Re: zIIPs and TCP/IP usage

2011-03-19 Thread Martin Packer
I think one of the points about IPSec is that it is an EMERGENT technology 
- in the sense that many sites aren't using it YET. So I regard its zIIP 
support to be an ENABLER. Might be time - in many shops - to exploit IPSec 
because of this.

(And, static the OBVIOUS, you won't see anything via the PROJECTCPU 
mechanism for workloads you aren't running yet.) :-)

Martin

Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker





Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU






--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: zIIPs and TCP/IP usage

2011-03-19 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2011-03-19 11:38, Martin Packer pisze:

I think one of the points about IPSec is that it is an EMERGENT technology
- in the sense that many sites aren't using it YET. So I regard its zIIP
support to be an ENABLER. Might be time - in many shops - to exploit IPSec
because of this.

(And, static the OBVIOUS, you won't see anything via the PROJECTCPU
mechanism for workloads you aren't running yet.) :-)


That's obvious.

However, how can I see what tasks are using zIIP?
All the zIIP usage peaks (in my environment) are related to DB2 utils 
running, but maybe there are other zIIP exploiters which consume few 
zIIP cycles, maybe I'm not aware of some of them. g



--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, 
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 16.07.2010 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.248.328 zotych. 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: zIIPs and TCP/IP usage

2011-03-19 Thread Fabio Massimo Ottaviani

Hello Radoslaw

if you have a tool to analyze SMF (e.g. SAS/MXG) 
you can check which address spaces are using the 
zIIP by looking at the SMF30_TIME_ON_ZIIP field in  SMF 30 records.


If not, you can run a RMF Monitor I Workload Activity report.
Using the SYSRPTS(WLMGL(SCPER)) ommand you can 
check which service classes are using the zIIP.
Using the SYSRPTS(WLMGL(RCPER)) ommand you can 
check which report classes are using the zIIP.


Best regards
Fabio

At 12.05 19/03/2011, you wrote:

W dniu 2011-03-19 11:38, Martin Packer pisze:

I think one of the points about IPSec is that it is an EMERGENT technology
- in the sense that many sites aren't using it YET. So I regard its zIIP
support to be an ENABLER. Might be time - in many shops - to exploit IPSec
because of this.

(And, static the OBVIOUS, you won't see anything via the PROJECTCPU
mechanism for workloads you aren't running yet.) :-)


That's obvious.

However, how can I see what tasks are using zIIP?
All the zIIP usage peaks (in my environment) are 
related to DB2 utils running, but maybe there 
are other zIIP exploiters which consume few zIIP 
cycles, maybe I'm not aware of some of them. g



--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII 
WydziaGospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr 
rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie16.07.2010 r. kapitazakadowy 
BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.248.328 zotych.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



+
+ Fabio Massimo Ottaviani
+ EPV Technologies Technical Director
+ Skype: fabio.massimo.ottaviani
+
+ IT Cost under Control
+ www.epvtech.com
+

P Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


zIIPs and TCP/IP usage

2011-03-18 Thread Jim Marshall
Right now I am looking at zIIPs and zAAPs planning for some new z196s.  One 
area of interest is I read zIIPs can offload some of my TCP/IP work.  What are 
people seeing as what is being offloaded within TCP/IP and how much.  

Just from a high level is this any load of significance I could expect or is it 
relatively low.  Say for instance I did not have any DB2 or XML, then has 
anyone just got the zIIP because of TCP/IP.  


I am discounting JAVA workload out of the picture to keep away from the 
discussion of doing zIIPzAAPs and combining the two.  So just for the sake of 
this discussion say I have no JAVA workload either. 

Be interested in others actual experiences. jim 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: zIIPs and TCP/IP usage

2011-03-18 Thread Finch, Steve (ES - Mainframe)
The books say All SRB-based processing in stack can be done on a zIIP,
depending on what level of zOS

If you are doing IPSEC (SSL encryption), you will be using a lot of CPU time
in stack. It could justify zIIP or two to offload the IPSEC work

Steve Finch


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Jim Marshall
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 8:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: zIIPs and TCP/IP usage

Right now I am looking at zIIPs and zAAPs planning for some new z196s.  One
area of interest is I read zIIPs can offload some of my TCP/IP work.  What are
people seeing as what is being offloaded within TCP/IP and how much.

Just from a high level is this any load of significance I could expect or is it
relatively low.  Say for instance I did not have any DB2 or XML, then has
anyone just got the zIIP because of TCP/IP.


I am discounting JAVA workload out of the picture to keep away from the
discussion of doing zIIPzAAPs and combining the two.  So just for the sake of
this discussion say I have no JAVA workload either.

Be interested in others actual experiences. jim

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html