Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-15 Thread Ed Philbrook
Clark et al,

Depending on the degree of modifications, isn't it a major negative that 
mods to a COTS package have to be reapplied or reworked for every upgrade 
to the package?

EdP 



Clark Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/14/2008 07:56 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU


To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to 
ZIP a mainframe file.






On 14 Feb 2008 09:42:02 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

Don Leahy wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Steve Comstock
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

 Sorry. What is COTS?


 Kind regards,

 -Steve Comstock
 The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
 
 
 Commercial Off The Shelf.
 
 It is the 'silver bullet' solution du jour in the organization that I 
work for.

Ahh! We don't need no steenkin' programmers:
we just buy what we want from de' sof'ware store.


Which, of course, fails to distinguish your
capabilities from those of your competitors.

As someone who made his living as a COBOL application
programmer-analyst when he wasn't a systems programmer, I wish I could
dismiss COTS as something that won't make the grade.  However, most of
the major COTS packages both enable a company to get good IT practices
and tailor the package to meet the organization's needs and goals. SAP
or Oracle implementations are not cheap but they can allow major
upgrades in the way a company does business because many of the
processes have already been coded and tested.

Clark Morris


Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

   z/OS Application development made easier
 * Our classes include
+ How things work
+ Programming examples with realistic applications
+ Starter / skeleton code
+ Complete working programs
+ Useful utilities and subroutines
+ Tips and techniques

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-15 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Philbrook) writes:
 Clark et al,

 Depending on the degree of modifications, isn't it a major negative that 
 mods to a COTS package have to be reapplied or reworked for every upgrade 
 to the package?

re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008d.html#37 COTS software on box ? to replace 
mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file

it is all relative ... and/or return-on-investment

aka whether overall lower net costs of COTS w/modifications or a wholly
developed RYO (roll-your-own) implementation.

also there are business opportunity costs ... aka whether the business
can better spend the same amount of money someplace else (ROI).

for extreme scenario ... a large datacenter (billion or two in mainframe
hardware) paid all the engineering and development for a new,
significantly better PDU (power distribution unit) ... and then turned
it over to a PDU vendor. the business easily justified having a much
better PDU ... but couldn't justify actually getting into the PDU
business. That PDU is now a staple in large number datacenters.

another such example was a large financial institution hired a several
experts in complex pattern algorithms and created a sophisticated new
fraud detection tool ... and then turned it over to a vendor of fraud
detection applications. Again, the business easily justified having much
better fraud detection ... but didn't actually justify ongoing
development and support ... any competitive business advantage was more
than offset by having ongoing supportdevelopment amortized acrossed a
large number of customers (and because of competitive business issues
they wouldn't have been able to easily vend the products to other
institutions)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-15 Thread Clark Morris
On 15 Feb 2008 08:38:11 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

Clark et al,

Depending on the degree of modifications, isn't it a major negative that 
mods to a COTS package have to be reapplied or reworked for every upgrade 
to the package?

It depends on what the customization is and how is it done.  Data
tables (taxes, account breakdowns, etc.) should survive upgrades with
little or no change.  Parmlib equivalents also should as should
modifications and additions made at the vendor sanctioned change
points.  Remember that in many ways we are just the installers and
modifiers of applications that run and control our data centers (z/OS,
CA-1, DB2, etc.).

EdP 



Clark Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/14/2008 07:56 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU


To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to 
ZIP a mainframe file.






On 14 Feb 2008 09:42:02 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

Don Leahy wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Steve Comstock
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

 Sorry. What is COTS?


 Kind regards,

 -Steve Comstock
 The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
 
 
 Commercial Off The Shelf.
 
 It is the 'silver bullet' solution du jour in the organization that I 
work for.

Ahh! We don't need no steenkin' programmers:
we just buy what we want from de' sof'ware store.


Which, of course, fails to distinguish your
capabilities from those of your competitors.

As someone who made his living as a COBOL application
programmer-analyst when he wasn't a systems programmer, I wish I could
dismiss COTS as something that won't make the grade.  However, most of
the major COTS packages both enable a company to get good IT practices
and tailor the package to meet the organization's needs and goals. SAP
or Oracle implementations are not cheap but they can allow major
upgrades in the way a company does business because many of the
processes have already been coded and tested.

Clark Morris


Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

   z/OS Application development made easier
 * Our classes include
+ How things work
+ Programming examples with realistic applications
+ Starter / skeleton code
+ Complete working programs
+ Useful utilities and subroutines
+ Tips and techniques

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-14 Thread Steve Comstock

Don Leahy wrote:

On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Steve Comstock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Sorry. What is COTS?


Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.



Commercial Off The Shelf.

It is the 'silver bullet' solution du jour in the organization that I work for.


Ahh! We don't need no steenkin' programmers:
we just buy what we want from de' sof'ware store.


Which, of course, fails to distinguish your
capabilities from those of your competitors.



Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

  z/OS Application development made easier
* Our classes include
   + How things work
   + Programming examples with realistic applications
   + Starter / skeleton code
   + Complete working programs
   + Useful utilities and subroutines
   + Tips and techniques

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-14 Thread Don Leahy
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Steve Comstock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Sorry. What is COTS?


  Kind regards,

  -Steve Comstock
  The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

Commercial Off The Shelf.

It is the 'silver bullet' solution du jour in the organization that I work for.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-14 Thread Don Leahy
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Steve Comstock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Don Leahy wrote:
   On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Steve Comstock
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
   Sorry. What is COTS?
  
  
   Kind regards,
  
   -Steve Comstock
   The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
  
  
   Commercial Off The Shelf.
  
   It is the 'silver bullet' solution du jour in the organization that I work 
 for.

  Ahh! We don't need no steenkin' programmers:
  we just buy what we want from de' sof'ware store.


  Which, of course, fails to distinguish your
  capabilities from those of your competitors.




  Kind regards,

  -Steve Comstock
  The Trainer's Friend, Inc.


Competitors?   We don't have no steenkin' competitors.  If you don't
like the way we collect your taxes, then you can take your business
elsewherenot.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-14 Thread Clark Morris
On 14 Feb 2008 09:42:02 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

Don Leahy wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Steve Comstock
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

 Sorry. What is COTS?


 Kind regards,

 -Steve Comstock
 The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
 
 
 Commercial Off The Shelf.
 
 It is the 'silver bullet' solution du jour in the organization that I work 
 for.

Ahh! We don't need no steenkin' programmers:
we just buy what we want from de' sof'ware store.


Which, of course, fails to distinguish your
capabilities from those of your competitors.

As someone who made his living as a COBOL application
programmer-analyst when he wasn't a systems programmer, I wish I could
dismiss COTS as something that won't make the grade.  However, most of
the major COTS packages both enable a company to get good IT practices
and tailor the package to meet the organization's needs and goals. SAP
or Oracle implementations are not cheap but they can allow major
upgrades in the way a company does business because many of the
processes have already been coded and tested.

Clark Morris


Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

   z/OS Application development made easier
 * Our classes include
+ How things work
+ Programming examples with realistic applications
+ Starter / skeleton code
+ Complete working programs
+ Useful utilities and subroutines
+ Tips and techniques

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-13 Thread Clark Morris
On 13 Feb 2008 08:21:59 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
 Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:49 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.
 
 
 McKown, John wrote:
 [snip]
  
  I don't look for zAAP information on anything. The 
 mainframe is going
  away is the mantra and nothing that I have done in the 
 past can even
  get the attention of management. They simply don't seem to 
 want to be
  bothered with the System z in any manner.
 
 John,
 
 I was going through some of my old emails the other day
 and I noticed you writing the mainframe is dying is the
 motto around here on July 22, 2005.
 
 So it seems to be taking its own sweet time. Is this
 the kind of situation Stephen Y Odo writes about? He's
 in the 18th year of a five year plan to get rid of
 the mainframe.

Too true. In fact, the mainframe stayed and management went away (was
allowed to persue other interests or some such HR-speak). But the motto
has stayed.

 
 Maybe someone in your management might be amenable to
 recognizing that the reality is the mainframe is not
 going away at UICI Insurance Center.

The current management still says that it is going away (despite the
fact that the workload is growing). They base this on the plan to
replace the mainframe software with COTS software running on other
platforms such as Linux (Windows is now considered to be also ran
around here). They just haven't really found the COTS software that they
need yet.

Unfortunately even if the mainframe were considered, the probability
of finding COTS software that both meets the business need and runs on
the mainframe is slim.

 
 
 Kind regards,
 
 -Steve Comstock

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Comstock

Clark Morris wrote:

On 13 Feb 2008 08:21:59 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock

Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.


McKown, John wrote:
[snip]

I don't look for zAAP information on anything. The 


mainframe is going

away is the mantra and nothing that I have done in the 


past can even

get the attention of management. They simply don't seem to 


want to be


bothered with the System z in any manner.


John,

I was going through some of my old emails the other day
and I noticed you writing the mainframe is dying is the
motto around here on July 22, 2005.

So it seems to be taking its own sweet time. Is this
the kind of situation Stephen Y Odo writes about? He's
in the 18th year of a five year plan to get rid of
the mainframe.


Too true. In fact, the mainframe stayed and management went away (was
allowed to persue other interests or some such HR-speak). But the motto
has stayed.



Maybe someone in your management might be amenable to
recognizing that the reality is the mainframe is not
going away at UICI Insurance Center.


The current management still says that it is going away (despite the
fact that the workload is growing). They base this on the plan to
replace the mainframe software with COTS software running on other
platforms such as Linux (Windows is now considered to be also ran
around here). They just haven't really found the COTS software that they
need yet.



Unfortunately even if the mainframe were considered, the probability
of finding COTS software that both meets the business need and runs on
the mainframe is slim.


Sorry. What is COTS?


Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

  z/OS Application development made easier
* Our classes include
   + How things work
   + Programming examples with realistic applications
   + Starter / skeleton code
   + Complete working programs
   + Useful utilities and subroutines
   + Tips and techniques

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-13 Thread Tom Schmidt
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:00:38 -0700, Steve Comstock wrote:

Clark Morris wrote:
 On 13 Feb 2008 08:21:59 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main John wrote: 
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

McKown, John wrote:
[snip]

The current management still says that it is going away (despite the
fact that the workload is growing). They base this on the plan to
replace the mainframe software with COTS software running on other
platforms such as Linux (Windows is now considered to be also ran
around here). They just haven't really found the COTS software that they
need yet.


 Unfortunately even if the mainframe were considered, the probability
 of finding COTS software that both meets the business need and runs on
 the mainframe is slim.

Sorry. What is COTS?
 
 
COTS == Cheap, Off-The-Shelf  (software in this case; it can also apply to 
hardware... 
and even to people.) 
  
--
Tom Schmidt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: COTS software on box ? to replace mainframe was Re: Curious(?) way to ZIP a mainframe file.

2008-02-13 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Comstock) writes:
 Sorry. What is COTS?

commercial off the shelf ... i believe coined by somebody in
gov. sometime around the early 80s ... as alternative to highly
customized, one-off, specialty implementations.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html