Re: Question: Possible to send email, with an attachment from the Mainframe?

2014-08-20 Thread John P Kalinich
Check this out.

http://www.lbdsoftware.com/xmitip.html

Regards,
John K

Leonard Sasso from the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 08/20/2014 11:34:03 AM:

 We are able to send email from our mainframe (z/OS 1.13).  Is it possible

 to send an email with an attachment, from our mainframe?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dataset update error from MVS guest

2014-08-19 Thread John P Kalinich
What IOS000I message did you receive?

Regards,
John K

Jake A of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
wrote on 08/19/2014 08:22:35 AM:

 From: Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date: 08/19/2014 08:22 AM
 Subject: Dataset update error from MVS guest
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

 Hi,

 I am trying to update a dataset but I receive the below error :

 IEC212I 414-04,IFG0201R,JAKE099,PROC099,ISP09114,0F81,TCHN01,
 TCHN01.ASM.DATA
 ***

 IBM manual says :

 Explanation
 04
 An I/O error occurred writing a DSCB during processing of a CLOSE macro
 instruction.

 I am trying to update this dataset from a MVS Guest running over a VM.
The
 DASD are shared and I have connected the Volume to MVS guest as
READ/WRITE
 but still I get this error.

 MVS guest is running at Z/OS 1.13.


 One of a link from Google I took :

 ABEND 414-04 Mean?
  Ran into this one recently and I thought I'd share. Essentially, a
volume
 can be set to READ ONLY. This is something outside the scope of any
 security product that might be running on the system, meaning you may
have
 RACF permissions to a data set, but if the volume on which that data set
 resides is READ ONLY, you'll get the 414 abend. The solution is to get
your
 system programmer to un-read only the volume so you can write to it.

 I was also looking at :
 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PK37533

 But not sure if it is really matches the error that I am getting.


 Any thoughts or suggestion on the above.

 Regards,
 Jake

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Dataset update error from MVS guest

2014-08-19 Thread John P Kalinich
WRI is write inhibited or read-only.  Check your VM sharing options.

Regards,
John K

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
08/19/2014 08:57:41 AM:

 From: Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date: 08/19/2014 08:57 AM
 Subject: Re: Dataset update error from MVS guest
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

 Hi John,

 IOS000I 0F81,2D,WRI,E7,0200,,06820003,TCHN01,JAKE099  , 855
  80026F14081218D156000F004CE0


 On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:15 PM, John P Kalinich jkali...@csc.com
wrote:

  What IOS000I message did you receive?
 
  Regards,
  John K
 
  Jake A of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  wrote on 08/19/2014 08:22:35 AM:
 
   From: Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.com
   To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
   Date: 08/19/2014 08:22 AM
   Subject: Dataset update error from MVS guest
   Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  
   Hi,
  
   I am trying to update a dataset but I receive the below error :
  
   IEC212I 414-04,IFG0201R,JAKE099,PROC099,ISP09114,0F81,TCHN01,
   TCHN01.ASM.DATA
   ***
  
   IBM manual says :
  
   Explanation
   04
   An I/O error occurred writing a DSCB during processing of a CLOSE
macro
   instruction.
  
   I am trying to update this dataset from a MVS Guest running over a
VM.
  The
   DASD are shared and I have connected the Volume to MVS guest as
  READ/WRITE
   but still I get this error.
  
   MVS guest is running at Z/OS 1.13.
  
  
   One of a link from Google I took :
  
   ABEND 414-04 Mean?
Ran into this one recently and I thought I'd share. Essentially, a
  volume
   can be set to READ ONLY. This is something outside the scope of any
   security product that might be running on the system, meaning you may
  have
   RACF permissions to a data set, but if the volume on which that data
set
   resides is READ ONLY, you'll get the 414 abend. The solution is to
get
  your
   system programmer to un-read only the volume so you can write to it.
  
   I was also looking at :
   http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PK37533
  
   But not sure if it is really matches the error that I am getting.
  
  
   Any thoughts or suggestion on the above.
  
   Regards,
   Jake

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ISPF extended statistics design

2014-08-13 Thread John P Kalinich
Tom Conley from the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 08/12/2014 02:27:20 PM:

 I just posted this to the SHARE requirements discussion database for the
 requirement on extended statistics design.  As a quick recap, the
 current design is flawed because a user has to enter the STATS EXT
 command for each member in order to get extended statistics.

 After SHARE in Pittsburgh, the following design was agreed upon. The
 STATS EXT command is unnecessary and should be deleted.  If the
 installation specified extended stats, then ISPF should automatically
 determine if extended stats are needed and create them when necessary.
 If the installation said no extended stats, then that's that.  The user
 SHOULD NOT have control over extended statistics.  The highlighting on a
 member with extended statistics will remain.  This design addresses all
 known concerns; forcing the user to specify STATS EXT to get extended
 statistics, wasting directory space on members that don't need extended
 stats, putting the installation in control of extended stats (not
 allowing the user to turn them off if the installation turned them on).
 If you have any issues with this design, please let us know.

 Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about this
design.

In addition to highlighting the member name in the selection list for
extended stats members, why not use scaling factors (a la SDSF) for display
of large numeric values in the Size and Init fields?  And add the Info
line command for the Edit/Browse selection lists so the exact counts can be
displayed.

Regards,
John K
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: TSO Logon region size increase

2014-08-07 Thread John P Kalinich
VM of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
08/07/2014 05:40:17 AM:

 From: Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW vinoth.meenak...@bestbuy.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date: 08/07/2014 05:40 AM
 Subject: TSO Logon region size increase
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

 Hi All,

 We are in need to increase the region size of TSO 4M to 8M and we
 need to do it globally instead of  editing manually  in the TSO logon
screen.

 Please guide me

 Regards,
 Vinoth M

What security system are you using?  With ACF2, you can set the TSO default
region in the TSO GSO record.

Regards,
John K

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: TSO Logon region size increase

2014-08-07 Thread John P Kalinich
Vinoth,

Ask your Top-Secret Security Administrator if there is a global option to
set the default TSO logon region.  If not, you may have to define it for
each userid.

Regards,
John K

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
08/07/2014 08:25:20 AM:

 From: Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW vinoth.meenak...@bestbuy.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date: 08/07/2014 08:26 AM
 Subject: Re: TSO Logon region size increase
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

 Hi,

 Do we need to define the region size in Security tool, CA-TSS is
 tool we are using.

 Thanks

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 ] On Behalf Of Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW
 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 4:57 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: TSO Logon region size increase

 Hi John,

 We are using CA-Top Secret security tool.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 ] On Behalf Of John P Kalinich
 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 4:54 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: TSO Logon region size increase

 VM of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote
on
 08/07/2014 05:40:17 AM:

  From: Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW vinoth.meenak...@bestbuy.com
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Date: 08/07/2014 05:40 AM
  Subject: TSO Logon region size increase Sent by: IBM Mainframe
  Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 
  Hi All,
 
  We are in need to increase the region size of TSO 4M to 8M and we need
  to do it globally instead of  editing manually  in the TSO logon
 screen.
 
  Please guide me
 
  Regards,
  Vinoth M

 What security system are you using?  With ACF2, you can set the TSO
 default region in the TSO GSO record.

 Regards,
 John K

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: TSO EDIT COMMAND - BOUNDS

2014-07-25 Thread John P Kalinich
Just include the boundaries on the change command.

change all 'string1' 'string2' 35 50

Regards,
John K

Esmie from the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
wrote on 07/25/2014 08:50:07 AM:

 I am trying the bounds command because I want to make a universal
 change between columns 35 to 50.

 I tried the HELP BNDS doc however it is not very clear.  Here is what it
says:

 The bounds may then be changed by overtyping with  to define the left
 bound and  to define the right bound.

 I am not sure where I would overtype the   the 

 I tried 35 but it shifted the datat to col 35 which is not what I want.

 I would like to set the bounds between col 35  50 so that I can
 enact my CHANGE command.

 Is this possible?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Find member in Linklist through JCL?

2014-07-25 Thread John P Kalinich
PDS does not have a FINDMOD subcommand.  As Peter explained, it would
require authorization.

Regards,
John K

Skip from the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
wrote on 07/25/2014 08:47:57 AM:

 Since no has mentioned it, I should point out that the PDS command,
 available on the mods tape, as well as its proprietary progeny
(StarTool),
 includes a FINDMOD function that will identify all locations where a load

 module could be found in the current environment, all the way from
STEPLIB
 to LINKLIST to LPA. Surely easier than writing you own code.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IOF in batch to capture Started task output while STC is still running: Updated

2014-07-24 Thread John P Kalinich
Ed,

ESF is the name of  our CA-Spool System task.  You need to substitute the
name of your system task to capture the sysouts.  The 1-10 SNAP command
below would snap out the first 10 sysout datasets for your stcname.

//TSO  EXEC  PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSTSPRT DD  SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN  DD  *
IOF stcname RUNNING
SD DSNAME('AD.stcname.LOG') RECFM(FBA) LRECL(133) BLKSIZE(6384)
1-10 SNAP

Regards,
John K

Ed Long of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
wrote on 07/24/2014 08:30:58 AM:

 Thank you all for the help.
 I tried the command sequence John suggested and got the following result.
 I tried the IOF ESF RUNNING and got the following error message
 OUTPUT RECORDS FOLLOW
 Nothing matching specified criteria was found.
 The SD and snap commands were treated as TSO commands not IOF commands.
 I will do some more research on the ESF and RUNNING options.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IOF in batch to capture Started task output while STC is still running

2014-07-23 Thread John P Kalinich
Ed,

Try the following...

//TSO  EXEC  PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSTSPRT DD  SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN  DD  *
IOF ESF RUNNING
SD DSNAME('AD.ESF.LOG') RECFM(FBA) LRECL(133) BLKSIZE(6384)
10 SNAP

Regards,
John K

 Happy Wednesday.
 We have a need to copy, on a daily basis, the full spool output from
 certain long running started tasks.
 We do not have access to SDSF; instead we have IOF.
 Have any of you successfully persuaded IOF to copy off the listing
 for a running task in a batch job? The online commands work fine;
 the provided batch utilities seem to only do held output or completed
jobs.
 Any suggestions are appreciated.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ISPF Copyright Notice

2014-07-10 Thread John P Kalinich
My mod to ISR@PRIM.

IF (ZLOGO = 'YES') /* CK@MJC*/
  IF (ZSPLIT = 'NO')  /* Not in split screen@L5A*/
IF (ZCMD = Z)/* No command pending @L5A*/
  IF (ZLOGOPAN ^= 'DONE') /* No logo displayed yet  @L5A*/
 /* .MSG = ISRLO999   Set logo information   @L5A*/
 /* .RESP = ENTER Simulate enter @L5A*/

Skip Robinson from the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 07/10/2014 11:46:33 AM:

 Interesting. We also modify ISR@PRIM but never messed with logo logic.
 Same usermod for 2.1 as for 1.13, different result. (I use ISPF or PDF
 command, not a script.) Need more research. Thanks for the tips.

 From:   Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
 Date:   07/10/2014 09:13 AM
 Subject:Re: ISPF Copyright Notice
 Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



 Skip Robinson wrote:

 Just bringing up z/OS 2.1. When I enter ISPF, the IBM copyright notice
 box shows up on the primary menu. I thought that was only for the first
 time, but it displays every time I enter from Ready. Is there an option
 I'm missing?

 Easy to fix it. Just simulate an ENTER and you're cured from your allergy

 to such nasty copyright pop-ups.

 In my (actually our) primary panel, I *edited* that ZLOGO to NO:

 )INIT
 ... some lame init statements ...
 IF (ZLOGO = 'NO') /* WAS YES - Elardus  @L5A*/
   IF (ZSPLIT = 'NO')  /* Not in split screen@L5A*/
 IF (ZCMD = Z)/* No command pending @L5A*/
   IF (ZLOGOPAN ¬= 'DONE') /* No logo displayed yet  @L5A*/
 .MSG = ISRLO999/* Set logo information   @L5A*/
 .RESP = ENTER  /* Simulate enter @L5A*/
 ZLOGOPAN = 'DONE' /*@L5A*/
 ZCLEAN = 'NO' /*@L5A*/
 IF (ZCMD ¬= Z) ZLOGOPAN = 'DONE'   /* command pending @L5A*/
 VPUT (ZLOGOPAN) SHARED /*@L5A*/
   IF (ZSPLIT = 'YES') ZLOGOPAN = 'DONE'

 Or, in my bookwrangler, I get rid of that pop-up by do this:

 )INIT
 .RESP = ENTER

 So, you just simply simulate ENTER

 Groete / Greetings
 Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Having trouble delete a broadcast message

2014-06-12 Thread John P Kalinich
Try entering it as an operator command in SDSF.  TSO has a SEND command but
you can not delete messages with it.

Regards,
John K

Rick Stetser of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 06/12/2014 10:23:01 AM:

 When I log on to TSO I'm getting a message from the broadcast
 dataset.  I try to delete it by typing SE 1,DELETE but I get a
 response that says to enter the message text enclosed in
 apostrophes.  Anyone have any ideas as to what's going wrong here?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Inquire SPACE/DIR allocation attributes

2014-04-23 Thread John P Kalinich
There are utilities (e.g. DSAT) on the CBT tape that do this, but you will need 
RACF authority to open/read each PDS directory.

Regards,
John K

dsat 'almsa.anscopy' pds sec 
SERIAL   ALLOCFREE EXT   SEC UNITS DSORG DIRADIRUENTR  AL 
RLIB90  15   9   1 1  CYL   PO 10   5  300

-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote: -
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
From: Gabor Hoffer 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
Date: 04/23/2014 07:58AM
Subject: Inquire SPACE/DIR allocation attributes

Hi,

How can I get allocation attribs for an existing dataset? PRI/SEC Space,
space unit (CYL,TRKS,etc), DIR (in case of PDS)
Where are these informations stored? Do you have any example ASM code for
it?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ISPF START command remains on the command line

2014-04-10 Thread John P Kalinich
Have you ran a panel trace yet?

Regards,
John K

C.2  Panel trace command (ISPDPTRC)   © Copyright IBM Corp. 1980, 2011
Topic lines 1 to 16 of 236
  
   The ISPDPTRC command traces the Dialog Manager panel processing that   
   occurs within any screen in the current ISPF session. You can trace both   
   the execution of panel service calls (DISPLAY, TBDISPL, and TBQUERY) and   
   the processing that occurs within the Dialog Manager panel code, including 
   the processing of statements in the )ABCINIT, )ABCPROC, )INIT, )REINIT,
   and )PROC sections of the panel.   
  
   The output from the trace is written to a dynamically allocated VB 
   (variable blocked) data set that has a record length of 255. Where the 
   ddname ISPDPTRC is preallocated, this data set is used, providing it   
   refers to a sequential, VB data set with a record length of at least 255.  

-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote: -
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
From: Peter Hunkeler 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
Date: 04/10/2014 11:10AM
Subject: Re: ISPF START command remains on the command line

 Lots of great suggestions in this thread. Use what you like and ignore 
the rest.

I fully agree. Nevertheless, I do have my own great ways to jump around
without the need to take my fingers off the keyboard (no mouse needed).
I'm using PCOM macros.

My problem is not how to get around but to understand why the command
is not clear in the command line. Still investigating...

Thanks for your suggestions
--
Peter Hunkeler


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I am getting message IKJ56866I DATA SET NOT ALLOCATED, CONCURRENT ALLOCATIONS

2014-01-31 Thread John P Kalinich
Mil Hashoul if the IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 01/31/2014 09:13:16 AM:

 I have program which allocate through dynamical allocation a thousands 
of
 datasets under the same address space, eventaully I start to get the
 message:
 IKJ56866I DATA SET x NOT ALLOCATED, CONCURRENT ALLOCATIONS
 
 What I can do? is this a parameter that I indicate at the JCL to allow 
me
 to allocate more?
 I have this message at started task address space, not regular batch 
JCL.
 
 for the allocation I use SVC99, and I am doing free, all the datasets 
are
 temporary datasets, I just use the DCB parametter, and it is dynamical
 

Increase DYNAMNBR value in your TSO logon procstep.

Regards,
John K

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OT: Entry Level System Programmer Job Description

2014-01-30 Thread John P Kalinich
1. Graduated from SHARE Assembler Boot Camp.
2. Read and understood the contents of Advanced Assembler Language and MVS
Interfaces for IBM Systems and Application Programmers by Carmine A.
Cannatello.
3. Fluent in z/OS operator commands.
4. Can IPL a z/OS system.

Regards,
John K
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: D T command gives no result.

2013-11-12 Thread John P Kalinich
John Norgauer of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 11/12/2013 01:36:50 PM:

 From: John Norgauer john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date: 11/12/2013 01:37 PM
 Subject: D T command gives no result.
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

 After a long weekend with NO system changes(that I know of) when I issue
 D T, nothing else appears on the console.

 Any thoughts please.

MPF message suppression?

Regards,
John K

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Assembling SHOWMVS errors

2013-11-01 Thread John P Kalinich
Does SHOWMVS run under z/OS 2.1?  I haven't heard from Roland S. in a 
while.

Regards,
John K

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Does z/OS 2.1 support COBOL 4.2?

2013-09-18 Thread John P Kalinich
This web link has end of service dates for IBM products.

http://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycle/index_e.html

Regards,
John K

Willie Rouse of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 09/18/2013 10:24:08 AM:

 I would like to know where to find what IBM products z/OS 2.1 supports.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DCBs and DCBEs - Could IBM have done it any worse?

2013-08-22 Thread John P Kalinich
These 2 APARS also address the IEC190I issue.

1.  APAR OA42406: OCE FIX ROLLUP FOR HDZ2210: Individual APAR status

A fix is available.  The life cycle of this APAR is complete.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA42406myns=aparmynp
=DOCTYPEstatusmync=E


2.  APAR OA42694: ABEND0C4 IFG0554P: Individual APAR status

A fix is available.  The life cycle of this APAR is complete.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA42694myns=aparmynp
=DOCTYPEstatusmync=E

Regards,
John K

Lizette K of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
wrote on 08/22/2013 07:22:11 AM:

 APAR Identifier .. OA42701  Last Changed  13/08/07
   AMATERSE INVOCATION RESULTS IN MSGIEC190I


   Symptom .. IN INCORROUT Status ... CLOSED  PER
   Severity ... 3  Date Closed . 13/07/26
   Component .. 5752SC112  Duplicate of 
   Reported Release . 790  Fixed Release  999
   Component Name SVA UTILITIESSpecial Notice
   Current Target Date ..13/08/15  Flags
   SCP ...
   Platform 

   Status Detail: SHIPMENT - Packaged solution is available for
 shipment.

   PE PTF List:

   PTF List:
   Release 790   : UA70061 available 13/08/07 (1000 )


   Parent APAR:
   Child APAR list:


   ERROR DESCRIPTION:
   Under certain conditions executing an AMATERSE with the PACK
   option will result in a successful execution, but MSGIEC190I
   xx,STEP,SYSUT3 INVALID DCBE: STORAGE NOT ADDRESSABLE is
   issued.


   LOCAL FIX:


   PROBLEM SUMMARY:
   
   * USERS AFFECTED: All users of AMATERSE on release HBB7790.*
   
   * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: AMATERSE MSGIEC190I INVALID DCBE:   *
   *  STORAGE NOT ADDRESSABLE *
   
   * RECOMMENDATION:  *
   
   While PACK/ UNPACKing a PDS data set, AMATERSE may successfully
   complete, but MSGIEC190I is issued. Also, AMATERSE fails to use
   system determined blocksize for PACK/SPACK output.


   PROBLEM CONCLUSION:
   AMATERSE's PACK and UNPACK processing is updated to correctly
   set the relevant DCB data, to prevent the IEC190I message. Also,
   AMATERSE's processing is changed to allow System Determined
   Blocksize for the PACK/SPACK output data set.



 Lizette

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 ] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
 Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:21 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: DCBs and DCBEs - Could IBM have done it any worse?

 On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:10:42 -0500, Klaus Stanislawiak wrote:

 On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:41:11 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
 
  I prefer to be told when I make a programming error.
 
 When did I say that?

 It looks that they are going to tell us soon.
 Please see APARs OA42701, OA43000 and OA43037.
 
 Humph!  For OA43037 the Google synopsis says:

 Search Results

 IBM OA43037: IRRDBU00 MSGIEC190I - United States
 www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?crawler=1uid=isg1OA43037‎
 Aug 14, 2013 - DFP was enhanced to more closely validate some DCB
data.
 RACF's Database Unload Utility - IRRDBU00 - was caught using an
invalid.

 And IBM seems not to want me to view the page:

 Our apologies...
 The page you requested cannot be displayed
 ...
 Get assistance
 This option lets you send an information request and tell us
 about a broken link.
 You will receive an e-mail from us to help you find what you need.

 Interesting.  I don't think I'll bother to report the broken link.

 -- gil

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: load module scan

2013-08-14 Thread John P Kalinich
snip from COBANAL output

 Options in effect
--
 ADV QUOTE   DATA(31)  NODECK   NODUMP  NODYNAMNOFASTSRT
LIB LIST
 MAP NONUM   OBJ   NOOFFSET OPTIMIZE   OUTDD(Supplied)
NUMPROC(NOPFD)  NORENT
 RES SEQ SIZE(MAX) SOURCE   NOSSRANGE  NOTERM NOTEST
TRUNC(STD)  NOWORD
 NOVBREF XREFZWB   NONAME   NUMCLS(PRIM)  DBCS
AWO NOEVENTS
 NOCURRENCY  Compilation unit = Program
 RMODE(ANY)  NO TEST(STMT)  NO TEST(PATH)  NO TEST(BLOCK)
NOOPT OR OPT(STD)
 INTDATE(ANSI)   NO TEST(SEPARATE)  NOT PGMNAME(LONGUPPER)
NOT PGMNAME(LONGMIXED)
 NODLL   NOEXPORTALLNODATEPROC YEARWINDOW(1900)
ARITH(COMPAT)   NOTHREAD
 TEST(NOEJPNOC   NOSQL NOCICS   NOMDECKSQLCCSID   NOOPTFILE
XMLPARSE(COMPAT)
 CODEPAGE(1140)


Regards,
John K

Peter Farley of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 08/14/2013 09:01:57 AM:

 And more importantly CBT file 321, COBANAL, which does a passable
 job of extracting the COBOL options directly from the load module code.

 IIRC File 330 only provides an ISPF skin for COBANAL and not COBANAL
itself.

 HTH

 Peter

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 ] On Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach
 Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 4:22 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: load module scan

 see file 330 on cbttape.org.

 ITschak

 On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hello.  From the load module i need to get all compiler options that is
  used to build the code(cobol.db2). Pls some one let us know is there
any
  standard routines to get this information?
 
 
  Thanks,
  Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: The z/OS V2.1 Migration PDF available

2013-08-10 Thread John P Kalinich
I don't normally install z/OS, but when I do, I install dos punto uno.

Regards,
John K

Marna Walle of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 08/09/2013 07:38:30 PM:

 Hi Timothy,

 It is unlikely that we'd put an unsupported coexistence path in the 
 book - even as a checklist of items.  As you know, you can see what 
 one of those jumps would look like by putting a couple of books 
 together.  We'll keep all the documentation out there for you, though 
:). 
 
 As the Dos Equis guy might say:  Stay current, my friends.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: BLKSIZE=3120

2013-07-26 Thread John P Kalinich
Jim,

The LOG dataset can stay 3120 because most of the entries would not fill a 
block.  It is the OUTPUT DCB that needs to have BLKSIZE=0

Regards,
John K

Jim Mulder from the IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 07/26/2013 12:45:34 AM:

 From: Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
 Date: 07/26/2013 09:15 AM
 Subject: Re: BLKSIZE=3120
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
 
 
 A customer (mildly) complained thatsome of our product allocations still 

 use 
 BLKSIZE=3120. I vaguely remember trying to change all of them to 
 BLKSIZE=0 many years ago (probably before OS/390) and running into some 
 issues with certain IBM utilities. Unfortunately, I can't remember the 
 specifics. 
 
 In starting to revisit this again, I noticed numerousoccurrences of 
'3120' 
 
 in IBM help and documentation. For example, the TSO/E RECEIVE command 
HELP 
 
 claims that the log data set must be BLKSIZE=3120: 
 
 TSO/E RECEIVE command HELP 
 LOGDATASET   You may specify an alternate data set to be 
   used for the logging of the transmitted data. 
   This data set will be created if it does not 
   exist.  The data set should be created with 
   a logical record length of 255, a record format 
   of VB and a blocksize of 3120. 
 ... 
 
 LOGDSNAMEYou may specify an alternate data set to be 
   used for the logging of the transmitted data. 
   This data set will be created if it does not 
   exist.  The data set should be created with 
   a logical record length of 255, a record format 
   of VB and a blocksize of 3120. 
 /TSO/E RECEIVE command HELP 
 
 Is this just outdated help? Or does this restriction still exist? 
 
 
   I looked at the current TRANSMIT/RECEIVE code, and it still 
 specifies BLKSIZE=3120 when it creates a LOG data set, and still
 hardcodes BLKSIZE=3120 on its DCB for the log data set.  I engaged
 in battle with the former TSO developers a long time ago (maybe over 
 20 years ago, maybe even before the advent of System Determined
 Blocksize).  I wanted them to at least remove the BLKSIZE=3120
 on the DCB so that if someone (like me) was sensible enough 
 to allocate his own log dataset with an efficient BLKSIZE,
 TRANSMIT/RECEIVE would cease to override that on the DCB and thus
 no longer change the BLKSIZE to 3120.  Since the stupid DCB
 specification is still there, exists, I apparently lost that battle. 
 
 Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: BLKSIZE=3120

2013-07-22 Thread John P Kalinich
Gilbert has a zap on CBT file 183 to overlay 3120 with zero in the OUTPUT
DCB of XMIT.  It may have to be reworked.

Regards,
John K

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on
07/22/2013 11:28:26 AM:

 From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
 To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
 Date: 07/22/2013 11:28 AM
 Subject: Re: BLKSIZE=3120
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu

 I took the giant leap several years ago and stopped using 3120 for TSO
XMIT.
 I hard-code 27920. Not as wonderful as 0, but better than 3120. Several
 years now with no issues.

 Charles

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
 Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 9:08 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: BLKSIZE=3120

 A customer (mildly) complained thatsome of our product allocations still
use
 BLKSIZE=3120. I vaguely remember trying to change all of them to
 BLKSIZE=0 many years ago (probably before OS/390) and running into some
 issues with certain IBM utilities. Unfortunately, I can't remember the
 specifics.

 In starting to revisit this again, I noticed numerousoccurrences of
'3120'
 in IBM help and documentation. For example, the TSO/E RECEIVE command
HELP
 claims that the log data set must be BLKSIZE=3120:

 TSO/E RECEIVE command HELP
 LOGDATASET   You may specify an alternate data set to be
   used for the logging of the transmitted data.
   This data set will be created if it does not
   exist.  The data set should be created with
   a logical record length of 255, a record format
   of VB and a blocksize of 3120.
 ...

 LOGDSNAMEYou may specify an alternate data set to be
   used for the logging of the transmitted data.
   This data set will be created if it does not
   exist.  The data set should be created with
   a logical record length of 255, a record format
   of VB and a blocksize of 3120.
 /TSO/E RECEIVE command HELP

 Is this just outdated help? Or does this restriction still exist?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: PDS86 EAV compatibility

2013-07-12 Thread John P Kalinich
Anthony,

SAS provided the modifications to PDS86 for access to PDSE's in cylinder 
managed space on EAV.  Download from CBT Updates page.

Regards,
John K

-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote: -
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
From: Anthony Fletcher 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
Date: 07/11/2013 07:29PM
Subject: PDS86 EAV compatibility

Is anyone, by any chance, working on PDS86 to make it compatible with the EAV 
DASD support code?
The z/OS Tracking facility is listing PDS86 as not having the necessary set up.

For example - this is just after emptying the list.
RESPONSE=MLCS                                                              
 CNZ1001I 10.26.09 TRACKING DISPLAY 212                                    
 STATUS=ON       NUM=6    MAX=1000 MEM=00  EXCL=125   REJECT=0             
 TRACKING INFORMATION -VALUE-- JOBNAME  PROGNAME+OFF-- ASID NUM    
 SMS-E:1 DADSM OBTAIN           C10001 DB2ADM   SSCLOCT    172   71   2    
 SMS-E:1 DADSM OBTAIN           C10001 LDAXF67  PDS86     3D42   55   1         
                  
 SMS-E:1 DADSM OBTAIN           C10001 LDAXF67  SSCLOCT    172   55   5    
 SMS-E:1 DCB OPEN EAS 113-44        01 CTDTROLD IOADBS     53E   4F   2    
 SMS-E:1 DCB OPEN EAS 113-44        01 LDAXF67  PDS86      124   55   1         
                   
 SMS-W:2 IEHLIST LISTVTOC           02 AXR08    IRXSTAM   1F3A   41   1    
 --    
 TO REPORT THESE INSTANCES, SEND THIS MESSAGE VIA E-MAIL TO                
 conso...@us.ibm.com. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR TO OBTAIN A CURRENT    
 EXCLUSION LIST, SEE APAR II13752.                                         

--

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: formatting control blocks

2013-04-29 Thread John P Kalinich
From the CBT tape.

//***FILE 264 IS FROM B.F. GOODRICH IN AKRON OHIO
//*
//* 1  LOOK-  A TSO COMMAND PROCESSOR THAT ALLOWS
//*   FULL SCREEN DISPLAY OF REAL TIME
//*   MEMORY.  THIS COMMAND HAS BEEN
//*   ENHANCED TO MAKE IT EASY TO ADD NEW
//*   CONTROL BLOCK MAPS, USUALLY IN 3 OR
//*   4 STATEMENTS


 - Original Message -
 On 26.04.2013 17:48, Gary Weinhold wrote:
 I'm looking for a public domain control block formatting tool that will
display memory formatted with the information from a non-IBM assembler
DSECT.  I realize that there are a couple of CBT files that probably
include this capability, but I'd appreciate any experiences regarding ease
of use or limitations before investing too much time.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ISPF 3.4 Performance degradation on z/OS 1.13

2013-04-23 Thread John P Kalinich
Anthony,

I notice similar results on our 1.13 system.  When I used Initial view of
1. VOLUME, a 29,000 list takes 20 seconds.  When I used 2. SPACE it takes
700 seconds.  When monitoring my TSO session, it was using around 20% CPU
with an EXCP rate of 100/second.

Regards,
John K



From:   Anthony Fletcher flet...@nz1.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date:   04/22/2013 10:34 PM
Subject:ISPF 3.4 Performance degradation on z/OS 1.13
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu



We have a customer running on a z800 in a capped LPAR.
We just converted them from z/OS 1.12 to z/OS 1.13 and have found that
performance has degraded.

They are looking at a list of data sets - approx 98,000 under a HLQ, say
ABCD with the Initial view  set to 2. SPACE

On z/OS 1.12 this list was retrieved in under 10 seconds
On z/OS 1.13 this list took 20 Minutes to return.

If the Initial View is changed to 1. Volumes
then the performance is much the same.

The view is paged right to get the space values, on the 1.12 system it
comes back in seconds
on the 1.13 system it takes minutes to come back.

Many of the 98,000 data sets are on TAPE or migrated.

Anyone recognise a feature that came with z/OS 1.13 that might cause this
change in behaviour?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IEBPDSE

2013-03-11 Thread John P Kalinich
The only doc that I know of is the IGW700I message itself.  The PDSE structure 
is top secret and is not published with the general SMS documentation.

Regards,
John K

-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote: -
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
From: ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO 4254.itur...@bradesco.com.br
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
Date: 03/11/2013 08:36AM
Subject: IEBPDSE

Hi all,

We're trying to monitor some PDSE datasets, mainly concerning fragmentation,
and IEBPDSE was the logical choice to indicate if the dataset is ok or not.

The utility runs successfully, but we couldn't find out any documentation 
regarding
the indicators presented in SYSPRINT.

That's what IEBPDSE shows:

IGW700I PDSE Directory Validation Successful
DSN:XX.
ADPages:17806 IXRecords:716420
NDPages:3462 IXRecords:286228
AD ND Tree Nodes:286228
ADPercentFree:26 NDPercentFree:42

Can you point me to the right direction ?

Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Spacewar! on S/360

2013-02-25 Thread John P Kalinich
The Michigan Mods tapes are on the CBT web site.

Regards,
John K



From:   Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date:   02/25/2013 06:56 AM
Subject:Re: Spacewar! on S/360
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu



On 24 Feb 2013 23:37:07 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

In a google search, I saw a textbook mention of the game, and that it
was ported.  No mention of the software.  Did find a web site with the
PDP-1 version with a PDP-1 emulator on the browser page at

http://www.geek.com/articles/games/play-spacewar-on-the-dec-pdp-1-emulated-in-your-browser-20121211/


Maybe someone can isolate the PDP-1 source and re-port it?

Is the MICHMODS OS360 precursor to the CBT tape archived anywhere? the
Goddard tape?

Clark Morris

I am fairly certain the Star Trek and Klingon games are on the CBTTape.org
site.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Sean P. McBride spmcbr...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
 All,

 I recently found out that Edson Hendricks (the creator of VNET) wrote a
copy of Spacewar! for the IBM System 360 while he was an MIT student.  It
was based on the PDP-1 version, and it was used by MIT for their annual
open house in either 1965 or 1966.  My understanding is that this S/360
version ended up getting played by IBMers at the IBM Research Lab, which
resulted in a corporate ban of running the software on IBM machines.
Considering that the source should run on modern IBM mainframes with some
code modification, I thought that this might be something worth
resurrecting for the 50th anniversary of the System 360 announcement.  Do
any of you ever recall playing this game on an IBM mainframe or hearing
about others that might have done this? Do any of you have suggests for
finding the source code for this S/360 version?  Edson does not have a
copy, and I have not yet heard back the from Computer History Museum.

 Thanks for your help!!!

 Respectfully,
 Sean P. McBride
 Millennialmainframer.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Determining 3390 Model

2013-02-16 Thread John P Kalinich
The DVOL and PDS commands use the DCE (returned from UCBSCAN) to determine the 
3390 model number.  Until EAV, any volumes larger than a model 9 were 
identified as model 9.  The DCE model number for EAV DASD is A.  There is a 
SHARE requirement to document the DCE in MACLIB.

Regards,
John K

-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote: -
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
From: Edward Jaffe 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
Date: 02/15/2013 07:19PM
Subject: Re: Determining 3390 Model

On 2/15/2013 4:19 PM, Dale McCart wrote:
 Any thing larger than a Mod 1 is listed as Mod 3 if not larger than a 3
 Any thing larger than a Mod 3 is listed as Mod 9.

Not true. If not Mod1, Mod2, Mod3 or Mod9, it is reported as ModA. This is true 
for both DS8xxx HMC and z/OS displays.

DS P,8339
IEE459I 17.08.42 DEVSERV PATHS 648
  UNIT DTYPE  M CNT VOLSER  CHPID=PATH STATUS
       RTYPE  SSID CFW TC   DFW PIN DC-STATE CCA DDC       CYL CU-TYPE
08339,3390A ,A,041,MVSEV0,12=+ 2E=+
       2107   8003  Y  YY.  YY.  N  SIMPLEX   39  39    262668 2107
 SYMBOL DEFINITIONS 
A = ALLOCATED                      + = PATH AVAILABLE

Note this volume is listed as 3390A aka ModA. (Mod9 would be listed as 33909.)

Since the volume has 262,668 cylinders, it would be listed as Mod236 using 
the 
technique suggested earlier in this thread.

-- 
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DASDCALC

2013-02-14 Thread John P Kalinich
What specific error are you getting on the install?

Regards,
John K



From:   Dazzo, Matt mda...@pch.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date:   02/14/2013 09:47 AM
Subject:DASDCALC
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu



So my Win XP work station machine is gone, not my choice. So I am looking
for a replacement tool for the indispensable DASDCALC tool distributed my
Central coast software. I use this tool regularly and it makes my life very
easy.  I cannot seem to get it working on Windows 7 although I read some
others have. Of course I could use the good old fashion calculator as a
means to survive but that seems too old fashioned.

Has anyone found a replacement tool or can u provide some tips on how you
got it working on Win 7.

Thanks Matt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Utility issuing STOW Initialize?

2013-01-26 Thread John P Kalinich
The following subcommand in PDS 8.6 will do what you want.

FIXPDS STOWINIT

Regards,
John K



From:   Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date:   01/25/2013 05:17 PM
Subject:Re: Utility issuing STOW Initialize?
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu



On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:00:46 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:

I can confirm that 3.1 S * D does *not* do things the easy way. SMF 
reveals
that it does 'n' member deletes.

From CBTTAPE FILE182(PDSHELP):

002337 5.  The RESET of a PDSE directory is done with the STOW 
002338 Initialize function. 
002339 

http://www.cbttape.org/freepds.htm

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: FTP variable block dataset from z/OS to Windows and back

2013-01-10 Thread John P Kalinich
Ed,

The BDW/RDW data does not get transferred.

Regards,
John K



From:   Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date:   01/10/2013 02:10 PM
Subject:Re: FTP variable block dataset from z/OS to Windows and back
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu



John:

But in VB type datasets there is always binary data in the RR portion
of the record.

Ed

On Jan 10, 2013, at 8:27 AM, John P Kalinich wrote:

 Gilbert,

 If there is no binary data in the file it should work.

 Regards,
 John K



 From:  Gilbert Cardenas gilbertcarde...@grocerybiz.com
 To:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
 Date:  01/10/2013 08:11 AM
 Subject:   FTP variable block dataset from z/OS to Windows and 
 back
 Sent by:   IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu



 Does anyone know if the following limitation still applies?
 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21188301

 I have a request to ftp a z/OS variable blocked dataset to a
 windows server
 and then be able to ftp that dataset back to a z/OS system.  I am
 not privy
 to all the details about why they want to do this, just been asked
 if it is
 possible to do?  I'm guessing they want to make some minor tweaks
 to the
 dataset and re-upload.

 Anyhow, can this be done and if so, can you share any samples?

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Z196 and z/OS 1.4

2012-11-12 Thread John P Kalinich
Does the DR site have VM available?

Regards,
John K

Allen Staller of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 11/12/2012 02:20:40 PM:

 It will either work, or fail completely.

 Not supported, but I can't see why it would fail.

 Good luck!

 snip
 Would anyone dare try to run z/OS 1.4 on a Z196 machine?  We are
 also in the 10th year of a 2 year plan to get off of the mainframe.
 The machine available for us at DR site is a Z196.  I am running 1.4
 w/ compatability mantenance.  I REALLY DO NOT dare apply maintenance
 on the current OS.
 /snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 26.4.2 JCL DD statement parameters and equivalent text units

2012-11-09 Thread John P Kalinich
Paul,

The table displays OK on my Firefox 16.0.2 brower.

Regards,
John K

-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote: -
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
From: Paul Gilmartin 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
Date: 11/08/2012 08:54PM
Subject: 26.4.2 JCL DD statement parameters and equivalent text units

I'm looking at this page with Firefox:

    http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2a8c1/26.4.2
    26.4.2 JCL DD statement parameters and equivalent text units

Where I read:

    Use this table to convert ...

I don't see any table.  I look at it with Safari.  I don't see any table.
With Firefox, I look the corresponding page for several earlier z/OS
releases.  I don't see any table.

What am I missing?

I download the PDF and view it.  Now the table appears.

WTF?

Thanks,
gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: How many subscribers?

2012-09-11 Thread John P Kalinich
http://www.lsoft.com/catalist.html

Graham Hobbs of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 09/11/2012 10:13:29 AM:

 Arte there any available estimates of how many subscribers there are
 to both this list and CICS-L? Would be appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Proof That Dinosaurs Can Learn New Tricks

2012-09-07 Thread John P Kalinich
snip from Ed's blog

This time, there was no new z/OS release to talk about; the next one is 
not scheduled until September, 2013.

/snip

What happened to the June, 2013 release date?

Regards,
John K

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 
09/07/2012 10:46:21 AM:

 From: Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
 Date: 09/07/2012 10:47 AM
 Subject: Proof That Dinosaurs Can Learn New Tricks
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
 
 Proof that dinosaurs can learn new tricks, I wrote my first 'blog' 
 entry -- EVER 
 -- and it is on SHARE's web site. http://www.share.org/p/bl/ar/
 blogaid=167source=6

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Anyone know how to copy a PDS directory as a flat file?

2012-09-06 Thread John P Kalinich
There are also software vendors that can change the information in a PDS
directory without notice.  PDSMAN and Endevor come to mind.

Regards,
John K

John Gilmore of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 09/06/2012 08:56:31 AM:

 Lizette's point that IBM can change the information in a PDS directory
 without notice is of course generically correct

 That conceded, such changes have been infrequent for many years; and
 the functional stabilization of PDS support that came about with the
 introduction of PDSEs makes further such changes unlikely.  Brutally
 put, PDSEs are changing, PDSs are not.

 Have you succeeded in opening your PDS as a sequential file?

 --jg

 On 9/6/12, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
  Charles,
 
  If I recall when writing an Assembler Program for a STOW macro there
were
  some pointers on how to dump a PDS Directory.  And I think there may be
  information in the ISPF Manuals as well.
 
  Though I think you are better served by doing this with an assembler
  program.  Also, remember IBM can change the info in the directory
without
  explanation.
 
  Lizette
 
 
 
  I want to make a PS (flat file) copy of the series of 256-byte blocks
of
  a
  PDS
  directory. (I want to copy the data to another platform so I can test
  some
  code with it
  more readily.)
 
  I tried
 
  //GENEREXEC PGM=IEBGENER
  //SYSUT1   DD   DSN=MY.PDS,DISP=SHR,RECFM=F,DSORG=PS
  //SYSUT2   DD   DSN=THE.SAMPLE.PDSDIR,DISP=(NEW,CATLG),
  //  SPACE=(TRK,(1,1))
 
  but IEBGENER is too smart for that:
 
  IEB311I CONFLICTING DCB PARAMETERS
  IEB311I CONFLICTING DCB PARAMETERS
 
  (and copied nothing).
 
  Anyone know how to accomplish this, short of writing an assembler
program
  to
  do it?
 
  Charles

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: modifying secondary space allocation

2012-08-13 Thread John P Kalinich
If you are looking for a supported tool, I would use IEBCOPY to clone.

Regards,
John K

David Jousma of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 08/13/2012 07:34:56 AM:

 This is interesting.  I will look at this closer, however given the
 scope of our current problem, I'd prefer to use supported
 functions/utilities to do this.

 Check out CDSCB on the CBT tape.

 SYNTAX  -
 CDSCB  'DSNAME'   EXPDT(DATE)  SHR  VOL(VOLUME) UNIT(UNIT)
   CREATE(DATE) REFDT(DATE)
   DSORG(XX) RECFM(XX) LRECL(XX) BLKSIZE(XX)
   ALLOC(TR/CYL/BL)  SPACE(SECONDARY-AMOUNT)
   PWR/PWW/NOP/RACF/NORACF
   ZAP(OFFSET VERDATA REPDATA)

 Regards,
 John K

 David Jousma of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-
 m...@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 08/13/2012 07:03:15 AM:

  This may be a dumb question...just can't see a solution in front of my
  nose at the moment.
 
  Say you have many PDS(not PDSE) datasets that for whatever reason
  were never allocated with secondary extents(not LLA datasets).Is
  there a tool that can change the dataset secondary allocation from 0
  to some other number easily?   Don't want to have to reallocate the
 datasets.
 
  I don't see that the PDS can do it, nor does it look like IDCAMS can
  do
 it...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Cbttape Freeware isn't available

2012-07-23 Thread John P Kalinich
It is available now.

Regards,
John K

Francisco H. of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 07/23/2012 02:28:11 AM:

 I tried to access the web Cbttape: www.cbttape.org, and is not available:
 You see this page because there is no Web site available at this address:

 http://www.cbttape.org .

 Someone knows because not available ?

 Thank you very much.

 Francisco

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: MXI freeware?

2012-07-16 Thread John P Kalinich
It is on the CBT tape.

Regards,
John K

Matan Cohen of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
wrote on 07/16/2012 09:05:34 AM:

 Hi ,
 does 'MXI' isn't a freeware anymore?
 http://www.rocketsoftware.com/mainstar/products/mxi-g2
 I can't seem to find any link for downloading it .

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN