Re: Help with elementary CPU speed question

2012-07-18 Thread Finch, Steve (ES - Mainframe)
I would say that on the average the z9 is 1.48 times faster , but that number 
depends on what the program is doing.  The number could be 1.1 to 1.8 depending 
on what the batch program is doing.  It's the old - your mileage will vary 
comment

The purpose of PCR is to deal with the flux factor 

Steve Finch

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 2:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Help with elementary CPU speed question

Jon, thanks for the thoughtful reply. Much appreciated.

You say the z900 is 1/8 as fast (powerful, whatever, fill in your favorite 
word) as the z9. That's a combination of two factors, right? Each CPU on the z9 
is 1.48 times as fast as those on the z900, and in addition the -722 has 22 of 
them, while the -2C3 has only three, is that right? I am mostly interested at 
this moment in CPU time. I know it's not the only thing, and it's not the same 
thing as wall clock time, but it is what the company is going to be billed for 
so it is a (the?) critical factor at this moment. So I think my focusing on 
relative CPU speed rather than total box power (CPU's only, or CPU's and I/O) 
is correct at this time. Any thoughts?

Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jon Butler
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Help with elementary CPU speed question

As has been pointed out, there are many IBM tools such as zPCR that you can 
download to help with this exercise.  The tools require either a good estimate 
or RMF data from the LPARs to give you an accurate comparison.  In running one 
job anything can happen to distort the figures.

However, I think a rough calculation without regard to the other work in the 
LPARs on the several CECs can give you an idea of what to expect.  If we make 
the assumption that both CECs are running a similar workloadnot bloody 
likely give the CEC's design difference, disk drives, I/O configs, WLM 
settings, OS version, etcbut using numbers from the latest MIPS ratings 
here is what you are up against:

z9/722 rated at 1226 MSU
z900/2C3 rated at 144 MSU

I'd guess your job is going to run 1226/144 or 8 times slower.  Let us know 
what happens.  Of course if the z9 is running at 95% and the z900 at 5%, your 
job may be faster on the older CEC

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Yahoo Password Breach: 7 Lessons Learned - Security - Attacks/breaches - Informationweek

2012-07-16 Thread Finch, Steve (ES - Mainframe)
Perhaps 8 character passwords should be replaced with 255 characters passphases 
(password phases) ?

Steve Finch

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 1:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Yahoo Password Breach: 7 Lessons Learned - Security - 
Attacks/breaches - Informationweek

On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:00:33 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:

Passwords or userids that may be at most 8 characters in length are 
unacceptable today.
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF volume - follow-up

2012-06-20 Thread Finch, Steve (ES - Mainframe)
Jay,

Make certain that SMFPRMxx has DDCONS=NO,  NODETAIL,  EMPTYEXCPCSEC(SUPPRESS),  
and INTERVAL is set to at least an hour 

Then check out for DB2 traces

That should cut down your DB2 SMF records  


Steve 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf 
Of Campbell Jay
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 4:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMF volume - follow-up

This is just type 100 - 102 records on 2 out of 11 LPARS BTW.
For some reason - the word overkill came to mind.
So I decided to conduct Operation Overkill.
36 MAN* datasets per LPAR... MAN0 - MANZ... 3337 cylinders per MAN*.
24 hourly jobs to MOD the DUMPXY contents to virtual tape.
( First job each day is DISP=NEW  just to keep things pretty )

The following day we have a problem.
IEFU29 isseued I SMF every 3 minutes.
Here's what 1 of the 2 LPARs looked like...





Jay Campbell

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Campbell Jay
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:01 PM
To: ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SMF volume

 
Is anyone else is required to collect and retain 500,000 cylinders + of SMF 
data on an LPAR in one day...
how do you handle the downstream copies ?

Jay Campbell

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN