Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
IBM XL C/C++ library, the ffs (find first set [bit]) function. Not only does it count from the LSb, it counts from one. So ffs(0x04) would return 3. BTW and FWIW, the link garbling was at your end I think. My post survived the round trip to my Outlook just fine except for folding/truncation. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 9:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS The GMU URL rewriter (we hates it precisous, we hates it!) garbled the URL: what manual and what section? Thanks. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 7:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS Except when they don't: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibm.co m%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Fzos%2F2.3.0%3Ftopic%3Dfunctions-ffs-find-first-set-bitd ata=05%7C01%7Csmetz3%40gmu.edu%7C03d02dae3da64eb4b32e08da21909547%7C9e857255 df574c47a0c00546460380cb%7C0%7C0%7C637859202152362257%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3 d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000% 7C%7C%7Csdata=nGxEubdIHZEl02ScOTlQQAQ3ZvrZOw9caS1%2FCdD74N8%3Drese rved=0 -in-integer -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
The GMU URL rewriter (we hates it precisous, we hates it!) garbled the URL: what manual and what section? Thanks. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 7:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS Except when they don't: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibm.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Fzos%2F2.3.0%3Ftopic%3Dfunctions-ffs-find-first-set-bitdata=05%7C01%7Csmetz3%40gmu.edu%7C03d02dae3da64eb4b32e08da21909547%7C9e857255df574c47a0c00546460380cb%7C0%7C0%7C637859202152362257%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=nGxEubdIHZEl02ScOTlQQAQ3ZvrZOw9caS1%2FCdD74N8%3Dreserved=0 -in-integer Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 3:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS No, IBM numbers bits from the left. In an 8-bit field, bit 0 corresponds to a mask of '80'x and bit 7 to a maskm of '01'x. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
There have also been vendors who used 1-offset numbering. Sometimes manufacturers used different conventions for different product lines. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 6:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS You're right of course. Other systems count bits the other direction. You can make an argument for either approach. - 0 as the high bit corresponds to how we generally represent binary integers, with the high order bit on the left. - 0 as the low bit gives you consistency across 8, 16, 32 and 64 bit operands, and makes the bit numbers correspond to powers of 2. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael Oujesky Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 2:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS My reading of Principals of Operation indicates register documentation has bit 0 as the high order bit, not lower order bit. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
Except when they don't: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.3.0?topic=functions-ffs-find-first-set-bit -in-integer Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 3:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS No, IBM numbers bits from the left. In an 8-bit field, bit 0 corresponds to a mask of '80'x and bit 7 to a maskm of '01'x. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
Some IBM documentation gives bit numbers 0-7 and other documentation gives the masks for those bits: bit 0 is mask 80, bit 1 is mask 40 ... bit 7 is mask 01. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of binary 1, 2 or 3. Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? Or provide some other interpretation? Thanks, Charles -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
No, IBM numbers bits from the left. In an 8-bit field, bit 0 corresponds to a mask of '80'x and bit 7 to a maskm of '01'x. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 12:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX). So is my interpretation correct? SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 8:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of binary 1, 2 or 3. Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
You're right of course. Other systems count bits the other direction. You can make an argument for either approach. - 0 as the high bit corresponds to how we generally represent binary integers, with the high order bit on the left. - 0 as the low bit gives you consistency across 8, 16, 32 and 64 bit operands, and makes the bit numbers correspond to powers of 2. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael Oujesky Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 2:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS My reading of Principals of Operation indicates register documentation has bit 0 as the high order bit, not lower order bit. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
My reading of Principals of Operation indicates register documentation has bit 0 as the high order bit, not lower order bit. Michael At 11:20 AM 4/18/2022, Charles Mills wrote: Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX). So is my interpretation correct? SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'? Charles -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
Thanks but it is pretty clear that the bits are X'80' and so forth. The client was seeing 1, 2 and 3 because they were looking at the wrong byte (SMF30MES). Displaying the correct byte they are seeing 128's, which is good -- says audit is on but no usage. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 12:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 12:20, Charles Mills wrote: > > Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX). I think you were right the first time. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 12:20, Charles Mills wrote: > > Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX). I think you were right the first time. Tony H. > So is my interpretation correct? > > SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'? > > Charles > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Charles Mills > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 8:33 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS > > We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having > trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. > > The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the > SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as > Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the > x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of > binary 1, 2 or 3. > > Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" > IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
FW: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
MXG decodes these raxflags: SMF30_RAXFLAGS='AUDIT*USERKEY*CSA*FLAGS' SMF30_RAXFLAG0='RAX0*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*ENABLED?' SMF30_RAXFLAG1='RAX1*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*USAGE?' SMF30_RAXFLAG2='RAX2*USERKEY*CADS*USAGE?' SMF30_RAXFLAG3='RAX3*USERKEY*CHANGE*KEY*USAGE?' SMF30_RAXFLAG4='RAX4*USERKEY*RUCSA*USAGE?' SMF30_RAXFLAG5='RAX5*ATTEMPT*EARLY*RUCSA?' SMF30_RAXFLAG6='RAX6*ALLOW*EARLY*RUCSA?' IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='1...'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG0='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG0=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='.1..'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG1='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG1=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='..1.'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG2='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG2=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='...1'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG3='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG3=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='1...'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG4='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG4=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='.1..'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG5='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG5=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='..1.'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG6='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG6=' '; -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX). So is my interpretation correct? SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 8:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of binary 1, 2 or 3. Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
Thanks. The customer is reporting 1's, 2's and 3's, so there must be some program logic confusion. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Dave Jousma Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 9:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:32:53 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having >trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. > >The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the >SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as >Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the >x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of >binary 1, 2 or 3. > >Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" >IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? > /* 1000 = 80 = AUDIT ON */ /* 1001 = 90 = CHANGE KEY*/ /* 1010 = A0 = CADS USAGE*/ /* 1011 = B0 = CADS+CHANGE KEY */ /* 1100 = C0 = CSA USAGE */ /* 1101 = D0 = CSA+CHANGE KEY*/ /* 1110 = E0 = CSA+CADS */ /* = F0 = CSA+CADS+CHANGEKEY*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
MXG decodes as: SMF30_RAXFLAGS='AUDIT*USERKEY*CSA*FLAGS' SMF30_RAXFLAG0='RAX0*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*ENABLED?' SMF30_RAXFLAG1='RAX1*USERKEY*COMMON*AUDIT*USAGE?' SMF30_RAXFLAG2='RAX2*USERKEY*CADS*USAGE?' SMF30_RAXFLAG3='RAX3*USERKEY*CHANGE*KEY*USAGE?' SMF30_RAXFLAG4='RAX4*USERKEY*RUCSA*USAGE?' SMF30_RAXFLAG5='RAX5*ATTEMPT*EARLY*RUCSA?' SMF30_RAXFLAG6='RAX6*ALLOW*EARLY*RUCSA?' IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='1...'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG0='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG0=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='.1..'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG1='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG1=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='..1.'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG2='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG2=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='...1'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG3='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG3=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='1...'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG4='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG4=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='.1..'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG5='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG5=' '; IF SMF30_RAXFLAGS='..1.'B THEN SMF30_RAXFLAG6='Y'; ELSE SMF30_RAXFLAG6=' '; -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX). So is my interpretation correct? SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 8:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of binary 1, 2 or 3. Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:32:53 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having >trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. > >The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the >SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as >Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the >x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of >binary 1, 2 or 3. > >Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" >IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? > /* 1000 = 80 = AUDIT ON */ /* 1001 = 90 = CHANGE KEY*/ /* 1010 = A0 = CADS USAGE*/ /* 1011 = B0 = CADS+CHANGE KEY */ /* 1100 = C0 = CSA USAGE */ /* 1101 = D0 = CSA+CHANGE KEY*/ /* 1110 = E0 = CSA+CADS */ /* = F0 = CSA+CADS+CHANGEKEY*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX). So is my interpretation correct? SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 8:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of binary 1, 2 or 3. Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS
We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of binary 1, 2 or 3. Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? Or provide some other interpretation? Thanks, Charles -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
