Re: In-rack FICON DASD
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote: >I don't know about any candidates to this category, but when we add HDS, >we have all current vendors of mainframe disks. No, that's not correct. Infinidat also markets FICON-attached ECKD storage (evidently not in 16U or smaller physical sizes), and there might be others. Timothy Sipples IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM Z & LinuxONE E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Debug tool in background batch job
Hello Peter, I cannot find program ADSTAT anywhere on my system. And I do have the IBM DEBUG products installed. On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:37:10 +0800, Peter Van Dyke wrote: >Hi, > >This can be done with Debug Tool. The following JCL is for a batch job that >runs a COBOL program and has Debug Tool write a trace of all statements and >labels executed. It also shows the values of all referenced variables. The >trace is written to the INSPLOG DD. > >//VANDYKET JOB (ACCTG),'DT JOB',REGION=0M,CLASS=A, >// MSGCLASS=X,NOTIFY=,MSGLEVEL=(1,1) >//* >//RUNSAM1 EXEC PGM=ADSTAT,REGION=4M, >//PARM='/TEST(,DTCMD,,)' Regards Bruce -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: TapeTools VEHSYNC job
Hi, I looked all over, but couldn't find the address. Do you know what it is? Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 5:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: TapeTools VEHSYNC job If you send an email to the team that supports this, they are very helpful. Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:56 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: TapeTools VEHSYNC job > > Hi, > The VEHSYNC job in the tapetools package has DD cards for various Tape > Management Systems. > We use Control-M/Tape from BMC formerly known as Control-T. > There are two DD's the look like they belong to Control-T, CNTLT60 and > CNTLT61. > > Does anyone know what these DD's should point to? > > Thanks > > Gadi > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: HSM dummy question ML1
Thanks Just curious, on every upgrade does anyone runs FVP(functional verification program) of HSM ? Just to be sure HSM functions as expected ? I was going through the FVP and has lot of great information . On Wed, 17 Apr, 2019, 11:07 AM Elardus Engelbrecht, < elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote: > Jake Anderson wrote: > > >When we say ML1 I understand it's a dasd ? > > Usually yes, but you as HSM admin has the final say. > > > >So if it a HSM managed where can I list it or do we define a set of pool ? > > Look in your ARCCMDxx parmlib member for this statement like this example. > > ADDVOL ?? UNIT(3390) MIGRATION(ML1 ... > > There are some HSENDCMD QUERY commands and perhaps ISMF which can help you. > > Groete / Greetings > Elardus Engelbrecht (ex-HSM/SMS Storage admin... ;-D ) > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Debug tool in background batch job
Hi, This can be done with Debug Tool. The following JCL is for a batch job that runs a COBOL program and has Debug Tool write a trace of all statements and labels executed. It also shows the values of all referenced variables. The trace is written to the INSPLOG DD. //VANDYKET JOB (ACCTG),'DT JOB',REGION=0M,CLASS=A, // MSGCLASS=X,NOTIFY=,MSGLEVEL=(1,1) //* //RUNSAM1 EXEC PGM=ADSTAT,REGION=4M, //PARM='/TEST(,DTCMD,,)' //STEPLIB DD DSN=,DISP=SHR //*DD DSN=DEBUG.V10R1.SEQAMOD,DISP=SHR //INSPLOG DD SYSOUT=* //DTCMDDD * /*DEBUG TOOL COMMAND FILE */ /*TO PRODUCE A FULL STATEMENT TRACE */ /* */ CLEAR AT; AT * BEGIN; LIST LINE %LINE; GO; END; AT LABEL * BEGIN; LIST LINE %LINE; GO; END; /* STEP 2; */ SET LOG KEEP 3000; SET AUTO ON LOG; GO; //* //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=* //* Regards, Peter Van Dyke On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 23:50, Joseph Reichman wrote: > Hi > > Would anyone know if I could run debug tool > As a batch job producing an instruction trace of a program thanks > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CSSMTP
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:06:20 -0400, Roberto Halais wrote: >I solved the brackets issue by specifying: >TRANSLATE Ibm-037 in the config parms. > Suppose you have one user partisan to IBM-037, and another IBM-1047. Can you satisfy both? >On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 9:05 AM Allan Staller wrote: > >> Almost none. The only thing ISTR is CSSMTP is not very happy with square >> brackets "[" and "]". >> And what about attachments? Suppose in the user's z/FS directory there is the file (attached), properly tagged IBM-1208. What happens? What about an analogous file properly tagged IBM-1154? Why should things so easy on my desktop be so hard on a computer thousands of times more expensive? -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Host: IBM-1047 output: from_IBM-1154 0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 192 208 224 240 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 a0 b0 c0 d0 e0 f0 0 0 & - Ð Ñ Ð¹ Ñ Ñ { } \ 0 1 1 Â Ñ / Ð a j ~ Ñ A J ⬠1 2 2 Ñ Ñ Ð Ð b k s з B K S 2 3 3 Ñ Ñ Ð Â c l t Ñ C L T 3 4 4 Ñ Ñ Ð Ð d m u Ñ D M U 4 5 5 Ñ Ñ Ð Ð e n v Ñ E N V 5 6 6 Ñ Ñ Ð Ñ f o w Ñ F O W 6 7 7 Ñ Ðª Ра g p x Ñ G P X 7 8 8 Ñ â Рб h q y Ю H Q Y 8 9 9 Ñ Ð Ð ` i r z Ð I R Z 9 10 a [ ] | : д к Ñ Ð Ð¥ РТ Ð 11 b . $ , # е л Ñ Ð¦ РРУ Ш 12 c < * % @ Ñ Ð¼ Ñ Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð 13 d ( ) _ ' г н Ñ Ð Ð Ð¯ РЩ 14 e + ; > = Ñ Ð¾ ж Ф РРЬ Ч 15 f ! ^ ? " и п в РРС Ы -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CSSMTP
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:23:30 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >What was in the charset on the content-type header field? > I know VM's SMTP performs ASCII<->EBCDIC conversion without adjusting charset. I would hardly be surprised if other mainframe mailers misbehave likewise. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
Now - they are not all correct but they are a reasonable start -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF I just found the jobs in CAKOJCL0. Do a srchfor OSMF on the library. Looks like maybe CA has made some inprovements. Will have to take a closer look at the various members. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** I think my teammate went to the CA Site, I don't expect TSS rules for usage to be in SMP/E format ? I"ll check with him, I don't recall him saying they were. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:08:58 PM Subject: Re: z?OSMF If you google z/osmf top secret or racf or acf2 it will bring you to a CA webpage. And the jobs are in a SMP/e library -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF I am in the same boat here - clear as mud Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:23:46 PM Subject: Re: z?OSMF I found, and downloaded the cookbook too. Again, fine for setting up the STC security, but trying to figure out some level of role based functionality, and who should see what, is the hard part. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I agree, still a mess to setup correctly. still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group does not understand the required setup and refuses to complete the security setup because of these issues. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:06:55 AM Subject: Re: z?OSMF The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild mess to setup. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To:
Re: z?OSMF
I just found the jobs in CAKOJCL0. Do a srchfor OSMF on the library. Looks like maybe CA has made some inprovements. Will have to take a closer look at the various members. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** I think my teammate went to the CA Site, I don't expect TSS rules for usage to be in SMP/E format ? I"ll check with him, I don't recall him saying they were. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:08:58 PM Subject: Re: z?OSMF If you google z/osmf top secret or racf or acf2 it will bring you to a CA webpage. And the jobs are in a SMP/e library -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF I am in the same boat here - clear as mud Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:23:46 PM Subject: Re: z?OSMF I found, and downloaded the cookbook too. Again, fine for setting up the STC security, but trying to figure out some level of role based functionality, and who should see what, is the hard part. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I agree, still a mess to setup correctly. still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group does not understand the required setup and refuses to complete the security setup because of these issues. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:06:55 AM Subject: Re: z?OSMF The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild mess to setup. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For
Re: Incoming | Computerworld SHARK TANK
Well, "amazing" is a signed variable. What do you do when IBM tells you that a machine check after pressing RESTART is a software error? What do you do when you put the 168 in Single Step mode, press RESTART and again get a machine check, without affecting the "software error" fairy tale? Amazing, but not in a good way. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom Brennan Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 2:47:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Incoming | Computerworld SHARK TANK I didn't notice any unusual sounds even when standing over the unit. I think at the time there was nothing but res packs left on the 3330's, a holdover which allowed us to cheaply have multiple OS level backups. There was a project going on to move res packs to 3380's which had just arrived, so it could be that particular 3330 was never fixed. IBM was often amazing with repairs. I remember one morning my 3278 tube died. I went to lunch and it was fixed by the time I got back. On 4/14/2019 11:20 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > What kind of disk dies silently? When our fixed-head disk crashed after > multiple power failures it screamed like all the banshees in Hell, and the > was no doubt about what was happening. IBM said they could have it back up in > two weeks, and I thought they were blowing smokes. They flew in a special > team that did nothing but repair 2305 drives > > Part of the procedure after repair is to hook up measurement equipment and > spin for 24 hours, install the heads and spin for another 24 hours. If the > instrument detects anything out of balance you fix it and start the test from > the beginning, not from where you left off. We had a power while they were > testing, and they still turned over the working drive within the 2 weeks they > had promised. > > I don't impress easily, but they impressed me. > > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of > Tom Brennan > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2019 1:27 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Incoming | Computerworld SHARK TANK > > Interesting story! The only time I've actually seen a head crash was on > an old 3330 where I had just popped in a RES pack. I walked over to the > hardware console to IPL - the old 3270 where you had to type L1/A2 or > whatever those commands were. The hardware console told me I had an I/O > error, and there was a red light on the device. I pushed the button to > open the 3330 drawer and there were bits of disk head all over the inside. > > On 4/13/2019 9:16 AM, Gabe Goldberg wrote: >> Many years ago I had friends in old DEC building in Maynard, MA. They >> had story of periodic head crashes on monster disk drives with >> vertically spinning platters. They realized cause: trucks backing into >> loading dock hitting and shaking the building -- since platters were >> oriented perpendicular to truck motion. Solution: turn drives 90 degrees >> to align platters with truck motion. At worst, I/O errors but no head >> crashes (I guess heads flew much higher than on today's devices). I'll >> ask veterans I know of that time/place to confirm... >> >> ITschak Mugzach said: >> >> That reminds me another story. ten years ago a client of us installed a new >> hitachi disk array. The technician installed and configured the array, but >> for some reasons, it was not immediately used by the client. few days >> later, the client tried to connect to the array and it was down. it was >> repeatedly don everyday afterwards. investigation showed that the the >> people who cleans the computer room unplugged the power for the vacuum >> cleaner... The array was using a standard power plug. >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
I think my teammate went to the CA Site, I don't expect TSS rules for usage to be in SMP/E format ? I"ll check with him, I don't recall him saying they were. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:08:58 PM Subject: Re: z?OSMF If you google z/osmf top secret or racf or acf2 it will bring you to a CA webpage. And the jobs are in a SMP/e library -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF I am in the same boat here - clear as mud Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:23:46 PM Subject: Re: z?OSMF I found, and downloaded the cookbook too. Again, fine for setting up the STC security, but trying to figure out some level of role based functionality, and who should see what, is the hard part. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I agree, still a mess to setup correctly. still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group does not understand the required setup and refuses to complete the security setup because of these issues. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:06:55 AM Subject: Re: z?OSMF The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild mess to setup. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message >(including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or >entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure >under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If
Re: z?OSMF
If you google z/osmf top secret or racf or acf2 it will bring you to a CA webpage. And the jobs are in a SMP/e library -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF I am in the same boat here - clear as mud Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:23:46 PM Subject: Re: z?OSMF I found, and downloaded the cookbook too. Again, fine for setting up the STC security, but trying to figure out some level of role based functionality, and who should see what, is the hard part. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I agree, still a mess to setup correctly. still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group does not understand the required setup and refuses to complete the security setup because of these issues. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:06:55 AM Subject: Re: z?OSMF The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild mess to setup. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message >(including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or >entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure >under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are >not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly >prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us >immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) >delete this message
Re: TapeTools VEHSYNC job
Do I just point it to the MDB? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Oren, Yifat Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: TapeTools VEHSYNC job Hi Gadi, Long time no speak If we're not mistaken, you should use CNTLT60 for Control-T V6 MDB or CNTLT61 for V6.1 (and higher). There was a change in the MDB format in 6.1. HTH, Yifat -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] TapeTools VEHSYNC job Hi, The VEHSYNC job in the tapetools package has DD cards for various Tape Management Systems. We use Control-M/Tape from BMC formerly known as Control-T. There are two DD's the look like they belong to Control-T, CNTLT60 and CNTLT61. Does anyone know what these DD's should point to? Thanks Gadi -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
found it. thanks all. TSOPROC called TSOLPROC, tss ADD command accepts both but only TSOLPROC work. ITschak On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:56 PM Cieri, Anthony wrote: > > If the user is NOT defined in UADS then don't you need to define a > TSO segment in TSS??? > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:51 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: what is racinit error 32? > > [[ SEI WARNING *** This email was sent from an external source. Do not > open attachments or click on links from unknown or suspicious senders. *** > ]] > > > that's true. racf is not active, it is a tss lpar. however other users can > login. it must be a tso issue as job submition under this user work well. > The user is NOT defined to UADS. I know that if I will define the user to > UADS it will work, but am trying to understand what is missing. > > ITschak > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:45 PM Lou Losee wrote: > > > Might the code be displayed in decimal in which case it is equivalent to > > x'20' which then indicates RACF is not active. > > > > Lou > > -- > > Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity > > - Unknown > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:08 PM ITschak Mugzach > > wrote: > > > > > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR > > CODE > > > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > > > > > Any idea? > > > ITschak > > > > > > -- > > > ITschak Mugzach > > > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous > Monitoring > > > for Legacy **| * > > > > > > -- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > -- > ITschak Mugzach > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > for Legacy **| * > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
The user has facility(tso) and a tso segment with only TSOLSIZE. from some reason, add(xxx) tsoproc() doesn't show in list. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:54 PM Mark Jacobs < 0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Is there a TSS TSO segment defined for that userid? > > Mark Jacobs > > > Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. > > GPG Public Key - > https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:50 PM, ITschak Mugzach > wrote: > > > that's true. racf is not active, it is a tss lpar. however other users > can > > login. it must be a tso issue as job submition under this user work well. > > The user is NOT defined to UADS. I know that if I will define the user to > > UADS it will work, but am trying to understand what is missing. > > > > ITschak > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:45 PM Lou Losee llo...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Might the code be displayed in decimal in which case it is equivalent > to > > > x'20' which then indicates RACF is not active. > > > > > > Lou > > > > > > > > > > > > Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity > > > > > > - Unknown > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:08 PM ITschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR > > > > CODE > > > > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > > > Any idea? > > > > ITschak > > > > -- > > > > ITschak Mugzach > > > > |* IronSphere Platform* | *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > > > > for Legacy **| * > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > > > > ITschak Mugzach > > |* IronSphere Platform* | *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > > for Legacy **| * > > > > > --- > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
I am in the same boat here - clear as mud Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:23:46 PM Subject: Re: z?OSMF I found, and downloaded the cookbook too. Again, fine for setting up the STC security, but trying to figure out some level of role based functionality, and who should see what, is the hard part. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I agree, still a mess to setup correctly. still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group does not understand the required setup and refuses to complete the security setup because of these issues. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:06:55 AM Subject: Re: z?OSMF The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild mess to setup. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message >(including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or >entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure >under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are >not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly >prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us >immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) >delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank >you. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or
Re: what is racinit error 32?
If the user is NOT defined in UADS then don't you need to define a TSO segment in TSS??? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:51 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: what is racinit error 32? [[ SEI WARNING *** This email was sent from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown or suspicious senders. *** ]] that's true. racf is not active, it is a tss lpar. however other users can login. it must be a tso issue as job submition under this user work well. The user is NOT defined to UADS. I know that if I will define the user to UADS it will work, but am trying to understand what is missing. ITschak On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:45 PM Lou Losee wrote: > Might the code be displayed in decimal in which case it is equivalent to > x'20' which then indicates RACF is not active. > > Lou > -- > Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity > - Unknown > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:08 PM ITschak Mugzach > wrote: > > > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR > CODE > > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > > > Any idea? > > ITschak > > > > -- > > ITschak Mugzach > > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > > for Legacy **| * > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
Is there a TSS TSO segment defined for that userid? Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:50 PM, ITschak Mugzach wrote: > that's true. racf is not active, it is a tss lpar. however other users can > login. it must be a tso issue as job submition under this user work well. > The user is NOT defined to UADS. I know that if I will define the user to > UADS it will work, but am trying to understand what is missing. > > ITschak > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:45 PM Lou Losee llo...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Might the code be displayed in decimal in which case it is equivalent to > > x'20' which then indicates RACF is not active. > > > > Lou > > > > > > > > Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity > > > > - Unknown > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:08 PM ITschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > > > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR > > > CODE > > > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > > Any idea? > > > ITschak > > > -- > > > ITschak Mugzach > > > |* IronSphere Platform* | *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > > > for Legacy **| * > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > > ITschak Mugzach > |* IronSphere Platform* | *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > for Legacy **| * > > --- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
that's true. racf is not active, it is a tss lpar. however other users can login. it must be a tso issue as job submition under this user work well. The user is NOT defined to UADS. I know that if I will define the user to UADS it will work, but am trying to understand what is missing. ITschak On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:45 PM Lou Losee wrote: > Might the code be displayed in decimal in which case it is equivalent to > x'20' which then indicates RACF is not active. > > Lou > -- > Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity > - Unknown > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:08 PM ITschak Mugzach > wrote: > > > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR > CODE > > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > > > Any idea? > > ITschak > > > > -- > > ITschak Mugzach > > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > > for Legacy **| * > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
see the msg. it is during login. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:40 PM Steve Beaver wrote: > Are you trying to CREATE, CHANGE or DELETE? > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:31 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: what is racinit error 32? > > The return codes are not described in the msg manual... > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:27 PM Steve Beaver > wrote: > > > https://www.ibm.com/support/libraryserver/download/ikj2m211.pdf > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > > Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:08 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: what is racinit error 32? > > > > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR > CODE > > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > > > Any idea? > > ITschak > > > > -- > > ITschak Mugzach > > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > > for Legacy **| * > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > -- > ITschak Mugzach > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > for Legacy **| * > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
Might the code be displayed in decimal in which case it is equivalent to x'20' which then indicates RACF is not active. Lou -- Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity - Unknown On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:08 PM ITschak Mugzach wrote: > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR CODE > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > Any idea? > ITschak > > -- > ITschak Mugzach > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > for Legacy **| * > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
Are you trying to CREATE, CHANGE or DELETE? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: what is racinit error 32? The return codes are not described in the msg manual... On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:27 PM Steve Beaver wrote: > https://www.ibm.com/support/libraryserver/download/ikj2m211.pdf > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:08 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: what is racinit error 32? > > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR CODE > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > Any idea? > ITschak > > -- > ITschak Mugzach > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > for Legacy **| * > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
The return codes are not described in the msg manual... On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:27 PM Steve Beaver wrote: > https://www.ibm.com/support/libraryserver/download/ikj2m211.pdf > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:08 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: what is racinit error 32? > > I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR CODE > 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). > > Any idea? > ITschak > > -- > ITschak Mugzach > *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring > for Legacy **| * > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: what is racinit error 32?
https://www.ibm.com/support/libraryserver/download/ikj2m211.pdf -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: what is racinit error 32? I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR CODE 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). Any idea? ITschak -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
I found, and downloaded the cookbook too. Again, fine for setting up the STC security, but trying to figure out some level of role based functionality, and who should see what, is the hard part. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I agree, still a mess to setup correctly. still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group does not understand the required setup and refuses to complete the security setup because of these issues. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:06:55 AM Subject: Re: z?OSMF The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild mess to setup. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message >(including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or >entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure >under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are >not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly >prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us >immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) >delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank >you. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > > >This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be >privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you >receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in >any
what is racinit error 32?
I am trying to login to tso and get msg ikj56416i (RACF RACINIT ERROR CODE 32). however, racinit error code skips 32 (30, 34). Any idea? ITschak -- ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring for Legacy **| * -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CSSMTP
I solved the brackets issue by specifying: TRANSLATE Ibm-037 in the config parms. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 9:05 AM Allan Staller wrote: > Almost none. The only thing ISTR is CSSMTP is not very happy with square > brackets "[" and "]". > > HTH, > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Bill Giannelli > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:01 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: CSSMTP > > I am a Db2 Systems Programmer, not a z/OS Systems Programmer. What are the > difficulties with implementing CSSMTP? > thanks > Bill > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ::DISCLAIMER:: > > -- > The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and > intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not > guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, > corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain > viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without > referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator > or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this > email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the > views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, > dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or > publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized > representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before > opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and > other defects. > > -- > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Politics: Poli (many) - tics (blood sucking parasites) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Debug tool in background batch job
Hi Would anyone know if I could run debug tool As a batch job producing an instruction trace of a program thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Fwd: All is A4-OK | Computerworld
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3389659/all-is-a4-ok.html Regards, Mark T. Regan, K8MTR CTO1 USNR-Retired, 1969-1991 Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CSSMTP
Hi Marshall, my I/P guy is steplibing to TCPIP.SEZATCP - I found it there Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Marshall Stone" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:40:05 AM Subject: Re: CSSMTP That’s interesting - The TCPIP.SEZALOAD on these z/OS V2.3 systems do not have MVPMAIN load module anymore. Could someone have copied it? MS -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP what program is not found? looks like out network guy has an SMTP address space started using MVPMAIN, I see this program still in my 2.3 TCPIP.SEZATCP loadlib is there another program in the call charin that is no longer there? also from the migration Guide Share presentation I have sez. z/OS V2.3 is the last release to include the Simple Mail Transport Protocol Network Job Entry (SMTPD NJE) Mail Gateway and Sendmail mail transports. If you use the SMTPD NJE Gateway to send mail, use the existing CSSMTP SMTP NJE Mail Gateway instead. IBM had announced plans to provide a replacement program for the Sendmail client that would not require programming changes. Those plans have changed, and IBM plans to provide a compatible subset of functions for Sendmail in the replacement program and to announce those functions in the future. Programming changes or alternative solutions to currently provided Sendmail functions might be required. No replacement function is planned in z/OS Communications Server to support using SMTPD or Sendmail as a (SMTP) server for receiving mail for delivery to local TSO/E or z/OS UNIX System Services user mailboxes, or for forwarding mail to other destinations. - confused 0 Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Marshall Stone" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:12:54 AM Subject: Re: CSSMTP Also you are going from basically a POP mail server with full functions to a spool offload program that just forwards files to your corporate mail server. In V2.3 and above the mail program is no longer found, but we did cheat and copy the module from V2.2 and it worked in the lab under V2.3. MS -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wawiorko, Mike : Infrastructure Services Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP The biggest problem with migrating to CSSMTP would be not doing it. If you try to stick with SMTP, when you upgrade z/OS you'd have nothing as SMTP would stop working. Mike Wawiorko _ This message is for information purposes only, it is not a recommendation, advice, offer or solicitation to buy or sell a product or service nor an official confirmation of any transaction. It is directed at persons who are professionals and is not intended for retail customer use. Intended for recipient only. This message is subject to the terms at: www.barclays.com/emaildisclaimer. For important disclosures, please see: www.barclays.com/salesandtradingdisclaimer regarding market commentary from Barclays Sales and/or Trading, who are active market participants; and in respect of Barclays Research, including disclosures relating to specific issuers, please see http://publicresearch.barclays.com. __ If you are incorporated or operating in Australia, please see https://www.home.barclays/disclosures/importantapacdisclosures.html for important disclosure. __ __ How we use personal information see our privacy notice https://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/disclosures/personalinformationuse.html _ Barclays offers wealth and investment management products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. The availability of products and services may be limited by the applicable laws and
Re: CSSMTP
That’s interesting - The TCPIP.SEZALOAD on these z/OS V2.3 systems do not have MVPMAIN load module anymore. Could someone have copied it? MS -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP what program is not found? looks like out network guy has an SMTP address space started using MVPMAIN, I see this program still in my 2.3 TCPIP.SEZATCP loadlib is there another program in the call charin that is no longer there? also from the migration Guide Share presentation I have sez. z/OS V2.3 is the last release to include the Simple Mail Transport Protocol Network Job Entry (SMTPD NJE) Mail Gateway and Sendmail mail transports. If you use the SMTPD NJE Gateway to send mail, use the existing CSSMTP SMTP NJE Mail Gateway instead. IBM had announced plans to provide a replacement program for the Sendmail client that would not require programming changes. Those plans have changed, and IBM plans to provide a compatible subset of functions for Sendmail in the replacement program and to announce those functions in the future. Programming changes or alternative solutions to currently provided Sendmail functions might be required. No replacement function is planned in z/OS Communications Server to support using SMTPD or Sendmail as a (SMTP) server for receiving mail for delivery to local TSO/E or z/OS UNIX System Services user mailboxes, or for forwarding mail to other destinations. - confused 0 Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Marshall Stone" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:12:54 AM Subject: Re: CSSMTP Also you are going from basically a POP mail server with full functions to a spool offload program that just forwards files to your corporate mail server. In V2.3 and above the mail program is no longer found, but we did cheat and copy the module from V2.2 and it worked in the lab under V2.3. MS -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wawiorko, Mike : Infrastructure Services Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP The biggest problem with migrating to CSSMTP would be not doing it. If you try to stick with SMTP, when you upgrade z/OS you'd have nothing as SMTP would stop working. Mike Wawiorko _ This message is for information purposes only, it is not a recommendation, advice, offer or solicitation to buy or sell a product or service nor an official confirmation of any transaction. It is directed at persons who are professionals and is not intended for retail customer use. Intended for recipient only. This message is subject to the terms at: www.barclays.com/emaildisclaimer. For important disclosures, please see: www.barclays.com/salesandtradingdisclaimer regarding market commentary from Barclays Sales and/or Trading, who are active market participants; and in respect of Barclays Research, including disclosures relating to specific issuers, please see http://publicresearch.barclays.com. __ If you are incorporated or operating in Australia, please see https://www.home.barclays/disclosures/importantapacdisclosures.html for important disclosure. __ __ How we use personal information see our privacy notice https://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/disclosures/personalinformationuse.html _ Barclays offers wealth and investment management products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. The availability of products and services may be limited by the applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions. The Barclays Group does not normally accept or offer business instructions via internet email. Any action that you might take upon this message might be at your own risk. This email and any attachments are
Re: CSSMTP
what program is not found? looks like out network guy has an SMTP address space started using MVPMAIN, I see this program still in my 2.3 TCPIP.SEZATCP loadlib is there another program in the call charin that is no longer there? also from the migration Guide Share presentation I have sez. z/OS V2.3 is the last release to include the Simple Mail Transport Protocol Network Job Entry (SMTPD NJE) Mail Gateway and Sendmail mail transports. If you use the SMTPD NJE Gateway to send mail, use the existing CSSMTP SMTP NJE Mail Gateway instead. IBM had announced plans to provide a replacement program for the Sendmail client that would not require programming changes. Those plans have changed, and IBM plans to provide a compatible subset of functions for Sendmail in the replacement program and to announce those functions in the future. Programming changes or alternative solutions to currently provided Sendmail functions might be required. No replacement function is planned in z/OS Communications Server to support using SMTPD or Sendmail as a (SMTP) server for receiving mail for delivery to local TSO/E or z/OS UNIX System Services user mailboxes, or for forwarding mail to other destinations. - confused 0 Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Marshall Stone" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:12:54 AM Subject: Re: CSSMTP Also you are going from basically a POP mail server with full functions to a spool offload program that just forwards files to your corporate mail server. In V2.3 and above the mail program is no longer found, but we did cheat and copy the module from V2.2 and it worked in the lab under V2.3. MS -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wawiorko, Mike : Infrastructure Services Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP The biggest problem with migrating to CSSMTP would be not doing it. If you try to stick with SMTP, when you upgrade z/OS you'd have nothing as SMTP would stop working. Mike Wawiorko _ This message is for information purposes only, it is not a recommendation, advice, offer or solicitation to buy or sell a product or service nor an official confirmation of any transaction. It is directed at persons who are professionals and is not intended for retail customer use. Intended for recipient only. This message is subject to the terms at: www.barclays.com/emaildisclaimer. For important disclosures, please see: www.barclays.com/salesandtradingdisclaimer regarding market commentary from Barclays Sales and/or Trading, who are active market participants; and in respect of Barclays Research, including disclosures relating to specific issuers, please see http://publicresearch.barclays.com. __ If you are incorporated or operating in Australia, please see https://www.home.barclays/disclosures/importantapacdisclosures.html for important disclosure. __ __ How we use personal information see our privacy notice https://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/disclosures/personalinformationuse.html _ Barclays offers wealth and investment management products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. The availability of products and services may be limited by the applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions. The Barclays Group does not normally accept or offer business instructions via internet email. Any action that you might take upon this message might be at your own risk. This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this email
Re: TapeTools VEHSYNC job
If you send an email to the team that supports this, they are very helpful. Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Gadi Ben-Avi > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:56 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: TapeTools VEHSYNC job > > Hi, > The VEHSYNC job in the tapetools package has DD cards for various Tape > Management Systems. > We use Control-M/Tape from BMC formerly known as Control-T. > There are two DD's the look like they belong to Control-T, CNTLT60 and > CNTLT61. > > Does anyone know what these DD's should point to? > > Thanks > > Gadi > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CSSMTP
Also you are going from basically a POP mail server with full functions to a spool offload program that just forwards files to your corporate mail server. In V2.3 and above the mail program is no longer found, but we did cheat and copy the module from V2.2 and it worked in the lab under V2.3. MS -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wawiorko, Mike : Infrastructure Services Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP The biggest problem with migrating to CSSMTP would be not doing it. If you try to stick with SMTP, when you upgrade z/OS you'd have nothing as SMTP would stop working. Mike Wawiorko _ This message is for information purposes only, it is not a recommendation, advice, offer or solicitation to buy or sell a product or service nor an official confirmation of any transaction. It is directed at persons who are professionals and is not intended for retail customer use. Intended for recipient only. This message is subject to the terms at: www.barclays.com/emaildisclaimer. For important disclosures, please see: www.barclays.com/salesandtradingdisclaimer regarding market commentary from Barclays Sales and/or Trading, who are active market participants; and in respect of Barclays Research, including disclosures relating to specific issuers, please see http://publicresearch.barclays.com. __ If you are incorporated or operating in Australia, please see https://www.home.barclays/disclosures/importantapacdisclosures.html for important disclosure. __ __ How we use personal information see our privacy notice https://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/disclosures/personalinformationuse.html _ Barclays offers wealth and investment management products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. The availability of products and services may be limited by the applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions. The Barclays Group does not normally accept or offer business instructions via internet email. Any action that you might take upon this message might be at your own risk. This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this email or its attachments. Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or without viruses. The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons. Any opinion or other information in this email or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group. Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167). Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom. Barclays Bank PLC is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority ( Financial Services Register No. 122702). __ If you are incorporated or operating in Australia, please see https://www.home.barclays/disclosures/important-apac-disclosures.html for important disclosure.
Re: CSSMTP
The biggest problem with migrating to CSSMTP would be not doing it. If you try to stick with SMTP, when you upgrade z/OS you'd have nothing as SMTP would stop working. Mike Wawiorko _ This message is for information purposes only, it is not a recommendation, advice, offer or solicitation to buy or sell a product or service nor an official confirmation of any transaction. It is directed at persons who are professionals and is not intended for retail customer use. Intended for recipient only. This message is subject to the terms at: www.barclays.com/emaildisclaimer. For important disclosures, please see: www.barclays.com/salesandtradingdisclaimer regarding market commentary from Barclays Sales and/or Trading, who are active market participants; and in respect of Barclays Research, including disclosures relating to specific issuers, please see http://publicresearch.barclays.com. __ If you are incorporated or operating in Australia, please see https://www.home.barclays/disclosures/importantapacdisclosures.html for important disclosure. __ __ How we use personal information see our privacy notice https://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/disclosures/personalinformationuse.html _ Barclays offers wealth and investment management products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. The availability of products and services may be limited by the applicable laws and regulations in certain jurisdictions. The Barclays Group does not normally accept or offer business instructions via internet email. Any action that you might take upon this message might be at your own risk. This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this email or its attachments. Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or without viruses. The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons. Any opinion or other information in this email or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group. Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167). Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom. Barclays Bank PLC is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority ( Financial Services Register No. 122702). __ If you are incorporated or operating in Australia, please see https://www.home.barclays/disclosures/important-apac-disclosures.html for important disclosure. __ This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments. Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free. The Barclays
Re: In-rack FICON DASD
W dniu 2019-04-17 o 06:57, Timothy Sipples pisze: So far here's the list of currently available FICON-attached/ECKD storage units that fit within the 16U Reserved feature of the IBM z14 ZR1 and LinuxONE Rockhopper II machines, in alphabetical order by vendor: Dell EMC PowerMax 8000 IBM DS8882F Luminex T2S Visara Vi-8810L Any candidates still missing? I don't know about any candidates to this category, but when we add HDS, we have all current vendors of mainframe disks. Of course both EMC and IBM also make bigger systems. ;-) -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland == Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości: - powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!), - usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub zapisałeś na dysku). Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może wykorzystać tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia (kopiuje, rozprowadza) tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, narusza prawo i może podlegać karze. mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na 01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych. If you are not the addressee of this message: - let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!), - delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have printed out or saved). This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who disseminates (copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar action, violates the law and may be penalised. mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the Capital City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN 169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: StorageTek VSM Roadmap?
W dniu 2019-04-16 o 19:44, Michael Pantoja pisze: Anybody heard anything about Oracle's future plans for the VSM? VSM 7 came out in 2016 and there's been plenty of RIFs since then as they continue their focus on "Cloud". My personal opinion: it's moribound. Still under sales, but no plans for real development. Note, they canceled their real tape drives. That means T1E is canceled, existing T1D is still under sale, but it's GA was in 2013. They also canceled VSM open (for distributed systems). My €0.02 -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland == Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości: - powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!), - usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub zapisałeś na dysku). Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może wykorzystać tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia (kopiuje, rozprowadza) tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, narusza prawo i może podlegać karze. mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na 01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych. If you are not the addressee of this message: - let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!), - delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have printed out or saved). This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who disseminates (copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar action, violates the law and may be penalised. mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the Capital City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN 169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
:( well isn't that special - now not just planning 2.3 now 'I' have to start to look at 2.4 with no traditional migration guide? I sure hope I don't need internet access from my ServerPac system. thanks IBM ! looking to retire earlier that later now Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Tom Marchant" <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:22:48 AM Subject: Re: z?OSMF On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:36:59 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote: >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work I don't have an answer to that question, but you might want to consider the following, from the z/OS 2.4 preview announcement. https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/3/897/ENUS219-013/index.html z/OS Migration Workflow Starting in z/OS V2.4, IBM intends to no longer provide the z/OS Migration publication, GA32-0889, in its current format. Since z/OS V2.2, the preferred method for learning about migration actions has been the z/OS Migration Workflow. Discovering, performing, and verifying many migration actions through the z/OS MF Workflow function instead of a more traditional book format allows for a tailored and specific upgrade path associated with a particular system. Starting with the z/OS V2.4 release and later, IBM intends to continue to provide migration tasks in a z/OS MF Workflow, as well as a single exported file. By providing the z/OS V2.4 migration materials in both formats, users still can enjoy the advantages of a z/OSMF Workflow as well as being able to search, browse, and print in a more traditional format. With the removal of the traditional z/OS Migration publication, GA32-0889, it is strongly recommended that you plan for your next upgrade by having z/OS MF ready to use in at least one location in your enterprise. Notice that the exported format of the z/OS migration materials that can be easily read or printed for those without any z/OS MF capabilities will not be tailored for any environment. When the z/OS workflow for migration is provided for z/OS V2.4, it is to be renamed the z/OS Upgrade Workflow to better identify that each z/OS release contains a higher level of functionality than the prior release. In general, the term upgrade will be used in place of migration. The z/OS Upgrade Workflow is planned to be provided using the git repository for IBM/IBM-Z-zOS, which today hosts the z/OS Migration Workflows. -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CSSMTP
I don't recall. This was circa z/OS 1.11 when I first migrated to CSSMTP. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP What was in the charset on the content-type header field? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3data=02%7C01%7Callan.staller%40HCL.COM%7Cb73cb372e95a4714e07608d6c337f17b%7C189de737c93a4f5a8b686f4ca9941912%7C0%7C0%7C636911042407386607sdata=oDaF1aIDYjh%2Fch5crsF0IB79FgWFrVJet%2BoeL8FgdQM%3Dreserved=0 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Allan Staller Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP Almost none. The only thing ISTR is CSSMTP is not very happy with square brackets "[" and "]". HTH, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Giannelli Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CSSMTP I am a Db2 Systems Programmer, not a z/OS Systems Programmer. What are the difficulties with implementing CSSMTP? thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CSSMTP
What was in the charset on the content-type header field? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Allan Staller Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CSSMTP Almost none. The only thing ISTR is CSSMTP is not very happy with square brackets "[" and "]". HTH, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Giannelli Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CSSMTP I am a Db2 Systems Programmer, not a z/OS Systems Programmer. What are the difficulties with implementing CSSMTP? thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:36:59 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote: >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work I don't have an answer to that question, but you might want to consider the following, from the z/OS 2.4 preview announcement. https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/3/897/ENUS219-013/index.html z/OS Migration Workflow Starting in z/OS V2.4, IBM intends to no longer provide the z/OS Migration publication, GA32-0889, in its current format. Since z/OS V2.2, the preferred method for learning about migration actions has been the z/OS Migration Workflow. Discovering, performing, and verifying many migration actions through the z/OS MF Workflow function instead of a more traditional book format allows for a tailored and specific upgrade path associated with a particular system. Starting with the z/OS V2.4 release and later, IBM intends to continue to provide migration tasks in a z/OS MF Workflow, as well as a single exported file. By providing the z/OS V2.4 migration materials in both formats, users still can enjoy the advantages of a z/OSMF Workflow as well as being able to search, browse, and print in a more traditional format. With the removal of the traditional z/OS Migration publication, GA32-0889, it is strongly recommended that you plan for your next upgrade by having z/OS MF ready to use in at least one location in your enterprise. Notice that the exported format of the z/OS migration materials that can be easily read or printed for those without any z/OS MF capabilities will not be tailored for any environment. When the z/OS workflow for migration is provided for z/OS V2.4, it is to be renamed the z/OS Upgrade Workflow to better identify that each z/OS release contains a higher level of functionality than the prior release. In general, the term upgrade will be used in place of migration. The z/OS Upgrade Workflow is planned to be provided using the git repository for IBM/IBM-Z-zOS, which today hosts the z/OS Migration Workflows. -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: TapeTools VEHSYNC job
Hi Gadi, Long time no speak If we're not mistaken, you should use CNTLT60 for Control-T V6 MDB or CNTLT61 for V6.1 (and higher). There was a change in the MDB format in 6.1. HTH, Yifat -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] TapeTools VEHSYNC job Hi, The VEHSYNC job in the tapetools package has DD cards for various Tape Management Systems. We use Control-M/Tape from BMC formerly known as Control-T. There are two DD's the look like they belong to Control-T, CNTLT60 and CNTLT61. Does anyone know what these DD's should point to? Thanks Gadi -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I agree, still a mess to setup correctly. still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group does not understand the required setup and refuses to complete the security setup because of these issues. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Steve Beaver" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:06:55 AM Subject: Re: z?OSMF The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild mess to setup. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message >(including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or >entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure >under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are >not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly >prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us >immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) >delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank >you. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > > >This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be >privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you >receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in >any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please >reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was >misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your >assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Re: z?OSMF
The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild mess to setup. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message >(including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or >entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure >under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are >not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly >prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us >immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) >delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank >you. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > > >This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be >privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you >receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in >any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please >reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was >misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your >assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this
Re: CSSMTP
Almost none. The only thing ISTR is CSSMTP is not very happy with square brackets "[" and "]". HTH, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Giannelli Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CSSMTP I am a Db2 Systems Programmer, not a z/OS Systems Programmer. What are the difficulties with implementing CSSMTP? thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Dumps and cancelling jobs
It seems odd to me that MVS needs all those "built-in" SLIPs to suppress dumps. I would expect most of those are abends that didn't request a dump in the first place. sas On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:42 AM Peter Relson wrote: > There is nothing that fault analyzer can do about this. When the system is > told not to take a dump, it does not take a dump. > > >I'm not going to get permission to do this. > > Permission to do what? Ask someone who issues "CANCEL" (especially for > something of yours) to include the "DUMP" operand? > Removal of the SLIP trap would not be appropriate. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
TapeTools VEHSYNC job
Hi, The VEHSYNC job in the tapetools package has DD cards for various Tape Management Systems. We use Control-M/Tape from BMC formerly known as Control-T. There are two DD's the look like they belong to Control-T, CNTLT60 and CNTLT61. Does anyone know what these DD's should point to? Thanks Gadi -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Dumps and cancelling jobs
There is nothing that fault analyzer can do about this. When the system is told not to take a dump, it does not take a dump. >I'm not going to get permission to do this. Permission to do what? Ask someone who issues "CANCEL" (especially for something of yours) to include the "DUMP" operand? Removal of the SLIP trap would not be appropriate. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
Yea, I should have been a bit clearer. Security setup for the actual STC's is not unreasonable. It's trying to determine the correct access for various levels of security for different role types (general user, sysprog, sysprog admin, etc). The other is that zOSMF requires bits of operating system pieces that we hadn’t previously configured (CIM, CEA, etc), that we are still working the bugs out of. We are a CA-TSS shop too. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Taylor Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent >configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >Behalf Of Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message >(including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or >entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure >under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are >not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly >prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us >immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) >delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank >you. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or >unexpected emails** > > >This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be >privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you >receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in >any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please >reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was >misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your >assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected.
Re: z?OSMF
IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell script way. I had the basic security set-up carried out within minutes - the worst bit was changing all the SAMPLIB jobs to stick an OWNER on the CONNECT and RDEFINE RACF commands :) Jim On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:03:26 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed >the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming >that it may never see the light of day here. > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >Marshall Stone >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: z?OSMF > >**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected >emails** > >I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent configs >(IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) > >Regards, >Marshall Stone >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >Steve Beaver >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: z?OSMF > >z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. > > > >Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work > > > >TIA > > >Steve > > > > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message >(including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or >entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure >under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are >not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly >prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us >immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) >delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank >you. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to >lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL >EMAIL** > >**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected >emails** > > >This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be >privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you >receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in >any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please >reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was >misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your >assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z?OSMF
Marshall, That's all we use it for at this point too. IMHO, they have fixed the installation issues, but the security setup payload is so overwhelming that it may never see the light of day here. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Marshall Stone Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z?OSMF **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent configs (IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc) Regards, Marshall Stone -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Beaver Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: z?OSMF z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure. Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work TIA Steve -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: HSM dummy question ML1
Jake Anderson wrote: >When we say ML1 I understand it's a dasd ? Usually yes, but you as HSM admin has the final say. >So if it a HSM managed where can I list it or do we define a set of pool ? Look in your ARCCMDxx parmlib member for this statement like this example. ADDVOL ?? UNIT(3390) MIGRATION(ML1 ... There are some HSENDCMD QUERY commands and perhaps ISMF which can help you. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht (ex-HSM/SMS Storage admin... ;-D ) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: In-rack FICON DASD
Thanks everyone for your wonderful replies! This was exactly what I was looking for :-). Thanks, On Tue, 16 Apr 2019, 15:53 John Kaba wrote: > We have been using the Visara 8810 for almost a year, and it has been a > reliable, cost effective, rack mounted solution for our older z890 running > VM and VSE. It has a small footprint, and is faster than what our old z890 > channels can handle, so it is limited only by our CPU. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Mike Shorkend > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 8:28 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: In-rack FICON DASD > > Check out IBM's DS8882F. > > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 17:56, Ken Bloom wrote: > > > Check out the Visara vi-8810 DASD, 2U high, SSD dasd. I can give you > > more info offline. > > > > Regards > > Ken > > > > Kenneth A. Bloom > > CEO > > Avenir Technologies Inc > > /d/b/a Visara International > > 203-984-2235 > > bl...@visara.com > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.visara.com=E > > ,1,c1RJve6w5qylHKFFZbk-1h0Nt1xjCkxMEMwHaCeWaFRUczvytiQme5hvswcgtmv81CF > > a5TGZpT9rz1_qX9tSn5pRKFdG0yHcVMwsNRiPXznJ=1 > > > > > > > On Apr 14, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Christian Svensson < > > 022ad63487ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > With the z14 ZR1's 16U reserved 19" space option available I'm > > > curious if anyone has figured out a way to fit everything one needs in > one rack? > > > Adding two switches, and a conventional SAN is a no-brainer with > > > space to spare - but what would you pick for FICON EKCD for supporting > z/OS load? > > > > > > An old DS6800 would work but what if you want something that is a > > > bit > > newer > > > and not EOL? > > > > > > Imagine this rack is for development purposes or something that is > > > not mission critical, where the space (and power) is more of a premium. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > > IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > -- > Mike Shorkend > m...@shorkend.com > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.shorkend.com=E,1,w5UTp-OTVhMERCltq0wkfUSgfC5cJFaBMaYh3CJqCaCpUdGmOCETllsy2ZfGGHngC5tWSkiHPi1iQIjENro13yqXAfOg6V_VSyyT0KtbtTmBp_hfPQ,,=1 > Tel: +972524208743 > Fax: +97239772196 > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN