AUTO: Frank Krueger is in vacation. (returning 09/03/2013)

2013-08-11 Thread Frank Krueger
I am out of the office until 09/03/2013.

I am on leave travelling through Europe. No mail access.
In urgent cases leave message on mobile phone
or contact my manager Bernd Mueller or my team leader Peter Kimmel


Note: This is an automated response to your message  IBM-MAIN Digest - 9
Aug 2013 to 10 Aug 2013 (#2013-222) sent on 11/08/2013 6:00:01.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: The z/OS V2.1 Migration PDF available

2013-08-11 Thread Timothy Sipples
That's not my suggestion. My suggestion is simply to list (and to link to)
all the previous migration documents within the current migration document.
Save the reader a step (or two) in hunting them down.

I don't know if the current migration document already does that but, if
not, it should. It'd be a very short chapter that looks something like
this:


Chapter X: Upgrade to z/OS 2.1 from Operating System Releases Prior to z/OS
1.12

IBM does not support sharing z/OS 2.1 datasets and other operating system
elements with operating system releases prior to z/OS 1.12. Also, IBM may
no longer support your older operating system release. Customers migrating
from operating system releases prior to z/OS 1.12 must prepare and execute
a special migration plan to move to z/OS 2.1. To understand the migration
considerations applicable to upgrades to past releases, please review the
historical migration guides relevant to your circumstances. Here is a list
of historical operating system migration guides:

(Insert list/links here.)

You may wish to engage a specialist services organization or IBM to assist
in preparing and executing your special migration plan. Special migration
plans are broadly split into two types: stepwise migrations and single step
migrations. Stepwise migrations adhere to IBM's previously and currently
supported operating system coexistence combinations. For example, if you
are upgrading to z/OS 2.1 from z/OS 1.10, then a stepwise migration would
involve an initial upgrade from z/OS 1.10 to 1.12 followed by a second
upgrade from 1.12 to 1.21, in sequence. Single step migrations involve
skipping intermediate releases, migrating directly to z/OS 2.1 without
sharing datasets and other operating system elements between the old
release and z/OS 2.1. For perspective, most of the IT industry's operating
systems do not support release coexistence, so a single step migration is
broadly similar in nature to release upgrades among other operating
systems. Customers vary in how they weigh risk and cost factors as they
consider migration strategies, but generally costs tend to increase as the
number of migration steps increases.

To reiterate, IBM may no longer support your older operating system
release. Moreover, IBM never supported sharing datasets and other elements
between operating system releases unless IBM specifically published
coexistence guidance indicating otherwise. You and your services partner
(if applicable) should carefully understand, assess, and manage the risks
involved when preparing and executing your special migration plan.


That'd work!


Timothy Sipples
GMU VCT Architect Executive (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Multiple timezones?

2013-08-11 Thread Timothy Sipples
I can think of a couple more possibilities:

1. A job scheduler such as IBM Operations Manager for z/VM (IBM program
number 5697-J10), CA VM:Schedule, etc. might handle this requested use case
directly.

2. A job scheduler -- on z/OS notably -- could start a job via RSCS or FTPS
in z/VM. (This is a variation on the Linux idea.)

These two possibilities depend somewhat on how smart the scheduler is about
periodic shifts in local time, e.g. daylight savings time. Many job
schedulers are pretty smart. I'm generally in favor of scheduling jobs in
one logical place if possible and absent a compelling reason otherwise.

Note that the local time changes rather often in the world, hence the
previous paragraph and its once and once well view. Operating system
release X.Y.Z may not have a current understanding of the correct local
time in a particular geography if enough time passes.


Timothy Sipples
GMU VCT Architect Executive (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/TPF question

2013-08-11 Thread Timothy Sipples
ALCS -- a close cousin to z/TPF that runs on z/OS -- could use zIIPs
indirectly. As one example, if you've got an IPSEC connection to/from ALCS
then IPSEC can exploit zIIPs.

My understanding is that z/TPF benefits rather more substantially than most
software products from another specialty engine: SAPs (System Assist
Processors).


Timothy Sipples
GMU VCT Architect Executive (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: FEW VLF RETRIEVES

2013-08-11 Thread Peter Relson
The general approach for VLF is that a module is eligible for caching only 
after being fetched 10 times.

The functionality of caching is asynchronous. It will be kicked off, via 
POST, after the 10th fetch. It is possible that your test program made it 
through its LOADs before the VLF processing got around to caching the 
module.

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Linkage Editing VSE Phase in z/OS

2013-08-11 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In
CAKvHmLtCsh_B8uJmzXVomWVVhOi06p=pwc-o0gvbppc2an2...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/09/2013
   at 04:13 PM, Roberto Halais roberto.hal...@gmail.com said:

We are doing a VSE to z/OS conversion and had to do the following
since we have no source.

Ouch!

We put the phase in a z/os pds member (lrecl 80) 

How? If you used FTP, was it in binary mode?

IEW2359E 240B SECTION FA010 CONTAINS AN RLD WITH AN INVALID ADCON
LOCATION.
 CLASS = B_TEXT, ELEMENT OFFSET = FFAFFF88

Does VSE support negative offsets?
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Multiple timezones?

2013-08-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 17:41:04 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote:

I can think of a couple more possibilities:

1. A job scheduler such as IBM Operations Manager for z/VM (IBM program
number 5697-J10), CA VM:Schedule, etc. might handle this requested use case
directly.

2. A job scheduler -- on z/OS notably -- could start a job via RSCS or FTPS
in z/VM. (This is a variation on the Linux idea.)
 
Of these, how many can handle more timezones than GMT and LOCAL?
(After all, the topic is Multiple timezones and the OP's requirement is
clear.)

These two possibilities depend somewhat on how smart the scheduler is about
periodic shifts in local time, e.g. daylight savings time. Many job
schedulers are pretty smart. I'm generally in favor of scheduling jobs in
one logical place if possible and absent a compelling reason otherwise.

Note that the local time changes rather often in the world, hence the
previous paragraph and its once and once well view. Operating system
release X.Y.Z may not have a current understanding of the correct local
time in a particular geography if enough time passes.
 
Indeed, the data base must be updated in a timely, hopefully
nondisruptive fashion.  For a Horrid Example, Independent Samoa
advanced its clocks by 24 hours on December 1, 2012.  So:

512 $ TZ=UTC0 date
Sun Aug 11 15:13:36 UTC 2013

513 $ ssh 192.168.0.5 uname; TZ=Pacific/Apia date
Linux
Mon Aug 12 04:13:43 WST 2013

Ubuntu Linux had it right, even in anticipation of the change
(admittedly, the system has been restarted since the change,
so I can't vouch for nondisruptive), but:

514 $ uname; TZ=Pacific/Apia date
Darwin
Sun Aug 11 04:14:16 WST 2013

OS X (above; admittedly an out-of-support release), Solaris,
and various other Linuxen still haven't got it right 16 months
after the fact.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: The z/OS V2.1 Migration PDF available

2013-08-11 Thread Don Williams
All double column formatted PDFs drive me crazy.  If I set the view to entire 
page, then the fonts too small. If I set the font large enough to see, then I 
have to yo-yo the pages up and down to read the columns.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Bonno, Tuco
 Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 6:13 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: The z/OS V2.1 Migration PDF available
 
 most emphatic ditto to what Louis Losee said, with this addendum:   ...
 and doing so is driving me nuts 
 /s/ tuco bonno;
 Graduate, College of Conflict Management;
 University of SouthEast Asia;
 I partied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail - tiến lên !! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Louis Losee
 Sent: Thursday, 08 August, 2013 10:36 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: The z/OS V2.1 Migration PDF available
 
 The migration specific format is nice, however, for online reading the dual
 columns cause the reader to constanly page up and down to read each page.
 
 
 On Aug 8, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Marna WALLE mwa...@us.ibm.com wrote:
 
  Hi All,
  Since you mentioned the z/OS V2,1 Migration book being available, I
 thought I would bring to your attention something.  It's different.
 
  We've tried a new format for the book, which I'm hoping will make it easier
 to read.  We've divided up the chapters into which migration path you are on
 (R12- V2.1,  or  R13- V2.1).  You read only the chapters that apply to you.
 
  Here's the layout:
  Chapter 1:  Introduction   for all users
  Chapter 2:  General migration actionsfor all users
  Chapter 3:  Migration from z/OS R13 for R13 - V2.1 users
  Chapter 4:  Migration from z/OS R12 for R12 - V2.1 users
 
  R13-V2R1 :  Read Chapters 1, 2, and 3.  Skip Chapter 4.
  R12 - V2R1:  Read Chapter 1,2, and 4.  Skip chapter 3.
 
  Any feedback on this format is welcome!
  -Marna WALLE
  z/OS System Installation
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
  email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Announcing PCRE for z/OS 8.33 V2

2013-08-11 Thread Ze'ev Atlas
PCRE for z/OS 8.33 V2 is nnow available on my website www.zaconsultants.net.

New in this version:
Full support for the Posix compatibility module
GETMAIN and FREEMAIN as front ends for malloc and free
pcregrep version that recognizes PDS and PDSE as such and treat them as 
directories and full support for HFS and ZFS


With all the limitations of PCREGREP, I could still say SRCHFOR is dead, long 
live PCREGREP.

ZA

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


List all dataset in system by HLQ

2013-08-11 Thread Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
Hello Group.
I want to know if it is possible to list all datasets on the system but I'm 
just interested to obtain the list by the HLQ.

That way I can get this?

Example.

sys1. *
parmlib. *


Thanks to all

ATTE

Victor

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: List all dataset in system by HLQ

2013-08-11 Thread Lizette Koehler
It will depend.  Are you looking for something in ISPF like option 3.4?
Do you want to read a DCOLLECT file that will contain all files on Dasd, 
Migrated?

Do you want to use ISMF?

Do you want to code a program like REXX or COBOL?

Many ways to do what you want.

You can also use the Catalog Search Interface (CSI)

I typically use DCOLLECT with SAS and MXG


Lizette


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: List all dataset in system by HLQ

Hello Group.
I want to know if it is possible to list all datasets on the system but I'm 
just interested to obtain the list by the HLQ.

That way I can get this?

Example.

sys1. *
parmlib. *


Thanks to all

ATTE

Victor

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: zHPF

2013-08-11 Thread Ron Hawkins
Ed,

Actually the TCW has a shorter path length to process on the storage side, at 
least on HDS kit.

On the VSP we see an improvement in response time, tens of microseconds, and an 
increase in max throughput of a VSD (Virtual Storage Director - the MP that 
handles almost everything except data transfer). Noticeable for cache hit 
workloads, but not so much for cache miss.

Ron

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
 Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 12:48 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] zHPF
 
 On 8/6/2013 12:35 PM, gsg wrote:
  Would like to turn on zHPF.  Is there a way to benchmark this to see what
 we're getting out of it?  Would like to do this in test and then again in
 production.
 
 The main advantage to zHPF is more (overlapped) I/Os per second, not faster
 per-I/O speed. Therefore, to observe a measurable difference, you will need
 to run one hellacious benchmark! :)
 
 --
 Edward E Jaffe
 Phoenix Software International, Inc
 831 Parkview Drive North
 El Segundo, CA 90245
 http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN