I NUMBER OF VRS RETAINED VOLUMES TO BE DROPPED =344 7% EDG2310I INVENTORY MANAGEMENT STOPPING BECAUSE OF VRSDROP(PERCENT(5),FAIL) OPTI EDG2243I INITIAL NUMBER OF NEWLY ASSIGNED VOLUMES =948 1% EDG2245I NUMBER OF NEWLY ASSIGNED VOLUMES TO BE RETAINED=352 37% EDG2305E INVENTORY MANAGEMENT TASK VRSELFAILED WITH RETURN CODE 04 EDG2305E INVENTORY MANAGEMENT TASK EXPROC FAILED WITH RETURN CODE 04 EDG6901I UTILITY EDGHSKP COMPLETED WITH RETURN CODE 12 I analyzed the MESSAGE file and I undersood the the problem is related to the VRSDROP definition. 1. I need to Understatnd which volume will be dropped by the VRS control . Is there any way to know which volumes will be DROPPED by VRS control so to understatnd If I had some problem with the VRS definitions. 2. Is there any way to confirm that the number 344 volumes can be dropped by VRS control using, for example, the CONFIRM option or I have the change the VRSDROP percent to 7, reload the parameters and execute agein the EDGHSKP. Thank you and best regards Marco -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 45 years of Mainframe
In of64999155.948bfae8-on8525770a.0077cc3b-8525770a.00796...@ca.ibm.com, on 04/19/2010 at 06:06 PM, Tom Russell tom_russ...@ca.ibm.com said: Nice. My first job as a coop student at IBM was to convert a 650 SOAP program that ran the Toronto plant to a 1401 card system Autocoder ITYM tape system; the assembler for a cards only 1401 was SPS. Not a fond memory, but an interesting one. The 650 we were taking out had a 2 (4?) KB drum memory. Wronk size; the 650 was a decimal machine, and the drum size was measured in 10 digit words. Ours has 2K words, but there was a 4K model. The autocoder (think BAL) The BAL equivalent was SPS. High/Low/Equal compare was a special feature on a 1401. Well, yes, but then index registers were a special feature on the 650. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 45 years of Mainframe
In 4bccfdef.4040...@acm.org, on 04/19/2010 at 08:05 PM, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org said: Total capacity was 2000 words, There was a 4K model, but it was not compatible with some of the other features that we had on our (2K) 650. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 45 years of Mainframe
In a30a9f528e618748a8ef5199e80c4a1c02882...@wkpp1infmb03.cbsh.com, on 04/20/2010 at 07:48 AM, Kelman, Tom thomas.kel...@commercebank.com said: It didn't have the normal addition/multiplication registers of the 360. The relevant difference wasn't the registers; it was the ALU. BTW, the RCA 301 also used table lookup for addition. Instead it did all of it's addition and multiplication via table lookup from tables it kept on the rotating disk. Core, initially loaded from cards, at least on smaller machines. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: WLMOPT
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:31:44 -0700, Walter Marguccio walter_marguc...@yahoo.com wrote: can any of you share the WLMOPT tool used to display IEAOPTxx ? I tried to download it from http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/wlm/tools/wlmque.html but got back 'error 404, page not found' Walter, That was the URL I had also (well, the one I had redirected there), but a quick search on IBM's web site led me here: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/wlm/tools/index.html BTW, with z/OS 1.11 and above this information is now in RMF II. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:mzel...@flash.net Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
DIAG00 AUTOIPL error message
I guess I'm dense right now. I don't see any way to diagnose the following error message from my IPL. IGV010I IN PARMLIB MEMBER=DIAG00 ON LINE 4: 157 AUTOIPL WAS NOT PROCESSED, DUE TO AN ENVIRONMENT ERROR The best that I've come up with is that our Z9BC does not have the require feature, 9904, or is not at driver level 67. Could anybody tell me how to check that? I assume that I can do it via the HMC, but I don't know how. John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: WLMOPT
Yes, but then the link to WLMQUE leads back to the 404 page not found (lol). At least that is what happens when I try it. I have emailed the PDS directly to Walter. Bruce -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: WLMOPT On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:31:44 -0700, Walter Marguccio walter_marguc...@yahoo.com wrote: can any of you share the WLMOPT tool used to display IEAOPTxx ? I tried to download it from http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/wlm/tools/wlmque.html but got back 'error 404, page not found' Walter, That was the URL I had also (well, the one I had redirected there), but a quick search on IBM's web site led me here: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/wlm/tools/index.html BTW, with z/OS 1.11 and above this information is now in RMF II. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:mzel...@flash.net Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This communication including any information transmitted with it is intended only for the use of the addressees and is confidential. If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for delivering the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure, conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use of any part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the taking or omitting of any action in reliance upon this communication. If you receive this communication in error or without authorization please notify us immediately by return e-mail or otherwise and permanently delete the entire communication from any computer, disk drive, or other storage medium. If the above disclaimer is not properly readable, it can be found at www.td.com/legal AVERTISSEMENT DE CONFIDENTIALITE Ce courriel, ainsi que tout renseignement ci-inclus, destiné uniquement aux destinataires susmentionnés, est confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu ou un agent responsable de la livraison de ce courriel, tout examen, divulgation, copie, impression, reproduction, distribution, ou autre utilisation d'une partie de ce courriel est strictement interdit de même que toute intervention ou abstraction à cet égard. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur ou sans autorisation, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen et supprimer immédiatement cette communication entière de tout système électronique. Si l'avis de non-responsabilité ci-dessus n'est pas lisible, vous pouvez le consulter à www.td.com/francais/legale -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Repro Variable blocked records
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:50:20 +0200, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) wrote: Found the problem If go into ISPF/EDIT on the ds it chops off trailing blanks PRESERVE ON it a good idea, except when you really want to truncate trailing blanks. But beware; PRESERVE may not do what you intend (at least not what I expected until I carefully RTFM). If you insert or delete characters, PRESERVE causes trailing blanks to be deleted or removed : so as to maintain the original line length. And, AFAIK, there's still no way to add trailing blanks to, or selectively remove some trailing blanks from an existing line. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MOVING TO DASD FROM TAPE - ML2
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:44:55 -0700, esmie moo esmie_...@yahoo.ca wrote: Ron, You mentioned compression. Please correct me if I am wrong. All the dsns on ML1 are compressed? Thanks. If your ML1 happens to be on SVA/V2X2/V2X4f, then all datasets are compressed by the hardware. In that case, compression cannot be disabled. You would want to ensure that DFHSM compression is disabled, to reduce waste of general purpose CP's that it uses. Regards, Mike Baldwin Cartagena Software Ltd. Markham, Ontario, Canada http://www.cartagena.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Repro Variable blocked records
But beware; PRESERVE may not do what you intend... Thanks for remembering me of the real function of that command: preserving the LRECL (and not preserving trailing blanks). I only ever needed to change data without changing the record's length recently. I guess that's why the real meaning didn't come to my mind before posting. -- Peter Hunkeler Credit Suisse -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: (slightly OT - Linux) Did IBM bet on the wrong OS?
jim_elli...@ca.ibm.com (Jim Elliott, IBM) writes: From the IBM viewpoint, *BSD would be superior to Linux due to the BSD license allowing for OCO distribution. IBN, or at least the historic z systems area, loves OCO and seems to dislike releasing source. However, from my limited knowledge, the z/Linux effort was a skunk works project by a group in IBM Germany. I don't know why they chose Linux. There already was a Linux for 370 development going on by another group of non-IBM people. This project still has a web page at http://linas.org/linux/i370.html . as an aside ... germany was the group that tried for a time to release the ATT TSS/unix as general product (including some number of the tss/370 group in dallas taking assignments in germany). A stripped down tss/370 kernel (SSUP) had been done for ATT ... which ATT then placed higher levels of UNIX on top. Part of this was getting mainframe RAS, error recovery/reporting, etc ... aka adding mainframe RAS and error recovery/reporting to unix was significantly larger effort than any straight-forward port. This was also behind a lot of other mainframe unix products (aka aix/370 was UCLA's unix-like LOCUS) in the 80s being under VM370 (field engineering mandating EREP to provide machine service). misc. past posts mentioning SSUP: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004q.html#37 A Glimpse into PC Development Philosophy http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005b.html#13 Relocating application architecture and compiler support http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005d.html#61 Virtual Machine Hardware http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005s.html#34 Power5 and Cell, new issue of IBM Journal of RD http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006f.html#26 Old PCs--environmental hazard http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006m.html#30 Old Hashing Routine http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006p.html#22 Admired designs / designs to study http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006t.html#17 old Gold/UTS reference http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007.html#38 How many 36-bit Unix ports in the old days? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007b.html#3 How many 36-bit Unix ports in the old days? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007k.html#43 John W. Backus, 82, Fortran developer, dies http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007m.html#69 Operating systems are old and busted http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007r.html#23 Abend S0C0 http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008e.html#1 Migration from Mainframe to othre platforms - the othe bell? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008l.html#82 Yet another squirrel question - Results (very very long post) http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008r.html#21 What if the computers went back to the '70s too? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010c.html#43 PC history, was search engine history, was Happy DEC-10 Day http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010e.html#17 Senior Java Developer vs. MVS Systems Programmer (warning: Conley rant) http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010e.html#72 Entry point for a Mainframe? -- 42yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar1970 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
On 23 Apr 2010 06:48:53 -0700, eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote: We also know that the answer but the number of MIPS is growing is smokescreen - number of MIPS on my desktop grew up significantly, but the number of PCs remained the same. The number of mainframes remain the same, or shrink. But, I can do more with my mainframe than you can do with your PC. Define more. Especially if someone's PC is a laptop, then he can watch Dr. Who at Starbucks, play WOW at Borders, update his GPS from within his car... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: WLMOPT
Oops. Sorry... didn't click on the link from that point. I hope that it wasn't removed due to the RMF enhancement in z/OS 1.11. Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:mzel...@flash.net Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:49:52 -0400, Mackenzie, Bruce bruce.macken...@td.com wrote: Yes, but then the link to WLMQUE leads back to the 404 page not found (lol). At least that is what happens when I try it. I have emailed the PDS directly to Walter. Bruce -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: WLMOPT On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:31:44 -0700, Walter Marguccio walter_marguc...@yahoo.com wrote: can any of you share the WLMOPT tool used to display IEAOPTxx ? I tried to download it from http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/wlm/tools/wlmque.html but got back 'error 404, page not found' Walter, That was the URL I had also (well, the one I had redirected there), but a quick search on IBM's web site led me here: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/wlm/tools/index.html BTW, with z/OS 1.11 and above this information is now in RMF II. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:mzel...@flash.net Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This communication including any information transmitted with it is intended only for the use of the addressees and is confidential. If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for delivering the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure, conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use of any part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the taking or omitting of any action in reliance upon this communication. If you receive this communication in error or without authorization please notify us immediately by return e-mail or otherwise and permanently delete the entire communication from any computer, disk drive, or other storage medium. If the above disclaimer is not properly readable, it can be found at www.td.com/legal AVERTISSEMENT DE CONFIDENTIALITE Ce courriel, ainsi que tout renseignement ci-inclus, destiné uniquement aux destinataires susmentionnés, est confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu ou un agent responsable de la livraison de ce courriel, tout examen, divulgation, copie, impression, reproduction, distribution, ou autre utilisation d'une partie de ce courriel est strictement interdit de même que toute intervention ou abstraction à cet égard. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur ou sans autorisation, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen et supprimer immédiatement cette communication entière de tout système électronique. Si l'avis de non-responsabilité ci-dessus n'est pas lisible, vous pouvez le consulter à www.td.com/francais/legale -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
On 23 Apr 2010 06:51:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: I bet the number of customers migrated off the mainframe is higher than number of new customers. Sucker bet! Nobody will/has ever published the number of mainframes (or even mainframe shops) in use. First thing needed is for everybody to agree on what mainframe means. Second thing is - if some applications get migrated off the mainframe, does that count? -- In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department. - James Madison -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
On 21 Apr 2010 07:41:41 -0700, l...@garlic.com (Anne Lynn Wheeler) wrote: some of this view reflects the culture of the executives ... they are brought in to plunder the company and then they move on to plunder the next company. Certainly. This is how politicians work too - spend money now and let someone else pay. Trouble is, when the executives don't plan for the long term, neither do the proles. Everything is done with the resume in mind, show the short term cost savings, meeting of (redefined) targets, and damn the future. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
On 23 Apr 2010 05:02:51 -0700, jch...@ussco.com (Chase, John) wrote: [ snip ] Please...its much easier for them to blame their problems on COBOL than to admit that they have done a crappy job managing their legacy assets. At each step in maintenance it is always easier to hack something together rather than to clean things up with new changes and requirements, but eventually there is a price to pay. As I say too frequently here, The problem with 'quick and dirty' is that if it works, it will stay 'dirty'. Quick and dirty doesn't matter for one time jobs.But moving in the direction of integrated OO environments, the costs of cleaning up go up tremendously. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
On 22 Apr 2010 05:21:09 -0700, john.mck...@healthmarkets.com (McKown, John) wrote: COBOL can be object oriented as well. And it does interoperate with Java, at least with z/OS Enterprise COBOL (tho not as well as some would like).. It's just that people don't seem too interested in upgrading their COBOL skills into the new facilities. An example here is some COBOL which does XML to interchange data with a Windows system. It was written by one of our more rogue programmers (who was let go in a recent downsizing). It works well. Other programmers don't like it because they are unfamiliar with and dislike XML. Not just that.While most mainframe programmers aren't interested in upgrading their skills into OO, it is also true that most mainframe shops don't want one programmer sticking OO CoBOL into their mainframe job flow. (Even if someone spends the money to get an OO CoBOL compiler on their PC to learn how to do it, then tries to figure out how to implement it at work). And non-mainframe programmers don't see that OO CoBOL has any compelling advantages over other OO tools. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
On 22 Apr 2010 06:51:01 -0700, thomas.kel...@commercebank.com (Kelman, Tom) wrote: It is true that back in the good old days companies would have internal training to teach programming skills. In those days, companies expected a good return on their investment as a much higher percentage of their IS staff were expected to stick around for their careers.But the executives don't stick around and don't expect their top programmers to stick around either. Why spend money to train workers for their competitors? The problem is much bigger than IS. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
On 24 Apr 2010 07:07:19 -0700, m...@cartagena.com (Mike Baldwin) wrote: IBM calls REXX a language: ...z/OS TSO/E REXX Interpreter (hereafter referred to as the interpreter or language processor) and the REstructured eXtended eXecutor (called REXX) language. Together, the language processor and the REXX language are known as TSO/E REXX. And what does the L stand for in JCL? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DIAG00 AUTOIPL error message
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 04/26/2010 09:15:38 AM: I guess I'm dense right now. I don't see any way to diagnose the following error message from my IPL. IGV010I IN PARMLIB MEMBER=DIAG00 ON LINE 4: 157 AUTOIPL WAS NOT PROCESSED, DUE TO AN ENVIRONMENT ERROR The best that I've come up with is that our Z9BC does not have the require feature, 9904, or is not at driver level 67. Could anybody tell me how to check that? I assume that I can do it via the HMC, but I don't know how. You are correct that the IGV101I message is telling you that either the machine does not support the function, or you are running z/OS as a guest of an older release of VM which does not support the function. Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
EKM at z/OS 1.11
We are upgrading to z/OS 1.11, and EKM is having problems. I get the following when an tape to be encypted is mounted: Logic:validateDKiAlias:testing alias=TAMMVS1 rest of cert label Logic:validateDKiAlias:suffix=MVS1 rest of cert label validateDKiAlias:wrong format 'TAMMVS1 rest of cert label' is a valid certificate label which has been workinf at z/OS 1.9. I don't know where 'MVS1 rest of cert label' came from, I don't have a certificate like this, and haven't defined this anywhere I can find. I am wondering if PK59178 and PK70752 might have something to do with this. I am contacting support, but thought I would see if anyone has seen this. Does anyone have EKM running on z/OS 1.11? Thanks, Richard -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
Define more. More Business. The rest is just noise toys! - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
Quick and dirty doesn't matter for one time jobs. Unfortunately, one-timers become old-timers. If it works, it has a high potential of becoming some sort of production! - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: EKM at z/OS 1.11
Richard, we currently use EKM under Z/os 1.11. No problems or exceptions found after migration to new release. Best regards _ Paolo Cacciari IBM Italia S.p.A. Business Continuity and Resiliency Services, IBM Global Services - South Region, EMEA From: Richard Peurifoy r-peuri...@neo.tamu.edu To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: 26/04/2010 17.08 Subject: EKM at z/OS 1.11 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu We are upgrading to z/OS 1.11, and EKM is having problems. I get the following when an tape to be encypted is mounted: Logic:validateDKiAlias:testing alias=TAMMVS1 rest of cert label Logic:validateDKiAlias:suffix=MVS1 rest of cert label validateDKiAlias:wrong format 'TAMMVS1 rest of cert label' is a valid certificate label which has been workinf at z/OS 1.9. I don't know where 'MVS1 rest of cert label' came from, I don't have a certificate like this, and haven't defined this anywhere I can find. I am wondering if PK59178 and PK70752 might have something to do with this. I am contacting support, but thought I would see if anyone has seen this. Does anyone have EKM running on z/OS 1.11? Thanks, Richard -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html IBM Italia S.p.A. Sede Legale: Circonvallazione Idroscalo - 20090 Segrate (MI) Cap. Soc. euro 384.506.359,00 C. F. e Reg. Imprese MI 01442240030 - Partita IVA 10914660153 Società soggetta all?attività di direzione e coordinamento di International Business Machines Corporation (Salvo che sia diversamente indicato sopra / Unless stated otherwise above) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: EKM at z/OS 1.11
On 04/26/10 11:05, Richard Peurifoy wrote: We are upgrading to z/OS 1.11, and EKM is having problems. I get the following when an tape to be encypted is mounted: Logic:validateDKiAlias:testing alias=TAMMVS1 rest of cert label Logic:validateDKiAlias:suffix=MVS1 rest of cert label validateDKiAlias:wrong format 'TAMMVS1 rest of cert label' is a valid certificate label which has been workinf at z/OS 1.9. I don't know where 'MVS1 rest of cert label' came from, I don't have a certificate like this, and haven't defined this anywhere I can find. I am wondering if PK59178 and PK70752 might have something to do with this. I am contacting support, but thought I would see if anyone has seen this. Does anyone have EKM running on z/OS 1.11? Thanks, Richard I have EKM running on our test zOS 1.11 environment. I'm using JDK 6.0 SR7 without any problems. -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL It is impossible to make anything foolproof, because fools are so ingenious. -- Robert Heinlein -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem On 24 Apr 2010 07:07:19 -0700, m...@cartagena.com (Mike Baldwin) wrote: IBM calls REXX a language: ...z/OS TSO/E REXX(tm) Interpreter (hereafter referred to as the interpreter or language processor) and the REstructured eXtended eXecutor (called REXX) language. Together, the language processor and the REXX language are known as TSO/E REXX. And what does the L stand for in JCL? laborious? lachrymous( definition 2 : tending to cause tears) lackluster -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
Ted MacNEIL pisze: Define more. More Business. The rest is just noise toys! No. Even games are serious business, not to mention applications like image processing, DTP, GPS and maps, CAD, etc. IT business is not equal to financial data processing. BTW: your statement I can do more with my mainframe than you can do with your PC was completely misplaced. Yes, I can agree with the above, at least for the following analyzis. So? 10 years ago I had the same number of PCs on my desktop (1) and the above was also true as today. My point was: 10 years ago there were more mainframe shops than today. Number of PCs is rather g growing, number of mainframes is shrinking. Power of single machine is obviously growing, but it doesn't prove growth of mainframe market. A secretary used 10 years ago word processor, email program and spreadsheet. Nowadays she use ...almost exactly same set of application, exactly the same NUMBER of them: one. Number of MIPS in her PC grew up significantly. Can we talk about growth IN THIS CONTEXT? That's why I described statement about MIPS growth as a smokescreen masking sad truth: mainframe world is shrinking. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- BRE Bank SA ul. Senatorska 18 00-950 Warszawa www.brebank.pl Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237 NIP: 526-021-50-88 Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2009 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 118.763.528 złotych. W związku z realizacją warunkowego podwyższenia kapitału zakładowego, na podstawie uchwały XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca 2008r., oraz uchwały XVI NWZ z dnia 27 października 2008r., może ulec podwyższeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 zł. Akcje w podwyższonym kapitale zakładowym BRE Banku SA będą w całości opłacone. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DIAG00 AUTOIPL error message
Jim Mulder wrote: You are correct that the IGV101I message is telling you that either the machine does not support the function, or you are running z/OS as a guest of an older release of VM which does not support the function. Just curious: What was the first release of VM which does support that function? Alternative: what z/OS can be running as a guest on what z/VM release if you need to use AUTOIPL? If that is documented somewhere, just point me to that or its link(s). Thanks in advance for your kind answer. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: EKM at z/OS 1.11
Richard, Where are the certs being stored? Rob Schramm Sirius Computer Solutions -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
My point was: 10 years ago there were more mainframe shops than today. Prove it! Nobody has the stats as to how many exist. Then, or now! - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: On software-hardware licensing bundling
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:06:20 +0100, Mikhail Ramendik m...@ramendik.ru wrote: Is the company named IBM? No - IBM won't actually pressure noncommercial emulators, they only get up in arms when somebody is making $$$, and of course they won't license the software but old versions are Out There. Yet it gets some flak for that. Are you the Mikhail Ramendik of IBM Ireland? You state that IBM won't pressure non-commercial emulators. Do have access to some information that says this for a fact? If so then it would be helpful if you could get IBM to issue a new pledge stating that they won't assert *any* patents against non-commercial emulators. That would be a start. The new pledge would be similar to the now-notorious 2005 pledge [1], except that it would cover *all* patents and not just a token 500 (and ideally it should have an additional clause stating that IBM won't try to wriggle out of the pledge five years later by attempting to add additional exclusions like does not apply to competitors of IBM [2]) [1] http://www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/patents/pledgedpatents.pdf [2] http://www.techeye.net/software/ibm-breaks-open-source-deal Roger Bowler Hercules the people's mainframe -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
R.S. wrote: That's why I described statement about MIPS growth as a smokescreen masking sad truth: mainframe world is shrinking. Yup. If a vendor says: I have sold X MIPS in year 2009 making this $999 million dollars, what does that means to me? MIPS per box/machine/case MIPS per CPU MIPS per sale transaction(s) of some Or if you have a dual or quad core CPU, how do you say how many MIPS per part of the CPU assembly or for the WHOLE CPU assembly? I'm really taking this 'x MIPS sold in y months' story with a little grain of pure salt. ;-D Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second for some interesting info. ;-D There is a refence of 'zMIPS' there, but a search in IBM's pages doesn't turn out any hits... :-( Your turn to put a smoke screen on me... ;D Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DIAG00 AUTOIPL error message
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 04/26/2010 11:25:55 AM: Just curious: What was the first release of VM which does support that function? Alternative: what z/OS can be running as a guest on what z/VM release if you need to use AUTOIPL? If that is documented somewhere, just point me to that or its link(s). AutoIPL was introduced in z/OS 1.10. From MVS Planning: Operations 5.4 Exploiting the Automatic IPL Function AutoIPL requires hardware support. That support is present on all z10 machines. On z9® EC machines, it is provided by feature code 9904 and hardware driver 67 or later (both are required). z/OS must be IPLed in order to detect the support. AutoIPL can also be used by a z/OS guest on z/VM Release 5.3.0 or later. Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: EKM at z/OS 1.11
On 4/26/2010 10:42 AM, Rob Schramm wrote: Richard, Where are the certs being stored? In RACF. In my searching, so far the only reference to DKI I can find is for LTO drives, but we are using TS1120s. I am waiting on a call back from level2. I will let you now what I find. Thanks, Richard -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
A secretary used 10 years ago word processor, email program and spreadsheet. Nowadays she use ...almost exactly same set of application, exactly the same NUMBER of them: one. Number of MIPS in her PC grew up significantly. Can we talk about growth IN THIS CONTEXT? Yes. And no. Is this a good thing? We used to have accountants make financial statements. Now, we have secretaries, without credentials, doing these statements. They don't know the basics, but they're putting out stuff that becomes part of their company record. I have seen published financial statements with =ERR in cells. Just because the tools are faster, better, stronger, doesn't mean they're used properly. A faster wrench means you are driving the screws in faster! - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
R.S. wrote: sad truth: mainframe world is shrinking. Please, give us some confirmed/trustworthy sources to confirm that statement. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
Well, if the Business is raw number crunching, then the PC may very well be able to do more than the mainframe. When it comes to raw CPU power, PCs are very competitive. Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca 4/26/2010 11:09 AM Define more. More Business. The rest is just noise toys! - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains confidential and privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received this material in error and that any forwarding, copying, printing, distribution, use or disclosure of the material is strictly prohibited. If you have received this material in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the material. Emails are not secure and can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by email. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: RMM VRSDROP
Marco, To analyze the results of VRSEL processing you can use the ACTIVITY file and the sample JCL EDGJACTP. That JCL creates detail and summary reports and those VRS related will show you summary of the reason data sets are dropped, and details of each data set dropped. This information is added to the R12 books. When FAIL action is specified there are no CDS updates made by the run, but the ACTIVITY file is updated to show what changes would have been made - this is just like you had a trial run with EDGHSKP parms VRSEL,VERIFY. In case you also start to look at VRSRETAIN or EXPDTDROP be aware there is an APAR OA30881 which provides some additional reporting for EDGJACTP to help with limit reporting for other than VRSDROP. That is new function in R12 rolled-back to R10 and R11. Mike Wood RMM Development -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DIAG00 AUTOIPL error message
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:47:09 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: AutoIPL requires hardware support. That support is present on all z10 machines. On z9® EC machines, it is provided by feature code 9904 and hardware driver 67 or later (both are required). z/OS must be IPLed in order to detect the support. AutoIPL can also be used by a z/OS guest on z/VM Release 5.3.0 or later. Must the system then have the hardware support? This strikes me as the sort of feature that might be provided entirely by CP, regardless of hardware support. (You wouldn't want to autoIPL an LPAR because one VM requested autoIPL.) -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
Ted MacNEIL wrote: I have seen published financial statements with =ERR in cells. Look at http://www.louisepryor.com/showTheme.do?theme=13 for (somewhat old but useful) discussions about accuracy of spreadsheets and errors within financial statements in spreadsheets. Problems discussed are bad macros, bad pasting and handling big and small numbers in a formula, etc... One nice moral: Be very afraid when copying and pasting Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DIAG00 AUTOIPL error message
Jim Mulder wrote: AutoIPL was introduced in z/OS 1.10. From MVS Planning: Operations 5.4 Exploiting the Automatic IPL Function AutoIPL requires hardware support. That support is present on all z10 machines. On z9® EC machines, it is provided by feature code 9904 and hardware driver 67 or later (both are required). z/OS must be IPLed in order to detect the support. AutoIPL can also be used by a z/OS guest on z/VM Release 5.3.0 or later. Thanks for your very kind answer. I will have a nice talk with my z/OS Team about this. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
In a message dated 4/26/2010 10:59:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za writes: Problems discussed are bad macros, bad pasting and handling big and small numbers in a formula, etc... One nice moral: Be very afraid when copying and pasting We had a big stink when the Yearly NSF report came back with a question mark and DATE : DA/TE/ Seems like the midnight shift entered DATE when prompted === r nn,Enter Date -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
I don't think anyone but IBM can prove how many mainframes there are now and how many there were 10 or 20 years ago. I can give you examples of my home city of Milwaukee though. Back in the mid eighties, when I was employed but looking for a job, there were probably between 30 to 40 MVS datacenters within 30 miles of my house. We had a group called the Synergistics OS Users Group that met back quarterly, and had a membership list of all those who belonged. Four years ago, as I've mentioned on IBM-Main before, when PH Mining closed their z/OS datacenter, my best estimates of how many z/OS customers that were in the area within 30 miles from my house, was 10 or 11. I did get some info from friends of mine that worked at IBM at the time. I may have missed some datacenters, but probably not too many. I suspect that if you go to any big city in the US, the number of z/OS datacenters has decreased by more than half. I know that in Milwaukee, the biggest bank had a datacenter. Now that datacenter is in another city through merger. Many of the manufacturing plants, like my old employer, either closed their datacenter, consolidated it, or went out of business. Allis Chalmers was a HUGE manufacturing presence in Milwaukee for many years. My Dad worked there for 30 years. I also knew some of the people that worked in their datacenter. All gone now. -- Eric Bielefeld Systems Programmer IBM MVS Technical Services Dubuque, Iowa 563-845-4363 Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote: My point was: 10 years ago there were more mainframe shops than today. Prove it! Nobody has the stats as to how many exist. Then, or now! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
When it comes to raw CPU power, PCs are very competitive. Yes. I've never disputed that. But, when it comes to I/O ... - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:12:03 +, Eric Bielefeld eric- ibmm...@wi.rr.com wrote: Allis Chalmers was a HUGE manufacturing presence in Milwaukee for many years. My Dad worked there for 30 years. I also knew some of the people that worked in their datacenter. All gone now. ~ Eric, you may be of interest of this with your Dad working for AC for so long. There is a guy here in Sioux City that supposedly has the biggest collection of Allis Chalmer tractors in the country. Every year he uses them to pull floats in our Rivercade parade. Just thought I'd share. Regards, Pat Lyon -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:28:29 -0700 (PDT), StevePratt steve_pr...@isp.state.il.us wrote: I think the point here is that just because some tacks the word language onto a description is different than the *true* meaning of defining a programming language. Which is why I added the JCL comment, as few of us would call it a language. But are we right? I don't know, words mean what people say they mean.I tend to object to people who use the term database as a base for information - including libraries. That's because my business has a jargon with a more precise meaning that is more useful to me. Language is also a jargon word, which we use in a different way than we find in most dictionaries. Where can we find a dictionary that shows the meaning that would include the languages we want to include, but exclude those that others want to include? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) writes: Yes. I've never disputed that. But, when it comes to I/O ... there can be very large difference between PCs configured for desktop and PCs configured for servers. recent thread discussing that featuring large number of channels ... may actually involve highlighting a bug http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010f.html#18 What was the historical price of a P/390? asynchronous, full-duplex, packetized I/O programs can do an enormous amount of I/O thru a single interface. the reverse has shown up numerous times in the mainframe half-duplex channel interface. one such instance was that the 3090 increased the number of channels offered by something like 1/3rd (over initial plan/design) ... when they found out about the 3880 disk controller channel busy overhead (how long it was taking the slow 3880 jib-prime microprocessor to process channel commands). there was even some talk about charging the disk division for the extra 3090 manufacturing cost. -- 42yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar1970 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
I don't think anyone but IBM can prove how many bmainframes there are now and how many there were 10 or 20 years ago. I can give you examples of my home city of Milwaukee though. I can give examples in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area), and it has not diminished much. So, each's experience is all we've got. And, that doesn't allow one to make a definitive statement in either direction. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
So Toronto hasn't lost many of its mainframes? That's good to hear. I suspect that my experiences in Milwaukee are similar to a lot more people's on this list than yours are. Anyone care to comment? You are correct in your statement that your (or my) personal experience doesn't allow us to make general comments. I do get the feeling that, mostly from this list, that the number of mainframes is shrinking, at least across the US, even though the processing power of the remaining processors in total is going up. -- Eric Bielefeld Systems Programmer IBM MVS Technical Services Dubuque, Iowa 563-845-4363 Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote: I don't think anyone but IBM can prove how many bmainframes there are now and how many there were 10 or 20 years ago. I can give you examples of my home city of Milwaukee though. I can give examples in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area), and it has not diminished much. So, each's experience is all we've got. And, that doesn't allow one to make a definitive statement in either direction. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:06:34 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote: When it comes to raw CPU power, PCs are very competitive. Yes. I've never disputed that. But, when it comes to I/O ... Depends on the I/O. For TCP/IP, I find z painfully slow. Examples: OS X (Intel) --- 500 $ time ftp localhost /dev/null Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. 220 ::1 FTP server (tnftpd 20080929) ready. Name (localhost:paulgilm): EOF received; login aborted. 221 Thank you for using the FTP service on ::1. real0m1.536s user0m0.002s sys 0m0.005s 501 $ 501 $ 501 $ time ftp localhost /dev/null Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. 220 ::1 FTP server (tnftpd 20080929) ready. Name (localhost:paulgilm): EOF received; login aborted. 221 Thank you for using the FTP service on ::1. real0m0.064s user0m0.002s sys 0m0.005s Solaris (Intel) Solaris: 168$ time ftp localhost /dev/null Login incorrect. Login failed. real0m0.04s user0m0.00s sys 0m0.00s Solaris: 169$ time ftp localhost /dev/null Login incorrect. Login failed. real0m0.03s user0m0.00s sys 0m0.00s z/OS --- z/OS: time ftp localhost /dev/null IBM FTP CS V1R10 Connecting to: localhost 127.0.0.1 port: 21. 220-FTPD1 IBM FTP CS V1R10 at .COM, 16:32:42 on 2010-04-26. 220 Connection will close if idle for more than 5 minutes. NAME QUIT generated by unexpected end of file QUIT 221 Quit command received. Goodbye. real0m 9.21s user0m 0.14s sys 0m 0.05s z/OS: time ftp localhost /dev/null IBM FTP CS V1R10 Connecting to: localhost 127.0.0.1 port: 21. 220-FTPD1 IBM FTP CS V1R10 at .COM, 16:32:55 on 2010-04-26. 220 Connection will close if idle for more than 5 minutes. NAME QUIT generated by unexpected end of file QUIT 221 Quit command received. Goodbye. real0m 9.23s user0m 0.13s sys 0m 0.05s -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 11:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM When it comes to raw CPU power, PCs are very competitive. Yes. I've never disputed that. But, when it comes to I/O ... - I don't know the I/O capacity of the newest PC fibre I/O, but did find a Web site which says 4 GiB/Sec. But I'm relatively sure that there are fewer fibre HBAs in most servers than there are FICON channels, the nearest z equivalent (I think), on a z. And I also wonder if such devices or PC servers have multipath capability, similar to the z's. I am totally certain (watch somebody prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have shared DASD on a PC like we are used to. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DIAG00 AUTOIPL error message
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 04/26/2010 11:54:51 AM: AutoIPL requires hardware support. That support is present on all z10 machines. On z9® EC machines, it is provided by feature code 9904 and hardware driver 67 or later (both are required). z/OS must be IPLed in order to detect the support. AutoIPL can also be used by a z/OS guest on z/VM Release 5.3.0 or later. Must the system then have the hardware support? This strikes me as the sort of feature that might be provided entirely by CP, regardless of hardware support. (You wouldn't want to autoIPL an LPAR because one VM requested autoIPL.) As far as I know, if you are running as a VM guest, then only the VM support is required. Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:45:27 +, Eric Bielefeld wrote: You are correct in your statement that your (or my) personal experience doesn't allow us to make general comments. I do get the feeling that, mostly from this list, that the number of mainframes is shrinking, at least across the US, even though the processing power of the remaining processors in total is going up. Johnny Carson was fond of saying, If you buy the premise, you buy the bit. What's noise, and what's signal? Certainly the historical trend in one area is a unfair metric; actually no comparison.) How to account for: o Consoidation of data centers, versus o Dispersal of computing onto desktops? Best to consider in context: o Fraction of total installed MIPS sold per year. (But how to count iPhones and automotive control computers?) o Fraction of total market revenue. (But how to account for customers held captive by Legacy software and paying inflated prices?) o Fraction of total I/O bandwidth. (But how much of that is viewing erotica on iPhones nowadays?) It's apples (or should that be Apples) and oranges. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:52:53 -0500, McKown, John wrote: I am totally certain (watch somebody prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have shared DASD on a PC like we are used to. Point of view. Think of a DASD control unit as a very dumb fileserver. Or a fileserver as a very smart control unit. Depends on whether you prefer to serialize on extent or on file. Don't deprecate software serialization; GRS and ISPF both do this to gain performance and/or granularity over what RESERVE provides. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem
Amen - I own some of those poc. just finished moving some poc in ztrieve to Endevor from priv lib since they were being used in production. The next time they do title changes here I think I may lobby for System janitor. IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 04/26/2010 11:12:09 AM: From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: 04/26/2010 11:12 AM Subject: Re: COBOL - no longer being taught - is a problem Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Quick and dirty doesn't matter for one time jobs. Unfortunately, one-timers become old-timers. If it works, it has a high potential of becoming some sort of production! - The information contained in this communication (including any attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Thank you -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
Datacenter consolidations have been in vogue ever since IBM provided the machines capable of it making sense (dollar-wise and business-wise). Whenever this happens, one or more datacenters take a hit. I have participated in numerous consolidations and can tell you that the resulting installed MIPS/MSUs are not usually less than the individual datacenter totals. There usually is, however, a reduction in CECs. Synergies and economies of scale. Hence, while numbers of CECs may be going down, processing power is increasing. I guess that means I concur with your second paragraph. There used to be an axiom that stated if you were a one CPU (CEC) shop now...wait a little while and you will be a two CPU (CEC) shop soon. IBM has been staying ahead of that curve for the last ten years for all but the biggest customers. If the economy becomes more business-friendly, maybe we will yet see an expansion in datacenters. Time will tell if that, and innovation lead the charge. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM So Toronto hasn't lost many of its mainframes? That's good to hear. I suspect that my experiences in Milwaukee are similar to a lot more people's on this list than yours are. Anyone care to comment? You are correct in your statement that your (or my) personal experience doesn't allow us to make general comments. I do get the feeling that, mostly from this list, that the number of mainframes is shrinking, at least across the US, even though the processing power of the remaining processors in total is going up. -- Eric Bielefeld -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
[no subject]
Wouldn't it be interesting if IBM could do something like this: http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/3877861/IBM-Adopts-Novells-Linux-OS-for-Lotus-Websphere-Appliances.htm . for z/OS? Or am I going insane again? Would it be useful to run multiple z/OS appliances as separate images a parallel sysplex instead of running all the IBM software on just a few instances (still under parallel sysplex)? Or maybe there's just too much overhead to that. Well, for me, at least something interesting to consider. Tho I image most here will think it stupid. John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:52:53 -0500, McKown, John wrote: I am totally certain (watch somebody prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have shared DASD on a PC like we are used to. Point of view. Think of a DASD control unit as a very dumb fileserver. Or a fileserver as a very smart control unit. Depends on whether you prefer to serialize on extent or on file. Don't deprecate software serialization; GRS and ISPF both do this to gain performance and/or granularity over what RESERVE provides. -- gil I guess if you have a 10Gb Ethernet backbone, then that sort of sharing (via specialized servers) would be useful. I would worry about LAN congestion. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
It is possible to configure Storage Arrays in the PC world to work under a very similar methodology as a DASD does in the mainframe world. It is very common in the Virtual environment. I don't know if all the different PC virtualization technologies can support it, but quite a few do, with some very intelligent methods for sharing files amongst different servers and workstations, and spawning off new individual versions when a file is changed for only a specific machine. The PC world is getting closer and closer to the mainframe world when virtual environments start being used heavily. This is a bit more in depth than your average PC shop will get into, but not all that new in the PC world. Frank Finley -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:52:53 -0500, McKown, John wrote: I am totally certain (watch somebody prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have shared DASD on a PC like we are used to. Point of view. Think of a DASD control unit as a very dumb fileserver. Or a fileserver as a very smart control unit. Depends on whether you prefer to serialize on extent or on file. Don't deprecate software serialization; GRS and ISPF both do this to gain performance and/or granularity over what RESERVE provides. -- gil I guess if you have a 10Gb Ethernet backbone, then that sort of sharing (via specialized servers) would be useful. I would worry about LAN congestion. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com (McKown, John) writes: I don't know the I/O capacity of the newest PC fibre I/O, but did find a Web site which says 4 GiB/Sec. But I'm relatively sure that there are fewer fibre HBAs in most servers than there are FICON channels, the nearest z equivalent (I think), on a z. And I also wonder if such devices or PC servers have multipath capability, similar to the z's. I am totally certain (watch somebody prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have shared DASD on a PC like we are used to. re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010h.html#51 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010h.html#56 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010h.html#62 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM way back when ... one of the austin engineers took some fiber technology knocking around POK for a long time, made it full-duplex, increased media thruput by about 10% and had significantly cheaper drivers. The original eventually shipped from POK as (half-duplex) ESCON ... that had enormously lower aggregate thruput than the RS6000 SLA (more than just difference between 200mbits/sec versus 220mbits/sec media transfer) We had been working with NCAR on HYPERChannel NAS/SAN supercomputer access to ibm dasd farm ... we then participated on various standards committees with regard to HIPPI, HIPPI switches and IPI3 disk arrays ... including what was called 3rd party transfer in the HIPPI switch to simulate the NCAR NAS/SAN operation. Then the austin engineer wanted to enhance SLA to 800mbits and we convinced him to instead working on fiber-channel standard (1gbit/sec full-duplex). We also worked with the Hursley engineers on 9330 ... basically asynchronous, full-duplex, packetized SCSI commands over 80bit serial copper ... this evolved into SSA (running at 160mbit serial copper, full-duplex ... able to simultaneously write and read 160mbit/sec for 320mbit/sec aggregate). The (even late 80s, early 90s) FCS standards stuff included basic 64-way non-blocking, full-duplex cascading switch ... i.e. being able to cascade multiple 64-way for larger than 64-way connectivity. A port on the switch could be a processor, a disk controller, or some other sort of device. Old post mentioning (jan92) FCS, SSA, large cluster scaleup (aka 128 processors interconnected to large disk farm): http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/95.html#13 old email mentioning the cluster scaleup work http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/lhwemail.html#medusa other past posts mentioning ha/cmp product http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#hacmp In that time period ... there is a bunch of stuff from the FCS standards mailing list about lots of churn and furry from the POK channel engineers trying to layer the complexity of half-duplex channel operation on top of the underlying FCS full-duplex, asynchronous standards activity. As mentioned in the 95 post and the cluster scaleup email ... at the end of Jan ... the cluster scaleup work was transfered (announced for numerical intensive market) and we were told we couldn't work on anything with more than four processors. Trivial SCSI at the time (late 80s early 90s) ... not much scaleup and not very high thruput was being able to have four scsi adapter cards and four scsi controllers all on the same scsi bus (i.e. 8 positions). One of the issues for rs6000 in this time-frame was that the workstation group had been told that they had to use PS2 microchannel adapter cards (i.e. rs6000 moved to microchannel bus) rather than doing their own. The problem was that the PS2 microchannel adapter cards had been designed for the desktop, terminal emulation market ... with very high command processing overhead and low adapter thruput. Joke was that if rs6000 had to use all the PS2 microchannel adapter cards (helping their corporate brethern) ... that the rs6000 thruput would run as slow as a PS2. It wasn't just the scsi adapter cards and the display adapter cards ... but also things like the 16mbit T/R card. The PS2 microchannel 16mbit T/R card had been designed for terminal emulation market with possibly 300+ PS2 sharing same 16mbits. It had lower per card thruput than the PC/RT ISA 4mbit T/R card (that austin had designed for the precursor to the rs6000). past posts mentioning terminal emulation http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#emulation a couple recent IBM references: DB2 announces technology that trumps Oracle RAC and Exadata http://freedb2.com/2009/10/10/for-databases-size-does-matter IBM pureScale Technology Redefines Transaction Processing Economics. New DB2 Feature Sets the Bar for System Performance on More than 100 IBM Power Systems http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/28593.wss IBM responds to Oracle's Exadata with new systems http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9174967/IBM_responds_to_Oracle_s_Exadata_with_new_systems it isn't limited to power ... but also to high-end PC servers: IBM goes
Re: Multiple logon SMCS possibility
Too bad Dr. Alan Scherr had a tight schedule and did not have the time to expand the design to allow a user multiple concurrent logons to TSO. Of course, most users accept the restriction, but over the past 30+ years, I've had many dozens of complaints about it. To me, it would be a mistake to for the console design to have the same restriction. Don Williams -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER outage
I have an automated job that downloads maintenance every Monday morning at 8:00am. It has yet to fail - but, that's PDT. On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com wrote: Quite a few weekends it is down, up to and including first thing Monday mornings. It used to be one of my Monday morning rituals, to download weekly maintenance. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Brian Peterson Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER outage Looks like IBM's RECEIVE ORDER system is not working this weekend. I've been running RECEIVE ORDER jobs since 4/24 and all I get back is GIM69147S SMP/E WAITED 120 MINUTES BUT ORDER order IS NOT READY FOR DOWNLOAD. Further, RECEIVE ORDER(PENDING order) continue to fail after 120 minutes, more than 24 hours after placing the original order. I've opened a ticket - no response thus far. Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- Guy Gardoit z/OS Systems Programming -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Dataset Audit Facility (DAF) 1.4.9b Issue
Greetings, I am trying to assess how widespread an issue is with DAF that has been reported to me. Is anyone else seeing this same symptom? If so, let me know what level of z/OS you are running and also what level your DAF is at. Symptom Details: 2010-02-12 - Level 1.4.9b running on z/OS 1.9 and seeing the following. DAF612W 092 007 2010091 20.02.09.75 Unknown DataFSTYP= Cheers... Michael -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER outage
We cannot download corrective service ordered today. One of our team members had an order he placed at 0800 EST this morning and it is not yet available. There is no ETA from the IBMLink help desk which I just contacted again on his behalf. Best Regards, Sam Knutson, GEICO System z HW/SW/Automation Team Leader mailto:sknut...@geico.com (office) 301.986.3574 (cell) 301.996.1318 Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Brian Peterson Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER outage Looks like IBM's RECEIVE ORDER system is not working this weekend. I've been running RECEIVE ORDER jobs since 4/24 and all I get back is GIM69147S SMP/E WAITED 120 MINUTES BUT ORDER order IS NOT READY FOR DOWNLOAD. Further, RECEIVE ORDER(PENDING order) continue to fail after 120 minutes, more than 24 hours after placing the original order. I've opened a ticket - no response thus far. Brian This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
-snip- If a vendor says: I have sold X MIPS in year 2009 making this $999 million dollars, what does that means to me? MIPS per box/machine/case MIPS per CPU MIPS per sale transaction(s) of some Or if you have a dual or quad core CPU, how do you say how many MIPS per part of the CPU assembly or for the WHOLE CPU assembly? I'm really taking this 'x MIPS sold in y months' story with a little grain of pure salt. ;-D Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second for some interesting info. ;-D There is a refence of 'zMIPS' there, but a search in IBM's pages doesn't turn out any hits... :-( Your turn to put a smoke screen on me... ;D --unsnip--- I submit that MIPS is not a valid measurement, since it has no real correlation with the amount of useful work accomplished by any machine. One example is RISC machines. They have to simulate instructions that non-RISC machines execute on a regular basis. The only really good measure of processor speed is this: does it finish a business's workload in a timely fashion? To the Board of Directors, that's really the only valid measure. While a PC on a desktop might be more than adequate for secretarial chores, running a large corporation is a horse of a completely different color. Consider all the different tasks involved, including such things as accounts receivable, accounts payable, inventory management, payrolls, etc. Some of these tasks require HUGE amounts of I/O, far beyind the capabilities of a desktop PC. (And I've never met a salesman that could tell truth from fiction!) :-) Rick -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
On 26 Apr 2010 13:11:21 -0700, rfocht...@ync.net (Rick Fochtman) wrote: I submit that MIPS is not a valid measurement, since it has no real correlation with the amount of useful work accomplished by any machine. One example is RISC machines. They have to simulate instructions that non-RISC machines execute on a regular basis. The only really good measure of processor speed is this: does it finish a business's workload in a timely fashion? To the Board of Directors, that's really the only valid measure. While a PC on a desktop might be more than adequate for secretarial chores, running a large corporation is a horse of a completely different color. Consider all the different tasks involved, including such things as accounts receivable, accounts payable, inventory management, payrolls, etc. Some of these tasks require HUGE amounts of I/O, far beyind the capabilities of a desktop PC. Even there, speed isn't what is being measured.Throughput matters. And it doesn't matter how fast the CPU is on your document in the cloud if your internet connection is slow. We used to do more spreadsheet type processing on mainframes - before spreadsheet programs were available on users desktops.Now it is much quicker for them to do their data massaging on their desktop. It's even often quicker when their main computer is doing the manipulating live. The advantage (to them) of having the data on the mainframe isn't speed, it is making sure the data are valid and current.Even if it takes longer to get results to their desktops. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
W dniu 2010-04-26 17:50, Ted MacNEIL pisze: A secretary used 10 years ago word processor, email program and spreadsheet. Nowadays she use ...almost exactly same set of application, exactly the same NUMBER of them: one. Number of MIPS in her PC grew up significantly. Can we talk about growth IN THIS CONTEXT? Yes. And no. Is this a good thing? We used to have accountants make financial statements. Now, we have secretaries, without credentials, doing these statements. They don't know the basics, but they're putting out stuff that becomes part of their company record. I have seen published financial statements with =ERR in cells. Just because the tools are faster, better, stronger, doesn't mean they're used properly. A faster wrench means you are driving the screws in faster! You still miss the point. Is it intentional? Undereducated secretary could make the same errors 10 years ago, using fraction of the MIPS she has nowadays. Human errors are CPU power independent. However in terms of MIPS secretary has much more MIPS than 10 years ago. And still ONE PC. That's my point: number of computers. Not quality, usability or users education. Deprecating PC world is not a method for discussion about MIPS and pieces installed. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- BRE Bank SA ul. Senatorska 18 00-950 Warszawa www.brebank.pl Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237 NIP: 526-021-50-88 Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2009 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 118.763.528 złotych. W związku z realizacją warunkowego podwyższenia kapitału zakładowego, na podstawie uchwały XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca 2008r., oraz uchwały XVI NWZ z dnia 27 października 2008r., może ulec podwyższeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 zł. Akcje w podwyższonym kapitale zakładowym BRE Banku SA będą w całości opłacone. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
W dniu 2010-04-26 17:50, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze: R.S. wrote: sad truth: mainframe world is shrinking. Please, give us some confirmed/trustworthy sources to confirm that statement. Even IBM admits (I'VE SEEN IT SOMEWHERE) that number of mainframe datacenters is not growing but quickly explains it as effect of consolidation. (Indeed, consolidation is part of the reasons.) Of course IBM jealously protect their most secret information: number of mainframe sites. Even this is the proof - do you really think this is effect of modesty or shyness? The other proof is what we all see: another light on mainframe map gone. I can provide exact information about situation in Poland during last 10 years - that's whole country in Europe. Yes, number of mainframe sites in Poland has shrunk. I heard what going up in Czech, Slovakia, Hungary. What about South Africa - how many new customers do you know? How many closed (migrated) mainframe shops do you know? What's the balance? -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- BRE Bank SA ul. Senatorska 18 00-950 Warszawa www.brebank.pl Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237 NIP: 526-021-50-88 Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2009 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 118.763.528 zotych. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchway XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca 2008r., oraz uchway XVI NWZ z dnia 27 padziernika 2008r., moe ulec podwyszeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym BRE Banku SA bd w caoci opacone. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
W dniu 2010-04-26 18:52, McKown, John pisze: [...] I don't know the I/O capacity of the newest PC fibre I/O, but did find a Web site which says 4 GiB/Sec. But I'm relatively sure that there are fewer fibre HBAs in most servers than there are FICON channels, the nearest z equivalent (I think), on a z. And I also wonder if such devices or PC servers have multipath capability, similar to the z's. I am totally certain (watch somebody prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have shared DASD on a PC like we are used to. Indeed, I/O is still VERY strong advantage of mainframes. BUT: 1. 8Gbps FC were first, before FICON Express8 2. If you use screwdriver and open FICON card you would see PCIe cards inside. The same apply to modern OSAs, Cryptos. Caution: older models contains PCI-X, newer PCIe. 3. Multipathing is still significantly worse in their world, but the technology is maturing, especially in AIX. 4. Number of FC interfaces is indeed smaller per PC, but comparable per full rack of PCs. And we use single piece of mainframe, while they're using dozens of racks of cages of blades of PC's vbg 5. Shared DASD does exist in SCSI world, but serialization is worst than the worst possible configuration of GRS. However it is used for clustering. 6. They are hot on our heels. We had LPARs, VM - they also have something similar. Many years later, significantly worse, but they have. We have Coupling Facility - they are also trying to share memory. We had SAN (ESCON) - they also have SAN, in some aspects better than our. I think I feel what ancient Romans thought about the barbarians. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- BRE Bank SA ul. Senatorska 18 00-950 Warszawa www.brebank.pl Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237 NIP: 526-021-50-88 Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2009 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 118.763.528 zotych. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchway XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca 2008r., oraz uchway XVI NWZ z dnia 27 padziernika 2008r., moe ulec podwyszeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym BRE Banku SA bd w caoci opacone. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
remove
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM W dniu 2010-04-26 18:52, McKown, John pisze: [...] I don't know the I/O capacity of the newest PC fibre I/O, but did find a Web site which says 4 GiB/Sec. But I'm relatively sure that there are fewer fibre HBAs in most servers than there are FICON channels, the nearest z equivalent (I think), on a z. And I also wonder if such devices or PC servers have multipath capability, similar to the z's. I am totally certain (watch somebody prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have shared DASD on a PC like we are used to. Indeed, I/O is still VERY strong advantage of mainframes. BUT: 1. 8Gbps FC were first, before FICON Express8 2. If you use screwdriver and open FICON card you would see PCIe cards inside. The same apply to modern OSAs, Cryptos. Caution: older models contains PCI-X, newer PCIe. 3. Multipathing is still significantly worse in their world, but the technology is maturing, especially in AIX. 4. Number of FC interfaces is indeed smaller per PC, but comparable per full rack of PCs. And we use single piece of mainframe, while they're using dozens of racks of cages of blades of PC's vbg 5. Shared DASD does exist in SCSI world, but serialization is worst than the worst possible configuration of GRS. However it is used for clustering. 6. They are hot on our heels. We had LPARs, VM - they also have something similar. Many years later, significantly worse, but they have. We have Coupling Facility - they are also trying to share memory. We had SAN (ESCON) - they also have SAN, in some aspects better than our. I think I feel what ancient Romans thought about the barbarians. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- BRE Bank SA ul. Senatorska 18 00-950 Warszawa www.brebank.pl Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237 NIP: 526-021-50-88 Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2009 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 118.763.528 zotych. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchway XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca 2008r., oraz uchway XVI NWZ z dnia 27 padziernika 2008r., moe ulec podwyszeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym BRE Banku SA bd w caoci opacone. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) writes: 6. They are hot on our heels. We had LPARs, VM - they also have something similar. Many years later, significantly worse, but they have. We have Coupling Facility - they are also trying to share memory. We had SAN (ESCON) - they also have SAN, in some aspects better than our. I think I feel what ancient Romans thought about the barbarians. re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010h.html#51 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010h.html#56 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010h.html#62 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010h.html#63 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM long ago and far away, my wife was con'ed into going to POK to be in charge of loosely-coupled architecture (well, maybe not so long ago ... or at least my wife was in kindergarten at the time) ... and she created peer coupled shared data. However, until sysplex there wasn't any uptake except for IMS hot-standby ... which contributed to her not staying long in the position. There were also ongoing battles with the SNA forces about whether SNA had to be used for loosely-coupled operation. http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#shareddata In late 80s, we started the ha/cmp product using power hardware (but the design was independent of the processor architecture, worked equally well with intel processors or other risc processors). http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#hacmp -- 42yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar1970 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
Although not a comprehensive list, just looking at the external IBM press releases you can see both new mainframe customers as well as modernized and new workloads being deployed on System z. There are also other new System z mainframe customers not published. While these customers may not be located in Milwaukee, there is new mainframe technology being deployed around the world. For existing customers, consolidation continues to reign supreme. While I was at Microsoft, they talked about the number of mainframe footprints or servers that were declining without any regard for consolidation to larger servers using the PR/SM LPAR technology. Both the performance and capacity of these new servers support continued consolidation. Dongbu Insurance Selects IBM to Build a Smarter System to Fuel Growth -- 21April 2010 ((http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/29954.wss))--21 April 2010 Dongbu Insurance, Korea's second largest non-life insurer, to support the company's enterprise-wide business transformation and lay the foundations for future growth. Four IBM System z10 Enterprise Class and Business Class mainframe servers will serve as the backbone of the system, running on z/OS and Linux operating systems as well as IBM DB2 and WebSphere Application Server. Travelport Selects IBM to Provide Software Framework for Future Business Growth ((http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/29829.wss))--06 April 2010 The new investment in IBM software is designed to allow Travelport to more than double the information it processes to customers in 160 countries, including thousands of travel agencies, hotels and the leading car rental companies, cruise and tour operators and major rail networks. Travelport will utilize IBM technologies and work with IBM to upgrade its core system operating software to the IBM z/Transaction Processing Facility (zTPF). The agreement also includes elements of IBM’s software portfolio including WebSphere, Rational, Tivoli and Information Management products while also leveraging the full range of IBM server and storage products. Largest Korean Credit Card Company - BC Card - Selects IBM's System z Mainframe over HP and Oracle ((http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/29040.wss))--16 Dec 2009 Korea's largest credit card company, BC Card, has selected IBM to support its payment system for 2.62 million merchants and 40 million cardholders. BC Card chose IBM after an exhaustive review of competitive products from HP and Oracle. BC Card decided on the IBM System z mainframe for its low cost of computing, including energy savings and the system's strong disaster recovery capabilities. BC Card is a new IBM mainframe customer and will transform and consolidate its distributed servers to System z10 servers. Structured as a System z Solution Edition, the computing environment of BC Card also includes IBM middleware solutions, including DB2, CICS, WebSphere, Information Management, and Tivoli Software IBM Mainframe Deployed in Namibia for the First Time ((http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/28896.wss))--24 Nov 2009 First National Bank of Namibia Ltd has selected IBM to help the bank localize its banking systems and operations. Under the $5 million agreement, IBM will provide FNB with two of the latest IBM System z10 Business Class mainframes and supporting software to meet regulatory requirements and support the bank's growth. Businesses and governments in these emerging markets are modernizing their IT systems in banking, retail and other key sectors to compete in an interconnected world. IBM System z mainframes provide one of the world's highest levels of security and are unmatched in reliably managing high levels of transactions. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Runs Commercial Flight and Reservation Systems on IBM System z Mainframe ((http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/27863.wss))--29 June 2009 KLM Royal Dutch Airlines has become the first airline to fully deploy IBM's newest System z mainframe-based software for processing ultra-high volumes of real-time business transactions such as flight reservations. KLM has leveraged many of z/TPF's benefits, including modernization of their development platform through an open-standards-based Linux development environment. KLM is using the platform-independent open tooling, common across its
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
Even IBM admits (I'VE SEEN IT SOMEWHERE) that number of mainframe datacenters is not growing but quickly explains it as effect of consolidation. Tell us where. Or, consider a statement without substantiation what it's worth. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 45 years of Mainframe
In 4bd491ce.5010...@ync.net, on 04/25/2010 at 02:02 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said: I suspect that 2305 was an outgrowth of the 2302, not necessarily a new device. I don't have any information on that, although the platters certainly looked similar to those on the 1301, 1302 and 2302. The 2305 was available with selector channel interfaces before the blk-mux interfaces. At NCSS we were told that it took a complete selector subchannel, with eight exposures, to function properly so we configured them (16 devices) to run off 2860 Selector channels hanging off a 370/168 system. The 2880 was first announced for the S/360; the S/370 was not announced until 1970, a year after the 360/85, and the original announcement did not include the 370/168. I'd guess that your management simply did not want to spend the money on a 2880. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 45 years of Mainframe
On 26 April 2010 19:02, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: In 4bd491ce.5010...@ync.net, on 04/25/2010 at 02:02 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said: I suspect that 2305 was an outgrowth of the 2302, not necessarily a new device. I don't have any information on that, although the platters certainly looked similar to those on the 1301, 1302 and 2302. Where did the 2301 fit in? IIRC that was a true drum. We had one in the early 1970s on MVT on both a /65 and a /165, but support was dropped in MVS. The 2305 was available with selector channel interfaces before the blk-mux interfaces. At NCSS we were told that it took a complete selector subchannel, with eight exposures, to function properly so we configured them (16 devices) to run off 2860 Selector channels hanging off a 370/168 system. The 2880 was first announced for the S/360; the S/370 was not announced until 1970, a year after the 360/85, and the original announcement did not include the 370/168. I'd guess that your management simply did not want to spend the money on a 2880. The 2880 wasn't announced for all S/360 models, though. In S/370 architecture there is a block multiplexing control bit in Control Register 0. S/360 had no architected control registers (yeah, I know - the /67 did), but perhaps they added them on the /85 and /195? Tony H. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
Just found a post from DancingDinosaur on 26 April 2010 where he discusses System z in Korea including BC Card and Dongbu Insurance, In his blog, he quotes 40 new System z wins in 2009 with 9 new wins in 1Q2010 versus several mainframe losses as well. 2009 wasn’t the unmitigated disaster for the System z as some have suggested. IBM reports 40 new System z wins for the year, both z/OS and Linux on z users. Of course, there were some losses too; I know at least one I had written about extensively. This year seems to be off to a promising start with IBM reporting nine new System z wins in 1Q. Jon Nolting - System z IT Architect (zITA) zChampion IBM US West IMT based near Seattle (206) 587-2244 (Work) - T/L 277-244 (425) 281-5750 (Cell) (206) 587-2244 (Fax) (425) 222-7969 (Home)
Re: RACF password rules
More precisely, the RACF manual makes clear that the SETR PASSWORD rule given requires an 8 char password, with at least one alphabetic character in some position, with at least one numeric character in some position, and with all reamaining character positions any combination of alphabetic or numeric; and I believe in this context the national characters ( @ $ # ) are also defined as alphabetic. So unless you object to the additional restriction that at least one character position must be alphabetic, this probably does what you want. Joel C Ewing On 04/26/2010 09:47 AM, Serenity wrote: SETR PASSWORD( RULE1( LENGTH(8) ALPHANUM(1:8))) As I read it, this sets an 8 char password with an alphanumeric in any of the 8 positions. I'd like to require at least one numeric, but in any position. Can this be done without an exit? -- Joel C. Ewing, Fort Smith, ARjremoveccapsew...@acm.org -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER outage
In my PMR with SMP/E (the support organization for RECEIVE ORDER), the SMP/E tech told me that, upon querying Boulder, he was told there was a scheduled outage this past weekend affecting the system which processes RECEIVE ORDER orders - eFactory or something like that. Unfortunately, the organization which scheduled the outage forgot to notify customers. I don't know this, but suspect from the symptoms that there must have been lingering problems undetected until Monday-Friday staff showed up to work at 8 am mountain time, because my order finally worked later in the morning Monday. I'm just a bit disappointed by this episode Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Multiple logon SMCS possibility
Don Williams wrote: Too bad Dr. Alan Scherr had a tight schedule and did not have the time to expand the design to allow a user multiple concurrent logons to TSO. Of course, most users accept the restriction, but over the past 30+ years, I've had many dozens of complaints about it. To me, it would be a mistake to for the console design to have the same restriction. Would be? It IS that way and has been from the beginning. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 310-338-0400 x318 edja...@phoenixsoftware.com http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 04/26/2010 and will not return until 05/02/2010. I will be out of the office beginning Tuesday, April 27th. I will return on Monday, May 3rd. Thanks. HCSC Company Disclaimer The information contained in this communication is confidential, private, proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately at (312) 653-6000 in Illinois; (800)835-8699 in New Mexico; (918)560-3500 in Oklahoma; or (972)766-6900 in Texas. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 25 reasons why hardware is still hot at IBM
John, The Enterprise class Unix servers are supporting several hundred IO slots, and with two port cards being the norm nowadays it would be quite easy to configure a SUN M9000 with over 500 8Gb FCP Channels. (BTW FICON and FCP are Gb not Gib). Multipath for UNIX and Windows has been around on UNIX and Windows for as long as I can remember. It was a integral part of TRU64, while other OS have incorporated support that can be augmented by Vendor or ISP multi-path IO software. Excluding Windows, there is nothing in the OS or the storage that prevents you from sharing LUNs, just like you can share volumes across SYSPLEXes. I've worked with Oracle RAC operating across 5 separate HP Superdomes, all sharing LUNs just fine, and several shops that put LUNs online to other servers in Read Only state for reporting. There are also several File Systems, but I have only worked with one - QFS - with 15 servers sharing LUNs without a problem. That was nearly ten years ago! Unfortunately your ideas about what UNIX and Windows can support IO wise are somewhat dated. The AIX servers in the performance labs where I work easily keep pace, and often surpass the z systems without breathing hard or raising a sweat. And we don't have to fork out a fortune in MSU $ just for the privilege of doing a couple of 100 thousand IOs and a poofteenth of computing on AIX. Ron I don't know the I/O capacity of the newest PC fibre I/O, but did find a Web site which says 4 GiB/Sec. But I'm relatively sure that there are fewer fibre HBAs in most servers than there are FICON channels, the nearest z equivalent (I think), on a z. And I also wonder if such devices or PC servers have multipath capability, similar to the z's. I am totally certain (watch somebody prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have shared DASD on a PC like we are used to. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MOVING TO DASD FROM TAPE - ML2
Mike, You'd probably want to disable compression for all datasets on Primary Volumes as well, and bypass migration to ML1 as there is no benefit (except for SDSP maybe). Ron -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Baldwin Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 7:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] DFHSM QUESTION - MOVING TO DASD FROM TAPE - ML2 On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:44:55 -0700, esmie moo esmie_...@yahoo.ca wrote: Ron, You mentioned compression. Please correct me if I am wrong. All the dsns on ML1 are compressed? Thanks. If your ML1 happens to be on SVA/V2X2/V2X4f, then all datasets are compressed by the hardware. In that case, compression cannot be disabled. You would want to ensure that DFHSM compression is disabled, to reduce waste of general purpose CP's that it uses. Regards, Mike Baldwin Cartagena Software Ltd. Markham, Ontario, Canada http://www.cartagena.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html