Re: IEC507d

2007-11-14 Thread Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
Thank you all very much on this, we are looking into this to see what we
can do.


Aldridge Murrell

-Original Message-
From: Russell Witt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:04 PM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Cc: Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
Subject: RE: IEC507d

Aldridge,

While the reply is coming from the started task, it could still be from
an MPF exit or as others have indicated (most likely cause) is a WTO
subsystem intercept from your tape management system (CA-1, TLMS, rmm,
others). When an MPF exit or the WTO subsystem gets control of the
message, it will be in the address space that generated the message to
begin with. An MPF exit or subsystem intercept will intercept the
message as it is being written and perform its response as such. So, it
will appear that HSM is repling to the message, the reality is that it
was an OPEN by HSM that caused the IEC507D to be issued in the first
place and some WTO exit/intercept replied to it.

Russell Witt
CA-1 Level-2 Support Manager

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEC507d


Appreciate the response.
Not coming from there. Console messages says reply is coming from
started task, Whiz happens to be DFSMSHSM. 


Aldridge Murrell

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEC507d

I would look at your MPF list to see if there is any automation for this
message.

Lizette

-Original Message-
>From: "Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Nov 13, 2007 11:14 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>Subject: IEC507d
>
>We have been getting this message IEC507D and apparently DFSMSHSM has 
>been replying "U" to the message.
>Is there any way to stop this and where is it coming from??
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IEC507d

2007-11-13 Thread Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
Appreciate the response.
Not coming from there. Console messages says reply is coming from
started task, Whiz happens to be DFSMSHSM. 


Aldridge Murrell

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEC507d

I would look at your MPF list to see if there is any automation for this
message.

Lizette

-Original Message-
>From: "Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Nov 13, 2007 11:14 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>Subject: IEC507d
>
>We have been getting this message IEC507D and apparently DFSMSHSM has 
>been replying "U" to the message.
>Is there any way to stop this and where is it coming from??
>
>Any input would be appreciated. 
>Thank you.
>
>Aldridge Murrell
>
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


IEC507d

2007-11-13 Thread Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
We have been getting this message IEC507D and apparently DFSMSHSM has
been replying "U" to the message.
Is there any way to stop this and where is it coming from??

Any input would be appreciated. 
Thank you.

Aldridge Murrell


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How are you handling high SMF record volume?

2007-03-01 Thread Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
One thing that we do is dump the days data first, then run a job later
to split records for various functions. 


Aldridge Murrell

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How are you handling high SMF record volume?

We are running into issues with the volume of SMF records that we need
to process. We create a GDG every day for that day's records.
Occasionaly we run into contention issues during the day but mostly it
hits us at the end of the day when we read the day's records from the
GDG and split the output into various other tapes for specific functions
(accounting, performance, etc). While that job is reading the many tapes
created during the day, the GDG base is locked so our dump jobs are
forced to wait which eventually causes lost SMF data.
Has anyone else run into this problem? How are other shops handling high
SMF volumes?
We have 4 SMF datasets on each LPAR. Two are 3000 cyl and two are 1500
cyl.  
A side issue is that we are capturing DB2 trace records in SMF. We have
tried to turn them off but our performance area 'needs' them. We would
like to move these records from SMF to GTF but we use MXG and were told
that MXG cannot handle input from GTF. Any ideas? Is anyone using MXG
with GTF input?
Thanks much for any help!
Jon

Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683 


-
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender
by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html