Dynamic PER Traps

2008-04-10 Thread Peter Relson
>How quickly does the first of a pair of SLIP IF traps "arm" the second
one?

Ed Jaffe's "AFAIK" was correct: before control returns to the
PER-interrupted unit of work.

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Dynamic PER Traps

2008-04-09 Thread Edward Jaffe

Chase, John wrote:

How quickly does the first of a pair of SLIP IF traps "arm" the second
one?
  


AFAIK, it happens synchronously with respect to the first one.

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Dynamic PER Traps

2008-04-09 Thread Chase, John
Hi, All,

How quickly does the first of a pair of SLIP IF traps "arm" the second
one?

I have a situation wherein I may need to trap an IF in a common routine
only when it's called from a specific location within a specific
program.  The "route" from the caller to the common routine goes thru
some IBM OCO code, so I can't say with confidence how long it would take
to get from the caller to the callee.

TIA,

-jc-


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html