Re: IBM(r) z/OS(r) Management Facility (z/OSMF)

2012-05-24 Thread Martin, Larry D
Matt,

I think it is a really good tool.  The security, however, is very complex.  If 
you are a RACF shop then you are in good shape.  We are Top Secret and it was a 
real struggle.

..Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Dazzo, Matt
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBM(r) z/OS(r) Management Facility (z/OSMF)

So what do you folks have to say about IBM(r) z/OS(r) Management Facility 
(z/OSMF)? We have zos1.13 up and running and considering configuring IBM(r) 
z/OS(r) Management Facility (z/OSMF). Looking to see find out how hard it is to 
configure and how useful it is? Or any other info you might find useful. Thanks

Matthew Dazzo
Sr MVS Systems Programmer
Publishers Clearing House
Port Washington NY
516-944-4816


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Prince George’s
County Government or Prince George's County 7th Judicial Circuit
Court proprietary information or Protected Health Information,
which is privileged and confidential.  This E-mail is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and
attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited by federal law
and may expose you to civil and/or criminal penalties. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and
any printout.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Early IPL problems

2012-05-14 Thread Martin, Larry D
John,

I have always found that the Wait States that I encounter are of my own doing.  
I have never done an SADUMP.

The one occurrence that was problematic was after a POR and no LP would IPL.  
Had to make changes to SYS1.PARMLIB but had no system.  We were saved by  the 
Jan Jeager's OS/390 System Utilities.  Building that capability into the HMC 
would be a great addition.

Thanks,   .Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
John McDowell
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 12:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Early IPL problems

Thanks for all of the feedback thus far, both on and off the list, it has been 
useful.

So far, there seems to be general agreement that the frequency of problems is 
low (at least in production LPARs), that some way of displaying what the Wait 
State Code (WSC) means would be useful and that recovery from these sort of 
problems is accomplished by using another running z/OS system.

To help focus the feedback somewhat I would be interested to know:
- What are the typical steps taken to identify/recover from a WSC ?   For 
example, 
   Step 1: Find the meaning of the WSC  
   Step 2: SADUMP
   Step 3: Correct the source of the problem
   Step 4: Re-IPL
   Step 5: Open a PMR
   etc., etc.
   Steps 1 seems fairly certain, beyond that the remaining steps (both content 
and sequence) seem to be much less so.
- Are the existing messages useful/sufficient for identifying the underlying 
cause and how to correct the WSC ?
- Are there circumstances (e.g. console setup, etc.) that prevent the existing 
messages from being seen ?
- Are additional/better/different messages needed to identify and/or correct 
the cause of the WSC ?
- Is there any need to diagnose and/or correct problems without resorting to 
another running z/OS system ?
- To what extent, if any, is it desirable to avoid the WSC by providing some 
means of error recovery ? 

Thanks.

John McDowell - IBM




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Prince George’s
County Government or Prince George's County 7th Judicial Circuit
Court proprietary information or Protected Health Information,
which is privileged and confidential.  This E-mail is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and
attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited by federal law
and may expose you to civil and/or criminal penalties. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and
any printout.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Xerox LCDS to Postscript/PDF converters

2012-05-07 Thread Martin, Larry D
We have had good luck with ZIP390 from Data21.

.Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Gilbert Cardenas
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 12:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Xerox LCDS to Postscript/PDF converters

Hello all, we are in the process of moving one application from a content 
management server to an in house written application and we will be needing to 
send Xerox mainframe reports to this new application.

I am looking for any suggestions for a low cost, easy to use z/OS or windows 
converter that can accept a mainframe LCDS stream and convert it to postscript 
or preferably PDF with indexing or bookmarks. 

This is not a huge application (hence the low cost initiative) with about 150 
separate report entries) however, there will be a few thousand iterations of 
these created weekly.

As previously mentioned, we don't really care where the conversion takes place 
either z/OS or Win2K as long as we achieve the end results mentioned above.

If you have any recommendations or ideas, I would appreciate the feedback.

Best regards,
Gil.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Prince George’s
County Government or Prince George's County 7th Judicial Circuit
Court proprietary information or Protected Health Information,
which is privileged and confidential.  This E-mail is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and
attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited by federal law
and may expose you to civil and/or criminal penalties. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and
any printout.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Prevent FTP from root

2012-03-20 Thread Martin, Larry D
We have always used /u/userid for the home directory.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Bruce Wheatley
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Prevent FTP from root

We have numerous external clients and on occasion have found that depending on 
what product they use for FTP, their file transfer may in some fashion refer to 
our root directory or potentially the file transfer client being used defaults 
to a root directory.  

In order to prevent such access we're planning to change each userid's OMVS 
segment to have a HOME directory of: /u/userid. (Currently we just use ' / '.)

Anyone know of any gotchas with this plan?

TIA

(Posted on both RACF  IBM-Main lists)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: User datasets wrongly catalogued under Master Catalogue

2012-02-29 Thread Martin, Larry D
You can also use IDCAMS MERGECAT to move the catalog entries and then define 
the ALIAS(s).

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 7:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: User datasets wrongly catalogued under Master Catalogue

 
 Hi,
 
 Recently We have installed a new system Z/OS 1.13. During migration 
 the
Users
 datasets were restored and unfortunately all the user datasets are
catalogued under
 Master catalogue. I agree that this happens when a userid is defined 
 with
alias relating
 to user catalog. I am just trying to understand if it is possible to 
 move
all the users
 dataset catalogued under master catalogue to a user catalogue since 
 the
Number of
 datasets are in big number.
 
 Jake
 

If the datasets are not migrated, then you can use DFDSS to dump/delete, create 
the alias, restore the files with CATALOG.  
If they are migrated, then recall them, DFDSS dump/delete, create the alias, 
restore with CATALOG option.  If they are migrated and you cannot recall them, 
then keep the list of migrated files, and recover them with DFHSM after you 
correct the alias. 

I do not think you can do a repromergcat if the alias does not already exist.

This should work.  I have used this technique in the past.

Lizette

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Prob with DFHMAPS

2012-02-02 Thread Martin, Larry D
I think you need to edit the PROC and correct the SYSLIB DD statement(s).

Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Graham Hobbs
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Prob with DFHMAPS

Hello,

Trying to assemble a map, my first time but it failed with 'DATA SET NOT 
FOUND'. Given the following is there something obvious I've missed?

.. my JCL is ..

//ASSMBL   JOB (ASSEM-1),'GH',   
// CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=0,MSGLEVEL=(1,1) 
//PROCLIB  JCLLIB ORDER=DFH420.CICS.SDFHPROC   == where DFHMAPS is located 
   
//MFSYHE1  EXEC DFHMAPS, 
//MAPLIB=VENDOR.LINKLIB.SECOND,   == where i want the obj to go 
//DSCTLIB=IBMUSE1.MFSY,   == where I want my symbolic map to go  
//MAPNAME=MFSYHE1
//SYSUT1   DD DSN=IBMUSE1.MFSY.BMS(MFSYHE1),DISP=SHR  == where my BMS is   
  
//

.. partial list of SDSF;O shows that only the first step of DFHMAPS worked as 
follows ..   

IEF142I ASSMBL COPY MFSYHE1 - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE   
IEF285I   IBMUSE2.ASSMBL.JOB02276.D101.?   SYSOUT   
 
IEF285I   SYS12032.T210345.RA000.ASSMBL.TEMPM.H01  PASSED   
 
IEF285I   IBMUSE1.MFSY.BMS KEPT 
 
IEF285I   VOL SER NOS= VPWRKA.  
 
IEF373I STEP/COPY/START 2012032.2103
 
IEF032I STEP/COPY/STOP  2012032.2103
 
 CPU: 0 HR  00 MIN  00.00 SECSRB: 0 HR  00 MIN  00.00 SEC   
  
 VIRT:   172K  SYS:   256K  EXT:0K  SYS:11132K  
  
IEF212I ASSMBL ASMMAP MFSYHE1 SYSLIB - DATA SET NOT FOUND   
 
IEF272I ASSMBL ASMMAP MFSYHE1 - STEP WAS NOT EXECUTED.   

.. am I supposed to have some reference to SYSLIB somewhere? on the IEF212I 
explanation I could see only one thing that might be a prob being ..
The DD statement requested a data set cataloged in a user catalog. The JCL did 
not contain a JOBCAT or STEPCAT DD statement. 

Please, thanks,
Graham Hobbs

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ISPF Workstation Agent for Windows 7?

2012-01-27 Thread Martin, Larry D
z/OSMF comes with a no charge version of WAS called WASOEM.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Steve Comstock
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Workstation Agent for Windows 7?

On 1/27/2012 8:48 AM, Pinnacle wrote:
 On 1/27/2012 7:50 AM, Hunkeler Peter , KIUP 4 wrote:
 I've been asked if there is a way to see ISPF split sessions in 
 parallel in multiple windows, and remembered the ISPF workstation 
 agent WSA. I haven't looked into this for ages. The ISPF download 
 panel only talks about Windows 2000/NT. Trying to run the 
 downloaded file on Windows 7 ends with a message telling me not being 
 compatible. The ISPF manual also only talks about Windows 2000/NT.

 So, it seems this feature has been functionally stabilized. Or am I 
 missing something?



 Peter,

 The Workstation Agent is functionallly stabilized. z/OSMF is the way 
 to go if you really want multiple windows in the same ISPF session.

 Regards,
 Tom Conley

But z/OSMF requires WAS and is, itself, a separately licensed product. This 
could get pretty expensive in a hurry, just to have multiple windows in ISPF.



-- 

Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-355-2752
http://www.trainersfriend.com

* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
   + Training your people is an excellent investment

* Try our tool for calculating your Return On Investment
 for training dollars at
   http://www.trainersfriend.com/ROI/roi.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: question about report writer usage

2012-01-23 Thread Martin, Larry D
Our shop uses Easytrieve and CA-EARL - mostly because of old stuff still being 
run.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Sam Siegel
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 1:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: question about report writer usage

Hi - The following questions was approved by Darren for distribution on the 
list.

I'm trying to determine if any of the following production are in active use at 
your shop.

Easytrieve
DYL260, DYL280 (CA vision:results)
QUICKJOB
CA-EARL
pacsys(spectrum,zwriter, etc.)
Other commercial report writer not listed above.

If any of these product are installed on one of you systems it would be greatly 
appreciated if you could respond OFFLIST letting me know which ones you use.

Thanks,
Sam

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: FTP Recall HSM instead of DMS

2012-01-17 Thread Martin, Larry D
Make sure that you have executed a properly configured FDRSTART on the LPAR in 
question.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Marco Gianfranco Indaco
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: FTP Recall HSM instead of DMS

Hi to all.
We have a problem in a batch FTP that try to recall a locally migrated
dataset(ftp is a GET (REPLACE ) and fail because it try to use HSM(ADSMI002
error) instead of DMS.
We are in a sysplex and the same FTP works fine in 3/4 of SYS.
Using other method(IEFBR14 and so on) recall works fine.

Any idea?

Tks in advance.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Prince George’s
County Government or Prince George's County 7th Judicial Circuit
Court proprietary information or Protected Health Information,
which is privileged and confidential.  This E-mail is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and
attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited by federal law
and may expose you to civil and/or criminal penalties. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and
any printout.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Catalog PDS question

2011-12-23 Thread Martin, Larry D
A little information missing.  It seems obvious that the alias on the old 
system pointed to a different catalog on the current system.  That said you can 
always do a mergecat from the old catalog to the new catalog.  If the volume is 
SMS managed that could explain why the Catalog function is not allowed.

Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Sérgio Lima Costa
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 7:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Catalog PDS question

We have a PDS file here, and can't catalog it.

This file, was created on ZOS system (System 1), and then, the DASD was moved 
to another ZOS system (System 2).

Under DSLIST, the file is there, If I try put th C command in the line, receive 
the message : Data set not cataloged, and then, press PF1, and receive the 
message :

'RODRIGO.SUP.SAF500A.NEW.T001' was not found in catalog.

I spoke with a friend abouth this, and him ask to me, IF the alias exist.

Looking there, the alias exist.

Below our screen :

   Menu  Options  View  Utilities  Compilers  Help
 --
 DSLIST - Data Sets on volume GRV336 Data set not cataloged
 Command ===  Scroll === CSR
 'RODRIGO.SUP.SAF500A.NEW.T001' was not found in catalog.
 Command - Enter / to select action  Message   Volume
 ---
CRODRIGO.SUP.SAF500A.NEW.T001   GRV336
  SYS1.VTOCIX.GRV336 GRV336
  SYS1.VVDS.VGRV336  GRV336
 * End of Data Set list 

And here, the ALIAS LIST :

   Menu  Options  View  Utilities  Compilers  Help
 --
 DSLIST - Data Sets Matching RODRIGORow 1 of 34
 Command ===  Scroll === CSR

 Command - Enter / to select action  Message   Volume
 ---
  RODRIGO*ALIAS
  RODRIGO.BRODCAST   Z2OMV2

Someone already saw this ?

Thanks.



Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s) destinatários(s) 
acima identificado(s),
podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e seu 
sigilo é protegido por
lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente e 
apague-a de seu sistema.
Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação, distribuição, 
cópia ou uso sem
expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não refletem, 
necessariamente,
o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas autorizadas.

Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above 
identified, possibly
containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose content 
is protected by law.
In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and delete it 
from your system.
Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination, distribution, 
copy or use without
express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do not 
necessarily reflect
CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Prince George’s
County Government or Prince George's County 7th Judicial Circuit
Court proprietary information or Protected Health Information,
which is privileged and confidential.  This E-mail is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and
attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited by federal law
and may expose you to civil and/or criminal penalties. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and
any printout.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: How to change 1.000 data set mgmtclas setting the mgmtclas defined by DFSMS ACS MGMTCLAS ????

2011-12-14 Thread Martin, Larry D
You can use ADRDSSU to redetermine the MGMTCLASS.

Example:

//STEP1  EXEC  PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=2048K
//SYSPRINT  DD  SYSOUT=*   
//I16  DDVOL=SER=PR1032,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR 
//I35  DDVOL=SER=PR1045,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR 
//I38  DDVOL=SER=PR1048,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR 
//SYSINDD* 
 CONVERTV  REDETERMINE   - 
   DDNAME(I16,I35,I38) 
/*  


...Larry   

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
af dc
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: How to change 1.000 data set mgmtclas setting the mgmtclas defined by 
DFSMS ACS MGMTCLAS 

Hello,
due to an error on our ACS MGMTCLAS was set a wrong MC to 1.000 disk
datasets, now i want to set them correctly. ACS MC is now ok, but I
wanted to know if there is a process ofsetting the correct MC in a
quick way..otherwise I have to:
1- ISMF dsn test to check what is the correct MC
2- Doing a IDCAMS/ALTER to set the correct MGMTCLAS data set by data set

Any hint is welcome.
Many thx,A.Cecilio.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM SR availability problems

2011-12-13 Thread Martin, Larry D
I have had problems all day with SR.

.Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Knutson, Sam
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBM SR availability problems

We have seen recurring problems with SR yesterday and today hangs and
HTTP 500 Internal Server Error.

A ticked was put into the SR Helpdesk which is a completely unsatisfying
fill out the form and pray experience.

 

This is occurring for multiple users at multiple sites and no other web
browsing or support sites are experiencing difficulties.

IBMLink ETR is working fine and is our fallback.

Consider that SR is supposed to be highly available and ETR is slated
for sunset soon this is not reassuring. 

 

Is anyone else seeing problems with SR recently?

Best Regards, 

Sam Knutson, GEICO 
System z Team Leader 
mailto:sknut...@geico.com mailto:sknut...@geico.com  
(office)  301.986.3574 
(cell) 301.996.1318  

Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast... 

 


This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ROOT file system is out space

2011-12-09 Thread Martin, Larry D
Chokalingam,

You need a separate hfs (zfs) file in which to receive maintenance.  We have a 
large file and mount it at /smpe.  You do not want maintenance source in your 
root.

...Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Chokalingam Thangavelu
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 4:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ROOT file system is out space

We are applying RSU maintenance RSU 1109 and it has pulled around 4 GB
of PTFS. That's why the service root is running out of space.

Is there any way to pull only latest RSU not all the PTFS?

Regards,
Chokalingam Thangavelu


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bobbie Justice
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 7:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ROOT file system is out space

it's got to be sms managed if you want it larger than 4 GB, but I'm
curious why you have a 4 GB root, my 1.12 root still fits within a  
mod 3 size. (although just barely). 

Perhaps you might want to look at sms management for this, or splitting
some directories into their own separate files. 

Bobbie Jo Justice 

I have successfully expanded the Service Root but it has reached 4 GB
limit and unable to expand it further.
 Is there any way to expand beyond 4 GB limit and the file system is on
non sms volume. 
 
Regards,
Chokalingam

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. 

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email. 

www.wipro.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SMPE Help Needed

2011-11-28 Thread Martin, Larry D
Thanks to all who replied.  Using BYPASS(APPLYCHECK) allowed me to receive the 
missing PTS entries.

Thanks again,   .Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMPE Help Needed

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:58:00 -0500, Martin, Larry D wrote:

Gil,

Good thought - did NOT happen

Again, I can only guess, since you didn't provide the error message 
that should have appeared in SMPRPT.  However, you did tell us the 
RECEIVE command that you issued and it did not include 
BYPASS(APPLYCHECK).  Without that, SMP/E will not receive a PTF 
that has already been applied.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Paul Gilmartin

It has been my experience, and Kurt Q. has affirmed:

http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0403L=ibm-main-archivesP=R102325

... that if a PTF is absent from the SMPPTS, it will be re-received, even if 
listed
in the GLOBAL zone.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SMPE Help Needed

2011-11-23 Thread Martin, Larry D
Tom,

You may have missed my earlier replies.  The US60411 shows both Received and 
Applied.  It was not Accepted.

I am proceeding with a Restore and then re-receive it.

Thanks,   .Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 11:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMPE Help Needed

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:20:19 -0600, Larry Martin wrote:

There were no other messages before the No SYSMODS APPLY.  See below:

What you showed was the SMPOUT output.  What about SMPRPT? 
There should be more messages there.

And yes it was one of the four PTFs ordered.  I browsed the SMPPTS file(s) 
and it is NOT there.  It should not have been removed without an Accept.(?)

Other replies have asked you what SMP/E says about the status of UA60411. 
Have you checked?  Go to option 3.2 of the SMP/E dialogs and list SYSMOD 
UA60411.  What does it show?

ACCEPT does not remove a PTF from the global zone (and the PTS).  That is 
done by REJECT, which can be set to be done automatically upon ACCEPT. 
It can also be done independently. You could also have backleveled your PTS 
by, for example, restoring it (or the volume that is on) from a backup.

RESTORE should not be necessary.

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SMPE Help Needed

2011-11-23 Thread Martin, Larry D
Gil,

Good thought - did NOT happen

.Larry

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 11:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMPE Help Needed

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:15:26 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:20:19 -0600, Larry Martin wrote:

There were no other messages before the No SYSMODS APPLY.  See below:

What you showed was the SMPOUT output.  What about SMPRPT?
There should be more messages there.
 
I'll second that.

It has been my experience, and Kurt Q. has affirmed:

http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0403L=ibm-main-archivesP=R102325

... that if a PTF is absent from the SMPPTS, it will be re-received, even if 
listed
in the GLOBAL zone.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html