> Elapsed time will ALWAYS be longer than CPU time. This is only true if there is no multitasking / multithreading in the job. Lindy asked quite generally if a job's elapsed time would always be longer than the cpu time it used. And the general answer would be no. My DB2 colleagues run DB2 reorgs as batch jobs. Just lately, I saw one of these job using 670% (yes, that is six-seven-zero) of cpu over a really long time (can't check the exact number right now). If that job would be given the access, the cpu usage in say 30 minutes of elapsed would be some 200 minutes. An extreme example, I admit. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
- CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-clock Time Lindy Mayfield
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-clock Time Lizette Koehler
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-clock Ti... Lindy Mayfield
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-cloc... Clark Morris
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-... Lindy Mayfield
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-... John McKown
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-cloc... Vince Coen
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-... Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs ... Vince Coen
- AW: Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs W... Peter Hunkeler
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-cloc... retired mainframer
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-cloc... Lizette Koehler
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-... Lindy Mayfield
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs ... Massimo Biancucci
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-clock Time Vince Coen
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-clock Time Ed Jaffe
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-clock Time Paul Gilmartin
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-clock Ti... Lindy Mayfield
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-cloc... Paul Gilmartin
- Re: CPU Timerons/Seconds vs Wall-... Mark Post