Ah, the bad old days. And here I am in a nostalgia thread.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:24:38 +0000, Chris Hoelscher wrote:
>Of even older fortran
>If x (100,200,300)
>
That's a bug. What did it mean? But this is valid:
IF(X)100,200,300
Didn't the expression need to be enclosed in parentheses?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: zMan
>Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 1:21 PM
>
>And don't forget the (early):
>
>5 = 3
>
>which, in at least some compiless, would indeed make subsequent references to
>"5" use "3". I think that was considered a bug.
>
Bug, yes. But easier to do with subroutine formal parameters. I had a
colleague
who wrote a subroutine to generate semilog plots on an impact printer. Once he
wanted a semilog plot. He proudly showed me his accommodation:
CALL LINEAR( 2.718 )
....
SUBROUTINE LINEAR( E )
E = 1.0
RETURN
Voila! Linear! That's actually one of the few things I wouldn't have done.
Some used a shift routine that overwrote its caller with an inline shift
instruction.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
