Re: Any reason to still use SWA=BELOW?
I would doubt there is any reason to use SWA=BELOW unless someone is chasing the TIOT(?) chain using logic that was invalidated w/MVS/ESA. I once has an application program that choked on this. A relatively small source code change to use RDJFCB, instead of chaseing the chain resolved the issue. HTH, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Conley Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 7:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Any reason to still use SWA=BELOW? Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm seeing this in a JES2 parm member and I'm surprised, since I changed to SWA=ABOVE ages ago. Regards, Tom Conley -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Any reason to still use SWA=BELOW?
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:37:23 -0400, Tom Conley wrote: I assume you see this while browsing the syslog for events that occurred during system startup for STCs launched prior to JES2 start. This is why JES2 definition for STC jobclass is ignored. These STCs get serviced by Master Scheduler, not by JES2. >Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm >seeing this in a JES2 parm member and I'm surprised, since I changed to >SWA=ABOVE ages ago. > >Regards, >Tom Conley > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Any reason to still use SWA=BELOW?
If something/some program executing in that jobclass (I assume it's a batch initiator) is still running control blocks and not using SWAREQ, then yes it might be needed. Mark Jacobs Tom Conley wrote on 10/8/18 8:37 PM: Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm seeing this in a JES2 parm member and I'm surprised, since I changed to SWA=ABOVE ages ago. Regards, Tom Conley -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:lists...@listserv.ua.edu> with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Please be alert for any emails that may ask you for login information or directs you to login via a link. If you believe this message is a phish or aren't sure whether this message is trustworthy, please send the original message as an attachment to 'phish...@meredith.com<mailto:phish...@meredith.com>'. This electronic message, including any attachments, may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). You are hereby notified that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Any reason to still use SWA=BELOW?
Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm seeing this in a JES2 parm member and I'm surprised, since I changed to SWA=ABOVE ages ago. Regards, Tom Conley -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
