Re: ATTACHing a task in an arbitrary key

2023-11-02 Thread Jon Perryman
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 14:56:33 +0200, Binyamin Dissen  
wrote:..
>I see there is support for specifically key 9 (which also requires SZERO=NO)
>Tried attaching DISP=NO KEY=NINE,SZERO=NO, altering TCBPKF and it seems OK.

Key 9 is used for CICS user modules to keep them from fatally damaging CICS 
which runs key 8. SZERO=NO protects SP0 from being damaged by other TCB's (most 
notably programs that violate CICS unenforced restrictions such as STORAGE 
OBTAIN). If you want to live within key 9 restrictions, then it's OK. Out of 
curiosity, do you plan on using key 9 for something other than a multi-user 
address space? If so, what do you see as it's benefit? TSO, UNIX and others do 
not use it.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


ATTACHing a task in an arbitrary key

2023-11-02 Thread Binyamin Dissen
I see there is support for specifically key 9 (which also requires SZERO=NO)

Tried attaching DISP=NO KEY=NINE,SZERO=NO, altering TCBPKF and it seems OK.

--
Binyamin Dissen 
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN