Re: SV: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Hunter Cobb
The first example has no debug tool variables (strings that begin with a 
%); debug tool seems to be happy with explicit names in various 
combinations, it's only when you attempt to use a debug tool variable 
that it gets fussy. The only time I found a problem with explicit names 
(not sure it qualifies as a problem) was when I specified the load 
module name (either explicitly named, or via %LOAD) and the variable 
name, with no intervening compile unit or block names. In that case, 
debug tool was unhappy.


Hunter Cobb
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
-
Thomas Berg wrote:

-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Hunter Cobb

Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 21:28
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...

Thomas,

Some experiments with AT CHANGE confirm Don's observations about 
qualified names in COBOL. I've found that the Debug Tool 7.1 seems to 
allow at most one variable-based name, provided it's the first name 
reference in a series of name references. E.g., for a variable named 
xyz, in block blk1, in compile unit comp1, in load module 
lm1, you can successfully follow AT CHANGE with:


lm1::>comp1:>blk1:>xyz   [no debug tool variables]
%block:>xyz[block qualification variable]
%cu:>blk1:>xyz   [compile unit qualification variable]
%cu:>xyz [compile unit qualification, 
omitting block specification
%load::>blk1:>xyz[load module qualification, with block 
name]
%load::>comp1:>xyz[load module qualification, with compile 
unit name]
%load::>comp1:>blk1:>xyz  [load module qualification, with both compile 
unit and block name]

Any attempt to precede a debug tool variable reference with either 
another debug tool variable reference, or an explicit load module / 
compile unit / block name seems to fail. I'm not sure whether 
this is a feature or a problem; as you've noted, the documentation 
leaves some room for interpretation.



This seems to contradict Your first ("succesfully") example ?
Or do I missinterpret You ?

  
For what it's worth, in COBOL, the compile unit name is the first 
PROGRAM-ID in the source module. The block name is the same as the 
compile unit name, unless you are referencing variables defined in 
nested programs. A variable defined in a nested program's DATA DIVISION 
would have the block name of the nested program's PROGRAM-ID, 
but would have the compile unit name of the outermost program's 
PROGRAM-ID. Most typically (i.e., in the absence of nested programs), compile 
unit name and block name are the same, and you would normally only 
specify one of the two. Load module name is, of course, the member name of the 
executable program in the load library.


Hope this helps,

Hunter Cobb
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.



Many thanks for the help!

(With the use of "AT ENTRY" I made some progress...)
But how do ordinary cobol qualification work ?
Like "xyz OF abc OF ghi" etc.
I don't seem to get it right, despite "profreading" 
the variable names and quals in the program.  Do DT 
require ALL quals for a variable ?
Like "xyz OF abc OF def OF ghi OF jkl" despite that 
"xyz OF abc OF ghi" would be enough unique for COBOL.


(It's now quite late here, I will continue tomorrow.)

A part of my log:

...
* The ENTRY SISGB10 ::> SISGB10 breakpoint is replaced.  
  AT ENTRY SISMB10   
PERFORM  
  QUALIFY CU SISMB10 ;   
  AT CHANGE WB20-CLNR-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-AVTAL-EV OF  
 SISMB20-DS  
PERFORM  
  LIST WB20-CLNR-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-AVTAL-EV OF SISMB20-DS
 ;   
END-PERFORM ;
  AT CHANGE WB20-CLNR-LIKV-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-EV OF SISMB20-DS
PERFORM  
  LIST WB20-CLNR-LIKV-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-EV OF SISMB20-DS 
 ;   
END-PERFORM ;
  AT CHANGE CLNR-LIKV OF MOD-BUFFER  
PERFORM  
  LIST CLNR-LIKV OF MOD-BUFFER ; 
END-PERFORM ;
END-PERFORM ;
* The Entry breakpoint command for SISMB10 :> SISMB1

Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Bill Klein
If it turns out that there is something that Debug Tool can't do - that you
think it should, I just wanted to let all of you know that the LNGC project
at SHARE is now "accepting" (processing) requirements against that product.

If you are a SHARE member and would like to "enhance" Debug Tool (for
example to 
   "precede a debug tool variable reference with either another debug tool
variable reference, or an explicit load module / > > compile unit / block
name"

Please consider submitting a LNGC SHARE requirement.  If you need assistance
in doing this, please feel free to contact me "off-list" at
   wmklein  ix.netcom.com

and I can help you get started.

P.S. LNGC is now also accepting requirements against:
 - Fault Analyzer
 - File Manager
 - RDz (replacement for WDz and WSED)
 - Debut Tool (advanced and utilities)


"Thomas Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
..
> > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Hunter Cobb
> > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 21:28
> > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...
> > 
> > Thomas,
> > 
> > Some experiments with AT CHANGE confirm Don's observations about 
> > qualified names in COBOL. I've found that the Debug Tool 7.1 seems to 
> > allow at most one variable-based name, provided it's the first name 
> > reference in a series of name references. E.g., for a variable named 
> > xyz, in block blk1, in compile unit comp1, in load module 
> > lm1, you can successfully follow AT CHANGE with:
> > 
> > lm1::>comp1:>blk1:>xyz   [no debug tool variables]
> > %block:>xyz[block qualification
variable]
> > %cu:>blk1:>xyz   [compile unit qualification
variable]
> > %cu:>xyz [compile unit
qualification, omitting block specification
> > %load::>blk1:>xyz[load module qualification,
with block name]
> > %load::>comp1:>xyz[load module qualification, with
compile unit name]
> > %load::>comp1:>blk1:>xyz  [load module qualification, with both
compile unit and block name]
> > 
> > Any attempt to precede a debug tool variable reference with either 
> > another debug tool variable reference, or an explicit load module / 
> > compile unit / block name seems to fail. I'm not sure whether 
> > this is a feature or a problem; as you've noted, the documentation 
> > leaves some room for interpretation.
> 
> This seems to contradict Your first ("succesfully") example ?
> Or do I missinterpret You ?
> 
> > 
> > For what it's worth, in COBOL, the compile unit name is the first 
> > PROGRAM-ID in the source module. The block name is the same as the 
> > compile unit name, unless you are referencing variables defined in 
> > nested programs. A variable defined in a nested program's DATA DIVISION 
> > would have the block name of the nested program's PROGRAM-ID, 
> > but would have the compile unit name of the outermost program's 
> > PROGRAM-ID. Most typically (i.e., in the absence of nested programs),
compile 
> > unit name and block name are the same, and you would normally only 
> > specify one of the two. Load module name is, of course, the member name
of the 
> > executable program in the load library.
> > 
> > Hope this helps,
> > 
> > Hunter Cobb
> > The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
> 
> Many thanks for the help!
> 
> (With the use of "AT ENTRY" I made some progress...)
> But how do ordinary cobol qualification work ?
> Like "xyz OF abc OF ghi" etc.
> I don't seem to get it right, despite "profreading" 
> the variable names and quals in the program.  Do DT 
> require ALL quals for a variable ?
> Like "xyz OF abc OF def OF ghi OF jkl" despite that 
> "xyz OF abc OF ghi" would be enough unique for COBOL.
> 
> (It's now quite late here, I will continue tomorrow.)
> 
> A part of my log:
> 
> ...
> * The ENTRY SISGB10 ::> SISGB10 breakpoint is replaced.  
>   AT ENTRY SISMB10   
> PERFORM  
>   QUALIFY CU SISMB10 ;   
>   AT CHANGE WB20-CLNR-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-AVTAL-EV OF  
>  SISMB20-DS  
> PERFORM  

SV: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Thomas Berg
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Hunter Cobb
> Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 21:28
> Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> Some experiments with AT CHANGE confirm Don's observations about 
> qualified names in COBOL. I've found that the Debug Tool 7.1 seems to 
> allow at most one variable-based name, provided it's the first name 
> reference in a series of name references. E.g., for a variable named 
> xyz, in block blk1, in compile unit comp1, in load module 
> lm1, you can successfully follow AT CHANGE with:
> 
> lm1::>comp1:>blk1:>xyz   [no debug tool variables]
> %block:>xyz[block qualification variable]
> %cu:>blk1:>xyz   [compile unit qualification variable]
> %cu:>xyz [compile unit qualification, 
> omitting block specification
> %load::>blk1:>xyz[load module qualification, with 
> block name]
> %load::>comp1:>xyz[load module qualification, with 
> compile unit name]
> %load::>comp1:>blk1:>xyz  [load module qualification, with both 
> compile unit and block name]
> 
> Any attempt to precede a debug tool variable reference with either 
> another debug tool variable reference, or an explicit load module / 
> compile unit / block name seems to fail. I'm not sure whether 
> this is a feature or a problem; as you've noted, the documentation 
> leaves some room for interpretation.

This seems to contradict Your first ("succesfully") example ?
Or do I missinterpret You ?

> 
> For what it's worth, in COBOL, the compile unit name is the first 
> PROGRAM-ID in the source module. The block name is the same as the 
> compile unit name, unless you are referencing variables defined in 
> nested programs. A variable defined in a nested program's DATA DIVISION 
> would have the block name of the nested program's PROGRAM-ID, 
> but would have the compile unit name of the outermost program's 
> PROGRAM-ID. Most typically (i.e., in the absence of nested programs), compile 
> unit name and block name are the same, and you would normally only 
> specify one of the two. Load module name is, of course, the member name of 
> the 
> executable program in the load library.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Hunter Cobb
> The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

Many thanks for the help!

(With the use of "AT ENTRY" I made some progress...)
But how do ordinary cobol qualification work ?
Like "xyz OF abc OF ghi" etc.
I don't seem to get it right, despite "profreading" 
the variable names and quals in the program.  Do DT 
require ALL quals for a variable ?
Like "xyz OF abc OF def OF ghi OF jkl" despite that 
"xyz OF abc OF ghi" would be enough unique for COBOL.

(It's now quite late here, I will continue tomorrow.)

A part of my log:

...
* The ENTRY SISGB10 ::> SISGB10 breakpoint is replaced.  
  AT ENTRY SISMB10   
PERFORM  
  QUALIFY CU SISMB10 ;   
  AT CHANGE WB20-CLNR-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-AVTAL-EV OF  
 SISMB20-DS  
PERFORM  
  LIST WB20-CLNR-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-AVTAL-EV OF SISMB20-DS
 ;   
END-PERFORM ;
  AT CHANGE WB20-CLNR-LIKV-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-EV OF SISMB20-DS
PERFORM  
  LIST WB20-CLNR-LIKV-XX OF WB20-IMPORT-EV OF SISMB20-DS 
 ;   
END-PERFORM ;
  AT CHANGE CLNR-LIKV OF MOD-BUFFER  
PERFORM  
  LIST CLNR-LIKV OF MOD-BUFFER ; 
END-PERFORM ;
END-PERFORM ;
* The Entry breakpoint command for SISMB10 :> SISMB10 has been   
* deferred until the CU appears. 
* The ENTRY SISMB10 breakpoint is replaced.  
* *** Commands file commands end *** 
  GO ;   
  GO ;   
* The variable W

Re: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Hunter Cobb

Thomas Berg wrote:

-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy

Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 17:40
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Berg 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy


 > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 14:49

 We runs ver 7.1 (upgraded recently from 6.1).
 If You have some examples of AT CHANGE and LIST with
 qualified variables I would be pleased if You can send
 any to me.

 BTW, I'm trying to use this code in pre-saved PDS-members
 to be run automatically in DT, if that make any difference.

 Thanks,


Thomas
  

Fully qualified names work for me:

AT LABEL CXXMU21::>CXXMU21:>CXXMU21:>MAIN-OUTPUT

Where CXXMU21 is my load module name.

This also works for me:

AT LABEL %BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT

And so does

AT LABEL %CU:>MAIN-OUTPUT

But not:

AT LABEL %CU:>%BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT

and

AT LABEL %LOAD::>%CU:>%BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT



Thanks!
Looks like what I'm coding.  (Except that I use "AT CHANGE".)

Is that C++ modules ?

Thomas
_
Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

  

Thomas,

Some experiments with AT CHANGE confirm Don's observations about 
qualified names in COBOL. I've found that the Debug Tool 7.1 seems to 
allow at most one variable-based name, provided it's the first name 
reference in a series of name references. E.g., for a variable named 
xyz, in block blk1, in compile unit comp1, in load module lm1, you can 
successfully follow AT CHANGE with:


lm1::>comp1:>blk1:>xyz   [no debug tool variables]
%block:>xyz[block qualification variable]
%cu:>blk1:>xyz   [compile unit qualification 
variable]
%cu:>xyz [compile unit 
qualification, omitting block specification]
%load::>blk1:>xyz[load module qualification, 
with block name]
%load::>comp1:>xyz[load module qualification, with 
compile unit name]
%load::>comp1:>blk1:>xyz  [load module qualification, with both 
compile unit and block name]


Any attempt to precede a debug tool variable reference with either 
another debug tool variable reference, or an explicit load module / 
compile unit / block name seems to fail. I'm not sure whether this is a 
feature or a problem; as you've noted, the documentation leaves some 
room for interpretation.


For what it's worth, in COBOL, the compile unit name is the first 
PROGRAM-ID in the source module. The block name is the same as the 
compile unit name, unless you are referencing variables defined in 
nested programs. A variable defined in a nested program's DATA DIVISION 
would have the block name of the nested program's PROGRAM-ID, but would 
have the compile unit name of the outermost program's PROGRAM-ID. Most 
typically (i.e., in the absence of nested programs), compile unit name 
and block name are the same, and you would normally only specify one of 
the two. Load module name is, of course, the member name of the 
executable program in the load library.


Hope this helps,

Hunter Cobb
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Don Leahy
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>  Thanks!
>  Looks like what I'm coding.  (Except that I use "AT CHANGE".)
>
>  Is that C++ modules ?
>
>
>
>  Thomas
>  _
>  Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ)
>

Not C++.  Enterprise Cobol V3.3

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Thomas Berg
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy
> Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 17:40
> Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
> 
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Berg 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy
> >  > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 14:49
> >
> >  We runs ver 7.1 (upgraded recently from 6.1).
> >  If You have some examples of AT CHANGE and LIST with
> >  qualified variables I would be pleased if You can send
> >  any to me.
> >
> >  BTW, I'm trying to use this code in pre-saved PDS-members
> >  to be run automatically in DT, if that make any difference.
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >
> > Thomas
> 
> Fully qualified names work for me:
> 
> AT LABEL CXXMU21::>CXXMU21:>CXXMU21:>MAIN-OUTPUT
> 
> Where CXXMU21 is my load module name.
> 
> This also works for me:
> 
> AT LABEL %BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT
> 
> And so does
> 
> AT LABEL %CU:>MAIN-OUTPUT
> 
> But not:
> 
> AT LABEL %CU:>%BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT
> 
> and
> 
> AT LABEL %LOAD::>%CU:>%BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT

Thanks!
Looks like what I'm coding.  (Except that I use "AT CHANGE".)

Is that C++ modules ?

Thomas
_
Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Don Leahy
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy
>  > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 14:49
>
> > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>  > Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
>  >
>
>
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Thomas Berg
>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > Yes, I have looked into it.
>  > >  But my problems is like: The manual says You can
>  > >  use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of
>  > >  names of current items, e g " AT CHANGE %CU:>VARIABLE-NAME ",
>  > >  etc.  But I get syntax error for that and so on.
>  > >  I also get other errors regarding qualification of
>  > >  variables. The manual is very short on syntax and its
>  > >  restrictions.
>  > >
>  > >  So I need some advice from someone that have used DT
>  > >  a lot.  Or whatever examples of DT code that can be
>  > >  found.
>  >
>  > I am a DT user but unfortunately I do not know the answer to your
>  > question.  What I do know is that the concepts of CU and BLOCK seem to
>  > be language-dependent and I have never found them very helpful when
>  > debugging Cobol programs.   Also, our shop is still using version 5.1,
>  > which is not very current, and DT seems to change quite substantially
>  > from release to release.
>
>  We runs ver 7.1 (upgraded recently from 6.1).
>  If You have some examples of AT CHANGE and LIST with
>  qualified variables I would be pleased if You can send
>  any to me.
>
>  BTW, I'm trying to use this code in pre-saved PDS-members
>  to be run automatically in DT, if that make any difference.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>
> Thomas

Fully qualified names work for me:

AT LABEL CXXMU21::>CXXMU21:>CXXMU21:>MAIN-OUTPUT

Where CXXMU21 is my load module name.

This also works for me:

AT LABEL %BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT

And so does

AT LABEL %CU:>MAIN-OUTPUT

But not:

AT LABEL %CU:>%BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT

and

AT LABEL %LOAD::>%CU:>%BLOCK:>MAIN-OUTPUT

For the Cobol programs that I work with the variables %LOAD,  %CU and
%BLOCK always have the same value.  But DT doesn't seem to like it
when you use multiple variables.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Thomas Berg
You are right.  But as the PMR way is a slow lane and 
I prefer to be sure that the error is in the product 
rather than behind the keyboard I need some more data.

As nearly always, when You should do a PMR or write 
a RCF You don't have the time.

I will try at comp.lang.cobol as You suggested.
There must be *someone* else than me that have (tried to) 
done similar things in DT.

Thomas
_
Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 

> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Bill Klein
> Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 16:32
> Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Ämne: Debug Tool know how...
> 
> If you find cases where the manual says something will work 
> (or you read it
> as saying that) and the product doesn't support it, then I 
> would say that is
> DEFINITELY a place where you should create a support PMR.
> 
> If you have questions about "how to" (and the manuals aren't 
> clear), and it
> is for COBOL, you can try posting it to comp.lang.cobol 
> Usenet group.  I
> don't know how many debut tool users there are in that group, 
> but there may
> be some.  (Most of the contributors are PC/Linux/Unix COBOL 
> users, but some
> are from IBM Enterprise COBOL shops.
> 
> I would Certainly create RCF's (Readers Comment Forms) on 
> anything that you
> think needs to be changed or expanded in the documentation).
> 
> "Thomas Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> pa.myntet.se>.
> ..
> > Yes, I have looked into it.
> > But my problems is like: The manual says You can 
> > use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of 
> > names of current items, e g " AT CHANGE %CU:>VARIABLE-NAME ", 
> > etc.  But I get syntax error for that and so on.
> > I also get other errors regarding qualification of 
> > variables. The manual is very short on syntax and its 
> > restrictions.
> > 
> > So I need some advice from someone that have used DT
> > a lot.  Or whatever examples of DT code that can be 
> > found.
> > 
> > Thomas
> > _
> > Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
> >  
> >   
> > 
> > > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> > > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:55
> > > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
> > > 
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > There's also a Redbook SG24-7372-00 published June 2007 
> > > called "IBM Application Development and Problem Determination 
> > > Tools V7 for System z" which can be rather handy to have a 
> > > look at sometimes. Have you tried it? It's free to 
> download from IBM.
> > > 
> > > Cheers
> > > Timur 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:22:54 +0100
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: SV: Debug Tool  know how...
> > > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > > 
> > > > Thank You, but I already have the Reference manual and 
> > > > the User Guide...  ..and I have read them both :((
> > > > (Or at least big parts of them.)
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately the behaviour of DT doesn't correspond to 
> > > > the manuals (at points where I have found info about) 
> > > > - plus that there is a lot that is not explained.  
> > > > 
> > > > Thomas
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > > > > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> > > > > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:05
> > > > > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > > > Ämne: Re: Debug Tool know how...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can try the address;
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pdthelp/v1r1/index.jsp
> > > > > 
> > > > > for 
> > > > > IBM System z Enterprise Development Tools & Compilers 
> > > > > information centerCheers
> > > > > Timur Alpaslan
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> >

Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Bill Klein
If you find cases where the manual says something will work (or you read it
as saying that) and the product doesn't support it, then I would say that is
DEFINITELY a place where you should create a support PMR.

If you have questions about "how to" (and the manuals aren't clear), and it
is for COBOL, you can try posting it to comp.lang.cobol Usenet group.  I
don't know how many debut tool users there are in that group, but there may
be some.  (Most of the contributors are PC/Linux/Unix COBOL users, but some
are from IBM Enterprise COBOL shops.

I would Certainly create RCF's (Readers Comment Forms) on anything that you
think needs to be changed or expanded in the documentation).

"Thomas Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
..
> Yes, I have looked into it.
> But my problems is like: The manual says You can 
> use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of 
> names of current items, e g " AT CHANGE %CU:>VARIABLE-NAME ", 
> etc.  But I get syntax error for that and so on.
> I also get other errors regarding qualification of 
> variables. The manual is very short on syntax and its 
> restrictions.
> 
> So I need some advice from someone that have used DT
> a lot.  Or whatever examples of DT code that can be 
> found.
> 
> Thomas
> _
> Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
>  
>   
> 
> > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:55
> > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > There's also a Redbook SG24-7372-00 published June 2007 
> > called "IBM Application Development and Problem Determination 
> > Tools V7 for System z" which can be rather handy to have a 
> > look at sometimes. Have you tried it? It's free to download from IBM.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Timur 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:22:54 +0100
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: SV: Debug Tool  know how...
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > 
> > > Thank You, but I already have the Reference manual and 
> > > the User Guide...  ..and I have read them both :((
> > > (Or at least big parts of them.)
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately the behaviour of DT doesn't correspond to 
> > > the manuals (at points where I have found info about) 
> > > - plus that there is a lot that is not explained.  
> > > 
> > > Thomas
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > > > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> > > > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:05
> > > > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > > Ämne: Re: Debug Tool know how...
> > > > 
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > You can try the address;
> > > > 
> > > > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pdthelp/v1r1/index.jsp
> > > > 
> > > > for 
> > > > IBM System z Enterprise Development Tools & Compilers 
> > > > information centerCheers
> > > > Timur Alpaslan
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:42:51 +0100
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Debug Tool  know how...
> > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Anyone that can point me to a mailing list or resource 
> > > > > about IBM's Debug Tool ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm trying to use it on a COBOL program and have some 
> > > > > diificulties with its idiosyncrasys.
> > > > > 
> > > > > TIA
> > > > > Thomas
> > > > > 
> > > > > _
> > > > > Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > --
> > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> > > > IBM-MAIN INFO
> > > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > --
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> > IBM-MAIN INFO
> > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Thomas Berg
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Don Leahy
> Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 14:49
> Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
> 
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Thomas Berg 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I have looked into it.
> >  But my problems is like: The manual says You can
> >  use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of
> >  names of current items, e g " AT CHANGE %CU:>VARIABLE-NAME ",
> >  etc.  But I get syntax error for that and so on.
> >  I also get other errors regarding qualification of
> >  variables. The manual is very short on syntax and its
> >  restrictions.
> >
> >  So I need some advice from someone that have used DT
> >  a lot.  Or whatever examples of DT code that can be
> >  found.
> 
> I am a DT user but unfortunately I do not know the answer to your
> question.  What I do know is that the concepts of CU and BLOCK seem to
> be language-dependent and I have never found them very helpful when
> debugging Cobol programs.   Also, our shop is still using version 5.1,
> which is not very current, and DT seems to change quite substantially
> from release to release.

We runs ver 7.1 (upgraded recently from 6.1).
If You have some examples of AT CHANGE and LIST with 
qualified variables I would be pleased if You can send 
any to me.

BTW, I'm trying to use this code in pre-saved PDS-members 
to be run automatically in DT, if that make any difference.

Thanks,
Thomas
_
Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Don Leahy
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Thomas Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I have looked into it.
>  But my problems is like: The manual says You can
>  use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of
>  names of current items, e g " AT CHANGE %CU:>VARIABLE-NAME ",
>  etc.  But I get syntax error for that and so on.
>  I also get other errors regarding qualification of
>  variables. The manual is very short on syntax and its
>  restrictions.
>
>  So I need some advice from someone that have used DT
>  a lot.  Or whatever examples of DT code that can be
>  found.

I am a DT user but unfortunately I do not know the answer to your
question.  What I do know is that the concepts of CU and BLOCK seem to
be language-dependent and I have never found them very helpful when
debugging Cobol programs.   Also, our shop is still using version 5.1,
which is not very current, and DT seems to change quite substantially
from release to release.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Timur Alpaslan
Sorry!

I'm not a direct user of the product.

I'll suggest you contact IBM SW Support such tah they can help you with details.





> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:09:53 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SV: SV: Debug Tool  know how...
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> 
> Yes, I have looked into it.
> But my problems is like: The manual says You can 
> use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of 
> names of current items, e g " AT CHANGE %CU:>VARIABLE-NAME ", 
> etc.  But I get syntax error for that and so on.
> I also get other errors regarding qualification of 
> variables. The manual is very short on syntax and its 
> restrictions.
> 
> So I need some advice from someone that have used DT
> a lot.  Or whatever examples of DT code that can be 
> found.
> 
> Thomas
> _
> Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
>  
>   
> 
> > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:55
> > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > There's also a Redbook SG24-7372-00 published June 2007 
> > called "IBM Application Development and Problem Determination 
> > Tools V7 for System z" which can be rather handy to have a 
> > look at sometimes. Have you tried it? It's free to download from IBM.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Timur 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:22:54 +0100
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: SV: Debug Tool  know how...
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > 
> > > Thank You, but I already have the Reference manual and 
> > > the User Guide...  ..and I have read them both :((
> > > (Or at least big parts of them.)
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately the behaviour of DT doesn't correspond to 
> > > the manuals (at points where I have found info about) 
> > > - plus that there is a lot that is not explained.  
> > > 
> > > Thomas
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > > > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> > > > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:05
> > > > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > > Ämne: Re: Debug Tool know how...
> > > > 
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > You can try the address;
> > > > 
> > > > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pdthelp/v1r1/index.jsp
> > > > 
> > > > for 
> > > > IBM System z Enterprise Development Tools & Compilers 
> > > > information centerCheers
> > > > Timur Alpaslan
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:42:51 +0100
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Debug Tool  know how...
> > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Anyone that can point me to a mailing list or resource 
> > > > > about IBM's Debug Tool ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm trying to use it on a COBOL program and have some 
> > > > > diificulties with its idiosyncrasys.
> > > > > 
> > > > > TIA
> > > > > Thomas
> > > > > 
> > > > > _
> > > > > Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > --
> > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> > > > IBM-MAIN INFO
> > > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > --
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> > IBM-MAIN INFO
> > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > --

SV: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Thomas Berg
Yes, I have looked into it.
But my problems is like: The manual says You can 
use the DT variable %CU or %BLOCK in place of 
names of current items, e g " AT CHANGE %CU:>VARIABLE-NAME ", 
etc.  But I get syntax error for that and so on.
I also get other errors regarding qualification of 
variables. The manual is very short on syntax and its 
restrictions.

So I need some advice from someone that have used DT
a lot.  Or whatever examples of DT code that can be 
found.

Thomas
_
Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
 
  

> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:55
> Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Ämne: Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...
> 
> Hi!
> 
> There's also a Redbook SG24-7372-00 published June 2007 
> called "IBM Application Development and Problem Determination 
> Tools V7 for System z" which can be rather handy to have a 
> look at sometimes. Have you tried it? It's free to download from IBM.
> 
> Cheers
> Timur 
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:22:54 +0100
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: SV: Debug Tool  know how...
> > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > 
> > Thank You, but I already have the Reference manual and 
> > the User Guide...  ..and I have read them both :((
> > (Or at least big parts of them.)
> > 
> > Unfortunately the behaviour of DT doesn't correspond to 
> > the manuals (at points where I have found info about) 
> > - plus that there is a lot that is not explained.  
> > 
> > Thomas
> > 
> > 
> > > -Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> > > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:05
> > > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > Ämne: Re: Debug Tool know how...
> > > 
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > You can try the address;
> > > 
> > > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pdthelp/v1r1/index.jsp
> > > 
> > > for 
> > > IBM System z Enterprise Development Tools & Compilers 
> > > information centerCheers
> > > Timur Alpaslan
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:42:51 +0100
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Debug Tool  know how...
> > > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > > 
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > Anyone that can point me to a mailing list or resource 
> > > > about IBM's Debug Tool ?
> > > > 
> > > > I'm trying to use it on a COBOL program and have some 
> > > > diificulties with its idiosyncrasys.
> > > > 
> > > > TIA
> > > > Thomas
> > > > 
> > > > _
> > > > Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> --
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> > > IBM-MAIN INFO
> > > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> > > 
> > > 
> --
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> IBM-MAIN INFO
> > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> IBM-MAIN INFO
> > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Timur Alpaslan
Hi!

There's also a Redbook SG24-7372-00 published June 2007 called "IBM Application 
Development and Problem Determination Tools V7 for System z" which can be 
rather handy to have a look at sometimes. Have you tried it? It's free to 
download from IBM.

Cheers
Timur 



> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:22:54 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SV: Debug Tool  know how...
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> 
> Thank You, but I already have the Reference manual and 
> the User Guide...  ..and I have read them both :((
> (Or at least big parts of them.)
> 
> Unfortunately the behaviour of DT doesn't correspond to 
> the manuals (at points where I have found info about) 
> - plus that there is a lot that is not explained.  
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> > Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:05
> > Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > Ämne: Re: Debug Tool know how...
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > You can try the address;
> > 
> > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pdthelp/v1r1/index.jsp
> > 
> > for 
> > IBM System z Enterprise Development Tools & Compilers 
> > information centerCheers
> > Timur Alpaslan
> > 
> > 
> > > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:42:51 +0100
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Debug Tool  know how...
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > > 
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > Anyone that can point me to a mailing list or resource 
> > > about IBM's Debug Tool ?
> > > 
> > > I'm trying to use it on a COBOL program and have some 
> > > diificulties with its idiosyncrasys.
> > > 
> > > TIA
> > > Thomas
> > > 
> > > _
> > > Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
> > > 
> > > 
> > --
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> > IBM-MAIN INFO
> > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> > 
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> > 
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


SV: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Thomas Berg
Thank You, but I already have the Reference manual and 
the User Guide...  ..and I have read them both :((
(Or at least big parts of them.)

Unfortunately the behaviour of DT doesn't correspond to 
the manuals (at points where I have found info about) 
- plus that there is a lot that is not explained.  

Thomas


> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Timur Alpaslan
> Skickat: den 5 mars 2008 13:05
> Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Ämne: Re: Debug Tool know how...
> 
> Hi!
> 
> You can try the address;
> 
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pdthelp/v1r1/index.jsp
> 
> for 
> IBM System z Enterprise Development Tools & Compilers 
> information centerCheers
> Timur Alpaslan
> 
> 
> > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:42:51 +0100
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Debug Tool  know how...
> > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Anyone that can point me to a mailing list or resource 
> > about IBM's Debug Tool ?
> > 
> > I'm trying to use it on a COBOL program and have some 
> > diificulties with its idiosyncrasys.
> > 
> > TIA
> > Thomas
> > 
> > _
> > Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
> > 
> > 
> --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
> IBM-MAIN INFO
> > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Timur Alpaslan
Hi!

You can try the address;

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pdthelp/v1r1/index.jsp

for 
IBM System z Enterprise Development Tools & Compilers 
information centerCheers
Timur Alpaslan


> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:42:51 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Debug Tool  know how...
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Anyone that can point me to a mailing list or resource 
> about IBM's Debug Tool ?
> 
> I'm trying to use it on a COBOL program and have some 
> diificulties with its idiosyncrasys.
> 
> TIA
> Thomas
> 
> _
> Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Debug Tool know how...

2008-03-05 Thread Thomas Berg
Hi!

Anyone that can point me to a mailing list or resource 
about IBM's Debug Tool ?

I'm trying to use it on a COBOL program and have some 
diificulties with its idiosyncrasys.

TIA
Thomas

_
Thomas Berg   Specialist   IT Utveckling   Swedbank AB (Publ) 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html