Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-04-03 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
I got an answer back from IBM development today on it, and they're in
essence saying the same thing, albeit more generically.  The answer I
got was

 Rex...According to development:

All data sets can potentially display SMS data now therefore the change.
Apart from the SMS data, information should be the same.

So, it's working as designed.

Rex




-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 7:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:15:18 -0500, Norbert Friemel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:22:35 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:

Assuming it is not intentional for some reason (panel ISRUAIP still 
exists in hlq.SISPPENU) they should if the customer pushes for it.
z/OS 1.7 doesn't
hit EOS (end of service) until September 2008.   But there could be a
reason
that IBM decided they always should use panel ISRUAIES.  I just can't 
imagine what that reason could be.


The reason is probably support for large format data sets in z/OS 1.7.
DSNTYPE (LARGE or blank) appears only on panel ISRUAIES. Panel 
ISRUAIP is still used for PDS.


Good catch.  That is exactly the reason.   

Mark

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-03-27 Thread Norbert Friemel
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:22:35 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:

Assuming it is not intentional for some reason (panel ISRUAIP still exists
in hlq.SISPPENU) they should if the customer pushes for it.  z/OS 1.7 doesn't
hit EOS (end of service) until September 2008.   But there could be a reason
that IBM decided they always should use panel ISRUAIES.  I just can't
imagine what that reason could be.


The reason is probably support for large format data sets in z/OS 1.7.
DSNTYPE (LARGE or blank) appears only on panel ISRUAIES. Panel ISRUAIP is
still used for PDS.

Norbert Friemel

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-03-27 Thread George Davis
It appears on the 1.7 system I am working on now, after getting a Data Set
List (=3.4) of a non-SMS dataset, that an S (Information - short) brings
up panel ISRUAIES and the **NONE** in MC and SC.  However, I (Information)
brings up panel ISRUAIPO which does not display any SMS information.

Under 1.4, S brings up ISRUAIP, while I brings up ISRUAIPO.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-03-27 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:15:18 -0500, Norbert Friemel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:22:35 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:

Assuming it is not intentional for some reason (panel ISRUAIP still exists
in hlq.SISPPENU) they should if the customer pushes for it.  z/OS 1.7 doesn't
hit EOS (end of service) until September 2008.   But there could be a reason
that IBM decided they always should use panel ISRUAIES.  I just can't
imagine what that reason could be.


The reason is probably support for large format data sets in z/OS 1.7.
DSNTYPE (LARGE or blank) appears only on panel ISRUAIES. Panel ISRUAIP is
still used for PDS.


Good catch.  That is exactly the reason.   

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-03-26 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Hi list.

I have a question (probably rather picky) going from z/OS 1.4 to 1.7.
During testing of the 1.7 upgrade, I had an applications programmer run
a batch COBOL/IDMS job that created and cataloged a new non-SMS dataset.
The JCL is shown below - quite straightforward, and the dataset ends up
on a non-SMS pack as expected.

//AGCYPROD EXEC PGM=AGCYPROD,REGION=0K  
//STEPLIB  DD DSN=MVS.CN6.LOADLIB,DISP=SHR  
// DD DSN=WSC.PROD.LOADLIB,DISP=SHR 
// DD DSN=IDMS.PROD.LOADLIB,DISP=SHR
//SYSLST   DD SYSOUT=*  
//SYSCTL   DD DSN=IDMS.SQL.SYSCTL,DISP=SHR  
//SYSIDMS  DD DSN=MVS.PROD.SKELETON(WSCPROD),DISP=SHR   
//SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*  
//SYSDBOUT DD SYSOUT=*  
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=D  
//OUTPUT   DD  DSN=MVS.CN6.AGENCY7, 
// DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE), 
// UNIT=SYSDA,  
// DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=110),
// SPACE=(CYL,(20,10),RLSE) 

The question that I have is that once the dataset has been created under
1.7, looking at it under ISPF 3.4, it looks like this - notice the SMS
management class, etc:

Data Set Name . . . . : MVS.CN6.AGENCY7

 

General DataCurrent Allocation

Management class . . :  **None**Allocated
cylinders : 2 
Storage class  . . . :  **None**Allocated
extents . : 1 
Volume serial . . . :   WSC003

Device type . . . . :   3390

Data class . . . . . :  **None**Current
Utilization  
Organization  . . . :   PS  Used cylinders
. . :   2 
Record format . . . :   FB  Used extents  .
. . :   1 
Record length . . . :   110

Block size  . . . . :   27940

1st extent cylinders:   2

Secondary cylinders :   10

Data set name type  :   SMS Compressible
:   NO   
 

Creation date . . . :   2008/03/26  Referenced date
. . :   2008/03/26 
  Expiration date . . : ***None***


When he runs the same JCL on a 1.4 system, the output from ISPF 3.4
looks like this - notice, no SMS information:

Data Set Name  . . . :  MVS.CN6.AGENCY7 
 

General DataCurrent Allocation

Volume serial . . . :   WSC001Allocated
cylinders : 2 
Device type . . . . :   3390Allocated
extents . : 1 
Organization  . . . :   PS

Record format . . . :   FB

Record length . . . :   110

Block size  . . . . :   27940   Current
Utilization  
1st extent cylinders:   2   Used cylinders
. . :   2 
Secondary cylinders :   10  Used extents  .
. . :   1 
 

Creation date . . . :   2008/03/25

Referenced date . . :   2008/03/25

 Expiration date . . :  ***None***  

As a control test, I allocated the same dataset on the 1.7 system using
ISPF 3.2 and it showed up without the SMS lines in the ISPF output.

I tried unsuccessfully to find some documentation that would explain the
difference between the 1.4 and 1.7 system.  Any ideas as to why the
dataset allocated with the batch JCL would show up differently under 1.7
versus 1.4?

Thanks.

Rex

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-03-26 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:08:07 -0500, Pommier, Rex R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip

The question that I have is that once the dataset has been created under
1.7, looking at it under ISPF 3.4, it looks like this - notice the SMS
management class, etc:


snip

Hmmm.. It appears that panel ISRUAIES is being used instead of ISRUAIP
for non-sms flat files.  I've confirmed the same behavior on z/OS 1.8 and
z/OS 1.9.   I have a 1.6 system left and it looks correct.   This should
be APAR-able.  Open a PMR with IBM ISPF support.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-03-26 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
Since we're talking 1.4 to 1.7 will IBM do that?

Just curious.

Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information  Communications Technology
Crawford  Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084 
phone: 770-621-3256 
fax: 770-621-3237
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.crawfordandcompany.com 



IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 03/26/2008 
03:09:17 PM:

 -- Information from the mail header 
 ---
 Sender:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Poster:   Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question
 
---
 
 On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:08:07 -0500, Pommier, Rex R.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 snip
 
 The question that I have is that once the dataset has been created 
under
 1.7, looking at it under ISPF 3.4, it looks like this - notice the SMS
 management class, etc:
 
 
 snip
 
 Hmmm.. It appears that panel ISRUAIES is being used instead of ISRUAIP
 for non-sms flat files.  I've confirmed the same behavior on z/OS 1.8 
and
 z/OS 1.9.   I have a 1.6 system left and it looks correct.   This should
 be APAR-able.  Open a PMR with IBM ISPF support.
 
 Mark
 --
 Mark Zelden
 Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
 Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 z/OS Systems Programming expert at 
http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
 Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
 



Best Overall Third-Party Claims Administrator - 2007 Business Insurance 
Readers Choice Awards
 
Consider the environment before printing this message.

This transmission is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which 
it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is 
confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise exempt from disclosure. If 
you are not the named addressee, you are NOT authorized to read, print, retain, 
copy or disseminate this communication, its attachments or any part of them. If 
you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and delete this communication from all computers.  This 
communication does not form any contractual obligation on behalf of the sender, 
the sender's employer, or the employer's parent company, affiliates or 
subsidiaries.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-03-26 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:13:16 -0400, Daniel McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Since we're talking 1.4 to 1.7 will IBM do that?

Just curious.



 Hmmm.. It appears that panel ISRUAIES is being used instead of ISRUAIP
 for non-sms flat files.  I've confirmed the same behavior on z/OS 1.8
and
 z/OS 1.9.   I have a 1.6 system left and it looks correct.   This should
 be APAR-able.  Open a PMR with IBM ISPF support.


Assuming it is not intentional for some reason (panel ISRUAIP still exists
in hlq.SISPPENU) they should if the customer pushes for it.  z/OS 1.7 doesn't
hit EOS (end of service) until September 2008.   But there could be a reason
that IBM decided they always should use panel ISRUAIES.  I just can't 
imagine what that reason could be.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

2008-03-26 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Mark,

I'll open a PMR on 1.7.  I just wanted to know if it was a documented
change that I had somehow missed before opening a PMR.

Thanks.


Rex 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 upgrade differences question

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:13:16 -0400, Daniel McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Since we're talking 1.4 to 1.7 will IBM do that?

Just curious.



 Hmmm.. It appears that panel ISRUAIES is being used instead of 
 ISRUAIP for non-sms flat files.  I've confirmed the same behavior on 
 z/OS 1.8
and
 z/OS 1.9.   I have a 1.6 system left and it looks correct.   This
should
 be APAR-able.  Open a PMR with IBM ISPF support.


Assuming it is not intentional for some reason (panel ISRUAIP still
exists in hlq.SISPPENU) they should if the customer pushes for it.  z/OS
1.7 doesn't
hit EOS (end of service) until September 2008.   But there could be a
reason
that IBM decided they always should use panel ISRUAIES.  I just can't
imagine what that reason could be.

Mark

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html